Arnaud Didierlaurent
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Arnaud Didierlaurent has a total of 11 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Jean-Claude Sirard
Univ. Lille, CNRS, Inserm, CHU Lille, Institut Pasteur de Lille, U1019 - UMR 9017 - CIIL - Center for Infection and Immunity of Lille, F-59000 Lille, France
2 shared publications John Goulding
Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, Imperial College London, London W6 8LH, England, UK
2 shared publications- Tracy Hussell
Lydia Becker Institute of Immunology and Inflammation, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, United Kingdom
2 shared publications Bart N. Lambrecht
Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, 3015 GE Rotterdam, Netherlands
1 shared publicationLeonie S. van Rijt
Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, 3015 GE Rotterdam, Netherlands
1 shared publicationLionel Low
Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, Imperial College London, London W6 8LH, England, UK
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 28 January 2008
- Published by Rockefeller University Press in Journal of Experimental Medicine
- Vol. 205 (2) , 323-329
Sustained desensitization to bacterial Toll-like receptor ligands after resolutionof respiratory influenza infection
The World Health Organization estimates that lower respiratory tract infections (excluding tuberculosis) account for ∼35% of all deaths caused by infectious diseases. In many cases, the cause of death may be caused by multiple pathogens, e.g., the life-threatening bacterial pneumonia observed in patients infected with influenza virus. The ability to evolve more efficient immunity on each successive encounter with antigen is the hallmark of the adaptive immune response. However, in the absence of cross-reactive T and B cell epitopes, one lung infection can modify immunity and pathology to the next for extended periods of time. We now report for the first time that this phenomenon is mediated by a sustained desensitization of lung sentinel cells to Toll-like receptor (TLR) ligands; this is an effect that lasts for several months after resolution of influenza or respiratory syncytial virus infection and is associated with reduced chemokine production and NF-κB activation in alveolar macrophages. Although such desensitization may be beneficial in alleviating overall immunopathology, the reduced neutrophil recruitment correlates with heightened bacterial load during secondary respiratory infection. Our data therefore suggests that post-viral desensitization to TLR signals may be one possible contributor to the common secondary bacterial pneumonia associated with pandemic and seasonal influenza infection.
- 28 January 2008
- Published by Rockefeller University Press in Journal of Experimental Medicine
- Vol. 205 (2) , 323-329
Open AccessSustained desensitization to bacterial Toll-like receptor ligands after resolutionof respiratory influenza infection
The World Health Organization estimates that lower respiratory tract infections (excluding tuberculosis) account for ∼35% of all deaths caused by infectious diseases. In many cases, the cause of death may be caused by multiple pathogens, e.g., the life-threatening bacterial pneumonia observed in patients infected with influenza virus. The ability to evolve more efficient immunity on each successive encounter with antigen is the hallmark of the adaptive immune response. However, in the absence of cross-reactive T and B cell epitopes, one lung infection can modify immunity and pathology to the next for extended periods of time. We now report for the first time that this phenomenon is mediated by a sustained desensitization of lung sentinel cells to Toll-like receptor (TLR) ligands; this is an effect that lasts for several months after resolution of influenza or respiratory syncytial virus infection and is associated with reduced chemokine production and NF-κB activation in alveolar macrophages. Although such desensitization may be beneficial in alleviating overall immunopathology, the reduced neutrophil recruitment correlates with heightened bacterial load during secondary respiratory infection. Our data therefore suggests that post-viral desensitization to TLR signals may be one possible contributor to the common secondary bacterial pneumonia associated with pandemic and seasonal influenza infection.
- Open Access
- 6 November 2007
- Published by Wiley in Immunology
- Vol. 122 (4) , 457-465
The impact of successive infections on the lung microenvironment
Summary: The effect of infection history on the immune response is ignored in most models of infectious disease and in preclinical vaccination studies. No one, however, is naïve and repeated microbial exposure, in particular during childhood, shapes the immune system to respond more efficiently later in life. Concurrent or sequential infections influence the immune response to secondary unrelated pathogens. The involvement of cross‐reactive acquired immunity, in particular T‐cell responses, is extensively documented. In this review, we discuss the impact of successive infections on the infected tissue itself, with a particular focus on the innate response of the respiratory tract, including a persistent alteration of (1) epithelial or macrophage expression of Toll‐like receptors or adherence molecules used by subsequent bacteria to invade the host, (2) the responsiveness of macrophages and neutrophils and (3) the local cytokine milieu that affects the activation of local antigen‐presenting cells and hence adaptive immunity to the next infection. We emphasize that such alterations not only occur during coinfection, but are maintained long after the initial pathogen is cleared. As innate responses are crucial to the fight against local pathogens but are also involved in the maintenance of the homeostasis of mucosal tissues, dysregulation of these responses by repeated infections is likely to have a major impact on the outcome of infectious or allergic disease.
- 6 November 2007
- Published by Wiley in Immunology
- Vol. 122 (4) , 457-465
Open AccessThe impact of successive infections on the lung microenvironment
Summary: The effect of infection history on the immune response is ignored in most models of infectious disease and in preclinical vaccination studies. No one, however, is naïve and repeated microbial exposure, in particular during childhood, shapes the immune system to respond more efficiently later in life. Concurrent or sequential infections influence the immune response to secondary unrelated pathogens. The involvement of cross‐reactive acquired immunity, in particular T‐cell responses, is extensively documented. In this review, we discuss the impact of successive infections on the infected tissue itself, with a particular focus on the innate response of the respiratory tract, including a persistent alteration of (1) epithelial or macrophage expression of Toll‐like receptors or adherence molecules used by subsequent bacteria to invade the host, (2) the responsiveness of macrophages and neutrophils and (3) the local cytokine milieu that affects the activation of local antigen‐presenting cells and hence adaptive immunity to the next infection. We emphasize that such alterations not only occur during coinfection, but are maintained long after the initial pathogen is cleared. As innate responses are crucial to the fight against local pathogens but are also involved in the maintenance of the homeostasis of mucosal tissues, dysregulation of these responses by repeated infections is likely to have a major impact on the outcome of infectious or allergic disease.
- 2 February 2006
- Published by Wiley in European Journal of Immunology
- Vol. 36 (2) , 260-263
Pathogen‐specific TLR signaling in mucosa: Mutual contribution of microbial TLR agonists and virulence factors
Detection of microorganisms through microbe‐associated molecular patterns (MAMP) by Toll‐like receptors (TLR) is crucial to trigger protective immunity. In the mucosa, sentinel cells are exposed to MAMP from both pathogens and commensals; however, the TLR response is tightly controlled to avoid inflammation in response to commensals. Uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) trigger innate responses during urinary tract infection in a TLR4‐dependent and CD14‐independent manner. UPEC express virulence factors, such as type 1 fimbriae and/or P fimbriae, allowing bacterial attachment to the epithelium. In this issue of the European Journal of Immunology, Fisher et al. show that fimbriae are required to induce a TLR4‐specific epithelial response. Depending on the fimbriae expressed by UPEC, different adaptor molecules are involved in TLR4 signaling. These data add to the recent body of evidence suggesting that TLR responses are regulated by co‐receptors, such as receptors for virulence factors. In conclusion, the “pathogenic” TLR stimulation provides a novel way for the host to ignore commensal bacteria.See accompanying article http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eji.200535149
- 2 February 2006
- Published by Wiley in European Journal of Immunology
- Vol. 36 (2) , 260-263
Pathogen‐specific TLR signaling in mucosa: Mutual contribution of microbial TLR agonists and virulence factors
Detection of microorganisms through microbe‐associated molecular patterns (MAMP) by Toll‐like receptors (TLR) is crucial to trigger protective immunity. In the mucosa, sentinel cells are exposed to MAMP from both pathogens and commensals; however, the TLR response is tightly controlled to avoid inflammation in response to commensals. Uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) trigger innate responses during urinary tract infection in a TLR4‐dependent and CD14‐independent manner. UPEC express virulence factors, such as type 1 fimbriae and/or P fimbriae, allowing bacterial attachment to the epithelium. In this issue of the European Journal of Immunology, Fisher et al. show that fimbriae are required to induce a TLR4‐specific epithelial response. Depending on the fimbriae expressed by UPEC, different adaptor molecules are involved in TLR4 signaling. These data add to the recent body of evidence suggesting that TLR responses are regulated by co‐receptors, such as receptors for virulence factors. In conclusion, the “pathogenic” TLR stimulation provides a novel way for the host to ignore commensal bacteria.See accompanying article http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eji.200535149