John W. B. Hershey

Protein synthesis involves a complex machinery comprising numerous proteins and RNAs joined by noncovalent interactions. Its function is to link long chains of amino acids into proteins with precise sequences as encoded by the genome. Regulation of protein synthesis, called translational control, occurs both at a global level and at specific messenger RNAs (mRNAs). To understand how translation is regulated, knowledge of the molecular structures and kinetic interactions of its components is needed. This review focuses on the targets of translational control and the mechanisms employed.

We introduce here the inaugural issue of the new scientific journal Translation. The overarching aim of this endeavor is to establish a new forum for a broad spectrum of research in the area of protein synthesis in living systems ranging from structural biochemical, evolutionary and regulatory aspects of translation to the fundamental questions related to post-translational control of somatic phenomena in multicellular organisms including human behavior and health. The journal will publish high quality research articles, provide novel insights, ask provocative questions and discuss new hypothesis in this emerging field. Launching a new journal is always challenging. We hope that strong criteria for the peer-review process, transparency of the editorial policy and the scientific reputation of its founders, editors and editorial board assure the success of Translation; and we rely on continuing support of the scientific community in all aspects of the journal's activity.

Translational control plays an essential role in the regulation of gene expression. It is especially important in defining the proteome, maintaining homeostasis, and controlling cell proliferation, growth, and development. Numerous disease states result from aberrant regulation of protein synthesis, so understanding the molecular basis and mechanisms of translational control is critical. Here we outline the pathway of protein synthesis, with special emphasis on the initiation phase, and identify areas needing further clarification. Features of translational control are described together with numerous specific examples, and we discuss prospects for future conceptual advances.

Comment on: Henderson A, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011; 108:6415-9.

The delivery of Met-tRNA _i to the 40S ribosomal subunit is thought to occur by way of a ternary complex (TC) comprising eIF2, GTP and Met-tRNA _i . We have generated from purified human proteins a stable multifactor complex (MFC) comprising eIF1, eIF2, eIF3 and eIF5, similar to the MFC reported in yeast and plants. A human MFC free of the ribosome also is detected in HeLa cells and rabbit reticulocytes, indicating that it exists in vivo . In vitro , the MFC-GTP binds Met-tRNA _i and delivers the tRNA to the ribosome at the same rate as the TC. However, MFC-GDP shows a greatly reduced affinity to Met-tRNA _i compared to that for eIF2-GDP, suggesting that MFC components may play a role in the release of eIF2-GDP from the ribosome following AUG recognition. Since an MFC–Met-tRNA _i complex is detected in cell lysates, it may be responsible for Met-tRNA _i –40S ribosome binding in vivo , possibly together with the TC. However, the MFC protein components also bind individually to 40S ribosomes, creating the possibility that Met-tRNA _i might bind directly to such 40S-factor complexes. Thus, three distinct pathways for Met-tRNA _i delivery to the 40S ribosomal subunit are identified, but which one predominates in vivo remains to be elucidated.

Within the field of eukaryotic protein synthesis, one factor remained putative for decades: eukaryotic translation initiation factor (eIF) 5A. Because eIF5A is an essential protein required for cell proliferation, and one easily targeted by inhibitors, identifying its role in the cell remains important and urgent. Recent reports support early findings that eIF5A stimulates protein synthesis and newly assign the factor a role in elongation rather than initiation. Here we show that eIF5A directly stimulates protein synthesis on native mRNAs, that rapid depletion of eIF5A in vivo immediately leads to a 2-fold inhibition of protein synthesis, and that both the immediate and lasting effects of eIF5A depletion are a reduction in polysome size concomitant with eIF5A depletion. Addition of purified eIF5A to a depleted lysate results in a roughly 2-fold stimulation of protein synthesis in vitro, a result consistent with both older methionyl–puromycin synthesis data and more recently published findings. We find that although eIF5A is not required for protein synthesis, it stimulates the process by about 2- to 3-fold. Our data, along with other published results, reinforce the conclusion that eIF5A stimulates protein synthesis with one important difference: Polysome profiles observed immediately after eIF5A depletion are diagnostic for a role in initiation. This discrepancy is discussed.