Sarah M. Camhi
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Sarah M. Camhi has a total of 5 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Marcia L. Stefanick
Department of Medicine, Stanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA
2 shared publications- Peter Todd Katzmarzyk
Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, LA, USA
2 shared publications Deborah R. Young
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Maryland School of Public Health, College Park, Maryland, USA
1 shared publicationDeborah Rohm Young
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Maryland College Park, MD 20742, USA
1 shared publicationPaul M. Ridker
Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 1 August 2011
- Published by Elsevier in The Journal of Pediatrics
- Vol. 159 (2) , 303-307
Prevalence of Cardiometabolic Risk Factor Clustering and Body Mass Index in Adolescents
- 1 August 2011
- Published by Elsevier in The Journal of Pediatrics
- Vol. 159 (2) , 303-307
Prevalence of Cardiometabolic Risk Factor Clustering and Body Mass Index in Adolescents
- Open Access
Metabolic Syndrome and Changes in Body Fat From a Low‐fat Diet and/or Exercise Randomized Controlled Trial
It is difficult to identify the successful component(s) related to changes in metabolic syndrome (MetS) from lifestyle interventions: the weight loss, the behavior change, or the combination. The purpose of this study is to determine the effects of a weight‐stable randomized controlled trial of low‐fat diet and exercise, alone and in combination, on MetS. Men (n = 179) and postmenopausal women (n = 149) with elevated low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL‐C) and low high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL‐C) were randomized into a 1‐year, weight‐stable trial with four treatment groups: control (C), diet (D), exercise (E), or diet plus exercise (D+E). MetS was defined using a continuous score. Changes in MetS score (ΔMetS) were compared between groups using analysis of covariance, stratified by gender and using two models, with and without baseline and change in percent body fat (ΔBF) as a covariate. In men, ΔMetS was higher for D vs. C (P = 0.04), D+E vs. C (P = 0.0002), and D+E vs. E (P = 0.02). For women, ΔMetS was greater for D vs. C (P = 0.045), E vs. C (P = 0.02), and D+E vs. C (P = 0.004). After adjusting for ΔBF, all differences between groups were attenuated and no longer significant. ΔMetS were associated with ΔBF for both men (P < 0.0001) and women (P = 0.004). After adjustment for ΔBF, low‐fat diet alone and in combination with exercise had no effect on MetS. The key component for MetS from low‐fat diet and/or increased physical activity appears to be body fat loss.
Open AccessMetabolic Syndrome and Changes in Body Fat From a Low‐fat Diet and/or Exercise Randomized Controlled Trial
It is difficult to identify the successful component(s) related to changes in metabolic syndrome (MetS) from lifestyle interventions: the weight loss, the behavior change, or the combination. The purpose of this study is to determine the effects of a weight‐stable randomized controlled trial of low‐fat diet and exercise, alone and in combination, on MetS. Men (n = 179) and postmenopausal women (n = 149) with elevated low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL‐C) and low high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL‐C) were randomized into a 1‐year, weight‐stable trial with four treatment groups: control (C), diet (D), exercise (E), or diet plus exercise (D+E). MetS was defined using a continuous score. Changes in MetS score (ΔMetS) were compared between groups using analysis of covariance, stratified by gender and using two models, with and without baseline and change in percent body fat (ΔBF) as a covariate. In men, ΔMetS was higher for D vs. C (P = 0.04), D+E vs. C (P = 0.0002), and D+E vs. E (P = 0.02). For women, ΔMetS was greater for D vs. C (P = 0.045), E vs. C (P = 0.02), and D+E vs. C (P = 0.004). After adjusting for ΔBF, all differences between groups were attenuated and no longer significant. ΔMetS were associated with ΔBF for both men (P < 0.0001) and women (P = 0.004). After adjustment for ΔBF, low‐fat diet alone and in combination with exercise had no effect on MetS. The key component for MetS from low‐fat diet and/or increased physical activity appears to be body fat loss.
- 1 January 2010
- Published by Elsevier in Metabolism
- Vol. 59 (1) , 54-61
Changes in C-reactive protein from low-fat diet and/or physical activity in men and women with and without metabolic syndrome
- 1 January 2010
- Published by Elsevier in Metabolism
- Vol. 59 (1) , 54-61
Changes in C-reactive protein from low-fat diet and/or physical activity in men and women with and without metabolic syndrome
- 14 December 2009
- Published by Elsevier in Metabolism
- Vol. 59 (3) , 455-456
Potential mechanisms linking low-fat diet to inflammation and metabolic syndrome
- 14 December 2009
- Published by Elsevier in Metabolism
- Vol. 59 (3) , 455-456
Potential mechanisms linking low-fat diet to inflammation and metabolic syndrome