Cynthia M. Connine
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Cynthia M. Connine has a total of 10 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Larissa J. Ranbom
Department of Psychology , Binghamton University, SUNY , Binghamton, NY, USA
2 shared publications- D. Titone
Brandeis University
1 shared publication David J. Patterson
State University of New York
1 shared publicationDavid Patterson
Psych. Dept., State Univ. of New York at Binghamton, Binghamton, NY 13902
1 shared publicationDawn G. Blasko
1 shared publicationDebra Titone
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 1 February 2011
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Language and Cognitive Processes
- Vol. 26 (2) , 236-261
Silent letters are activated in spoken word recognition
Four experiments are reported that investigate processing of mispronounced words for which the phonological form is inconsistent with the graphemic form (words spelled with silent letters). Words produced as mispronunciations that are consistent with their spelling were more confusable with their citation form counterpart than mispronunciations that are inconsistent with their spelling in a same/different task. Cross-modal repetition priming for orthographically supported productions and their citation form counterparts was equivalent; in contrast, orthographically unsupported productions showed reduced priming relative to the citation form. The findings are discussed in light of models of cross-modal interaction between spoken and written lexical representations. We argue that the results support a restructuring model where reading promotes development of a phonological representation used during spoken word recognition.
- 1 February 2011
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Language and Cognitive Processes
- Vol. 26 (2) , 236-261
Silent letters are activated in spoken word recognition
Four experiments are reported that investigate processing of mispronounced words for which the phonological form is inconsistent with the graphemic form (words spelled with silent letters). Words produced as mispronunciations that are consistent with their spelling were more confusable with their citation form counterpart than mispronunciations that are inconsistent with their spelling in a same/different task. Cross-modal repetition priming for orthographically supported productions and their citation form counterparts was equivalent; in contrast, orthographically unsupported productions showed reduced priming relative to the citation form. The findings are discussed in light of models of cross-modal interaction between spoken and written lexical representations. We argue that the results support a restructuring model where reading promotes development of a phonological representation used during spoken word recognition.
- 31 October 2009
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Memory and Language
- Vol. 61 (3) , 412-422
Perceptual learning of co-articulation in speech
- 31 October 2009
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Memory and Language
- Vol. 61 (3) , 412-422
Perceptual learning of co-articulation in speech
- 1 April 2008
- Published by Springer Nature in Perception & Psychophysics
- Vol. 70 (3) , 403-411
Processing variant forms in spoken word recognition: The role of variant frequency
Recognition of a spoken word phonological variant—schwa vowel deletion (e.g., corporate ? corp’rate)— was investigated in vowel detection (absent/present) and syllable number judgment (two or three...
- 1 April 2008
- Published by Springer Nature in Perception & Psychophysics
- Vol. 70 (3) , 403-411
Processing variant forms in spoken word recognition: The role of variant frequency
Recognition of a spoken word phonological variant—schwa vowel deletion (e.g., corporate ? corp’rate)— was investigated in vowel detection (absent/present) and syllable number judgment (two or three...
- Open Access
- 1 December 2004
- Published by Springer Nature in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
- Vol. 11 (6) , 1084-1089
It’s not what you hear but how often you hear it: On the neglected role of phonological variant frequency in auditory word recognition
Recognition of a frequently heard spoken word variant in American English (flapping) was investigated in a phoneme identification experiment. Listeners identified the initial segment ( b or p) of...
- 1 December 2004
- Published by Springer Nature in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
- Vol. 11 (6) , 1084-1089
Open AccessIt’s not what you hear but how often you hear it: On the neglected role of phonological variant frequency in auditory word recognition
Recognition of a frequently heard spoken word variant in American English (flapping) was investigated in a phoneme identification experiment. Listeners identified the initial segment ( b or p) of...
- 1 May 2004
- Published by Acoustical Society of America (ASA) in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Vol. 115 (5_Suppleme) , 2396
Production frequency effects in perception of phonological variation
- 1 May 2004
- Published by Acoustical Society of America (ASA) in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Vol. 115 (5_Suppleme) , 2396
Production frequency effects in perception of phonological variation
- 1 February 2002
- Published by Springer Nature in Perception & Psychophysics
- Vol. 64 (2) , 208-219
Rule-governed missing information in spoken word recognition: Schwa vowel deletion
Vowel deletion is a phonological process in which an unstressed /∂/ (schwa) vowel is deleted during pronunciation. In Experiment 1, vowel-deleted and vowel-reduced versions of two- and three-syllable...
- 1 February 2002
- Published by Springer Nature in Perception & Psychophysics
- Vol. 64 (2) , 208-219
Rule-governed missing information in spoken word recognition: Schwa vowel deletion
Vowel deletion is a phonological process in which an unstressed /∂/ (schwa) vowel is deleted during pronunciation. In Experiment 1, vowel-deleted and vowel-reduced versions of two- and three-syllable...
- 1 May 2001
- Published by Acoustical Society of America (ASA) in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Vol. 109 (5_Suppleme) , 2445
Variant frequency in American English flap production
- 1 May 2001
- Published by Acoustical Society of America (ASA) in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Vol. 109 (5_Suppleme) , 2445
Variant frequency in American English flap production
- 1 April 2000
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Behavioral and Brain Sciences
- Vol. 23 (3) , 328
Inhibition
We consider the motivation for the principle of bottom-up priority and its consequence for information flow in Merge. The relationship between the bottom-up priority rule and inhibitory effects is also discussed, along with data that demonstrate inhibitory influences in phoneme monitoring.
- 1 April 2000
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Behavioral and Brain Sciences
- Vol. 23 (3) , 328
Inhibition
We consider the motivation for the principle of bottom-up priority and its consequence for information flow in Merge. The relationship between the bottom-up priority rule and inhibitory effects is also discussed, along with data that demonstrate inhibitory influences in phoneme monitoring.
- 1 November 1997
- Published by Springer Nature in Psychological Research
- Vol. 60 (4) , 251-263
Syllabification strategies in spoken word processing: Evidence from phonological priming
Two experiments were conducted to examine which of two linguistic syllabification strategies, the maximal onset principle and the stress principle, is operative in auditory word recognition. Test stimuli consisted of bisyllabic words and nonwords containing two medial consonants, the second of which had a potential attachment to either the coda of the first syllable or the onset of the second syllable (e.g., MARKET). A phonological priming paradigm was used in which prime stimuli were artificially syllabified by inserting silence. In the critical conditions, the prime was consistent with the maximal onset principle (e.g., MAR-KET) or with the stress principle (e.g., MARK-ET). The results suggested that listeners prefer to attach a medial consonant to the onset of a syllable in a way that is characterized by the maximal onset principle. The results also indicate some use of the stress principle.
- 1 November 1997
- Published by Springer Nature in Psychological Research
- Vol. 60 (4) , 251-263
Syllabification strategies in spoken word processing: Evidence from phonological priming
Two experiments were conducted to examine which of two linguistic syllabification strategies, the maximal onset principle and the stress principle, is operative in auditory word recognition. Test stimuli consisted of bisyllabic words and nonwords containing two medial consonants, the second of which had a potential attachment to either the coda of the first syllable or the onset of the second syllable (e.g., MARKET). A phonological priming paradigm was used in which prime stimuli were artificially syllabified by inserting silence. In the critical conditions, the prime was consistent with the maximal onset principle (e.g., MAR-KET) or with the stress principle (e.g., MARK-ET). The results suggested that listeners prefer to attach a medial consonant to the onset of a syllable in a way that is characterized by the maximal onset principle. The results also indicate some use of the stress principle.