Midam Kim

Many English conversations across the globe today involve talkers with different language experiences. Here we show that, while language barriers challenge communicative efficiency, the detrimental effect of language distance may be mitigated by phonetic convergence. We analyzed a corpus of conversations in which talker pairs solved a spot-the-difference puzzle by verbally comparing two scenes only one of which was visible to each talker ("diapix" task). Language distance was varied by pairing talkers who either matched or mismatched in language background and in native/nonnative status relative to the target language. Communicative efficiency was measured by task-completion-time and word type-to-token ratio. Phonetic convergence was assessed by perceptual similarity tests in which listeners compared samples from one talker's speech to samples from his/her partner's speech from either early or late portions of the conversation. In this test, greater similarity for late than early samples indicates convergence. Results showed a negative correlation between language distance and communicative efficiency, a negative correlation between language distance and phonetic convergence, and a mitigating effect of phonetic convergence on the negative correlation between language distance and communicative efficiency. This suggests that convergence may be an effective mechanism for overcoming the detrimental effects of a language barrier.

This study explores phonetic convergence during conversations between pairs of talkers with varying language distance. Specifically, we examined conversations within two native English talkers and within two native Korean talkers who had either the same or different regional dialects, and between native and nonnative talkers of English. To measure phonetic convergence, an independent group of listeners judged the similarity of utterance samples from each talker through an XAB perception test, in which X was a sample of one talker's speech and A and B were samples from the other talker at either early or late portions of the conversation. The results showed greater convergence for same-dialect pairs than for either the different-dialect pairs or the different-L1 pairs. These results generally support the hypothesis that there is a relationship between phonetic convergence and interlocutor language distance. We interpret this pattern as suggesting that phonetic convergence between talker pairs that vary in the degree of their initial language alignment may be dynamically mediated by two parallel mechanisms: the need for intelligibility and the extra demands of nonnative speech production and perception.