Stephen R. McCauley

Objective: To investigate the latent factor structure and construct validity of the Verbal Series Attention Test (VSAT) across clinical patient populations.Participants and Methods: Participants included a consecutive series of clinical patients presenting with a primary memory complaint. Each patient underwent a comprehensive neuropsychological assessment and provided informed consent to allow their clinical data to be used for research. Groups formed included 1) No Neurocognitive Disorder [NoND, N=262, mean age=68.8, mean education=16.2, mean MMSE=28.3], 2) Mild Neurocognitive Disorder [MildND, N=337, mean age=72.3, mean education=15.4, mean MMSE=28.7], and 3)Major Neurocognitive Disorder [MajorND, N=524, mean age=76.5, mean education=14.5, mean MMSE=19.0] with etiologies including suspected Alzheimer’s disease and/or vascular pathology. Latent factors were investigated using exploratory factor analysis (EFA).Results: EFA was conducted using SAS 9.4 software and the promax (oblique) rotation to reveal the latent factors of the eight timed items of the VSAT in each of the three clinical groups. The structure was essentially identical in all three groups with two primary factors consistently emerging identified as 1-Complex Attention and 2-Simple Attention. Each factor had four items loading with a correlation range of > 0.37 x < 0.92. The internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha) for the VSAT total score in each group was excellent (NoND a=0.83, MildND a=0.81, and MajorND a=0.84). To investigate construct validity, the VSAT items were entered into factor analysis with measures of attention and executive function (i.e., Digit Span [forward, backward, sequence], Trail Making Test A & B, semantic fluency (animals), Controlled Oral Word Association Test [COWAT, FAS]). All three patient groups were combined (N=950) given the VSAT’s consistent factor structure. Using the same EFA procedure as before, two main factors emerged with the VSAT Complex Attention variables loading on a general complex attention/working memory factor including Trails B, semantic fluency, and Digit Span subtests. The VSAT Simple Attention items loaded on a general attention factor with the VSAT Simple Attention variables and Trails A. COWAT did not load significantly on either factor.Conclusions: The latent factor structure of the VSAT was consistent across patient populations with excellent internal consistency in each clinical group. The Complex and Simple Attention factors of the VSAT loaded on factors with similar variables identifying the anticipated latent factor structure demonstrating the construct validity of the VSAT across a wide spectrum of cognitive impairment in patients with primary memory complaints ranging from NoND to MajorND. This supports the use of the VSAT in patients across neurocognitive severity. Future studies will further explore additional psychometric properties of this instrument.

Objective Becoming culturally competent healthcare providers depends on the ability of practitioners to acquire knowledge, awareness, and skills related to other cultures. In building these areas of competence, it is essential to consider geopolitical factors that may influence health and health-seeking behaviors, particularly when working with immigrant populations. When care is sought, they are likely to experience significant barriers to effective care, including lack of providers who speak their language and failure of practitioners to integrate cultural beliefs into treatment plans. This is further complicated by the presence of geopolitical issues, including immigration status, war/conflict in the patient's country of origin, and/or human rights violations. Method The current study uses a sample case of a Burmese-speaking, Myanmar national to illustrate a culturally informed approach to the assessment of neurobehavioral changes within complex geopolitical circumstances. The sample represents an amalgam of several patients, designed to represent common presentations, sociodemographic situations, and concerns that arise during the neuropsychological assessment process. Results Description of relevant case information including background, clinical observations, and performance on testing is provided. Discussion Awareness of the impact of these life experiences not only has the potential to deepen our understanding of our patients but also results in a more holistic, accurate, and culturally competent conceptualization of their physical and mental health needs.

Objective: Asians of Chinese origin are the largest single Asian origin group in the United States and are also the third largest group in Harris County, TX (i.e., the Houston metropolitan area). Mandarin speakers constitute the majority of the group. The linguistic gaps between Chinese (Mandarin) and English make it essential to use appropriate tests and normative data when working with the Mandarin-speaking population. Although it is ideal to develop original tests and/or normative data for Mandarin-speaking patients residing in the United States, the process can be lengthy. Although these indigenous tests are being developed, a neuropsychological battery with tests validated in Mandarin-speaking regions (e.g., Mainland China, Taiwan, and Singapore) can provide valuable information for Mandarin-speaking patients who identify with their home culture/country/region.Methods: A systematic review of two electronic databases (PubMed and PsycInfo) was conducted.Results: A neuropsychological battery to assess cognitive domains, including global intellectual function, attention/processing speed, executive function, visuospatial/visuoconstruction, language, learning and memory, and emotion, was developed. Cognitive screeners and performance validity measures were also included. The battery consists of core and supplementary measures validated in the Mandarin-speaking population. A case illustration is provided.Conclusion: Strengths and limitations of the battery and the role of interpretation in service delivery are discussed. The battery is recommended to clinicians for the evaluation of Mandarin-speaking older adults residing in the United States and other non-Mandarin-speaking regions where local norms are not available.

Objectives: To assemble a core battery of culturally and linguistically appropriate neuropsychological measures that can be administered to Vietnamese-speaking patients with suspected dementia. Methods: Test instruments in Vietnamese were identified through systematic searches of PubMed, PsychInfo, and Google Scholar, and in consultation with two Vietnamese-speaking cultural brokers. Results: A battery assessing the domains of attention, executive function, verbal and visual episodic memory, basic language abilities, visuospatial/visuoconstruction abilities, and mood/anxiety was assembled that included core measures developed either specifically for a Vietnamese-speaking population, or were validated/normed with a Vietnamese-speaking sample either in Vietnam or Vietnamese-speaking persons in the U.S. Supplemental measures were selected that can be administered using translated instructions with U.S. English normative data. The rationale for test selection and caveats for their clinical use are presented. Conclusions: The number of neuropsychological measures identified in Vietnamese and/or with Vietnamese normative data was sparse. Given the large and growing population of Vietnamese-speaking residents in the U.S. and the aging of these communities, it is imperative to develop additional, appropriately designed and normed instruments to provide culturally competent assessments to better serve these individuals.

Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) has demonstrated its utility in detecting microscopic post-concussion cerebral white matter structural changes, which are not routinely evident on conventional neuroimaging modalities. In this study, we compared 10 adolescents with sports concussion (SC) to 12 orthopedically-injured (OI) individuals within 96 h and three months post injury to 12 typically-developing (TD) participants using DTI and volumetric analyses. In terms of volume, no group differences were noted between SC, OI and TD groups at both 96 h and three months post concussion. Results did not show significant differences between SC, OI, and TD groups for both fractional anisotropy (FA) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in all regions of interest within 96 h post concussion. However, at three months post-injury, the SC group exhibited significantly lower FA than the TD group in various regions of interest. In terms of ADC, significant group differences between SC and TD groups were found in some regions, with SC group having higher ADC than TD. No group differences for FA and ADC were noted between SC and OI groups at three months post-injury. However, several moderate effect sizes on between-group analyses were noted such that FA was lower and ADC was higher in SC relative to OI. Longitudinally, the SC group demonstrated decreased FA and increased ADC in some areas. The findings highlight the fact that the brain continues to change during the post-injury recovery period, and raises the possibility that adverse changes may result from the neurometabolic cascade that purportedly ensues following SC. DTI may potentially be used to characterize the nature of brain changes that occur following sports-related concussions.

We used magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) to evaluate the effects of boxing on brain structure and cognition in 10 boxers (8 retired, 2 active; mean age = 45.7 years; standard deviation [SD] = 9.71) and 9 participants (mean age = 43.44; SD = 9.11) in noncombative sports. Evans Index (maximum width of the anterior horns of the lateral ventricles/maximal width of the internal diameter of the skull) was significantly larger in the boxers ( F = 4.52; p = 0.050; Cohen's f = 0.531). Word list recall was impaired in the boxers ( F _(1,14) = 10.70; p = 0.006; f = 0.84), whereas implicit memory measured by faster reaction time (RT) to a repeating sequence of numbers than to a random sequence was preserved ( t = 2.52; p < 0.04). Fractional anisotropy (FA) and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measured by tractography did not significantly differ between groups. However, DTI metrics were significantly correlated with declarative memory (e.g., left ventral striatum ADC with delayed recall, r = −0.74; p = 0.02) and with RT to the repeating number sequence ( r = 0.70; p = 0.04) in the boxers. Years of boxing had the most consistent, negative correlations with FA, ranging from −0.65 for the right ventral striatum to −0.92 for the right cerebral peduncle. Years of boxing was negatively related to the number of words consistently recalled over trials ( r = −0.74; p = 0.02), delayed recall ( r = −0.83; p = 0.003), and serial RT ( r = 0.66; p = 0.05). We conclude that microstructural integrity of white matter tracts is related to declarative memory and response speed in boxers and to the extent of boxing exposure. Implications for chronic traumatic encephalopathy are discussed.

Although mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is now recognized as a major health issue, there have been relatively few studies of its acute effects. Previous studies of mTBI assessed at 1 week or less post-injury have produced inconsistent results, spanning reports of no ill effects to findings of robust dysfunction. These gross disparities reflect study differences such as the criteria for mTBI diagnosis and selection of comparison groups. In consideration of these issues, this study investigated outcome in the first 96 hours after injury in adolescents and adults ages 12-30 years with mTBI (n=73) compared with orthopedically injured (OI, n=65) and typically developing controls (TDC, n=40). The mTBI group reported significantly greater general psychological distress, post-concussion symptom severity, and post-traumatic stress severity than OI (all p<0.0001) and TDC (all p<0.0001); the OI and TDC groups responded similarly on these variables. There was a significant Group × Age interaction on the Total score (p<0.009), and the Cognitive (p=0.01) and Somatic (p<0.032) subscales of the Rivermead Post Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire where increasing symptom severity was associated with increasing age in the mTBI group. On neuropsychological assessment, the mTBI group performed significantly more poorly compared with OI for Verbal Selective Reminding Test (delayed recall, p=0.0003) and Symbol-Digit Modalities Test (SDMT written p=0.03; oral, p=0.001). The TDC group more robustly outperformed the mTBI group on these measures and also on the Brief Visuospatial Memory Test (delayed recall, p<0.04), Letter Fluency (p<0.02), and Category Switching (p<0.04). The TDC group outperformed the OI group on SDMT and Letter Fluency. These findings are consistent with previous reports of acute deficits in episodic memory and processing speed acutely after mTBI. Notably, however, these data also demonstrate the challenges of comparison group selection because differences were also found between the TDC and OI groups.

The Neurological Outcome Scale for Traumatic Brain Injury (NOS-TBI) is a measure assessing neurological functioning in patients with TBI. We hypothesized that the NOS-TBI would exhibit adequate concurrent and predictive validity and demonstrate more sensitivity to change, compared with other well-established outcome measures. We analyzed data from the National Acute Brain Injury Study: Hypothermia-II clinical trial. Participants were 16–45 years of age with severe TBI assessed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postinjury. For analysis of criterion-related validity (concurrent and predictive), Spearman's rank-order correlations were calculated between the NOS-TBI and the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS), GOS-Extended (GOS-E), Disability Rating Scale (DRS), and Neurobehavioral Rating Scale-Revised (NRS-R). Concurrent validity was demonstrated through significant correlations between the NOS-TBI and GOS, GOS-E, DRS, and NRS-R measured contemporaneously at 3, 6, and 12 months postinjury (all pp value using the false discovery rate was pppp<0.016). In summary, the NOS-TBI demonstrated adequate concurrent and predictive validity as well as sensitivity to change, compared with gold-standard outcome measures. The NOS-TBI may enhance prediction of outcome in clinical practice and measurement of outcome in TBI research.

There is significant heterogeneity in outcomes following mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). While several host factors (age, gender, and preinjury psychiatric history) have been investigated, the influence of preinjury psychological resilience and mood status in conjunction with mild TBI remains relatively unexplored. Euthymic mood and high resilience are potentially protective against anxiety and postconcussion symptoms, but their relative contributions are currently unknown. This prospective study obtained preinjury estimates of resilience and mood measures in addition to measures of anxiety (Acute Stress Disorder Scale and PTSD-Checklist-Civilian form) and postconcussion symptom severity (Rivermead Post Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire) n=46) or a comparison group with orthopedic injuries not involving the head (OI, n=29). The groups did not differ on preinjury resilience or mood status at baseline, but differed significantly on measures of anxiety and postconcussion symptom severity at each subsequent study occasion. Multivariate linear regression analyses were conducted to determine if preinjury resilience and mood were significant contributors to anxiety and postconcussion symptoms during the first month postinjury after accounting for other known host factors (e.g., age at injury, gender, and education). Injury group and preinjury mood status were significant predictors for all three dependent variables at each study occasion (all p<0.007). Preinjury resilience showed a positive trend only for acute stress severity at baseline, but demonstrated significant prediction of all three dependent measures at one week and one month postinjury. These results suggest that preinjury depressed mood and resilience are significant contributors to the severity of postinjury anxiety and postconcussion symptoms, even after accounting for effects of other specific host factors.

Patients (n = 8) with uncomplicated mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) underwent serial assessments (4) with diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and neuropsychological testing within the first 8 days post-injury. Using a multi-case study design, we examined changes in brain parenchyma (via DTI-derived fractional anisotropy [FA], apparent diffusion coefficient [ADC], axial diffusivity [AD] and radial diffusivity [RD] in the left cingulum bundle) and in memory performance (via Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised). Qualitative inspection of the results indicated that memory performance was transiently affected in most participants over the course of the week, with performance most negatively impacted on the second assessment (days 3–4 or 97–144 h post-injury), and then returning to within normal limits by 8 days post-injury. Alternatively, FA and other DTI metrics showed a more complex pattern, with the trajectory of some participants changing more prominently than others. For example, FA transiently increased in some participants over the study period, but the pattern was heterogeneous. Memory performance appeared to mirror changes in FA in certain cases, supporting a pathophysiological basis to memory impairment following mTBI. However, the pattern and the degree of symmetry between FA and memory performance was complex and did not always correspond. Serial imaging over the semi-acute recovery period may be important in reconciling conflicting findings in mTBI utilizing memory and/or DTI. Serial use of imaging modalities including DTI may aid understanding of underlying pathophysiological changes in the semi-acute post-injury period. Should a consistent pattern emerge that allows identification of patients at-risk for acute and/or persistent symptoms, such knowledge could guide development of therapeutic targets in mTBI and in understanding the most effective administration time window for these agents.