David A. Katz

Many surgeons require patients to quit smoking prior to elective surgeries to reduce the risk of postoperative complications. Our aim was to qualitatively evaluate the communication and care experiences of patients and clinicians involved in conversations about quitting smoking prior to elective orthopaedic surgery. A qualitative interview study of rural-residing Veterans, primary care providers (PCPs), and Veterans Administration (VA) orthopaedic surgery staff and pharmacists, who care for rural Veterans. We performed a combination of deductive and inductive approaches to support conventional content analysis using a Patient-Centered Care framework. Patients appreciated a shared approach with their PCP on the plan and reasons for cessation. Despite not knowing if the motivation for elective surgeries served as a teachable moment to facilitate long-term abstinence, almost all clinicians believed it typically helped in the short-term. There was a lack of standardized workflow between primary care and surgery, especially when patients used care delivered outside of VA. While clinician-provided information about the reasons behind the requirement to quit smoking preoperatively was beneficial, patients appreciated the opportunity to collaborate with their care teams on developing a plan for cessation and abstinence. Other aspects of patient-centered care need to be leveraged, such as the therapeutic alliance or patient-as-person, to build trust and improve communication surrounding tobacco use treatment. System-level changes may need to be made to improve coordination and connection of clinicians within and across disciplines. This study included perspectives from patients, primary care teams, and surgical teams and found that, in addition to providing information, clinicians need to address other aspects of patient-centered care such as the therapeutic alliance and patient-as-person domains to promote patient engagement in tobacco use treatment. This, in turn, could enhance the potential of surgery as a teachable moment and patient success in quitting smoking.

Introduction. Some medical centers and surgeons require patients to stop smoking cigarettes prior to elective orthopaedic surgeries in an effort to decrease surgical complications. Given higher rates of smoking among rural individuals, rural patients may be disproportionately impacted by these requirements. We assessed the perceptions and experiences of rural-residing Veterans and clinicians related to this requirement. Methods. We conducted qualitative semistructured one-on-one interviews of 26 rural-residing veterans, 10 VA orthopaedic surgery staff (from two Veterans Integrated Services Networks), 24 PCPs who serve rural veterans (14 VA; 10 non-VA), and 4 VA pharmacists. Using the knowledge, attitudes, and behavior framework, we performed conventional content analysis. Results. We found three primary themes across respondents: (1) knowledge of and the evidence base for the requirement varied widely; (2) strong personal attitudes toward the requirement; and (3) implementation and possible implications of this requirement. All surgery staff reported knowledge of requirements at their institution. VA PCPs reported knowledge of requirements but typically could not recall specifics. Most patients were unaware. The majority of respondents felt this requirement could increase motivation to quit smoking. Some PCPs felt a more thorough explanation of smoking-related complications would result in increased quit attempts. About half of all patients reported belief that the requirement was reasonable regardless of initial awareness. Respondents expressed little concern that the requirement might increase rural-urban disparities. Most PCPs and patients felt that there should be exceptions for allowing surgery, while surgical staff disagreed. Discussion. Most respondents thought elective surgery was a good motivator to quit smoking; but patients, PCPs, and surgical staff differed on whether there should be exceptions to the requirement that patients quit preoperatively. Future efforts to augment perioperative smoking cessation may benefit from improving coordination across services and educating patients more about the benefits of quitting.

In the originally published version of “Time to put it out – nurse-facilitated tobacco treatment in a comprehensive cancer center” by David A. Katz, Sarah L. Mott, Jane A Utech, Autumn C Bahlmann, Kimberly A Dukes, Aaron T Seaman, Douglas E Laux, Muhammad Furqan, Zachary J. Pollock, Mark W. Vander Weg (https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibab073), the NIH grant number was incorrect. The Funding section should read, “P30CA086862” instead of “P30CA044579”. This error has been corrected online.

Few cancer patients receive guideline-concordant care for treatment of tobacco dependence. The purpose of this pilot trial was to obtain preliminary estimates of effectiveness of an evidence-based practice intervention on the delivery of tobacco treatment and cessation outcomes in cancer patients. We conducted a pragmatic implementation trial with a before-after design in 119 current or recently quit adult smokers with cancer who met with a clinician at a single National Cancer Institute designated comprehensive cancer center (CCC) (n = 61 pre-implementation, n = 58 post-implementation). We used a multi-component strategy based on the Chronic Care Model to implement National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines for smoking cessation. Smoking cessation counseling during the index visit was assessed by exit interview and patients were interviewed by phone to assess cessation outcomes at 3-month follow-up. Performance of cessation counseling and 7-day point prevalence abstinence (PPA) were compared across the pre- and post-implementation periods using log-logistic regression, accounting for clustering by nursing staff. More patients had received assistance in quitting at the index visit during the post-implementation period compared to the pre-implementation period (30 vs. 10%, p < .01). At 3-month follow-up, 38 and 14% of participants had discussed smoking cessation medication with a CCC healthcare professional and 57 and 27% of participants had used pharmacotherapy, respectively (p < .01 for both comparisons). Seven-day PPA at 3-month follow-up was similar in both periods, however (14 vs. 12%, respectively). A multi-component tobacco treatment intervention increased the proportion of smokers who received assistance in quitting smoking during usual cancer care but did not improve cessation outcomes. Few patients with cancer receive help in quitting smoking. We conducted a pilot before-after trial to determine the effectiveness of an evidence-based practice intervention, including brief cessation counseling during the clinic visit and referral to an onsite tobacco treatment specialist, on the delivery of stop smoking services and cessation outcomes at a NCI-designated Comprehensive Cancer Center. During the post-implementation period, cancer patients who smoke were more likely to have received assistance in quitting in clinic and during 3-month follow-up. This change in process of care did not translate into improved short-term abstinence from tobacco, however. Greater and more sustained participation in tobacco treatment will be needed to improve cessation outcomes in this population.

PURPOSE Patient engagement has been broadly defined as the process of actively involving and supporting patients in health care and treatment decision making. The aim of this study was to identify organizational factors that are associated with greater use of patient engagement care practices in Veterans Health Administration primary care clinics. METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of data from the 2016 Patient-Aligned Care Team (PACT) national survey of direct care clinicians (primary care clinicians, registered nurses, and clinical associates). Exploratory factor analysis was used to group conceptually related patient engagement survey items into 3 subscales: planning and goal setting; motivational interviewing; and organizational strategies to promote self-management. Our independent variables included literature-based factors reported to promote team-based care and interdisciplinary collaboration in primary care. We used generalized estimating equations with multivariate logistic regression analysis to identify independent correlates of high performance on each patient engagement domain (top 25th vs bottom 25th percentile). RESULTS A total of 2,478 direct care clinicians from 609 clinics completed all patient engagement items in the PACT survey. For all patient engagement sub-scales, respondents at high-performing clinics were more likely to report having regular team meetings to discuss performance improvement and having leadership responsible for implementing PACT. For 2 of 3 patient engagement subscales, high performance was also associated with having fully staffed PACT teams (≥3 team members per primary care clinician) and role clarity. CONCLUSIONS Several desirable organizational and contextual factors were associated with high performance of patient engagement care practices. Strategies to improve the organizational functioning of primary care teams may enhance patient engagement in care.

Objective: To determine the relationship between travel distance and surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma among veterans with cirrhosis.Data Sources: Veterans Health Administration (VHA) inpatient and outpatient administrative data were linked to geocoded enrollee files. CMS‐VHA merged data were used to assess receipt of Medicare‐financed non‐VA imaging.Study Design: A retrospective cohort of US veterans diagnosed with cirrhosis between 2009 and 2015 was examined. First available abdominal imaging following the diagnosis of cirrhosis was analyzed separately as a function of travel distance to the nearest VA medical center (VAMC) and to the patient's assigned VA primary care provider. Veterans with dual use of Medicare and VA services were also examined for receipt of imaging outside of the VA.Principal Findings: Veterans who resided more than 30 miles from the nearest VAMC were less likely to receive any imaging for HCC surveillance. Among dual users, increased travel distance between the patient's residence and nearest VAMC was associated with an increased likelihood of receiving any abdominal imaging at non‐VA facilities.Conclusion: Increased travel distance to the nearest VA medical center reduces the likelihood of receiving imaging for HCC surveillance in cirrhotic veterans. Future efforts should focus on reducing geographic barriers to HCC surveillance.

Providers often prescribe counseling and/or medications for tobacco cessation without considering patients’ treatment preferences.