Nadean L. Brown
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Nadean L. Brown has a total of 41 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Tien T. Le
Division of Developmental Biology, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Research Foundation, 3333 Burnet Avenue, Cincinnati, OH 45229
6 shared publicationsKevin W. Conley
Division of Developmental Biology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Research Foundation, Cincinnati, Ohio
4 shared publicationsAmy N. Riesenberg
Division of Developmental Biology, Cincinnati Children's Research Foundation, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio 45229, USA
3 shared publicationsSheldon Rowan
Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
3 shared publications- David C. Blackburn
University of Florida, Gainesville, United States of America
2 shared publications Kevin Conley
2 shared publications
Latest Publications
- 1 February 2012
- Published by Elsevier in Developmental Biology
- Vol. 362 (2) , 219-229
Conditional ablation of the Notch2 receptor in the ocular lens
- 1 February 2012
- Published by Elsevier in Developmental Biology
- Vol. 362 (2) , 219-229
Conditional ablation of the Notch2 receptor in the ocular lens
- Open Access
- 13 January 2012
- Published by Wiley in Developmental Dynamics
- Vol. 241 (3) , 493-504
Requirements for Jag1‐Rbpj mediated Notch signaling during early mouse lens development
Background: During vertebrate lens development, the lens placode in the embryonic ectoderm invaginates into a lens vesicle, which then separates from the surface epithelium, followed by two waves of fiber cell differentiation. In the mouse, multiple labs have shown that Jag1‐Notch signaling is critically required during the second wave of lens fiber cell formation. However, Notch signaling appears to play no obvious role during lens induction or morphogenesis, although multiple pathway genes are expressed at these earlier stages. Results: Here, we explored functions for Notch signaling specifically during early lens development, by using the early‐acting AP2α‐Cre driver to delete Jag1 or Rbpj. We found that Jag1 and Rbpj are not required during lens induction, but are necessary for proper lens vesicle separation from the surface ectoderm. Conclusions: We conclude that precise levels of Notch signaling are essential during lens vesicle morphogenesis. In addition, AP2α‐Cre‐mediated deletion of Rbpj resulted in embryos with cardiac outflow tract and liver deformities, and perinatal lethality. Developmental Dynamics 241:493–504, 2012.
- 13 January 2012
- Published by Wiley in Developmental Dynamics
- Vol. 241 (3) , 493-504
Open AccessRequirements for Jag1‐Rbpj mediated Notch signaling during early mouse lens development
Background: During vertebrate lens development, the lens placode in the embryonic ectoderm invaginates into a lens vesicle, which then separates from the surface epithelium, followed by two waves of fiber cell differentiation. In the mouse, multiple labs have shown that Jag1‐Notch signaling is critically required during the second wave of lens fiber cell formation. However, Notch signaling appears to play no obvious role during lens induction or morphogenesis, although multiple pathway genes are expressed at these earlier stages. Results: Here, we explored functions for Notch signaling specifically during early lens development, by using the early‐acting AP2α‐Cre driver to delete Jag1 or Rbpj. We found that Jag1 and Rbpj are not required during lens induction, but are necessary for proper lens vesicle separation from the surface ectoderm. Conclusions: We conclude that precise levels of Notch signaling are essential during lens vesicle morphogenesis. In addition, AP2α‐Cre‐mediated deletion of Rbpj resulted in embryos with cardiac outflow tract and liver deformities, and perinatal lethality. Developmental Dynamics 241:493–504, 2012.
- 1 August 2011
- Published by Elsevier in Developmental Biology
- Vol. 356 (1) , 128
Requirements for Jag1-Rbpj mediated Notch signaling during early lens development
- 1 August 2011
- Published by Elsevier in Developmental Biology
- Vol. 356 (1) , 128
Requirements for Jag1-Rbpj mediated Notch signaling during early lens development
- 1 April 2010
- Published by Elsevier in Developmental Biology
- Vol. 340 (2) , 490-503
Neurog2 controls the leading edge of neurogenesis in the mammalian retina
- 1 April 2010
- Published by Elsevier in Developmental Biology
- Vol. 340 (2) , 490-503
Neurog2 controls the leading edge of neurogenesis in the mammalian retina
- Open Access
- 14 October 2009
- Published by Society for Neuroscience in Journal of Neuroscience
- Vol. 29 (41) , 12865-12877
RbpjCell Autonomous Regulation of Retinal Ganglion Cell and Cone Photoreceptor Fates in the Mouse Retina
Vertebrate retinal progenitor cells (RPCs) are pluripotent, but pass through competence states that progressively restrict their developmental potential (Cepko et al., 1996; Livesey and Cepko, 2001; Cayouette et al., 2006). In the rodent eye, seven retinal cell classes differentiate in overlapping waves, with RGCs, cone photoreceptors, horizontals, and amacrines forming predominantly before birth, and rod photoreceptors, bipolars, and Müller glia differentiating postnatally. Both intrinsic and extrinsic factors regulate each retinal cell type (for review, see Livesey and Cepko, 2001). Here, we conditionally deleted the transcription factorRbpj, a critical integrator of multipleNotchsignals (Jarriault et al., 1995; Honjo, 1996; Kato et al., 1997; Han et al., 2002), during prenatal mouse retinal neurogenesis. Removal ofRbpjcaused reduced proliferation, premature neuronal differentiation, apoptosis, and profound mispatterning. To determine the cell autonomous requirements forRbpjduring RGC and cone formation, we marked Cre-generated retinal lineages with GFP expression, which showed thatRbpjautonomously promotes RPC mitotic activity, and suppresses RGC and cone fates. In addition, the progressive loss ofRbpj−/− RPCs resulted in a diminished progenitor pool available for rod photoreceptor formation. This circumstance, along with the overproduction ofRbpj−/− cones, revealed that photoreceptor development is under homeostatic regulation. Finally, to understand how theNotchpathway regulates the simultaneous formation of multiple cell types, we compared the RGC and cone phenotypes ofRbpjtoNotch1(Jadhav et al., 2006b; Yaron et al., 2006),Notch3, andHes1mutants. We found particular combinations ofNotchpathway genes regulate the development of each retinal cell type.
- 14 October 2009
- Published by Society for Neuroscience in Journal of Neuroscience
- Vol. 29 (41) , 12865-12877
Open AccessRbpjCell Autonomous Regulation of Retinal Ganglion Cell and Cone Photoreceptor Fates in the Mouse Retina
Vertebrate retinal progenitor cells (RPCs) are pluripotent, but pass through competence states that progressively restrict their developmental potential (Cepko et al., 1996; Livesey and Cepko, 2001; Cayouette et al., 2006). In the rodent eye, seven retinal cell classes differentiate in overlapping waves, with RGCs, cone photoreceptors, horizontals, and amacrines forming predominantly before birth, and rod photoreceptors, bipolars, and Müller glia differentiating postnatally. Both intrinsic and extrinsic factors regulate each retinal cell type (for review, see Livesey and Cepko, 2001). Here, we conditionally deleted the transcription factorRbpj, a critical integrator of multipleNotchsignals (Jarriault et al., 1995; Honjo, 1996; Kato et al., 1997; Han et al., 2002), during prenatal mouse retinal neurogenesis. Removal ofRbpjcaused reduced proliferation, premature neuronal differentiation, apoptosis, and profound mispatterning. To determine the cell autonomous requirements forRbpjduring RGC and cone formation, we marked Cre-generated retinal lineages with GFP expression, which showed thatRbpjautonomously promotes RPC mitotic activity, and suppresses RGC and cone fates. In addition, the progressive loss ofRbpj−/− RPCs resulted in a diminished progenitor pool available for rod photoreceptor formation. This circumstance, along with the overproduction ofRbpj−/− cones, revealed that photoreceptor development is under homeostatic regulation. Finally, to understand how theNotchpathway regulates the simultaneous formation of multiple cell types, we compared the RGC and cone phenotypes ofRbpjtoNotch1(Jadhav et al., 2006b; Yaron et al., 2006),Notch3, andHes1mutants. We found particular combinations ofNotchpathway genes regulate the development of each retinal cell type.
- 1 April 2009
- Published by Elsevier in Developmental Biology
- Vol. 328 (1) , 118-126
Jagged 1 is necessary for normal mouse lens formation
- 1 April 2009
- Published by Elsevier in Developmental Biology
- Vol. 328 (1) , 118-126
Jagged 1 is necessary for normal mouse lens formation
Pax6 regulation of Math5 during mouse retinal neurogenesis
Activation of the bHLH factor Math5 (Atoh7) is an initiating event for mammalian retinal neurogenesis, as it is critically required for retinal ganglion cell formation. However, the cis‐regulatory elements and trans‐acting factors that control Math5 expression are largely unknown. Using a combination of transgenic mice and bioinformatics, we identified a phylogenetically conserved regulatory element that is required to activate Math5 transcription during early retinal neurogenesis. This element drives retinal expression in vivo, in a cross‐species transgenic assay. Previously, Pax6 was shown to be necessary for the initiation of Math5 mRNA expression. We extend this finding by showing that the Math5 retinal enhancer also requires Pax6 for its activation, via Pax6 binding to a highly conserved binding site. In addition, our data reveal that other retinal factors are required for accurate regulation of Math5 by Pax6. genesis 47:175–187, 2009.
Pax6 regulation of Math5 during mouse retinal neurogenesis
Activation of the bHLH factor Math5 (Atoh7) is an initiating event for mammalian retinal neurogenesis, as it is critically required for retinal ganglion cell formation. However, the cis‐regulatory elements and trans‐acting factors that control Math5 expression are largely unknown. Using a combination of transgenic mice and bioinformatics, we identified a phylogenetically conserved regulatory element that is required to activate Math5 transcription during early retinal neurogenesis. This element drives retinal expression in vivo, in a cross‐species transgenic assay. Previously, Pax6 was shown to be necessary for the initiation of Math5 mRNA expression. We extend this finding by showing that the Math5 retinal enhancer also requires Pax6 for its activation, via Pax6 binding to a highly conserved binding site. In addition, our data reveal that other retinal factors are required for accurate regulation of Math5 by Pax6. genesis 47:175–187, 2009.
- 1 September 2008
- Published by Elsevier in Developmental Biology
- Vol. 321 (1) , 111-122
Notch signaling regulates growth and differentiation in the mammalian lens
- 1 September 2008
- Published by Elsevier in Developmental Biology
- Vol. 321 (1) , 111-122
Notch signaling regulates growth and differentiation in the mammalian lens
- Open Access
- 23 July 2008
- Published by Wiley in Developmental Dynamics
- Vol. 237 (8) , 2209-2219
Isolation and expression of Pax6 and atonal homologues in the American horseshoe crab, Limulus polyphemus
Pax6 regulates eye development in many animals. In addition, Pax6 activates atonal transcription factors in both invertebrate and vertebrate eyes. Here, we investigate the roles of Pax6 and atonal during embryonic development of Limulus polyphemus rudimentary lateral, medial and ventral eyes, and the initiation of lateral ommatidial eye and medial ocelli formation. Limulus eye development is of particular interest because these animals hold a unique position in arthropod phylogeny and possess multiple eye types. Furthermore, the molecular underpinnings of eye development have yet to be investigated in chelicerates. We characterized a Limulus Pax6 gene, with multiple splice products and predicted protein isoforms, and one atonal homologue. Unexpectedly, neither gene is expressed in the developing eye types examined, although both genes are present in the lateral sense organ, a structure of unknown function. Developmental Dynamics 237:2209–2219, 2008.
- 23 July 2008
- Published by Wiley in Developmental Dynamics
- Vol. 237 (8) , 2209-2219
Open AccessIsolation and expression of Pax6 and atonal homologues in the American horseshoe crab, Limulus polyphemus
Pax6 regulates eye development in many animals. In addition, Pax6 activates atonal transcription factors in both invertebrate and vertebrate eyes. Here, we investigate the roles of Pax6 and atonal during embryonic development of Limulus polyphemus rudimentary lateral, medial and ventral eyes, and the initiation of lateral ommatidial eye and medial ocelli formation. Limulus eye development is of particular interest because these animals hold a unique position in arthropod phylogeny and possess multiple eye types. Furthermore, the molecular underpinnings of eye development have yet to be investigated in chelicerates. We characterized a Limulus Pax6 gene, with multiple splice products and predicted protein isoforms, and one atonal homologue. Unexpectedly, neither gene is expressed in the developing eye types examined, although both genes are present in the lateral sense organ, a structure of unknown function. Developmental Dynamics 237:2209–2219, 2008.
- 1 December 2007
- Published by Elsevier in Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience
- Vol. 36 (4) , 435-448
Conserved regulation of Math5 and Math1 revealed by Math5-GFP transgenes
- 1 December 2007
- Published by Elsevier in Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience
- Vol. 36 (4) , 435-448
Conserved regulation of Math5 and Math1 revealed by Math5-GFP transgenes