Stephen T. Crews
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Stephen T. Crews has a total of 27 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Joseph C. Pearson
Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3280, USA
8 shared publicationsScott R. Wheeler
Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Program in Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3280, USA
6 shared publications- Lan Jiang
Department of Biological Sciences, Oakland University, Rochester, Michigan, United States of America
5 shared publications Stephanie B. Stagg
Curriculum in Neurobiology, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3280, USA
3 shared publicationsAmaris R. Guardiola
Program in Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3280, USA
2 shared publicationsJoseph B. Kearney
2 shared publications
Latest Publications
- 1 December 2019
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Genetics
- Vol. 213 (4) , 1111-1144
Drosophila Embryonic CNS Development: Neurogenesis, Gliogenesis, Cell Fate, and Differentiation
The Drosophila embryonic central nervous system (CNS) is a complex organ consisting of ∼15,000 neurons and glia that is generated in ∼1 day of development. For the past 40 years, Drosophila developmental neuroscientists have described each step of CNS development in precise molecular genetic detail. This has led to an understanding of how an intricate nervous system emerges from a single cell. These studies have also provided important, new concepts in developmental biology, and provided an essential model for understanding similar processes in other organisms. In this article, the key genes that guide Drosophila CNS development and how they function is reviewed. Features of CNS development covered in this review are neurogenesis, gliogenesis, cell fate specification, and differentiation.
- 1 December 2019
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Genetics
- Vol. 213 (4) , 1111-1144
Drosophila Embryonic CNS Development: Neurogenesis, Gliogenesis, Cell Fate, and Differentiation
The Drosophila embryonic central nervous system (CNS) is a complex organ consisting of ∼15,000 neurons and glia that is generated in ∼1 day of development. For the past 40 years, Drosophila developmental neuroscientists have described each step of CNS development in precise molecular genetic detail. This has led to an understanding of how an intricate nervous system emerges from a single cell. These studies have also provided important, new concepts in developmental biology, and provided an essential model for understanding similar processes in other organisms. In this article, the key genes that guide Drosophila CNS development and how they function is reviewed. Features of CNS development covered in this review are neurogenesis, gliogenesis, cell fate specification, and differentiation.
- Open Access
- 1 April 2017
- Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory in Genes & Development
- Vol. 31 (7) , 629-631
Creating cell type-specific mutants by enhancer mutagenesis
Cell signaling plays an essential role in development, and knowledge of the identities of the cells sending the signal is critical. This can be a challenge, since signaling pathways and ligands are commonly used at multiple times and in multiple cell types during development. One solution to this problem is to create cell type-specific mutants using CRISPR/Cas9 to mutate enhancers that control different patterns of expression. In this issue of Genes & Development, Rogers and colleagues (pp. 634–638) provide the first use of this method in Drosophila to solve a long-standing issue in patterning of the embryonic central nervous system.
- 1 April 2017
- Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory in Genes & Development
- Vol. 31 (7) , 629-631
Open AccessCreating cell type-specific mutants by enhancer mutagenesis
Cell signaling plays an essential role in development, and knowledge of the identities of the cells sending the signal is critical. This can be a challenge, since signaling pathways and ligands are commonly used at multiple times and in multiple cell types during development. One solution to this problem is to create cell type-specific mutants using CRISPR/Cas9 to mutate enhancers that control different patterns of expression. In this issue of Genes & Development, Rogers and colleagues (pp. 634–638) provide the first use of this method in Drosophila to solve a long-standing issue in patterning of the embryonic central nervous system.
- Open Access
- 15 October 2016
- Published by The Company of Biologists in Development
- Vol. 143 (20) , 3723-3732
Chromatin profiling of Drosophila CNS subpopulations identifies active transcriptional enhancers
One of the key issues in studying transcriptional regulation during development is how to employ genome-wide assays that reveals sites of open chromatin and transcription factor binding to efficiently identify biologically relevant genes and enhancers. Analysis of Drosophila CNS midline cell development provides a useful system for studying transcriptional regulation at the genomic level due to a large, well-characterized set of midline-expressed genes and in vivo validated enhancers. In this study, FAIRE-seq on FACS-purified midline cells was performed and the midline FAIRE data were compared with whole-embryo FAIRE data. We find that regions of the genome with a strong midline FAIRE peak and weak whole-embryo FAIRE peak overlap with known midline enhancers and provide a useful predictive tool for enhancer identification. In a complementary analysis, we compared a large dataset of fragments that drive midline expression in vivo with the FAIRE data. Midline enhancer fragments with a midline FAIRE peak tend to be near midline-expressed genes, whereas midline enhancers without a midline FAIRE peak were often distant from midline-expressed genes and unlikely to drive midline transcription in vivo.
- 15 October 2016
- Published by The Company of Biologists in Development
- Vol. 143 (20) , 3723-3732
Open AccessChromatin profiling of Drosophila CNS subpopulations identifies active transcriptional enhancers
One of the key issues in studying transcriptional regulation during development is how to employ genome-wide assays that reveals sites of open chromatin and transcription factor binding to efficiently identify biologically relevant genes and enhancers. Analysis of Drosophila CNS midline cell development provides a useful system for studying transcriptional regulation at the genomic level due to a large, well-characterized set of midline-expressed genes and in vivo validated enhancers. In this study, FAIRE-seq on FACS-purified midline cells was performed and the midline FAIRE data were compared with whole-embryo FAIRE data. We find that regions of the genome with a strong midline FAIRE peak and weak whole-embryo FAIRE peak overlap with known midline enhancers and provide a useful predictive tool for enhancer identification. In a complementary analysis, we compared a large dataset of fragments that drive midline expression in vivo with the FAIRE data. Midline enhancer fragments with a midline FAIRE peak tend to be near midline-expressed genes, whereas midline enhancers without a midline FAIRE peak were often distant from midline-expressed genes and unlikely to drive midline transcription in vivo.
- 1 August 2014
- Published by Elsevier in Developmental Biology
- Vol. 392 (2) , 466-482
Enhancer diversity and the control of a simple pattern of Drosophila CNS midline cell expression
- 1 August 2014
- Published by Elsevier in Developmental Biology
- Vol. 392 (2) , 466-482
Enhancer diversity and the control of a simple pattern of Drosophila CNS midline cell expression
- Open Access
- 8 May 2013
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Bioinformatics
- Vol. 29 (13) , 1690-1692
Twine: display and analysis of cis-regulatory modules
Summary: Many algorithms analyze enhancers for overrepresentation of known and novel motifs, with the goal of identifying binding sites for direct regulators of gene expression. Twine is a Java GUI with multiple graphical representations (‘Views’) of enhancer alignments that displays motifs, as IUPAC consensus sequences or position frequency matrices, in the context of phylogenetic conservation to facilitate cis-regulatory element discovery. Thresholds of phylogenetic conservation and motif stringency can be altered dynamically to facilitate detailed analysis of enhancer architecture. Views can be exported to vector graphics programs to generate high-quality figures for publication. Twine can be extended via Java plugins to manipulate alignments and analyze sequences. Availability: Twine is freely available as a compiled Java .jar package or Java source code at http://labs.bio.unc.edu/crews/twine/. Contact:steve_crews@unc.edu Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
- 8 May 2013
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Bioinformatics
- Vol. 29 (13) , 1690-1692
Open AccessTwine: display and analysis of cis-regulatory modules
Summary: Many algorithms analyze enhancers for overrepresentation of known and novel motifs, with the goal of identifying binding sites for direct regulators of gene expression. Twine is a Java GUI with multiple graphical representations (‘Views’) of enhancer alignments that displays motifs, as IUPAC consensus sequences or position frequency matrices, in the context of phylogenetic conservation to facilitate cis-regulatory element discovery. Thresholds of phylogenetic conservation and motif stringency can be altered dynamically to facilitate detailed analysis of enhancer architecture. Views can be exported to vector graphics programs to generate high-quality figures for publication. Twine can be extended via Java plugins to manipulate alignments and analyze sequences. Availability: Twine is freely available as a compiled Java .jar package or Java source code at http://labs.bio.unc.edu/crews/twine/. Contact:steve_crews@unc.edu Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
- 1 December 2012
- Published by Elsevier in Developmental Biology
- Vol. 372 (1) , 131-142
Transcriptome analysis of Drosophila CNS midline cells reveals diverse peptidergic properties and a role for castor in neuronal differentiation
- 1 December 2012
- Published by Elsevier in Developmental Biology
- Vol. 372 (1) , 131-142
Transcriptome analysis of Drosophila CNS midline cells reveals diverse peptidergic properties and a role for castor in neuronal differentiation
- 1 June 2012
- Published by Elsevier in Developmental Biology
- Vol. 366 (2) , 420-432
Drosophila melanogaster Zelda and Single-minded collaborate to regulate an evolutionarily dynamic CNS midline cell enhancer
- 1 June 2012
- Published by Elsevier in Developmental Biology
- Vol. 366 (2) , 420-432
Drosophila melanogaster Zelda and Single-minded collaborate to regulate an evolutionarily dynamic CNS midline cell enhancer
- 1 January 2012
- Published by Elsevier in Developmental Biology
- Vol. 361 (2) , 232-244
Time-lapse imaging reveals stereotypical patterns of Drosophila midline glial migration
- 1 January 2012
- Published by Elsevier in Developmental Biology
- Vol. 361 (2) , 232-244
Time-lapse imaging reveals stereotypical patterns of Drosophila midline glial migration
- 1 December 2011
- Published by Elsevier in Gene Expression Patterns
- Vol. 11 (8) , 533-546
Molecular and functional analysis of Drosophila single-minded larval central brain expression
- 1 December 2011
- Published by Elsevier in Gene Expression Patterns
- Vol. 11 (8) , 533-546
Molecular and functional analysis of Drosophila single-minded larval central brain expression
- Open Access
- 1 June 2011
- Published by The Company of Biologists in Development
- Vol. 138 (11) , 2171-2183
Dual role for Drosophila lethal of scute in CNS midline precursor formation and dopaminergic neuron and motoneuron cell fate
Dopaminergic neurons play important behavioral roles in locomotion, reward and aggression. The Drosophila H-cell is a dopaminergic neuron that resides at the midline of the ventral nerve cord. Both the H-cell and the glutamatergic H-cell sib are the asymmetric progeny of the MP3 midline precursor cell. H-cell sib cell fate is dependent on Notch signaling, whereas H-cell fate is Notch independent. Genetic analysis of genes that could potentially regulate H-cell fate revealed that the lethal of scute [l(1)sc], tailup and SoxNeuro transcription factor genes act together to control H-cell gene expression. The l(1)sc bHLH gene is required for all H-cell-specific gene transcription, whereas tailup acts in parallel to l(1)sc and controls genes involved in dopamine metabolism. SoxNeuro functions downstream of l(1)sc and controls expression of a peptide neurotransmitter receptor gene. The role of l(1)sc may be more widespread, as a l(1)sc mutant shows reductions in gene expression in non-midline dopaminergic neurons. In addition, l(1)sc mutant embryos possess defects in the formation of MP4-6 midline precursor and the median neuroblast stem cell, revealing a proneural role for l(1)sc in midline cells. The Notch-dependent progeny of MP4-6 are the mVUM motoneurons, and these cells also require l(1)sc for mVUM-specific gene expression. Thus, l(1)sc plays an important regulatory role in both neurogenesis and specifying dopaminergic neuron and motoneuron identities.
- 1 June 2011
- Published by The Company of Biologists in Development
- Vol. 138 (11) , 2171-2183
Open AccessDual role for Drosophila lethal of scute in CNS midline precursor formation and dopaminergic neuron and motoneuron cell fate
Dopaminergic neurons play important behavioral roles in locomotion, reward and aggression. The Drosophila H-cell is a dopaminergic neuron that resides at the midline of the ventral nerve cord. Both the H-cell and the glutamatergic H-cell sib are the asymmetric progeny of the MP3 midline precursor cell. H-cell sib cell fate is dependent on Notch signaling, whereas H-cell fate is Notch independent. Genetic analysis of genes that could potentially regulate H-cell fate revealed that the lethal of scute [l(1)sc], tailup and SoxNeuro transcription factor genes act together to control H-cell gene expression. The l(1)sc bHLH gene is required for all H-cell-specific gene transcription, whereas tailup acts in parallel to l(1)sc and controls genes involved in dopamine metabolism. SoxNeuro functions downstream of l(1)sc and controls expression of a peptide neurotransmitter receptor gene. The role of l(1)sc may be more widespread, as a l(1)sc mutant shows reductions in gene expression in non-midline dopaminergic neurons. In addition, l(1)sc mutant embryos possess defects in the formation of MP4-6 midline precursor and the median neuroblast stem cell, revealing a proneural role for l(1)sc in midline cells. The Notch-dependent progeny of MP4-6 are the mVUM motoneurons, and these cells also require l(1)sc for mVUM-specific gene expression. Thus, l(1)sc plays an important regulatory role in both neurogenesis and specifying dopaminergic neuron and motoneuron identities.