Jacques Belghiti
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Jacques Belghiti has a total of 223 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Alain Sauvanet
Department of Hepato‐Bilio‐Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Beaujon Hospital, Assistance Publique‐Hôpitaux de Paris University Paris Cité Clichy France
20 shared publications Safi Dokmak
Department of HPB Surgery & Liver Transplantation, Beaujon Hospital (Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris), University Denis Diderot Paris 7, 100 Bd du Général Leclerc, 92110 Clichy, France
13 shared publications- François Durand
Hepatology & Liver Intensive Care, Beaujon Hospital, Clichy, France; University Paris Cité, Paris, France
11 shared publications - Valérie Paradis
Centre de Recherche Sur L’inflammation, Université Paris-Cité, Inserm, UMR 1149, Paris, France
10 shared publications - François Cauchy
Department of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Beaujon Hospital , Clichy
9 shared publications Olivier Farges
Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Beaujon Hospital, Clichy, France
9 shared publications
Latest Publications
- 29 June 2016
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of the American College of Surgeons
- Vol. 223 (4) , 595-601
Development of Collateral Pathways in Tumor Obstruction of Confluence of the Hepatic Veins: Neither Fortuitous nor Innocuous
Except in Budd-Chiari syndrome, alternative drainage pathways have been described rarely. The aim was to describe the alternative collaterals pathways due to tumor hepatic vein (HV) confluence obstruction and its impact in the setting of liver resection. Between 2006 and 2014, preoperative CT scans of 41 patients resected for malignant tumor(s) compressing the HV confluence were assessed for the presence of accessory veins and collateral veins. A 2:1 matched control group was used for comparison of intraoperative outcomes. Intrahepatic collaterals were observed in 28 (68%) patients, mostly between segments 3/4b and 5/4b, and subcapsular collaterals were observed in 12 (29%) patients. Patients with isolated right HV obstruction and with an accessory right HV present had fewer collateral pathways develop than patients without (6 of 10 patients [60%] vs 18 of 19 [95%]; p = 0.036). Segment 1 hypertrophy was present in only 6 (15%) patients. Compared with the control group, there was a significant increase in blood loss (900 mL [range 100 to 3,500 mL] vs 500 mL [range 100 to 2,600 mL]; p < 0.001), transfusion requirements (71% vs 15%; p < 0.001), and vascular clamping (hepatic pedicle: 85% vs 72%; p < 0.001, inferior vena cava: 41% vs 11%; p < 0.001) in case of HV obstruction. Development of collateral pathways is not fortuitous and depends on the number of HVs involved and pre-existing accessory veins. The increased blood loss observed in patients with collaterals leads to consider specific vascular clamping.
- 29 June 2016
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of the American College of Surgeons
- Vol. 223 (4) , 595-601
Development of Collateral Pathways in Tumor Obstruction of Confluence of the Hepatic Veins: Neither Fortuitous nor Innocuous
Except in Budd-Chiari syndrome, alternative drainage pathways have been described rarely. The aim was to describe the alternative collaterals pathways due to tumor hepatic vein (HV) confluence obstruction and its impact in the setting of liver resection. Between 2006 and 2014, preoperative CT scans of 41 patients resected for malignant tumor(s) compressing the HV confluence were assessed for the presence of accessory veins and collateral veins. A 2:1 matched control group was used for comparison of intraoperative outcomes. Intrahepatic collaterals were observed in 28 (68%) patients, mostly between segments 3/4b and 5/4b, and subcapsular collaterals were observed in 12 (29%) patients. Patients with isolated right HV obstruction and with an accessory right HV present had fewer collateral pathways develop than patients without (6 of 10 patients [60%] vs 18 of 19 [95%]; p = 0.036). Segment 1 hypertrophy was present in only 6 (15%) patients. Compared with the control group, there was a significant increase in blood loss (900 mL [range 100 to 3,500 mL] vs 500 mL [range 100 to 2,600 mL]; p < 0.001), transfusion requirements (71% vs 15%; p < 0.001), and vascular clamping (hepatic pedicle: 85% vs 72%; p < 0.001, inferior vena cava: 41% vs 11%; p < 0.001) in case of HV obstruction. Development of collateral pathways is not fortuitous and depends on the number of HVs involved and pre-existing accessory veins. The increased blood loss observed in patients with collaterals leads to consider specific vascular clamping.
- 1 October 2015
- Published by Elsevier in Journal de Chirurgie Viscérale
- Vol. 152 (5) , A29
Pancréatectomie gauche laparoscopique : seul le type de drainage influe sur le risque de fistule pancréatique
- 1 October 2015
- Published by Elsevier in Journal de Chirurgie Viscérale
- Vol. 152 (5) , A29
Pancréatectomie gauche laparoscopique : seul le type de drainage influe sur le risque de fistule pancréatique
- 17 September 2015
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 363-366
Hanging Maneuver for Anatomic Hemihepatectomy (Including Living-Donor Liver Transplantation)
- 17 September 2015
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 363-366
Hanging Maneuver for Anatomic Hemihepatectomy (Including Living-Donor Liver Transplantation)
- 1 July 2015
- Published by Elsevier in Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
- Vol. 13 (7) , 1221-1230
Management of Hepatocellular Adenoma: Recent Advances
- 1 July 2015
- Published by Elsevier in Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
- Vol. 13 (7) , 1221-1230
Management of Hepatocellular Adenoma: Recent Advances
- 28 April 2015
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 239-248
Hepaticojejunostomy Anastomotic Strictures
- Open Access
- 1 February 2015
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- Vol. 2, 19-27
A clinical perspective of the link between metabolic syndrome and hepatocellular carcinoma
A clinical perspective of the link between metabolic syndrome and hepatocellular carcinoma François Cauchy, Jacques BelghitiHPB and Liver Transplantation Unit, Hôpital Beaujon, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Clichy, France Metabolic syndrome (MS), which is defined as a constellation of clinico-biological features closely related to insulin-resistance has reached epidemic levels in Western Europe and Northern America. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) represents the hepatic manifestation of MS. As its incidence parallels that of MS, NAFLD is currently becoming one of the most frequent chronic liver diseases in Western countries. On one hand, MS favors the development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) either through NAFLD liver parenchymal alterations (steatosis; steatohepatitis; fibrosis), or in the absence of significant underlying liver parenchyma changes. In this setting, HCC are often diagnosed incidentally, tend to be larger than in patients developing HCC on cirrhosis and therefore frequently require major liver resections. On the other hand, MS patients are at increased risk of both liver-related postoperative complications and increased cardiorespiratory events leading to non-negligible mortality rates following liver surgery. These deleterious effects seem to be related to the existence of impaired liver function even in the absence of severe fibrosis but also higher cardiorespiratory sensitivity in a setting of MS/NAFLD. Hence, specific medical and surgical improvements in the perioperative management of these patients are required. These include complete preoperative cardiorespiratory work-up and the wide use of preoperative liver volume modulation. Finally, the long-term prognosis after curative surgery for MS-related HCC does not seem to be worse than for other HCC occurring on classical chronic liver diseases. This is probably related to less aggressive tumor behavior with lower micro vascular invasion and decreased rates of poorly differentiated lesions. In this setting, several medical therapies including metformin could be of value in the prevention of both occurrence and recurrence of HCC.Keywords: metabolic syndrome, NAFLD, NASH, neoplasia, hepatocellular carcinoma, hepatectomy, complications, morbidity
- 1 February 2015
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- Vol. 2, 19-27
Open AccessA clinical perspective of the link between metabolic syndrome and hepatocellular carcinoma
A clinical perspective of the link between metabolic syndrome and hepatocellular carcinoma François Cauchy, Jacques BelghitiHPB and Liver Transplantation Unit, Hôpital Beaujon, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Clichy, France Metabolic syndrome (MS), which is defined as a constellation of clinico-biological features closely related to insulin-resistance has reached epidemic levels in Western Europe and Northern America. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) represents the hepatic manifestation of MS. As its incidence parallels that of MS, NAFLD is currently becoming one of the most frequent chronic liver diseases in Western countries. On one hand, MS favors the development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) either through NAFLD liver parenchymal alterations (steatosis; steatohepatitis; fibrosis), or in the absence of significant underlying liver parenchyma changes. In this setting, HCC are often diagnosed incidentally, tend to be larger than in patients developing HCC on cirrhosis and therefore frequently require major liver resections. On the other hand, MS patients are at increased risk of both liver-related postoperative complications and increased cardiorespiratory events leading to non-negligible mortality rates following liver surgery. These deleterious effects seem to be related to the existence of impaired liver function even in the absence of severe fibrosis but also higher cardiorespiratory sensitivity in a setting of MS/NAFLD. Hence, specific medical and surgical improvements in the perioperative management of these patients are required. These include complete preoperative cardiorespiratory work-up and the wide use of preoperative liver volume modulation. Finally, the long-term prognosis after curative surgery for MS-related HCC does not seem to be worse than for other HCC occurring on classical chronic liver diseases. This is probably related to less aggressive tumor behavior with lower micro vascular invasion and decreased rates of poorly differentiated lesions. In this setting, several medical therapies including metformin could be of value in the prevention of both occurrence and recurrence of HCC.Keywords: metabolic syndrome, NAFLD, NASH, neoplasia, hepatocellular carcinoma, hepatectomy, complications, morbidity
- 1 October 2014
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Hepatic Oncology
- Vol. 1 (4) , 409-421
Liver Transplantation for Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumors
SUMMARY Neuroendocrine tumors are a heterogeneous group of rare epithelial tumors. Most of them are metastatic at the time of initial diagnosis. Liver transplantation (LT) has been proposed in selected patients with diffuse liver involvement. Rationale for LT in this indication is based on the frequently indolent nature of neuroendocrine tumors, the propensity for liver-only metastasis and the high rate of intrahepatic recurrence after resection. However, indications for LT for neuroendocrine liver metastases remain controversial, and patient selection criteria is still a matter of debate. The aim of this review is to summarize data regarding LT for neuroendocrine liver metastases by answering frequently asked questions about this issue.
- 1 October 2014
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Hepatic Oncology
- Vol. 1 (4) , 409-421
Liver Transplantation for Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumors
SUMMARY Neuroendocrine tumors are a heterogeneous group of rare epithelial tumors. Most of them are metastatic at the time of initial diagnosis. Liver transplantation (LT) has been proposed in selected patients with diffuse liver involvement. Rationale for LT in this indication is based on the frequently indolent nature of neuroendocrine tumors, the propensity for liver-only metastasis and the high rate of intrahepatic recurrence after resection. However, indications for LT for neuroendocrine liver metastases remain controversial, and patient selection criteria is still a matter of debate. The aim of this review is to summarize data regarding LT for neuroendocrine liver metastases by answering frequently asked questions about this issue.
- 1 October 2014
- Published by Elsevier in Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology
- Vol. 28 (5) , 881-896
Liver resection for HCC: Patient's selection and controversial scenarios
- 1 October 2014
- Published by Elsevier in Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology
- Vol. 28 (5) , 881-896
Liver resection for HCC: Patient's selection and controversial scenarios
- 1 September 2014
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Hepatology
- Vol. 61 (3) , 589-593
Preoperative tumour biopsy does not affect the oncologic course of patients with transplantable HCC
- 1 September 2014
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Hepatology
- Vol. 61 (3) , 589-593
Preoperative tumour biopsy does not affect the oncologic course of patients with transplantable HCC
- 16 April 2014
- Published by Wiley in World Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 38 (9) , 2363-2369
Local Venous Thrombotic Risk of an Expanding Haemostatic Agent Used During Liver Resection
Background: For patients undergoing liver resection that leaves an empty intraparenchymal cavity, traditional topical agents might be inadequate to achieve additional hemostasis. A new hemostatic expanding topical foam (BioFoam®) has been designed to provide a mechanical seal. The objective of this study was to report our preliminary results regarding the safety and the efficacy using this foam.Methods: Between 2009 and 2011, BioFoam® was used to fill a three‐dimensional defect following liver resection in 14 patients. The operative results and postoperative course of these patients were compared to those of 14 matched controls who underwent liver resection but did not receive BioFoam®.Results: The two groups were similar in terms of demographics, indications for liver resection, type of surgical procedure, and type and duration of clamping. BioFoam® patients experienced significantly less operative blood loss (275 vs. 630 ml, p = 0.032) but similar operative transfusion rates (28.6 vs. 35.7 %, p = 0.686) compared to no‐BioFoam® patients. The postoperative mortality was nil and no patient developed postoperative hemorrhage. While the two groups shared similar overall (64.3 vs. 57.1 %, p = 0.599) and major (28.6 vs. 14.3 %, p = 0.357) complications rates, BioFoam® patients experienced significantly higher major vascular thrombosis compared to no‐BioFoam® patients (29 vs. 0 %, p = 0.04). In the BioFoam® group, major vascular thrombosis was associated with exposure of the vessel along the transection plane.Conclusion: While the clinical benefit of BioFoam® in high‐risk liver resections leaving a deep parenchymal defect remains to be proven, the associated risk of vascular thrombosis should preclude its use in contact with major veins.
- 16 April 2014
- Published by Wiley in World Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 38 (9) , 2363-2369
Local Venous Thrombotic Risk of an Expanding Haemostatic Agent Used During Liver Resection
Background: For patients undergoing liver resection that leaves an empty intraparenchymal cavity, traditional topical agents might be inadequate to achieve additional hemostasis. A new hemostatic expanding topical foam (BioFoam®) has been designed to provide a mechanical seal. The objective of this study was to report our preliminary results regarding the safety and the efficacy using this foam.Methods: Between 2009 and 2011, BioFoam® was used to fill a three‐dimensional defect following liver resection in 14 patients. The operative results and postoperative course of these patients were compared to those of 14 matched controls who underwent liver resection but did not receive BioFoam®.Results: The two groups were similar in terms of demographics, indications for liver resection, type of surgical procedure, and type and duration of clamping. BioFoam® patients experienced significantly less operative blood loss (275 vs. 630 ml, p = 0.032) but similar operative transfusion rates (28.6 vs. 35.7 %, p = 0.686) compared to no‐BioFoam® patients. The postoperative mortality was nil and no patient developed postoperative hemorrhage. While the two groups shared similar overall (64.3 vs. 57.1 %, p = 0.599) and major (28.6 vs. 14.3 %, p = 0.357) complications rates, BioFoam® patients experienced significantly higher major vascular thrombosis compared to no‐BioFoam® patients (29 vs. 0 %, p = 0.04). In the BioFoam® group, major vascular thrombosis was associated with exposure of the vessel along the transection plane.Conclusion: While the clinical benefit of BioFoam® in high‐risk liver resections leaving a deep parenchymal defect remains to be proven, the associated risk of vascular thrombosis should preclude its use in contact with major veins.