David M. Landsberger
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
David M. Landsberger has a total of 7 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Arthi G. Srinivasan
Department of Communication and Auditory Neuroscience, House Research Institute, 2100 West 3rd Street, Los Angeles, CA 90057, USA
2 shared publications- Aniket A. Saoji
Research and Technology group, Advanced Bionics, LLC, 28515 Westinghouse Place, Valencia CA 91355, USA
1 shared publication John J. Galvin
Division of Communication and Auditory Neuroscience, House Ear Institute , 2100 West 3rd Street, Los Angeles, California 90057
1 shared publication- Justin M. Aronoff
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 901 S 6th St., Champaign, IL 61820, USA
1 shared publication - Leonid M. Litvak
Advanced Bionics Corporation, Sylmar, California 91342, USA
1 shared publication Monica Padilla
Department of Communication and Auditory Neuroscience, House Research Institute, 2100 West 3rd Street, Los Angeles, CA 90057, USA
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 15 July 2013
- Published by Acoustical Society of America (ASA) in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Vol. 134 (2) , EL217-EL222
The development of a modified spectral ripple test
Poor spectral resolution can be a limiting factor for hearing impaired listeners, particularly for complex listening tasks such as speech understanding in noise. Spectral ripple tests are commonly used to measure spectral resolution, but these tests contain a number of potential confounds that can make interpretation of the results difficult. To measure spectral resolution while avoiding those confounds, a modified spectral ripple test with dynamically changing ripples was created, referred to as the spectral-temporally modulated ripple test (SMRT). This paper describes the SMRT and provides evidence that it is sensitive to changes in spectral resolution.
- 15 July 2013
- Published by Acoustical Society of America (ASA) in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Vol. 134 (2) , EL217-EL222
The development of a modified spectral ripple test
Poor spectral resolution can be a limiting factor for hearing impaired listeners, particularly for complex listening tasks such as speech understanding in noise. Spectral ripple tests are commonly used to measure spectral resolution, but these tests contain a number of potential confounds that can make interpretation of the results difficult. To measure spectral resolution while avoiding those confounds, a modified spectral ripple test with dynamically changing ripples was created, referred to as the spectral-temporally modulated ripple test (SMRT). This paper describes the SMRT and provides evidence that it is sensitive to changes in spectral resolution.
- 1 April 2013
- Published by Elsevier in Hearing Research
- Vol. 298, 109-116
Masking patterns for monopolar and phantom electrode stimulation in cochlear implants
- 1 April 2013
- Published by Elsevier in Hearing Research
- Vol. 298, 109-116
Masking patterns for monopolar and phantom electrode stimulation in cochlear implants
- 1 February 2012
- Published by Elsevier in Hearing Research
- Vol. 284 (1-2) , 16-24
Reducing current spread using current focusing in cochlear implant users
- 1 February 2012
- Published by Elsevier in Hearing Research
- Vol. 284 (1-2) , 16-24
Reducing current spread using current focusing in cochlear implant users
- 1 September 2011
- Published by Acoustical Society of America (ASA) in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Vol. 130 (3) , 1559-1566
Discrimination between sequential and simultaneous virtual channels with electrical hearing
In cochlear implants (CIs), simultaneous or sequential stimulation of adjacent electrodes can produce intermediate pitch percepts between those of the component electrodes. However, it is unclear whether simultaneous and sequential virtual channels (VCs) can be discriminated. In this study, CI users were asked to discriminate simultaneous and sequential VCs; discrimination was measured for monopolar (MP) and bipolar + 1 stimulation (BP + 1), i.e., relatively broad and focused stimulation modes. For sequential VCs, the interpulse interval (IPI) varied between 0.0 and 1.8 ms. All stimuli were presented at comfortably loud, loudness-balanced levels at a 250 pulse per second per electrode (ppse) stimulation rate. On average, CI subjects were able to reliably discriminate between sequential and simultaneous VCs. While there was no significant effect of IPI or stimulation mode on VC discrimination, some subjects exhibited better VC discrimination with BP + 1 stimulation. Subjects’ discrimination between sequential and simultaneous VCs was correlated with electrode discrimination, suggesting that spatial selectivity may influence perception of sequential VCs. To maintain equal loudness, sequential VC amplitudes were nearly double those of simultaneous VCs, presumably resulting in a broader spread of excitation. These results suggest that perceptual differences between simultaneous and sequential VCs might be explained by differences in the spread of excitation.
- 1 September 2011
- Published by Acoustical Society of America (ASA) in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Vol. 130 (3) , 1559-1566
Discrimination between sequential and simultaneous virtual channels with electrical hearing
In cochlear implants (CIs), simultaneous or sequential stimulation of adjacent electrodes can produce intermediate pitch percepts between those of the component electrodes. However, it is unclear whether simultaneous and sequential virtual channels (VCs) can be discriminated. In this study, CI users were asked to discriminate simultaneous and sequential VCs; discrimination was measured for monopolar (MP) and bipolar + 1 stimulation (BP + 1), i.e., relatively broad and focused stimulation modes. For sequential VCs, the interpulse interval (IPI) varied between 0.0 and 1.8 ms. All stimuli were presented at comfortably loud, loudness-balanced levels at a 250 pulse per second per electrode (ppse) stimulation rate. On average, CI subjects were able to reliably discriminate between sequential and simultaneous VCs. While there was no significant effect of IPI or stimulation mode on VC discrimination, some subjects exhibited better VC discrimination with BP + 1 stimulation. Subjects’ discrimination between sequential and simultaneous VCs was correlated with electrode discrimination, suggesting that spatial selectivity may influence perception of sequential VCs. To maintain equal loudness, sequential VC amplitudes were nearly double those of simultaneous VCs, presumably resulting in a broader spread of excitation. These results suggest that perceptual differences between simultaneous and sequential VCs might be explained by differences in the spread of excitation.
- 1 August 2009
- Published by Elsevier in Hearing Research
- Vol. 254 (1-2) , 34-41
Virtual channel discrimination is improved by current focusing in cochlear implant recipients
- 1 August 2009
- Published by Elsevier in Hearing Research
- Vol. 254 (1-2) , 34-41
Virtual channel discrimination is improved by current focusing in cochlear implant recipients
- 18 July 2008
- Published by Acoustical Society of America (ASA) in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Vol. 124 (2) , EL21-EL27
Effects of modulation wave shape on modulation frequency discrimination with electrical hearing
Amplitude modulations of pulsitile stimulation can be used to convey pitch information to cochlear implant users. One variable in designing cochlear implant speech processors is the choice of modulation waveform used to convey pitch information. Modulation frequency discrimination thresholds were measured for 100Hz modulations with four waveforms (sine, sawtooth, a sharpened sawtooth, and square). Just-noticeable differences (JNDs) were similar for all but the square waveform, which often produced larger JNDs. The results suggest that a sine, sawtooth, and sharpened sawtooth waveforms are likely to provide similar pitch discrimination within a speech processing strategy.
- 18 July 2008
- Published by Acoustical Society of America (ASA) in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Vol. 124 (2) , EL21-EL27
Effects of modulation wave shape on modulation frequency discrimination with electrical hearing
Amplitude modulations of pulsitile stimulation can be used to convey pitch information to cochlear implant users. One variable in designing cochlear implant speech processors is the choice of modulation waveform used to convey pitch information. Modulation frequency discrimination thresholds were measured for 100Hz modulations with four waveforms (sine, sawtooth, a sharpened sawtooth, and square). Just-noticeable differences (JNDs) were similar for all but the square waveform, which often produced larger JNDs. The results suggest that a sine, sawtooth, and sharpened sawtooth waveforms are likely to provide similar pitch discrimination within a speech processing strategy.