Jan Paul Ottervanger
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Jan Paul Ottervanger has a total of 87 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Harry Suryapranata
Isala Klinieken, Hospital De Weezenlanden, Zwolle, The Netherlands
6 shared publications - Saman Rasoul
Department of Cardiology, Deventer Hospital, Deventer, the Netherlands,
6 shared publications - Elvin Kedhi
Isala Hartcentrum, Zwolle, The Netherlands
5 shared publications Marcel Gosselink
5 shared publications- Mohamed Mouden
Departments of Cardiology, Isala hospital, Dr. Van Heesweg 2, 8025 AB, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
4 shared publications - Pieter L. Jager
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Isala, Zwolle, the Netherlands
4 shared publications
Latest Publications
- 1 December 2022
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
- Vol. 29 (6) , 3155-3162
Semi-quantitative assessment of ischemia with rubidium-82 PET myocardial perfusion imaging
- 1 December 2022
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
- Vol. 29 (6) , 3155-3162
Semi-quantitative assessment of ischemia with rubidium-82 PET myocardial perfusion imaging
- Open Access
- 16 September 2022
- Published by Springer Nature in Netherlands Heart Journal
- Vol. 30 (12) , 567-571
Final benefit of primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction in older patients: long-term results of a randomised trial
Background: Although the short-term benefit of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in elderly patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has been demonstrated, the final long-term survival benefit is as yet unknown.Aim: To assess the final survival benefit of primary PCI as compared to thrombolytic therapy in patients over 75 years of age.Methods: Patients > 75 years with STEMI were randomised to either primary PCI or thrombolysis. Long-term data on survival were available for all patients.Results: A total of 46 patients were randomised to primary PCI, 41 to thrombolysis. There were no significant differences in baseline variables. After a maximum of 20 years’ follow-up, all patients had passed away. The patients randomised to thrombolysis died after a mean follow-up duration of 5.2 years (SD 4.9) compared to 6.7 years (SD 4.8) in patients randomised to primary PCI (p = 0.15). Thus, the mean final survival benefit of primary PCI was 1.5 years.Conclusion: The final survival benefit of primary PCI as compared to thrombolysis in elderly patients with STEMI is 1.5 years and their life expectancy increases by 28.8%.
- 16 September 2022
- Published by Springer Nature in Netherlands Heart Journal
- Vol. 30 (12) , 567-571
Open AccessFinal benefit of primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction in older patients: long-term results of a randomised trial
Background: Although the short-term benefit of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in elderly patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has been demonstrated, the final long-term survival benefit is as yet unknown.Aim: To assess the final survival benefit of primary PCI as compared to thrombolytic therapy in patients over 75 years of age.Methods: Patients > 75 years with STEMI were randomised to either primary PCI or thrombolysis. Long-term data on survival were available for all patients.Results: A total of 46 patients were randomised to primary PCI, 41 to thrombolysis. There were no significant differences in baseline variables. After a maximum of 20 years’ follow-up, all patients had passed away. The patients randomised to thrombolysis died after a mean follow-up duration of 5.2 years (SD 4.9) compared to 6.7 years (SD 4.8) in patients randomised to primary PCI (p = 0.15). Thus, the mean final survival benefit of primary PCI was 1.5 years.Conclusion: The final survival benefit of primary PCI as compared to thrombolysis in elderly patients with STEMI is 1.5 years and their life expectancy increases by 28.8%.
- 1 June 2019
- Published by Elsevier in International Journal of Cardiology
- Vol. 285, 93-96
Influence of coronary calcification on hyperemic response during fractional flow reserve measurements
- 1 June 2019
- Published by Elsevier in International Journal of Cardiology
- Vol. 285, 93-96
Influence of coronary calcification on hyperemic response during fractional flow reserve measurements
- 28 February 2017
- Published by Elsevier in International Journal of Cardiology
- Vol. 241, 46-49
Coronary artery stenoses more often overestimated in older patients
- 28 February 2017
- Published by Elsevier in International Journal of Cardiology
- Vol. 241, 46-49
Coronary artery stenoses more often overestimated in older patients
- 1 February 2017
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
- Vol. 24 (1) , 212-223
Sequential SPECT/CT imaging for detection of coronary artery disease in a large cohort: evaluation of the need for additional imaging and radiation exposure
- 1 February 2017
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
- Vol. 24 (1) , 212-223
Sequential SPECT/CT imaging for detection of coronary artery disease in a large cohort: evaluation of the need for additional imaging and radiation exposure
- Open Access
- 1 January 2017
- Published by Japanese Circulation Society in Circulation Journal
- Vol. 81 (2) , 199-205
Shock Index More Sensitive Than Cardiogenic Shock in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Treated by Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a strong predictor of mortality in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), but there is evidence that shock index (SI), taking into account both blood pressure and heart rate, is a more sensitive and powerful predictor. We investigated the independent impact of SI and CS on 30-day and 1-year mortality in patients with STEMI, treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).Methods and Results:In 7,412 consecutive patients with STEMI treated with primary PCI, the predictive value of either SI or CS on 1-year mortality was assessed. Best cut-off value of SI, determined using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, was 0.7, with an ROC AUC of 0.66 (95% CI: 0.65-0.67), compared with an ROC AUC of 0.60 (95% CI: 0.59-0.61) for CS (P<0.001). At admission, 387 patients (5.2%) had CS and 1,567 patients (21.1%) had SI ≥0.7. The adjusted hazard ratio of mortality in patients with SI ≥0.7 and in CS patients was, respectively, 3.3 (95% CI: 2.4-4.6) and 3.1 (95% CI: 2.1-4.6) after 30 days, and 2.3 (95% CI: 1.8-2.9) and 3.1 (95% CI: 2.2-4.2) after 1 year. SI identifies more patients with increased risk of mortality, and seems to be a more sensitive prognostic predictor than CS in patients with STEMI treated by primary PCI.
- 1 January 2017
- Published by Japanese Circulation Society in Circulation Journal
- Vol. 81 (2) , 199-205
Open AccessShock Index More Sensitive Than Cardiogenic Shock in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Treated by Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a strong predictor of mortality in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), but there is evidence that shock index (SI), taking into account both blood pressure and heart rate, is a more sensitive and powerful predictor. We investigated the independent impact of SI and CS on 30-day and 1-year mortality in patients with STEMI, treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).Methods and Results:In 7,412 consecutive patients with STEMI treated with primary PCI, the predictive value of either SI or CS on 1-year mortality was assessed. Best cut-off value of SI, determined using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, was 0.7, with an ROC AUC of 0.66 (95% CI: 0.65-0.67), compared with an ROC AUC of 0.60 (95% CI: 0.59-0.61) for CS (P<0.001). At admission, 387 patients (5.2%) had CS and 1,567 patients (21.1%) had SI ≥0.7. The adjusted hazard ratio of mortality in patients with SI ≥0.7 and in CS patients was, respectively, 3.3 (95% CI: 2.4-4.6) and 3.1 (95% CI: 2.1-4.6) after 30 days, and 2.3 (95% CI: 1.8-2.9) and 3.1 (95% CI: 2.2-4.2) after 1 year. SI identifies more patients with increased risk of mortality, and seems to be a more sensitive prognostic predictor than CS in patients with STEMI treated by primary PCI.