Nico H. J. Pijls
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Nico H. J. Pijls has a total of 110 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Bernard De Bruyne
Cardiovascular Center Aalst, Onze Lieve Vrouw Ziekenhuis, Aalst, Belgium
9 shared publications- Frans N. van de Vosse
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
7 shared publications Wilbert Aarnoudse
Department of Cardiology, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
6 shared publicationsGanesh Manoharan
Heart Centre, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, UK
5 shared publicationsLokien X. van Nunen
Department of Cardiology, Catharina Hospital , Eindhoven, The Netherlands
5 shared publicationsWilliam F. Fearon
Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA
5 shared publications
Latest Publications
- 1 December 2017
- Published by SAGE Publications in Therapeutic Hypothermia and Temperature Management
- Vol. 7 (4) , 199-205
Intracoronary Hypothermia Before Reperfusion to Reduce Reperfusion Injury in Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Novel Hypothesis and Technique
Because current reperfusion strategies in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) seem to be exhausted in terms of additional mortality benefit, there remains a need for new methods to attenuate reperfusion injury and, thereby, further reduce myocardial infarct size and improve long-term survival. Therapeutic hypothermia (32–35°C) diminishes reperfusion injury and reduces infarct size in a variety of animal models of AMI if provided before reperfusion. In human studies this reduction has not been confirmed so far, most likely because systemic cooling acts slowly, and therefore, the target temperature is not reached in time or at all in a substantial number of patients. Furthermore, systemic cooling can cause adverse effects such as severe shivering, volume overload, and an enhanced adrenergic state. In most randomized clinical trials, however, subgroups of patients with anterior myocardial infarction that reached the target temperature before reperfusion did show a reduction in infarct size. To transform therapeutic hypothermia into a clinically feasible treatment for AMI, its method must be modified. An ideal technique should be quick enough to achieve sufficient myocardial hypothermia before reperfusion, without significant delay and without the adverse effects of systemic cooling. In this review, we propose a novel, potentially feasible method of selective intracoronary hypothermia to overcome the problems encountered with prior techniques.
- 1 December 2017
- Published by SAGE Publications in Therapeutic Hypothermia and Temperature Management
- Vol. 7 (4) , 199-205
Intracoronary Hypothermia Before Reperfusion to Reduce Reperfusion Injury in Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Novel Hypothesis and Technique
Because current reperfusion strategies in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) seem to be exhausted in terms of additional mortality benefit, there remains a need for new methods to attenuate reperfusion injury and, thereby, further reduce myocardial infarct size and improve long-term survival. Therapeutic hypothermia (32–35°C) diminishes reperfusion injury and reduces infarct size in a variety of animal models of AMI if provided before reperfusion. In human studies this reduction has not been confirmed so far, most likely because systemic cooling acts slowly, and therefore, the target temperature is not reached in time or at all in a substantial number of patients. Furthermore, systemic cooling can cause adverse effects such as severe shivering, volume overload, and an enhanced adrenergic state. In most randomized clinical trials, however, subgroups of patients with anterior myocardial infarction that reached the target temperature before reperfusion did show a reduction in infarct size. To transform therapeutic hypothermia into a clinically feasible treatment for AMI, its method must be modified. An ideal technique should be quick enough to achieve sufficient myocardial hypothermia before reperfusion, without significant delay and without the adverse effects of systemic cooling. In this review, we propose a novel, potentially feasible method of selective intracoronary hypothermia to overcome the problems encountered with prior techniques.
- Open Access
- 17 April 2017
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in European Heart Journal
- Vol. 38 (25) , 1980-1989
Fractional flow reserve and pressure-bounded coronary flow reserve to predict outcomes in coronary artery disease
Fractional flow reserve (FFR) has proven to its prognostic and therapeutic value. However, the additive prognostic value of coronary flow reserve (CFR) remains unclear. This study sought to investigate the clinical utility of combined FFR and CFR measurements to predict outcomes. Using the prospective, multicentre Interventional Cardiology Research Incooperation Society–FFR registry, a total of 2088 lesions from 1837 patients were included in this substudy. Based on baseline and hyperaemic pressure gradients, we computed physiologic limits of CFR [the so called pressure-bounded (pb) CFR] and classified lesions as low (0.80 [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR): 2.15, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.19–3.89; P = 0.011. In contrast, the incidence of MACE did not differ between patients with pb-CFR < 2 vs. pb-CFR ≥ 2 (4.2% vs. 4.2%; aHR: 0.98, CI: 0.60 to 1.58; P = 0.92). Incorporation of FFR significantly improved model prediction of MACE (global χ2 38.8–48.1, P = 0.002). However, pb-CFR demonstrated no incremental utility to classify outcomes (global χ2 48.1–48.2, P > 0.99). In this large, prospective registry of over 2000 coronary lesions, FFR was strongly associated with clinical outcomes. In contrast, a significant association between pb-CFR and clinical events could not be determined and adding knowledge of pb-CFR did not improve prognostication over FFR alone.
- 17 April 2017
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in European Heart Journal
- Vol. 38 (25) , 1980-1989
Open AccessFractional flow reserve and pressure-bounded coronary flow reserve to predict outcomes in coronary artery disease
Fractional flow reserve (FFR) has proven to its prognostic and therapeutic value. However, the additive prognostic value of coronary flow reserve (CFR) remains unclear. This study sought to investigate the clinical utility of combined FFR and CFR measurements to predict outcomes. Using the prospective, multicentre Interventional Cardiology Research Incooperation Society–FFR registry, a total of 2088 lesions from 1837 patients were included in this substudy. Based on baseline and hyperaemic pressure gradients, we computed physiologic limits of CFR [the so called pressure-bounded (pb) CFR] and classified lesions as low (0.80 [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR): 2.15, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.19–3.89; P = 0.011. In contrast, the incidence of MACE did not differ between patients with pb-CFR < 2 vs. pb-CFR ≥ 2 (4.2% vs. 4.2%; aHR: 0.98, CI: 0.60 to 1.58; P = 0.92). Incorporation of FFR significantly improved model prediction of MACE (global χ2 38.8–48.1, P = 0.002). However, pb-CFR demonstrated no incremental utility to classify outcomes (global χ2 48.1–48.2, P > 0.99). In this large, prospective registry of over 2000 coronary lesions, FFR was strongly associated with clinical outcomes. In contrast, a significant association between pb-CFR and clinical events could not be determined and adding knowledge of pb-CFR did not improve prognostication over FFR alone.
- Open Access
- 6 March 2017
- Published by Springer Nature in Netherlands Heart Journal
- Vol. 25 (4) , 290-291
Stenting of bifurcation lesions
- 6 March 2017
- Published by Springer Nature in Netherlands Heart Journal
- Vol. 25 (4) , 290-291
Open AccessStenting of bifurcation lesions
- 1 January 2017
- Vol. 9 (2) , 558-568
Intracoronary hypothermia for acute myocardial infarction in the isolated beating pig heart
Hypothermia may attenuate reperfusion injury and thereby improve acute myocardial infarction therapy. Systemic cooling trials failed to reduce infarct size, perhaps because the target temperature was not reached fast enough. The use of selective intracoronary hypothermia combined with intracoronary temperature monitoring allows for titrating to target temperature and optimizing the cooling rate. We aimed to the test the feasibility of intracoronary cooling for controlled, selective myocardial hypothermia in an isolated beating pig heart. In five porcine hearts the left anterior descending artery (LAD) was occluded by an over-the-wire balloon (OTWB). After occlusion, saline at 22 degrees C was infused through the OTWB lumen for 5 minutes into the infarct area at a rate of 30 ml/min. Thereafter the balloon was deflated but infusion continued with saline at 4 degrees C for 5 minutes. Distal coronary temperature was continuously monitored by a pressure/temperature guidewire. Myocardial temperature at several locations in the infarct and control areas was recorded using needle thermistors. In the occlusion phase, coronary temperature decreased by 11.4 degrees C (range 9.4-12.5 degrees C). Myocardial temperature throughout the infarct area decreased by 5.1 degrees C (range 1.8-8.1 degrees C) within three minutes. During the reperfusion phase, coronary temperature decreased by 6.2 degrees C (range 4.1-10.3 degrees C) and myocardial temperature decreased by 4.5 degrees C (range 1.5-7.4 degrees C). Myocardial temperature outside the infarct area was not affected. In the isolated beating pig heart with acute occlusion of the LAD, we were able to rapidly "induce, maintain, and control" a stable intracoronary and myocardial target temperature of at least 4 degrees C below body temperature without side effects and using standard PCI equipment, justifying further studies of this technique in humans.
- 1 January 2017
- Vol. 9 (2) , 558-568
Intracoronary hypothermia for acute myocardial infarction in the isolated beating pig heart
Hypothermia may attenuate reperfusion injury and thereby improve acute myocardial infarction therapy. Systemic cooling trials failed to reduce infarct size, perhaps because the target temperature was not reached fast enough. The use of selective intracoronary hypothermia combined with intracoronary temperature monitoring allows for titrating to target temperature and optimizing the cooling rate. We aimed to the test the feasibility of intracoronary cooling for controlled, selective myocardial hypothermia in an isolated beating pig heart. In five porcine hearts the left anterior descending artery (LAD) was occluded by an over-the-wire balloon (OTWB). After occlusion, saline at 22 degrees C was infused through the OTWB lumen for 5 minutes into the infarct area at a rate of 30 ml/min. Thereafter the balloon was deflated but infusion continued with saline at 4 degrees C for 5 minutes. Distal coronary temperature was continuously monitored by a pressure/temperature guidewire. Myocardial temperature at several locations in the infarct and control areas was recorded using needle thermistors. In the occlusion phase, coronary temperature decreased by 11.4 degrees C (range 9.4-12.5 degrees C). Myocardial temperature throughout the infarct area decreased by 5.1 degrees C (range 1.8-8.1 degrees C) within three minutes. During the reperfusion phase, coronary temperature decreased by 6.2 degrees C (range 4.1-10.3 degrees C) and myocardial temperature decreased by 4.5 degrees C (range 1.5-7.4 degrees C). Myocardial temperature outside the infarct area was not affected. In the isolated beating pig heart with acute occlusion of the LAD, we were able to rapidly "induce, maintain, and control" a stable intracoronary and myocardial target temperature of at least 4 degrees C below body temperature without side effects and using standard PCI equipment, justifying further studies of this technique in humans.
- Open Access
- 26 October 2016
- Published by Springer Nature in Netherlands Heart Journal
- Vol. 25 (1) , 40-46
Evaluation of bifurcation stenting techniques at Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven in 2013
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of bifurcation lesions can be performed using various techniques. The aim of this study was to analyse the outcome of various techniques of bifurcation stenting in all patients undergoing bifurcation stenting at one large intervention centre in 2013, taking into account that more complex lesions might more often warrant a two-stent technique.
- 26 October 2016
- Published by Springer Nature in Netherlands Heart Journal
- Vol. 25 (1) , 40-46
Open AccessEvaluation of bifurcation stenting techniques at Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven in 2013
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of bifurcation lesions can be performed using various techniques. The aim of this study was to analyse the outcome of various techniques of bifurcation stenting in all patients undergoing bifurcation stenting at one large intervention centre in 2013, taking into account that more complex lesions might more often warrant a two-stent technique.
- 1 February 2016
- Published by Elsevier in The American Journal of Cardiology
- Vol. 117 (3) , 469-476
Usefulness of Intra-aortic Balloon Pump Counterpulsation
- 1 February 2016
- Published by Elsevier in The American Journal of Cardiology
- Vol. 117 (3) , 469-476
Usefulness of Intra-aortic Balloon Pump Counterpulsation
- Top Cited Papers
- 1 November 2015
- Published by Elsevier in The Lancet
- Vol. 386 (10006) , 1853-1860
Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guidance of PCI in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (FAME): 5-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial
- 1 November 2015
- Published by Elsevier in The Lancet
- Vol. 386 (10006) , 1853-1860
Top Cited PapersFractional flow reserve versus angiography for guidance of PCI in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (FAME): 5-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial
- 1 October 2015
- Published by Elsevier in American Heart Journal
- Vol. 170 (4) , 619-626.e2
Rationale and design of the Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation (FAME) 3 Trial: A comparison of fractional flow reserve–guided percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass graft surgery in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease
- 1 October 2015
- Published by Elsevier in American Heart Journal
- Vol. 170 (4) , 619-626.e2
Rationale and design of the Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation (FAME) 3 Trial: A comparison of fractional flow reserve–guided percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass graft surgery in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease
- Top Cited Papers
- 23 September 2015
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in European Heart Journal
- Vol. 36 (45) , 3182-3188
Deferral vs. performance of percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally non-significant coronary stenosis: 15-year follow-up of the DEFER trial
Aims Stenting an angiographically intermediate but functionally non-significant stenosis is controversial. Nevertheless, it has been questioned if deferral of a functionally non-significant lesion on the basis of fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurement, is safe, especially on the long term. Five-year follow-up of the DEFER trial showed that outcome after deferral of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of an intermediate coronary stenosis based on FFR ≥ 0.75 is excellent and was not improved by stenting. The aim of this study was to investigate the validity of this position on the very long term. Methods and results In 325 patients scheduled for PCI of an intermediate stenosis, FFR was measured just before the planned intervention. If FFR was ≥0.75, patients were randomly assigned to deferral (Defer group; n = 91) or performance (Perform group; n = 90) of PCI. If FFR was n = 144). Clinical follow-up was 15 years. There were no differences in baseline clinical characteristics between the randomized groups. Complete 15-year follow-up was obtained in 92% of patients. After 15 years of follow-up, the rate of death was not different between the three groups: 33.0% in the Defer group, 31.1% in the Perform group, and 36.1% in the Reference group (Defer vs. Perform, RR 1.06, 95% CI: 0.69–1.62, P = 0.79). The rate of myocardial infarction was significantly lower in the Defer group (2.2%) compared with the Perform group (10.0%), RR 0.22, 95% CI: 0.05–0.99, P = 0.03. Conclusion Deferral of PCI of a functionally non-significant stenosis is associated with a favourable very long-term follow-up without signs of late ‘catch-up’ phenomenon.
- 23 September 2015
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in European Heart Journal
- Vol. 36 (45) , 3182-3188
Top Cited PapersDeferral vs. performance of percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally non-significant coronary stenosis: 15-year follow-up of the DEFER trial
Aims Stenting an angiographically intermediate but functionally non-significant stenosis is controversial. Nevertheless, it has been questioned if deferral of a functionally non-significant lesion on the basis of fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurement, is safe, especially on the long term. Five-year follow-up of the DEFER trial showed that outcome after deferral of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of an intermediate coronary stenosis based on FFR ≥ 0.75 is excellent and was not improved by stenting. The aim of this study was to investigate the validity of this position on the very long term. Methods and results In 325 patients scheduled for PCI of an intermediate stenosis, FFR was measured just before the planned intervention. If FFR was ≥0.75, patients were randomly assigned to deferral (Defer group; n = 91) or performance (Perform group; n = 90) of PCI. If FFR was n = 144). Clinical follow-up was 15 years. There were no differences in baseline clinical characteristics between the randomized groups. Complete 15-year follow-up was obtained in 92% of patients. After 15 years of follow-up, the rate of death was not different between the three groups: 33.0% in the Defer group, 31.1% in the Perform group, and 36.1% in the Reference group (Defer vs. Perform, RR 1.06, 95% CI: 0.69–1.62, P = 0.79). The rate of myocardial infarction was significantly lower in the Defer group (2.2%) compared with the Perform group (10.0%), RR 0.22, 95% CI: 0.05–0.99, P = 0.03. Conclusion Deferral of PCI of a functionally non-significant stenosis is associated with a favourable very long-term follow-up without signs of late ‘catch-up’ phenomenon.
- 13 August 2015
- Published by Wiley in Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
- Vol. 87 (5) , 877-883
Safety and feasibility of local myocardial hypothermia
In ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), reduction in time to reperfusion of the occluded coronary artery reduces infarct size. In animal models, an additional reduction of infarct size was observed when hypothermia was induced before reperfusion, despite a longer ischemic time. However, several human studies did not corroborate this positive effect, which is believed to be in part due to the inability of systemic induced hypothermia to induce sufficient decrease of local myocardial temperature before reperfusion. Providing rapid local myocardial hypothermia by intracoronary infusion of saline before reperfusion in patients with STEMI may overcome this problem. In this study, we evaluate the safety and feasibility of providing rapid intracoronary myocardial hypothermia in patients undergoing intracoronary blood flow measurements based on thermodilution with continuous infusion of saline at room temperature. In 53 patients with stable angina (SA) and 20 patients with STEMI, a total of 215 measurements were performed. The measurements consisted of continuous selective intracoronary infusion of saline at room temperature with rates between 10 ml/min and 30 ml/min. Temperature changes compared to initial blood temperature (Tb) were measured at the tip of the infusion catheter (Ti) and distally in the coronary artery (Td). In patients with SA, Ti was −5.65 ± 1.41°C (range −9.27 to −2.28) and Td was −0.78 ± 0.51°C (range −3.27 to −0.23°C). In patients with STEMI, Ti was −7.45 ± 0.51°C (range −8.21 to −6.56) and Td was −1.37 ± 0.82°C (range −4.62 to −0.74°C). In all patients, steady-state intracoronary hypothermia was achieved within 15 sec and could be maintained without noticeable complications. This study demonstrates the safety and feasibility of inducing intracoronary hypothermia by selective infusion of saline at room temperature in patients with SA and STEMI. Steady-state hypothermia could be achieved and maintained quickly, easily, and safely using common PCI techniques. Therefore, our findings warrant further studies to the use of intracoronary hypothermia to enhance myocardial salvage in acute myocardial infarction.
- 13 August 2015
- Published by Wiley in Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
- Vol. 87 (5) , 877-883
Safety and feasibility of local myocardial hypothermia
In ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), reduction in time to reperfusion of the occluded coronary artery reduces infarct size. In animal models, an additional reduction of infarct size was observed when hypothermia was induced before reperfusion, despite a longer ischemic time. However, several human studies did not corroborate this positive effect, which is believed to be in part due to the inability of systemic induced hypothermia to induce sufficient decrease of local myocardial temperature before reperfusion. Providing rapid local myocardial hypothermia by intracoronary infusion of saline before reperfusion in patients with STEMI may overcome this problem. In this study, we evaluate the safety and feasibility of providing rapid intracoronary myocardial hypothermia in patients undergoing intracoronary blood flow measurements based on thermodilution with continuous infusion of saline at room temperature. In 53 patients with stable angina (SA) and 20 patients with STEMI, a total of 215 measurements were performed. The measurements consisted of continuous selective intracoronary infusion of saline at room temperature with rates between 10 ml/min and 30 ml/min. Temperature changes compared to initial blood temperature (Tb) were measured at the tip of the infusion catheter (Ti) and distally in the coronary artery (Td). In patients with SA, Ti was −5.65 ± 1.41°C (range −9.27 to −2.28) and Td was −0.78 ± 0.51°C (range −3.27 to −0.23°C). In patients with STEMI, Ti was −7.45 ± 0.51°C (range −8.21 to −6.56) and Td was −1.37 ± 0.82°C (range −4.62 to −0.74°C). In all patients, steady-state intracoronary hypothermia was achieved within 15 sec and could be maintained without noticeable complications. This study demonstrates the safety and feasibility of inducing intracoronary hypothermia by selective infusion of saline at room temperature in patients with SA and STEMI. Steady-state hypothermia could be achieved and maintained quickly, easily, and safely using common PCI techniques. Therefore, our findings warrant further studies to the use of intracoronary hypothermia to enhance myocardial salvage in acute myocardial infarction.