Michael R. Bishop

The population of survivors following allogeneic HSCT continues to increase, and yet their experiences of recovery and long-term survivorship have not been fully characterized. This paper presents a study protocol examining over time the functional status, psychosocial adjustment, health-related quality of life, and symptom experience of survivors who have undergone allogeneic transplantation. The aims of the study are to: 1) explore the patterns of change in these health outcomes during the survivorship phase; 2) characterize subgroups of survivors experiencing adverse outcomes; and 3) examine relationships among outcomes and demographic and clinical factors (such as age, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), and disease relapse).

There exists a need for effective salvage regimens for multiple myeloma patients being considered for reduced-intensity allogeneic hematopoietic SCT (RI-alloHSCT). We developed EPOCH-F, a regimen consisting of infusional etoposide, VCR and adriamycin with prednisone, CY and fludarabine to achieve both tumor control and host lymphocyte depletion to facilitate engraftment before RI-alloHSCT. In all, 22 multiple myeloma patients were treated with EPOCH-F before RI-alloHSCT. The median age was 53 years (range 36–65), and the median number of previous therapies was 2 (range 1–8). Patients received a median of three cycles (range 1–5) of EPOCH-F. Toxicities were primarily hematologic and manageable. Median lymphocyte counts decreased from 1423/μL (range 335–2788) to 519/μL (range 102–1420; P=0.0002). The overall response (⩾PR) to EPOCH-F was 22 with 13% achieving a CR/near-complete response (nCR); only 1 patient progressed while on therapy. A total of 20 patients underwent RI-alloHSCT. Median day +100 donor chimerism was 100% (range 60–100). In all, 70% of patients achieved very good partial response or better response after transplant; 40% of patients achieved CR/nCR. TRM at 100 days and 5 years was 5 and 30%, respectively. Median OS after RI-alloHSCT was 46.1 months. EPOCH-F provides disease control and host lymphocyte depletion with consistent full donor engraftment in multiple myeloma patients undergoing RI-alloHSCT.

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy sensitivity, defined simply as at least a partial response to chemotherapy, is an important outcome predictor for non‐Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) patients undergoing reduced‐intensity allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo‐HCT). The authors hypothesized that further differentiation of chemotherapy sensitivity by specific response, complete remission (CR) versus partial remission (PR) versus stable disease (SD) versus progression of disease (PD), correlates with post‐transplant outcomes.METHODS: The impact of pretransplant and early (28 days) post‐transplant disease response on transplant outcomes was analyzed in 63 NHL patients treated with reduced‐intensity allo‐HCT.RESULTS: The 3‐year event‐free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) (median potential follow‐up after reduced‐intensity allo‐HCT = 58 months) for all patients was 37% and 47%, respectively. The 3‐year EFS based on pretransplant response was: CR = 50%; PR = 66%; SD = 18%; no patient with PD pretransplant reached 3‐year follow‐up. The 3‐year OS based on pretransplant response was: CR = 63%; PR = 69%; SD = 45%. The 3‐year EFS based on post‐transplant response was: CR = 57%; PR = 32%; SD = 33%; no patient with PD post‐transplant reached 3‐year follow‐up. The 3‐year OS based on post‐transplant response was: CR = 65%; PR = 43%; SD = 50%. In multivariate analyses, pretransplant response was the best predictor of EFS (P< .0001). Pretransplant response (P< .0001) and age (P= .0035) were jointly associated with OS.CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that NHL patients with pretransplant SD, generally considered inappropriate candidates, may benefit from reduced‐intensity allo‐HCT, and patients with pretransplant PD should only receive this therapy in clinical trials. Cancer 2010. © 2010 American Cancer Society.

Purpose: Morbidity from acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) limits the success of allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) to treat malignancy. Interleukin-7 (IL-7), the principal homeostatic cytokine for T cells, is required for acute GVHD in murine models. In contrast to inflammatory cytokines (eg, IL-2, tumor necrosis factor α), IL-7 has not been studied extensively in the clinical transplant setting relative to its relationship with acute GVHD.Patients and Methods: We evaluated the association of serum IL-7 levels with acute GVHD in 31 patients who were uniformly treated in a prospective clinical trial with reduced-intensity allogeneic HSCT from human leukocyte antigen–identical siblings. GVHD prophylaxis consisted of cyclosporine and methotrexate. Serum IL-7 levels and lymphocyte populations were determined at enrollment, the day of transplantation before the allograft infusion, and at specified intervals through 12 months post-transplantation.Results: As expected, IL-7 levels were inversely correlated with T-cell populations (P < .00001). Acute GVHD was significantly associated with higher IL-7 levels at day +7 (P = .01) and day +14 (P = .00003) post-transplantation as well as with the allograft CD34⁺cell dose (P = .01). IL-7 levels at day +14 also correlated with the severity of acute GVHD (P < .0001). In logistic regression models, these factors were highly sensitive (up to 86%) and specific (100%) for classifying whether patients developed acute GVHD.Conclusion: These data support preclinical observations that IL-7 plays a critical role in inducing acute GVHD and provide a rational basis for novel approaches to prevent and treat acute GVHD through modulation of the IL-7 pathway.

Background: A graft-versus-lymphoma effect against diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is inferred by sustained relapse-free survival after allogeneic stem-cell transplantation; however, there are limited data on a direct graft-versus-lymphoma effect against DLBCL following immunotherapeutic intervention by either withdrawal of immunosuppression or donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI). Materials and methods: An analysis was carried out to determine whether a direct graft-versus-lymphoma effect exists against DLBCL. The analysis was restricted to patients with DLBCL, who were either not in complete remission at day +100 after allogeneic stem-cell transplantation or subsequently relapsed beyond this time point. Results: Fifteen patients were identified as either not in complete remission (n = 13) at their day +100 evaluation or subsequently relapsed (n = 2) and were assessed for subsequent responses after withdrawal of immunosuppression or DLI. Eleven patients were treated with either withdrawal of immunosuppression (n = 10) or a DLI (n = 1) alone; four patients received chemotherapy with DLI to reduce tumor bulk. Nine (60%) patients subsequently responded (complete = 8, partial = 1). Six responses occurred after withdrawal of immunosuppression alone. Six patients are alive (range 42–83+ months) in complete remission without further treatment. Conclusion: The demonstration of sustained complete remission following immunotherapeutic intervention provides direct evidence of a graft-versus-lymphoma effect against DLBCL.