Francisco M. De La Vega
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Francisco M. De La Vega has a total of 39 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Abra Brisbin
Department of Biological Statistics and Computational Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14850, USA
1 shared publicationAdam Auton
The Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, Oxford OX3 7BN, UK
1 shared publication- Alon Keinan
Department of Biological Statistics and Computational Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
1 shared publication - Andrew G. Clark
Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University
1 shared publication - Andrew J. Pakstis
Department of Genetics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
1 shared publication - Andrés Moreno-Estrada
Aging Research Center, Cinvestav Sede Sur, Center for Research and Advanced Studies of the National Polytechnic Institute, Mexico City, Mexico
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 1 October 2012
- Published by Elsevier in The American Journal of Human Genetics
- Vol. 91 (4) , 660-671
Population Genetic Inference from Personal Genome Data: Impact of Ancestry and Admixture on Human Genomic Variation
- 1 October 2012
- Published by Elsevier in The American Journal of Human Genetics
- Vol. 91 (4) , 660-671
Population Genetic Inference from Personal Genome Data: Impact of Ancestry and Admixture on Human Genomic Variation
- Open Access
- 1 July 2011
- Published by S. Karger AG in Human Heredity
- Vol. 71 (2) , 113-125
A New Expectation-Maximization Statistical Test for Case-Control Association Studies Considering Rare Variants Obtained by High-Throughput Sequencing
Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have been successful in identifying common genetic variation reproducibly associated with disease. However, most associated variants confer very small risk and after meta-analysis of large cohorts a large fraction of expected heritability still remains unexplained. A possible explanation is that rare variants currently undetected by GWAS with SNP arrays could contribute a large fraction of risk when present in cases. This concept has spurred great interest in exploring the role of rare variants in disease. As the cost of sequencing continue to plummet, it is becoming feasible to directly sequence case-control samples for testing disease association including rare variants. We have developed a test statistic that allows for association testing among cases and controls using data directly from sequencing reads. In addition, our method allows for random errors in reads. We determine the probability of a true genotype call based on the observed base pair reads using the expectation-maximization algorithm. We apply the SumStat procedure to obtain a single statistic for a group of multiple rare variant loci. We document the validity of our method through simulations. Our results suggest that our statistic maintains the correct type I error rate, even in the presence of differential misclassification for sequence reads, and that it has good power under a number of scenarios. Finally, our SumStat results show power at least as good as the maximum single locus results.
- 1 July 2011
- Published by S. Karger AG in Human Heredity
- Vol. 71 (2) , 113-125
Open AccessA New Expectation-Maximization Statistical Test for Case-Control Association Studies Considering Rare Variants Obtained by High-Throughput Sequencing
Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have been successful in identifying common genetic variation reproducibly associated with disease. However, most associated variants confer very small risk and after meta-analysis of large cohorts a large fraction of expected heritability still remains unexplained. A possible explanation is that rare variants currently undetected by GWAS with SNP arrays could contribute a large fraction of risk when present in cases. This concept has spurred great interest in exploring the role of rare variants in disease. As the cost of sequencing continue to plummet, it is becoming feasible to directly sequence case-control samples for testing disease association including rare variants. We have developed a test statistic that allows for association testing among cases and controls using data directly from sequencing reads. In addition, our method allows for random errors in reads. We determine the probability of a true genotype call based on the observed base pair reads using the expectation-maximization algorithm. We apply the SumStat procedure to obtain a single statistic for a group of multiple rare variant loci. We document the validity of our method through simulations. Our results suggest that our statistic maintains the correct type I error rate, even in the presence of differential misclassification for sequence reads, and that it has good power under a number of scenarios. Finally, our SumStat results show power at least as good as the maximum single locus results.
- Open Access
- 1 January 2011
- Published by Springer Nature in Investigative Genetics
- Vol. 2 (1) , 1
Analyses of a set of 128 ancestry informative single-nucleotide polymorphisms in a global set of 119 population samples
Using DNA to determine an individual's ancestry from among human populations is generally interesting and useful for many purposes, including admixture mapping, controlling for population structure in disease or trait association studies and forensic ancestry inference. However, to estimate ancestry, including possible admixture within an individual, as well as heterogeneity within a group of individuals, allele frequencies are necessary for what are believed to be the contributing populations. For this purpose, panels of ancestry informative markers (AIMs) have been developed.
- 1 January 2011
- Published by Springer Nature in Investigative Genetics
- Vol. 2 (1) , 1
Open AccessAnalyses of a set of 128 ancestry informative single-nucleotide polymorphisms in a global set of 119 population samples
Using DNA to determine an individual's ancestry from among human populations is generally interesting and useful for many purposes, including admixture mapping, controlling for population structure in disease or trait association studies and forensic ancestry inference. However, to estimate ancestry, including possible admixture within an individual, as well as heterogeneity within a group of individuals, allele frequencies are necessary for what are believed to be the contributing populations. For this purpose, panels of ancestry informative markers (AIMs) have been developed.