Kenneth M. McConnochie

Proven capacity to enable both valid diagnostic decisions and effective management decisions should be required before health care innovations are adopted in routine practice. Various care models, although distinct in capacity for information acquisition and status of effectiveness and efficiency assessment, are marketed as telemedicine. Ability to meet criteria of effective and efficient decision making depends heavily on both the type of clinical problem at hand and the diagnostic and communication tools included in the telemedicine model. As an example of a problem-type-specific, connected care model supported by a well-developed evidence base, we review research findings that support widespread implementation of a model for primary care pediatrics. But, as an understanding of disruptive innovations would predict and as our experience has shown, such evidence is not sufficient by itself to ensure adoption and dissemination. Disruptive innovations are “cheaper, simpler, more convenient products and services that start by meeting the needs of less demanding customers.” Such innovations threaten the value of existing services and organizations offering them. Consequently, dominant provider organizations positioned to develop telemedicine, but with important revenue streams threatened by telemedicine, anticipate negative financial impact. Accordingly, these organizations typically obstruct the adoption of disruptive innovations, or are at least slow to adopt them. Organizations funding health services research, investigators, provider organizations, individual providers, and payers, all share responsibility for developing the evidence base supporting connected care. For models supported by a solid evidence base, the challenge extends to ensuring widespread availability of this useful service.

Evaluation of telemedicine, including videoconferencing, specifically focused on primary care, has demonstrated quality as good as in-person care, reduced cost, elimination of socioeconomic disparities in access, and high levels of patient satisfaction. Distinctly different care models are currently marketed by provider organizations as telemedicine . Inclusion (or not) of videoconferencing capacity constitutes a distinguishing feature that is likely to impact effectiveness, but provider organizations, regulatory agencies, and payers have largely overlooked this distinction. Reassurance reducing patient and family anxiety has long been recognized as essential to both patient satisfaction and value of the medical profession. Interaction that reduces anxiety requires empathic communication. Interpersonal communication involves more than words; also key are intonation of voice, facial expression, body language, and capacity to accurately “read” emotions in others and to respond effectively. Telemedicine with videoconferencing has been shown to redress disparities in access while providing high-quality care that is well accepted by both patients and providers. Technical and practical barriers to inclusion of videoconferencing in telemedicine are minimal. Real-time video interaction, enabling “webside manner,” should be the default communication mode as telemedicine is increasingly accepted by patients, clinicians, and provider organizations as a tool to ensure high-quality primary care for all.

Background: Children with care for acute illness available through the Health-e-Access telemedicine model at childcare and schools were previously found to have 22% less emergency department (ED) use than counterparts without this service, but they also had 24% greater acute care use overall. Introduction: We assessed the hypothesis that increased utilization reflected improved access among impoverished inner-city children to a level experienced by more affluent suburban children. This observational study compared utilization among children without and with telemedicine access, beginning in 1993, ending in 2007, and based on 84,287 child-months of billing claims-based observation. Materials and Methods: Health-e-Access Telemedicine was initiated in stepwise manner over 187 study-months among 74 access sites (childcare, schools, community centers), beginning in month 105. Children dwelled in inner city, rest-of-city Rochester, NY, or in surrounding suburbs. Rate of total acute care visits (office, ED, telemedicine) was measured as visits per 100 child-years. Observed utilization rates were adjusted in multivariate analysis for age, sex, insurance type, and season of year. Results: When both suburban and inner-city children lacked telemedicine access, overall acute illness visits were 75% greater among suburban than inner-city children (suburban:inner-city rate ratio 1.75, p < 0.0001). After telemedicine became available to inner-city children, their overall acute visits approximated those of suburban children (suburban:inner-city rate ratio 0.80, p = 0.07), whereas acute visits among suburban children remained at least (worst-case comparison) 56% greater than inner-city children without telemedicine (rate ratio 1.56, p < 0.0001). Discussion: At baseline, overall acute illness utilization of suburban children exceeded that of inner-city children. Overall utilization for inner-city children increased with telemedicine to that of suburban children at baseline. Without telemedicine, however, inner-city use remained substantially less than for suburban counterparts. Conclusions: Health-e-Access Telemedicine redressed socioeconomic disparities in acute care access in the Rochester area, thus contributing to a more equitable community.

Background and Objectives: Prevailing regulatory and financing issues constrain dissemination of connected care despite evidence supporting acceptability, effectiveness, and efficiency. In this analysis we describe care provided over a 12-year period by Health-e-Access, an evidence-based, information-rich, connected care model designed to serve children with acute illness. We demonstrate the broad clinical capacity of this care model and key components imparting this capacity. Materials and Methods: Since 2001, Health-e-Access has been used in childcare, elementary schools, neighborhood after-hours sites, and a school for children with severe disabilities in Rochester, NY. With Health-e-Access, videoconference (preferably) or telephone enables parent, patient, and provider engagement. Technology includes the capacity for acquisition and exchange of a broad range of clinical observations, qualifying Health-e-Access as an information-rich model and differentiating it from multiple other connected care models commonly labeled telemedicine. Primary diagnoses recorded for completed visits were classified according to resources (technology, personnel, examination type) required to complete encounters appropriately. Results: Among 13,812 Health-e-Access visits initiated through June 2013, 98.2% were completed. Capacity for ear-nose-throat examination and close inspection of eye and skin were sufficient to identify positive findings supporting 95.2% of primary diagnoses. Videoconference and stethoscope were considered essential for observations required to rule out serious conditions often presenting in similar fashion to these 95%. Conclusions: Health-e-Access included technology essential for establishing diagnoses, ruling out more serious conditions, and identifying problems beyond its scope. Regulations enabling and financing incentivizing replication of similar connected care models would benefit families and communities substantially. Observations challenge regulatory bodies and payers to support connected health services of comparable value.

Introduction: Potential for direct patient care through remote exchange of health-related information has expanded enormously with the proliferation of technologies leveraging ubiquitous connectivity, but implementation of connected care has been slow and controversial. Materials and Methods: This review demonstrates that controversy regarding connected care arises largely from the fact that proponents and critics are generally considering distinctly different care models. Differences are highlighted to mitigate controversy and to distinguish capacities of these different models. Results: Distinguishing capacities is essential for establishing the evidence base supporting safety, effectiveness, and efficiency. In care of a particular patient's problem, value is achieved when resources allocated meet requirements for diagnosis and intervention but do not exceed them. Robust evidence supports the value of some well-defined connected care models, exemplified by the Health-e-Access Telemedicine Model. Conclusions: The pursuit of value in connected care is fundamentally the same as with in-person care. Provider organizations, legislators, regulators, and payers face not only a complex task in defining standards and enabling appropriate use, but also a heavy burden of responsibility for unleashing connected care that will benefit the entire community.

Background: Telemedicine has enhanced care for children with illness in Rochester, NY, since May 2001, enabling 13,568 acute illness visits through December 2013. Prior findings included high parent satisfaction with childcare- and school-based telemedicine (“school telemedicine”) and potential to replace 85% of office visits for illness. Urban neighborhood telemedicine (“neighborhood telemedicine”) was designed to offer convenient care for illness episodes that school telemedicine often cannot serve because illness arises when children are at home or symptoms preclude attendance. This study was designed to characterize health problems prompting neighborhood telemedicine use and to assess parent perceptions of its value. Materials and Methods: A parent satisfaction instrument was developed with input from parents and providers. Neighborhood telemedicine was initiated in January 2009 and totaled 1,362 visits through November 2013. During a 29-month survey period through January 2012, 3,871 acute illness telemedicine visits were completed, 908 (23.5%) of them via neighborhood telemedicine. Instruments were completed for 392 (43.2%) of the 908 visits. Results: Neighborhood telemedicine comprised 27% of all telemedicine visits during the year of peak neighborhood activity. Almost all survey respondents were satisfied or highly satisfied with neighborhood visits (97.6%) and endorsed greater convenience than alternatives (94.5%). Conclusions: Family preferences and the high value placed on neighborhood telemedicine suggest such service is important, especially in health systems driven by patient values. Service provided by neighborhood telemedicine holds potential to meet a large demand for care of acute childhood illness. Financing reform to support patient-centered care (e.g., bundled payments) should encompass sustainable business models for this service.

Background: Acute illness challenges all families with young children. The Health-e-Access Telemedicine Network in Rochester, NY, has enabled >7,000 telemedicine visits since 2001 among children in childcare or elementary schools, predominantly from Rochester's inner city. Large reductions in illness-related absence and emergency department use among Health-e-Access participants have occurred. Objective: The study was aimed to assess parent perception of telemedicine as a means to reduce burdens associated with childhood illness. Design/Methods: A total of 800 parents were surveyed before (578) or after (318) a child had at least one Health-e-Access visit. Queries addressed access to healthcare, conflicts between work/school and child's care during illness, and concerns and likes about telemedicine. Perceptions were elicited through open-ended and direct queries. Results: Among all respondents, 16% had high-school education and 25% had a college education. Race/ethnicity of the respondents included black (43.6%), Hispanic (22.9%), white (30.0%), and other (3.5%). All identified a primary care practice as a source for well childcare. Most (58%) had given antipyretics to their child to avoid being called by childcare or elementary school staff about illness. Likert scale interview items addressing quality of care elicited low levels of worry or concern. Worry scores trended lower after experience. Among 532 comments about Health-e-Access elicited through open-ended probes, positive ones (likes) predominated (84.6%). Likes most commonly included convenience/time saved (33.6% of all comments), parent stayed at work (13.5%), drug delivered to child site (7.1%) or called ahead to pharmacy (4.9%), and confidence in care (2.3%). Negative responses (concerns) totaled 15.4% of comments and most commonly included reliability of diagnosis (2.6%), technical problems (1.3%), and preference for in-person care (0.8%). Conclusions: Health-e-Access was well accepted by a substantial, diverse group of parents despite unfamiliarity with this approach to care. Convenience and convenience-related experience dominated perceptions. This model enables service beyond that mandated by payers and beyond that generally provided by medical practices.

Background: Health-e-Access, an urban telemedicine service, enabled 6,511 acute-illness telemedicine visits over a 7-year period for children at 22 childcare and school sites in Rochester, NY. Objectives: The aims of this article were to (1) describe provider attitudes and perceptions about efficiency and effectiveness of Health-e-Access and (2) assess hypotheses that (a) providers will complete a large proportion of the telemedicine visits attempted and (b) high levels of continuity with the primary care practice will be achieved. Design/Methods: This descriptive study focused on the 24-month Primary Care Phase in the development of Health-e-Access, initiated by the participation of 10 primary care practices. Provider surveys addressed efficiency, effectiveness, and overall acceptability. Performance measures included completion of telemedicine visits and continuity of care with the medical home. Results: Among survey respondents, the 30 providers who had completed telemedicine visits perceived that decision-making required slightly less time and total time required was slightly greater than for in-person visits. Confidence in diagnosis was somewhat less for telemedicine visits. Providers were comfortable collaborating with telemedicine assistants and confident that communications met parent needs. Among the 2,554 consecutive telemedicine visits attempted during the Primary Care Phase, 2,475 (96.9%) were completed by 47 providers. For visits by children with a participating primary care practice, continuity averaged 83.2% among practices (range, 28.1–92.9%). Conclusions: Providers perceived little or no advantage in efficiency or effectiveness to their practice in using telemedicine to deliver care; yet they used it effectively in serving families, completing almost all telemedicine visits requested, providing high levels of continuity with the medical home, and believing they communicated adequately with parents.

OBJECTIVE. Health-e-Access, a telemedicine service providing care for acute illnesses in children, has delivered >6500 telemedicine visits from 10 primary care practices in Rochester, New York, by using telemedicine access at 22 child care and school sites. The goal was to assess the hypotheses that children served by Health-e-Access received health care more often for acute illnesses but had fewer emergency department (ED) visits and lower health care expenditures than did children without access through this service.METHODS. By using insurance claims, this case study compared utilization (starting in May 2001) of telemedicine, office, or ED care for children with versus without telemedicine access. Children included in analyses had ≥6 consecutive insurance-covered months through July 2007. Claims data captured all utilization. A total of 19 652 child-months from 1216 children with telemedicine access were matched with respect to age, gender, socioeconomic status, and season with child-months for children without telemedicine availability.RESULTS. The mean age at utilization was 6.71 years, with 79% of all child-months being covered by Medicaid managed care. The overall utilization rate was 305.1 visits per 100 child-years. In multivariate analyses with adjustment for potential confounders, overall illness-related utilization rates (in-person or telemedicine visits per 100 child-years) for all sites were 23.5% greater for children with telemedicine access than for control children, but ED utilization was 22.2% less.CONCLUSION. The Health-e-Access telemedicine model holds potential to reduce health care costs, mostly through replacement of ED visits for nonemergency problems.