Mikhail Kashlev
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Mikhail Kashlev has a total of 20 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Maria L. Kireeva
VirIntel, LLC, Gaithersburg, MD 20877, USA
5 shared publications Natalia Komissarova
From the NCI-Frederick Cancer Research and Development Center, Frederick, Maryland 21702-1201
3 shared publicationsCeline Walmacq
NCI Center for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD 21702, USA
2 shared publicationsJeffrey N. Strathern
NCI Center for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD, 21702, USA
2 shared publicationsLucyna Lubkowska
NCI Center for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD, 21702, USA
2 shared publications- Alan Cm Cheung
School of Biochemistry, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 7 June 2012
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Biophysics
- Vol. 5 (1) , 1-18
Molecular dynamics and mutational analysis of the catalytic and translocation cycle of RNA polymerase
Background: During elongation, multi-subunit RNA polymerases (RNAPs) cycle between phosphodiester bond formation and nucleic acid translocation. In the conformation associated with catalysis, the mobile “trigger loop” of the catalytic subunit closes on the nucleoside triphosphate (NTP) substrate. Closing of the trigger loop is expected to exclude water from the active site, and dehydration may contribute to catalysis and fidelity. In the absence of a NTP substrate in the active site, the trigger loop opens, which may enable translocation. Another notable structural element of the RNAP catalytic center is the “bridge helix” that separates the active site from downstream DNA. The bridge helix may participate in translocation by bending against the RNA/DNA hybrid to induce RNAP forward movement and to vacate the active site for the next NTP loading. The transition between catalytic and translocation conformations of RNAP is not evident from static crystallographic snapshots in which macromolecular motions may be restrained by crystal packing. Results: All atom molecular dynamics simulations of Thermus thermophilus (Tt) RNAP reveal flexible hinges, located within the two helices at the base of the trigger loop, and two glycine hinges clustered near the N-terminal end of the bridge helix. As simulation progresses, these hinges adopt distinct conformations in the closed and open trigger loop structures. A number of residues (described as “switch” residues) trade atomic contacts (ion pairs or hydrogen bonds) in response to changes in hinge orientation. In vivo phenotypes and in vitro activities rendered by mutations in the hinge and switch residues in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Sc) RNAP II support the importance of conformational changes predicted from simulations in catalysis and translocation. During simulation, the elongation complex with an open trigger loop spontaneously translocates forward relative to the elongation complex with a closed trigger loop. Conclusions: Switching between catalytic and translocating RNAP forms involves closing and opening of the trigger loop and long-range conformational changes in the atomic contacts of amino acid side chains, some located at a considerable distance from the trigger loop and active site. Trigger loop closing appears to support chemistry and the fidelity of RNA synthesis. Trigger loop opening and limited bridge helix bending appears to promote forward nucleic acid translocation.
- 7 June 2012
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Biophysics
- Vol. 5 (1) , 1-18
Open AccessMolecular dynamics and mutational analysis of the catalytic and translocation cycle of RNA polymerase
Background: During elongation, multi-subunit RNA polymerases (RNAPs) cycle between phosphodiester bond formation and nucleic acid translocation. In the conformation associated with catalysis, the mobile “trigger loop” of the catalytic subunit closes on the nucleoside triphosphate (NTP) substrate. Closing of the trigger loop is expected to exclude water from the active site, and dehydration may contribute to catalysis and fidelity. In the absence of a NTP substrate in the active site, the trigger loop opens, which may enable translocation. Another notable structural element of the RNAP catalytic center is the “bridge helix” that separates the active site from downstream DNA. The bridge helix may participate in translocation by bending against the RNA/DNA hybrid to induce RNAP forward movement and to vacate the active site for the next NTP loading. The transition between catalytic and translocation conformations of RNAP is not evident from static crystallographic snapshots in which macromolecular motions may be restrained by crystal packing. Results: All atom molecular dynamics simulations of Thermus thermophilus (Tt) RNAP reveal flexible hinges, located within the two helices at the base of the trigger loop, and two glycine hinges clustered near the N-terminal end of the bridge helix. As simulation progresses, these hinges adopt distinct conformations in the closed and open trigger loop structures. A number of residues (described as “switch” residues) trade atomic contacts (ion pairs or hydrogen bonds) in response to changes in hinge orientation. In vivo phenotypes and in vitro activities rendered by mutations in the hinge and switch residues in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Sc) RNAP II support the importance of conformational changes predicted from simulations in catalysis and translocation. During simulation, the elongation complex with an open trigger loop spontaneously translocates forward relative to the elongation complex with a closed trigger loop. Conclusions: Switching between catalytic and translocating RNAP forms involves closing and opening of the trigger loop and long-range conformational changes in the atomic contacts of amino acid side chains, some located at a considerable distance from the trigger loop and active site. Trigger loop closing appears to support chemistry and the fidelity of RNA synthesis. Trigger loop opening and limited bridge helix bending appears to promote forward nucleic acid translocation.
- 1 April 2012
- Published by Elsevier in Molecular Cell
- Vol. 46 (1) , 18-29
Mechanism of Translesion Transcription by RNA Polymerase II and Its Role in Cellular Resistance to DNA Damage
- 1 April 2012
- Published by Elsevier in Molecular Cell
- Vol. 46 (1) , 18-29
Mechanism of Translesion Transcription by RNA Polymerase II and Its Role in Cellular Resistance to DNA Damage
- Open Access
- 1 July 2009
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Vol. 284 (29) , 19601-19612
Rpb9 Subunit Controls Transcription Fidelity by Delaying NTP Sequestration in RNA Polymerase II
- 1 July 2009
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Vol. 284 (29) , 19601-19612
Open AccessRpb9 Subunit Controls Transcription Fidelity by Delaying NTP Sequestration in RNA Polymerase II
- 2 June 2009
- Published by National Academy of Sciences in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Vol. 106 (22) , 8900-8905
Mechanism of sequence-specific pausing of bacterial RNA polymerase
Sequence-specific pausing of multisubunit RNA polymerases (RNAPs) represents a rate-limiting step during transcription elongation. Pausing occurs on average every 100 bases of DNA. Several models have been proposed to explain pausing, including backtracking of the ternary elongation complex, delay of translocation of the enzyme along DNA, or a conformational change in the active site preventing formation of the phosphodiester bond. Here, we performed biochemical characterization of previously-reported pauses of Escherichia coli RNAP and found that they are not associated with backtracking or a translocation delay. Instead, the paused complex contains the 3′ end of the transcript in the active center and is capable of binding the next cognate NTP. However, bond formation occurs much slower in the paused complex compared with its fully-active counterpart. The pausing is dramatically decreased by a substitution of the base encoding the next incoming NTP and the base encoding the 3′ end of the nascent RNA, suggesting that (mis)-alignment of the 3′ end of the RNA and the incoming NTP in the active site is crucial for pausing. These pause sites are conserved between E. coli and Thermus thermophilus RNAPs, but are not recognized by Saccharomyces cerevisiae RNAP II, indicating that prokaryotic RNAPs might be more sensitive to the changes in the alignment of the nascent transcript and the substrate NTP in the active site.
- 2 June 2009
- Published by National Academy of Sciences in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Vol. 106 (22) , 8900-8905
Mechanism of sequence-specific pausing of bacterial RNA polymerase
Sequence-specific pausing of multisubunit RNA polymerases (RNAPs) represents a rate-limiting step during transcription elongation. Pausing occurs on average every 100 bases of DNA. Several models have been proposed to explain pausing, including backtracking of the ternary elongation complex, delay of translocation of the enzyme along DNA, or a conformational change in the active site preventing formation of the phosphodiester bond. Here, we performed biochemical characterization of previously-reported pauses of Escherichia coli RNAP and found that they are not associated with backtracking or a translocation delay. Instead, the paused complex contains the 3′ end of the transcript in the active center and is capable of binding the next cognate NTP. However, bond formation occurs much slower in the paused complex compared with its fully-active counterpart. The pausing is dramatically decreased by a substitution of the base encoding the next incoming NTP and the base encoding the 3′ end of the nascent RNA, suggesting that (mis)-alignment of the 3′ end of the RNA and the incoming NTP in the active site is crucial for pausing. These pause sites are conserved between E. coli and Thermus thermophilus RNAPs, but are not recognized by Saccharomyces cerevisiae RNAP II, indicating that prokaryotic RNAPs might be more sensitive to the changes in the alignment of the nascent transcript and the substrate NTP in the active site.
- Open Access
- 1 April 2002
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Vol. 277 (17) , 14501-14508
Transcription Termination: Primary Intermediates and Secondary Adducts
- 1 April 2002
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Vol. 277 (17) , 14501-14508
Open AccessTranscription Termination: Primary Intermediates and Secondary Adducts
- Open Access
- 1 March 2000
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Vol. 275 (9) , 6530-6536
The 8-Nucleotide-long RNA:DNA Hybrid Is a Primary Stability Determinant of the RNA Polymerase II Elongation Complex
- 1 March 2000
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Vol. 275 (9) , 6530-6536
Open AccessThe 8-Nucleotide-long RNA:DNA Hybrid Is a Primary Stability Determinant of the RNA Polymerase II Elongation Complex
- 8 December 1998
- Published by National Academy of Sciences in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Vol. 95 (25) , 14699-14704
Functional topography of nascent RNA in elongation intermediates of RNA polymerase
To determine the dynamics of transcript extrusion from Escherichia coli RNA polymerase (RNAP), we used degradation of the RNA by RNases T1 and A in a series of consecutive elongation complexes (ECs). In intact ECs, even extremely high doses of the RNases were unable to cut the RNA closer than 14–16 nt from the 3′ end. Our results prove that all of the cuts detected within the 14-nt zone are derived from the EC that is denatured during inactivation of the RNases. The protected zone monotonously translocates along the RNA after addition of new nucleotides to the transcript. The upstream region of the RNA heading toward the 5′ end is cleaved and dissociated from the EC, with no effect on the stability and activity of the EC. Most of the current data suggest that an 8- to 10-nt RNA⋅DNA hybrid is formed in the EC. Here, we show that an 8- to 10-nt RNA obtained by truncating the RNase-generated products further with either GreB or pyrophosphate is sufficient for the high stability and activity of the EC. This result suggests that the transcript–RNAP interaction that is required for holding the EC together can be limited to the RNA region involved in the 8- to 10-nt RNA⋅DNA hybrid.
- 8 December 1998
- Published by National Academy of Sciences in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Vol. 95 (25) , 14699-14704
Functional topography of nascent RNA in elongation intermediates of RNA polymerase
To determine the dynamics of transcript extrusion from Escherichia coli RNA polymerase (RNAP), we used degradation of the RNA by RNases T1 and A in a series of consecutive elongation complexes (ECs). In intact ECs, even extremely high doses of the RNases were unable to cut the RNA closer than 14–16 nt from the 3′ end. Our results prove that all of the cuts detected within the 14-nt zone are derived from the EC that is denatured during inactivation of the RNases. The protected zone monotonously translocates along the RNA after addition of new nucleotides to the transcript. The upstream region of the RNA heading toward the 5′ end is cleaved and dissociated from the EC, with no effect on the stability and activity of the EC. Most of the current data suggest that an 8- to 10-nt RNA⋅DNA hybrid is formed in the EC. Here, we show that an 8- to 10-nt RNA obtained by truncating the RNase-generated products further with either GreB or pyrophosphate is sufficient for the high stability and activity of the EC. This result suggests that the transcript–RNAP interaction that is required for holding the EC together can be limited to the RNA region involved in the 8- to 10-nt RNA⋅DNA hybrid.