Lars Morawietz

Background: Microfracture is a first-line treatment option for cartilage repair. In microfracture, subchondral mesenchymal cortico-spongious progenitor cells (CSP) enter the defect and form cartilage repair tissue. The aim of our study was to investigate the effects of joint disease conditions on the in vitro chondrogenesis of human CSP. Methods: CSP were harvested from the subchondral bone marrow. CSP characterization was performed by analysis of cell surface antigen pattern and by assessing the chondrogenic, osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation potential, histologically. To assess the effect of synovial fluid (SF) on chondrogenesis of CSP, micro-masses were stimulated with SF from healthy (ND), osteoarthritis (OA) and rheumatoid arthritis donors (RA) without transforming growth factor beta 3. Results: CSP showed the typical cell surface antigen pattern known from mesenchymal stem cells and were capable of osteogenic, adipogenic and chondrogenic differentiation. In micro-masses stimulated with SF, histological staining as well as gene expression analysis of typical chondrogenic marker genes showed that SF from ND and OA induced the chondrogenic marker genes aggrecan, types II and IX collagen, cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (COMP) and link protein, compared to controls not treated with SF. In contrast, the supplementation with SF from RA donors decreased the expression of aggrecan, type II collagen, COMP and link protein, compared to CSP treated with SF from ND or OA. Conclusion: These results suggest that in RA, SF may impair cartilage repair by subchondral mesenchymal progenitor cells in microfracture, while in OA, SF may has no negative, but a delaying effect on the cartilage matrix formation.

In esophageal neoplasms, the histopathologic differentiation between Barrett’s esophagus with or without intraepithelial neoplasia and adenocarcinoma is often challenging. Immunohistochemistry might help to differentiate between these lesions. The expression of CDX2, LI-cadherin, mucin 2 (MUC2), blood group 8 (BG8, Lewis^y), claudin-2, and villin was investigated in normal gastroesophageal (n = 23) and in Barrett’s (n = 17) mucosa, in low-grade (n = 12) and high-grade (n = 9) intraepithelial neoplasia (IEN) as well as in esophageal adenocarcinoma (n = 16), using immunohistochemistry. For CDX2 and LI-cadherin, the immunoreactivity score was highest in IEN while for MUC2, BG8, and villin, it dropped gradually from Barrett’s via IEN to adenocarcinoma, and expression of Claudin-2 was only weak and focal in all lesions. The expression of MUC2 and LI-cadherin differed significantly between all examined lesions except between low-grade and high-grade IEN. MUC2 and LI-cadherin are useful immunohistochemical markers for the differentiation between normal glandular mucosa, Barrett’s mucosa, IEN, and invasive carcinoma of the esophagus; however, none of the examined markers was helpful for the differentiation between low-grade and high-grade IEN.

For the clinical diagnosis and appropriate therapy of patients with cancer of unknown primary (CUP), biopsies of the tumor metastases are generally examined histopathologically and by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Gene expression profiling (GEP) is a new diagnostic technique that might further contribute to tumor specification. Biopsies of 43 CUP cases underwent a retrospective central histopathological and immunohistochemical review and centrally performed GEP using CupPrint^TM. Two samples could not be evaluated by IHC due to small biopsy size or loss of immunoreactivity. One of these and 17 other samples were not suited for GEP due to RNA degradation. In 13 out of the remaining 24 cases (54%), the same primary was proposed by IHC and GEP and was supported by the clinical findings, furthermore leading to the doubtless identification of the primary in four out of these. In seven cases, there was discordance between IHC and GEP, with the clinical picture being more in line with IHC in three and with GEP in four cases. Four cases had to remain undecided because the primary tumors suggested by IHC and GEP were not supported. In conclusion, overlap between IHC and GEP results and the clinical presentation was noted in the majority of those true CUP cases that were evaluable with both techniques. Therefore, GEP can be a complementary diagnostic technique assisting immunohistochemical profiling of cancer biopsies with unknown primary.

Introduction: T-helper (Th) lymphocytes are critically required for the pathogenesis of glucose-6-phosphate isomerase (G6PI)-induced arthritis, but neither the G6PI epitopes recognized by arthritogenic T cells nor their pathogenic effector functions have been fully elucidated to date. We aimed at identifying arthritogenic G6PI peptides. Methods: We used a library of overlapping peptides spanning the entire G6PI sequence to identify the epitopes recognized by G6PI-specific Th cells. Immunodominant peptides were then used to immunize mice. Arthritis development was evaluated clinically and histologically. The humoral and cellular immune responses upon peptide immunization were analyzed by ELISA and multiparameter flow cytometry, respectively. Results: We identified six immunodominant T-cell epitopes in DBA/1 mice, of which three are arthritogenic. One of these peptides (G6PI_469–483) is identical in man and mice. Immunization with this peptide induces arthritis, which is less severe and of shorter duration than arthritis induced by immunization with full-length G6PI. Upon immunization with either G6PI or peptide, the antigen-specific Th cells produce IL-17, RANKL, IFNγ and TNFα. Conclusions: We identified immunodominant and arthritogenic epitopes of G6PI. Not all immunodominant peptides are arthritogenic. This is the first description of arthritis induced by immunization with a self-peptide in mice.

Aims:  The histopathological diagnosis of infection in periprosthetic tissue from loose total joint endoprosthesis has been the subject of controversy. The aim was to define a histological criterion that would best differentiate between aseptic and septic endoprosthesis loosening.Methods and results:  Neutrophilic granulocytes (NG) were enumerated histopathologically in 147 periprosthetic membranes obtained from aseptic and septic revision surgery, using periodic acid–Schiff (PAS) stains and CD15 immunohistochemistry. Cell numbers were correlated with the results of microbiological culture and the clinical diagnoses. Using receiver–operating characteristics, an optimized threshold was found at 23 NG in 10 high‐power fields (HPF). Using this threshold, histopathological examination had a sensitivity of 73% and specificity of 95% when compared with microbiological diagnosis (area under the curve 0.881), and a sensitivity of 77% and specificity of 97% when compared with clinical diagnosis (area under the curve 0.891).Conclusions:  We therefore recommend a counting algorithm with a threshold of ≥23 NG in 10 HPF (visual field diameter 0.625 mm) for the histopathological diagnosis of septic endoprosthesis loosening. If the enumeration of NG is difficult in conventional haematoxylin and eosin‐stained slides, CD15 immunohistochemistry should be performed, whereas the PAS stain has not proven to be helpful .

Introduction: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) leads to progressive destruction of articular cartilage. This study aimed to disclose major mechanisms of antirheumatic drug action on human chondrocytes and to reveal marker and pharmacological target genes that are involved in cartilage dysfunction and regeneration. Methods: An interactive in vitro cultivation system composed of human chondrocyte alginate cultures and conditioned supernatant of SV40 T-antigen immortalised human synovial fibroblasts was used. Chondrocyte alginate cultures were stimulated with supernatant of RA synovial fibroblasts, of healthy donor synovial fibroblasts, and of RA synovial fibroblasts that have been antirheumatically treated with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) (azathioprine, gold sodium thiomalate, chloroquine phosphate, and methotrexate), nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (piroxicam and diclofenac), or steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (SAIDs) (methylprednisolone and prednisolone). Chondrocyte gene expression profile was analysed using microarrays. Real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay were performed for validation of microarray data. Results: Genome-wide expression analysis revealed 110 RA-related genes in human chondrocytes: expression of catabolic mediators (inflammation, cytokines/chemokines, and matrix degradation) was induced, and expression of anabolic mediators (matrix synthesis and proliferation/differentiation) was repressed. Potential marker genes to define and influence cartilage/chondrocyte integrity and regeneration were determined and include already established genes (COX-2, CXCR-4, IL-1RN, IL-6/8, MMP-10/12, and TLR-2) and novel genes (ADORA2A, BCL2-A1, CTGF, CXCR-7, CYR-61, HSD11B-1, IL-23A, MARCKS, MXRA-5, NDUFA4L2, NR4A3, SMS, STS, TNFAIP-2, and TXNIP). Antirheumatic treatment with SAIDs showed complete and strong reversion of RA-related gene expression in human chondrocytes, whereas treatment with NSAIDs and the DMARD chloroquine phosphate had only moderate to minor effects. Treatment with the DMARDs azathioprine, gold sodium thiomalate, and methotrexate efficiently reverted chondrocyte RA-related gene expression toward the 'healthy' level. Pathways of cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction, transforming growth factor-beta/Toll-like receptor/Jak-STAT (signal transducer and activator of transcription) signalling and extracellular matrix receptor interaction were targeted by antirheumatics. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that RA-relevant stimuli result in the molecular activation of catabolic and inflammatory processes in human chondrocytes that are reverted by antirheumatic treatment. Candidate genes that evolved in this study for new therapeutic approaches include suppression of specific immune responses (COX-2, IL-23A, and IL-6) and activation of cartilage regeneration (CTGF and CYR-61).

The synovial membrane is a site where many diseases with different etiologies can become manifest. Tumors and storage diseases are some of the rare conditions, whereas crystal deposition diseases, acute bacterial infections and in particular chronic uncharacteristic synovitis are frequently encountered. The latter present a diagnostic problem, because they can barely be assigned to concrete diagnoses. This report will give an overview of the differential diagnosis of joint diseases and will focus on the so-called synovitis score as a tool for the systematic evaluation of chronic uncharacteristic synovitis, providing a possibility to differentiate between degenerative and rheumatic synovitis with a specificity of 60.5% and a sensitivity of 95.5%.

The correct diagnosis of a prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is crucial for adequate surgical treatment. The detection may be a challenge since presentation and preoperative tests are not always obvious and precise. This prospective study was performed to evaluate a variety of pre- and intraoperative investigations. Furthermore a detailed evaluation of concordance of each preoperative diagnosis was performed, together with a final diagnosis to assess the accuracy of the pre-operative assumption of PJI.

Histopathological examination of synovial specimens can contribute to the diagnosis of chronic joint diseases. A so-called synovitis score has been introduced as a standardised grading system, based on the semi-quantitative evaluation of the three determining features of chronic synovitis: enlargement of synovial lining, density of synovial stroma and inflammatory infiltrate, giving a score between 0 and 9. The present study examines the reliability of this procedure by comparison with exact measurements using computer-assisted image analysis (CAIA). Seventy-one synovial specimens from patients with osteoarthritis (OA, n = 22), psoriatic arthritis (PsA, n = 7), rheumatoid arthritis (RA, n = 35) and from a control group (Co, n = 7) were evaluated using both the synovitis score and CAIA. The measurements were transformed to semi-quantitative values analogous to the synovitis score. The differences between the transformed CAIA scores and the pathologist’s scores were 0 or +/−1 in 40 cases, whereas in 31 cases the difference was greater than 1 (correlation coefficient r = 0.725). The CAIA scores differed significantly between Co and RA cases (p = 0.000) as well as between OA and RA (p = 0.000). We conclude that the synovitis score was validated by CAIA and can be regarded a reliable grading system that contributes to the diagnostic procedure of chronic joint inflammation.