Mitsunori Kayano
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Mitsunori Kayano has a total of 9 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Koji Tsuda
Computational Biology Research Center (CBRC) National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), 2-4-2 Aomi, Koto-ku, Tokyo 135-0064, Japan
2 shared publicationsHiroshi Mamitsuka
Bioinformatics Center, Institute for Chemical Research, Kyoto University, Gokasho, Uji 611-0011, Japan
1 shared publication- Hiroshi Mamitsuka
Kyoto University
1 shared publication Ichigaku Takigawa
Bioinformatics Center, Institute for Chemical Research, Kyoto University, Gokasho, Uji 611-0011, Japan
1 shared publication- Ichigaku Takigawa
Hokkaido University
1 shared publication Koji Dozono
Graduate School of Mathematics, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 2 September 2010
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Classification
- Vol. 27 (2) , 211-230
Functional Cluster Analysis via Orthonormalized Gaussian Basis Expansions and Its Application
- 2 September 2010
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Classification
- Vol. 27 (2) , 211-230
Functional Cluster Analysis via Orthonormalized Gaussian Basis Expansions and Its Application
- 1 July 2010
- Published by World Scientific Pub Co Pte Ltd
- Vol. 24, 69-83
ON THE PERFORMANCE OF METHODS FOR FINDING A SWITCHING MECHANISM IN GENE EXPRESSION
We address an issue of detecting a switching mechanism in gene expression, where two genes are positively correlated for one experimental condition while they are negatively correlated for another. We compare the performance of existing methods for this issue, roughly divided into two types: interaction test (IT) and the difference of correlation coefficients. Interaction test, currently a standard approach for detecting epistasis in genetics, is the log-likelihood ratio test between two logistic regressions with/without an interaction term, resulting in checking the strength of interaction between two genes. On the other hand, two correlation coefficients can be computed for two experimental conditions and the difference of them shows the alteration of expression trends in a more straightforward manner. In our experiments, we tested three different types of correlation coefficients: Pearson, Spearman and a midcorrelation (biweight midcorrelation). The experiment was performed by using ~ 2.3 × 109 combinations selected out of the GEO (Gene Expression Omnibus) database. We sorted all combinations according to the p-values of IT or by the absolute values of the difference of correlation coefficients and then visually evaluated the top ranked combinations in terms of the switching mechanism. The result showed that 1) combinations detected by IT included non-switching combinations and 2) Pearson was affected by outliers easily while Spearman and the midcorrelation seemed likely to avoid them.
- 1 July 2010
- Published by World Scientific Pub Co Pte Ltd
- Vol. 24, 69-83
ON THE PERFORMANCE OF METHODS FOR FINDING A SWITCHING MECHANISM IN GENE EXPRESSION
We address an issue of detecting a switching mechanism in gene expression, where two genes are positively correlated for one experimental condition while they are negatively correlated for another. We compare the performance of existing methods for this issue, roughly divided into two types: interaction test (IT) and the difference of correlation coefficients. Interaction test, currently a standard approach for detecting epistasis in genetics, is the log-likelihood ratio test between two logistic regressions with/without an interaction term, resulting in checking the strength of interaction between two genes. On the other hand, two correlation coefficients can be computed for two experimental conditions and the difference of them shows the alteration of expression trends in a more straightforward manner. In our experiments, we tested three different types of correlation coefficients: Pearson, Spearman and a midcorrelation (biweight midcorrelation). The experiment was performed by using ~ 2.3 × 109 combinations selected out of the GEO (Gene Expression Omnibus) database. We sorted all combinations according to the p-values of IT or by the absolute values of the difference of correlation coefficients and then visually evaluated the top ranked combinations in terms of the switching mechanism. The result showed that 1) combinations detected by IT included non-switching combinations and 2) Pearson was affected by outliers easily while Spearman and the midcorrelation seemed likely to avoid them.
- Open Access
- 7 September 2009
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Bioinformatics
- Vol. 25 (21) , 2735-2743
Efficiently finding genome-wide three-way gene interactions from transcript- and genotype-data
Motivation: We address the issue of finding a three-way gene interaction, i.e. two interacting genes in expression under the genotypes of another gene, given a dataset in which expressions and genotypes are measured at once for each individual. This issue can be a general, switching mechanism in expression of two genes, being controlled by categories of another gene, and finding this type of interaction can be a key to elucidating complex biological systems. The most suitable method for this issue is likelihood ratio test using logistic regressions, which we call interaction test, but a serious problem of this test is computational intractability at a genome-wide level. Results: We developed a fast method for this issue which improves the speed of interaction test by around 10 times for any size of datasets, keeping highly interacting genes with an accuracy of ∼85%. We applied our method to ∼3 × 108 three-way combinations generated from a dataset on human brain samples and detected three-way gene interactions with small P-values. To check the reliability of our results, we first conducted permutations by which we can show that the obtained P-values are significantly smaller than those obtained from permuted null examples. We then used GEO (Gene Expression Omnibus) to generate gene expression datasets with binary classes to confirm the detected three-way interactions by using these datasets and interaction tests. The result showed us some datasets with significantly small P-values, strongly supporting the reliability of the detected three-way interactions. Availability: Software is available from http://www.bic.kyoto-u.ac.jp/pathway/kayano/bioinfo_three-way.html Contact:kayano@kuicr.kyoto-u.ac.jp Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
- 7 September 2009
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Bioinformatics
- Vol. 25 (21) , 2735-2743
Open AccessEfficiently finding genome-wide three-way gene interactions from transcript- and genotype-data
Motivation: We address the issue of finding a three-way gene interaction, i.e. two interacting genes in expression under the genotypes of another gene, given a dataset in which expressions and genotypes are measured at once for each individual. This issue can be a general, switching mechanism in expression of two genes, being controlled by categories of another gene, and finding this type of interaction can be a key to elucidating complex biological systems. The most suitable method for this issue is likelihood ratio test using logistic regressions, which we call interaction test, but a serious problem of this test is computational intractability at a genome-wide level. Results: We developed a fast method for this issue which improves the speed of interaction test by around 10 times for any size of datasets, keeping highly interacting genes with an accuracy of ∼85%. We applied our method to ∼3 × 108 three-way combinations generated from a dataset on human brain samples and detected three-way gene interactions with small P-values. To check the reliability of our results, we first conducted permutations by which we can show that the obtained P-values are significantly smaller than those obtained from permuted null examples. We then used GEO (Gene Expression Omnibus) to generate gene expression datasets with binary classes to confirm the detected three-way interactions by using these datasets and interaction tests. The result showed us some datasets with significantly small P-values, strongly supporting the reliability of the detected three-way interactions. Availability: Software is available from http://www.bic.kyoto-u.ac.jp/pathway/kayano/bioinfo_three-way.html Contact:kayano@kuicr.kyoto-u.ac.jp Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.