Thomas Benner
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Thomas Benner has a total of 22 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
A. Gregory Sorensen
Department of Radiology, Athinoula A. Martinos Center, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA
3 shared publicationsAndré J. W. van der Kouwe
Department of Radiology, Athinoula A. Martinos Center, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA
2 shared publications- Alma G Sorensen
Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 149 13th Street, Charlestown MA 02129, USA
1 shared publication André J.W. van der Kouwe
Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA
1 shared publication- Aneesh Bhim Singhal
Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston
1 shared publication Bruce Fischl
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 1 January 2012
- Published by Springer Nature in Medical Gas Research
- Vol. 2 (1) , 5
Evaluating effects of normobaric oxygen therapy in acute stroke with MRI-based predictive models
Voxel-based algorithms using acute multiparametric-MRI data have been shown to accurately predict tissue outcome after stroke. We explored the potential of MRI-based predictive algorithms to objectively assess the effects of normobaric oxygen therapy (NBO), an investigational stroke treatment, using data from a pilot study of NBO in acute stroke.
- 1 January 2012
- Published by Springer Nature in Medical Gas Research
- Vol. 2 (1) , 5
Open AccessEvaluating effects of normobaric oxygen therapy in acute stroke with MRI-based predictive models
Voxel-based algorithms using acute multiparametric-MRI data have been shown to accurately predict tissue outcome after stroke. We explored the potential of MRI-based predictive algorithms to objectively assess the effects of normobaric oxygen therapy (NBO), an investigational stroke treatment, using data from a pilot study of NBO in acute stroke.
- Open Access
- 24 February 2011
- Published by Wiley in Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
- Vol. 66 (1) , 154-167
Diffusion imaging with prospective motion correction and reacquisition
A major source of artifacts in diffusion‐weighted imaging is subject motion. Slow bulk subject motion causes misalignment of data when more than one average or diffusion gradient direction is acquired. Fast bulk subject motion can cause signal dropout artifacts in diffusion‐weighted images and results in erroneous derived maps, e.g., fractional anisotropy maps. To address both types of artifacts, a fully automatic method is presented that combines prospective motion correction with a reacquisition scheme. Motion correction is based on the prospective acquisition correction method modified to work with diffusion‐weighted data. The images to reacquire are determined automatically during the acquisition from the imaging data, i.e., no extra reference scan, navigators, or external devices are necessary. The number of reacquired images, i.e., the additional scan duration can be adjusted freely. Diffusion‐weighted prospective acquisition correction corrects slow bulk motion well and reduces misalignment artifacts like image blurring. Mean absolute residual values for translation and rotation were <0.6 mm and 0.5°. Reacquisition of images affected by signal dropout artifacts results in diffusion maps and fiber tracking free of artifacts. The presented method allows the reduction of two types of common motion related artifacts at the cost of slightly increased acquisition time. Magn Reson Med, 2011.
- 24 February 2011
- Published by Wiley in Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
- Vol. 66 (1) , 154-167
Open AccessDiffusion imaging with prospective motion correction and reacquisition
A major source of artifacts in diffusion‐weighted imaging is subject motion. Slow bulk subject motion causes misalignment of data when more than one average or diffusion gradient direction is acquired. Fast bulk subject motion can cause signal dropout artifacts in diffusion‐weighted images and results in erroneous derived maps, e.g., fractional anisotropy maps. To address both types of artifacts, a fully automatic method is presented that combines prospective motion correction with a reacquisition scheme. Motion correction is based on the prospective acquisition correction method modified to work with diffusion‐weighted data. The images to reacquire are determined automatically during the acquisition from the imaging data, i.e., no extra reference scan, navigators, or external devices are necessary. The number of reacquired images, i.e., the additional scan duration can be adjusted freely. Diffusion‐weighted prospective acquisition correction corrects slow bulk motion well and reduces misalignment artifacts like image blurring. Mean absolute residual values for translation and rotation were <0.6 mm and 0.5°. Reacquisition of images affected by signal dropout artifacts results in diffusion maps and fiber tracking free of artifacts. The presented method allows the reduction of two types of common motion related artifacts at the cost of slightly increased acquisition time. Magn Reson Med, 2011.
- Open Access
- 9 June 2006
- Published by Wiley in Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
- Vol. 56 (1) , 204-209
Real-time RF pulse adjustment forB0 drift correction
- 9 June 2006
- Published by Wiley in Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
- Vol. 56 (1) , 204-209
Open AccessReal-time RF pulse adjustment forB0 drift correction
- 1 April 2006
- Published by Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) in Radiology
- Vol. 239 (1) , 246-254
Comparison of Manual and Automatic Section Positioning of Brain MR Images
The study protocol was approved by the institutional review board and was in full compliance with HIPAA guidelines. Informed consent was obtained from all patients. The purpose of this study was to prospectively compare intra- and intersubject variability of manual versus automatic magnetic resonance (MR) imaging section prescription. In two examinations, T2-weighted series were acquired with both methods. All intrasubject and three of six intersubject section prescription variances were significantly higher for manual prescription (P < .01). Root mean square errors confirmed better coregistration of the automated approach (P < .001). Automatic section prescription leads to improved reproducibility of imaging orientations for intra- and intersubject series in clinical practice. © RSNA, 2006
- 1 April 2006
- Published by Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) in Radiology
- Vol. 239 (1) , 246-254
Comparison of Manual and Automatic Section Positioning of Brain MR Images
The study protocol was approved by the institutional review board and was in full compliance with HIPAA guidelines. Informed consent was obtained from all patients. The purpose of this study was to prospectively compare intra- and intersubject variability of manual versus automatic magnetic resonance (MR) imaging section prescription. In two examinations, T2-weighted series were acquired with both methods. All intrasubject and three of six intersubject section prescription variances were significantly higher for manual prescription (P < .01). Root mean square errors confirmed better coregistration of the automated approach (P < .001). Automatic section prescription leads to improved reproducibility of imaging orientations for intra- and intersubject series in clinical practice. © RSNA, 2006
- 11 September 2000
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- Vol. 12 (3) , 371-380
Cerebral MR perfusion imaging: First clinical application of a 1 M gadolinium chelate (Gadovist 1.0) in a double-blinded randomized dose-finding study
The purpose of this study was to evaluate efficacy and safety of the 1 M gadolinium chelate Gadovist 1.0 for assessment of cerebral hemodynamics with dynamic susceptibility contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. Eighty‐nine patients with carotid artery stenosis or cerebral infarcts were included in this multicenter, double‐blinded study using five dose groups from 0.1 to 0.5 mmol/kg. Imaging was performed with 1‐T scanners using a T2*‐weighted fast low‐angle shot (FLASH) sequence. Dose‐dependent changes in quantitative and qualitative parameters describing signal‐time curves and relative regional cerebral blood volume maps were investigated. For safety evaluation, vital signs, clinical and laboratory tests, and adverse events were assessed. The quantitative measurements revealed an optimal dose of 0.4 mmol/kg. The qualitative evaluation revealed that the required qualitative assessment for clinical purposes was already reached at a dose of 0.3 mmol/kg. No significant changes in vital signs and laboratory tests were found. No serious adverse events were observed. The combined results revealed the dose of 0.3 mmol/kg as the diagnostically adequate dose given the gradient‐echo sequence and field strength used. Gadovist 1.0 has been shown to be a safe and well‐tolerated contrast agent. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2000;12:371–380.
- 11 September 2000
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- Vol. 12 (3) , 371-380
Cerebral MR perfusion imaging: First clinical application of a 1 M gadolinium chelate (Gadovist 1.0) in a double-blinded randomized dose-finding study
The purpose of this study was to evaluate efficacy and safety of the 1 M gadolinium chelate Gadovist 1.0 for assessment of cerebral hemodynamics with dynamic susceptibility contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. Eighty‐nine patients with carotid artery stenosis or cerebral infarcts were included in this multicenter, double‐blinded study using five dose groups from 0.1 to 0.5 mmol/kg. Imaging was performed with 1‐T scanners using a T2*‐weighted fast low‐angle shot (FLASH) sequence. Dose‐dependent changes in quantitative and qualitative parameters describing signal‐time curves and relative regional cerebral blood volume maps were investigated. For safety evaluation, vital signs, clinical and laboratory tests, and adverse events were assessed. The quantitative measurements revealed an optimal dose of 0.4 mmol/kg. The qualitative evaluation revealed that the required qualitative assessment for clinical purposes was already reached at a dose of 0.3 mmol/kg. No significant changes in vital signs and laboratory tests were found. No serious adverse events were observed. The combined results revealed the dose of 0.3 mmol/kg as the diagnostically adequate dose given the gradient‐echo sequence and field strength used. Gadovist 1.0 has been shown to be a safe and well‐tolerated contrast agent. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2000;12:371–380.