Allan House
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Allan House has a total of 1000 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Maree Lisa Hackett
The George Institute for Global Health, Barangaroo, NSW, Australia
20 shared publications David Owens
Division of Psychological and Social Medicine, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, UK
17 shared publications- Elspeth Guthrie
University of Leeds
17 shared publications - Kate Hill
Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
15 shared publications - Louise D. Bryant
Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
13 shared publications - Trevor Andrew Sheldon
Institute of Population Health Sciences London E1 4NS Queen Mary University of London
13 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 23 October 2026
- Published by Royal College of Psychiatrists in Bjpsych Bulletin
- p. 1-3
Making up autism: can reading philosopher Ian Hacking help us with the neurodiversity and overdiagnosis debate?
Summary: Philosopher Ian Hacking noted that people respond to being placed in categories – setting up an iterative process that leads to (sometimes radical) changes in the features used to diagnose group membership. Hacking called this process making up people, and the interactions that were its underlying mechanism he called looping effects, which he saw as an important means both to advocacy and overdiagnosis. Hacking was sceptical of the idea of an autistic spectrum, not least because it carried a risk of overdiagnosing people with few symptoms. These are important messages for the current debate about diagnosis in autism.
- 23 October 2026
- Published by Royal College of Psychiatrists in Bjpsych Bulletin
- p. 1-3
Open AccessMaking up autism: can reading philosopher Ian Hacking help us with the neurodiversity and overdiagnosis debate?
Summary: Philosopher Ian Hacking noted that people respond to being placed in categories – setting up an iterative process that leads to (sometimes radical) changes in the features used to diagnose group membership. Hacking called this process making up people, and the interactions that were its underlying mechanism he called looping effects, which he saw as an important means both to advocacy and overdiagnosis. Hacking was sceptical of the idea of an autistic spectrum, not least because it carried a risk of overdiagnosing people with few symptoms. These are important messages for the current debate about diagnosis in autism.
- 22 October 2025
- Published by BMJ in BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care
- Vol. 16 (1) , 66-68
Decision-making and physician-assisted suicide: capacity assessment in the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill is inadequate
- 22 October 2025
- Published by BMJ in BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care
- Vol. 16 (1) , 66-68
Decision-making and physician-assisted suicide: capacity assessment in the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill is inadequate
- Open Access
- 1 August 2024
- Published by Royal College of Psychiatrists in The British Journal of Psychiatry
- Vol. 225 (2) , 339
New guidance for self-harm: an opportunity not to be missed: commentary, House
New guidance for self-harm: an opportunity not to be missed: commentary, House - Volume 225 Issue 2
- 1 August 2024
- Published by Royal College of Psychiatrists in The British Journal of Psychiatry
- Vol. 225 (2) , 339
Open AccessNew guidance for self-harm: an opportunity not to be missed: commentary, House
New guidance for self-harm: an opportunity not to be missed: commentary, House - Volume 225 Issue 2
- Open Access
- 1 May 2024
- Published by National Institute for Health and Care Research in Health and Social Care Delivery Research
- p. 1-15
Linkage of routinely collected NHS data to evaluate liaison mental health services: challenges and lessons learned
Background: Liaison mental health services provide mental health care to patients in acute hospital settings. Evaluation of liaison services is challenging due to their heterogeneous organisation and delivery, high case throughput and varied patient case mix. We aimed to link routinely collected National Health Service data from secondary care settings, chosen for their service characteristics, to data from primary care to evaluate hospital-based liaison mental health services in England. Methods: We planned to compare patients referred to hospital-based liaison services with comparable patients in the same hospital not referred to liaison services and comparable patients in hospitals without any liaison services. We designed and enacted a methodology to link data from: (1) Hospital Episode Statistics, a database controlled by the National Health Service Digital and (2) ResearchOne, a primary care database controlled by The Phoenix Partnership. Results: Obtaining approvals for the steps prespecified in the methodological protocol took 907 days. Enactment following approvals took 385 days. Data supplied from Hospital Episode Statistics contained 181,063 patients from 6 hospitals (mean = 30,177, standard deviation = 28,875.86) who matched the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data supplied from ResearchOne contained 33,666 (18.6%) of these patients from the 6 hospitals (mean = 5611, standard deviation = 5206.59). Discussion: Time required for approvals and enactment was attributable to slowness of data handling processes within each data holder and to resolution of technical and organisational queries between them. Variation in number of patients for which data was supplied between databases and between hospitals was attributable to coding inconsistencies and to the limited intersection of patient populations between databases and variation in recording practices between hospitals. Conclusion: Although it is technically feasible to link primary and secondary care data, the current system is challenging, complicated, unnecessarily bureaucratic, time consuming and costly. This limits the number of studies that could be conducted with these rich data sources. Funding: This article presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme as award number 13/58/08.
- 1 May 2024
- Published by National Institute for Health and Care Research in Health and Social Care Delivery Research
- p. 1-15
Open AccessLinkage of routinely collected NHS data to evaluate liaison mental health services: challenges and lessons learned
Background: Liaison mental health services provide mental health care to patients in acute hospital settings. Evaluation of liaison services is challenging due to their heterogeneous organisation and delivery, high case throughput and varied patient case mix. We aimed to link routinely collected National Health Service data from secondary care settings, chosen for their service characteristics, to data from primary care to evaluate hospital-based liaison mental health services in England. Methods: We planned to compare patients referred to hospital-based liaison services with comparable patients in the same hospital not referred to liaison services and comparable patients in hospitals without any liaison services. We designed and enacted a methodology to link data from: (1) Hospital Episode Statistics, a database controlled by the National Health Service Digital and (2) ResearchOne, a primary care database controlled by The Phoenix Partnership. Results: Obtaining approvals for the steps prespecified in the methodological protocol took 907 days. Enactment following approvals took 385 days. Data supplied from Hospital Episode Statistics contained 181,063 patients from 6 hospitals (mean = 30,177, standard deviation = 28,875.86) who matched the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data supplied from ResearchOne contained 33,666 (18.6%) of these patients from the 6 hospitals (mean = 5611, standard deviation = 5206.59). Discussion: Time required for approvals and enactment was attributable to slowness of data handling processes within each data holder and to resolution of technical and organisational queries between them. Variation in number of patients for which data was supplied between databases and between hospitals was attributable to coding inconsistencies and to the limited intersection of patient populations between databases and variation in recording practices between hospitals. Conclusion: Although it is technically feasible to link primary and secondary care data, the current system is challenging, complicated, unnecessarily bureaucratic, time consuming and costly. This limits the number of studies that could be conducted with these rich data sources. Funding: This article presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme as award number 13/58/08.
- Open Access
- 12 February 2024
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Health Services Research
- Vol. 24 (1) , 1-12
Experiences of delivering and receiving mental healthcare in the acute hospital setting: a qualitative study
Background: Recent investment in UK liaison psychiatry services has focused on expanding provision for acute and emergency referrals. Little is known about the experiences of users and providers of these services. The aim of this study was to explore the experiences of users of acute liaison mental health services (LMHS) and those of NHS staff working within LMHS or referring to LMHS. A secondary aim was to explore the potential impact of a one-hour service access target on service delivery. Methods: Cross-sectional qualitative study. Individual interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and interpreted using framework analysis. Results: Service users reported mixed experiences of LMHS, with some reporting positive experiences and some reporting poor care. Most service users described the emergency department (ED) environment as extremely stressful and wished to be seen as quickly as possible. Staff described positive benefits of the one-hour access target but identified unintended consequences and trade-offs that affected other parts of the liaison service. Conclusions: The assessment and treatment of people who attend ED with mental health problems needs to improve and particular attention should be given to the stressful nature of the ED environment for those who are extremely agitated or distressed.
- 12 February 2024
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Health Services Research
- Vol. 24 (1) , 1-12
Open AccessExperiences of delivering and receiving mental healthcare in the acute hospital setting: a qualitative study
Background: Recent investment in UK liaison psychiatry services has focused on expanding provision for acute and emergency referrals. Little is known about the experiences of users and providers of these services. The aim of this study was to explore the experiences of users of acute liaison mental health services (LMHS) and those of NHS staff working within LMHS or referring to LMHS. A secondary aim was to explore the potential impact of a one-hour service access target on service delivery. Methods: Cross-sectional qualitative study. Individual interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and interpreted using framework analysis. Results: Service users reported mixed experiences of LMHS, with some reporting positive experiences and some reporting poor care. Most service users described the emergency department (ED) environment as extremely stressful and wished to be seen as quickly as possible. Staff described positive benefits of the one-hour access target but identified unintended consequences and trade-offs that affected other parts of the liaison service. Conclusions: The assessment and treatment of people who attend ED with mental health problems needs to improve and particular attention should be given to the stressful nature of the ED environment for those who are extremely agitated or distressed.
- 1 May 2023
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Stroke
- Vol. 54 (5) , E213-E214
Pharmaceutical Interventions for Emotionalism After Stroke
- 1 May 2023
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Stroke
- Vol. 54 (5) , E213-E214
Pharmaceutical Interventions for Emotionalism After Stroke
- Open Access
- 24 October 2022
- Published by Royal College of Psychiatrists in Bjpsych Bulletin
- Vol. 47 (5) , 305
When It Is Darkest: Why People Die by Suicide and What We Can Do to Prevent It By Rory O'Connor Vermilion. 2021. £14.99 (pb). 352 pp. ISBN 9781785043437
- 24 October 2022
- Published by Royal College of Psychiatrists in Bjpsych Bulletin
- Vol. 47 (5) , 305
Open AccessWhen It Is Darkest: Why People Die by Suicide and What We Can Do to Prevent It By Rory O'Connor Vermilion. 2021. £14.99 (pb). 352 pp. ISBN 9781785043437
- 31 March 2022
- Published by Royal College of Psychiatrists in The British Journal of Psychiatry
- Vol. 220 (4) , 246
Safety planning-type interventions for suicide prevention: meta-analysis
- 31 March 2022
- Published by Royal College of Psychiatrists in The British Journal of Psychiatry
- Vol. 220 (4) , 246
Safety planning-type interventions for suicide prevention: meta-analysis