ITI. P. M. Tomlinson

I. P. M. Tomlinson

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


I. P. M. Tomlinson has a total of 15 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    An update on the genetics of colorectal cancer

    by Zoe Kemp, Cristina Thirlwell, Oliver Sieber, Andrew Silver, Ian Tomlinson

    Colorectal carcinoma (CRC) remains a frequent cause of cancer-associated mortality in the UK and still has a relatively poor outcome. Single gene defects account for up to 2–6% of cases, but twin studies suggest a hereditary component in 35%. CRC represents a paradigm for cancer genetics. Almost all the major-gene influences on CRC have been identified, and the identification of the remaining susceptibility alleles is proving troublesome. Only a few low-penetrance alleles, such as methylene tetrahydrofolate reductase C677T, appear convincingly to be associated with CRC risk. To identify the remaining CRC genes, parallel approaches, including strategies based on linkage and association and complementary analyses such as searches for modifier genes, must be employed. To gain sufficient evidence to prove that a gene is involved in CRC predisposition, it is probably necessary for multiple, adequately-powered studies to demonstrate an association with the disease, especially if the allelic variants have only a small differential effect on risk. It may also be possible to show how genes interact with each other and the environment, although this will be even more difficult. Accurate quantitation of the allele-specific risks in different populations will be necessary, but problematic, especially if those risks combine in a fashion which is not of a straightforward additive or multiplicative type. Without any good prior evidence of the nature of the remaining genetic influence on CRC, the possibility remains that this is a truly polygenic trait or that multiple, rare variants contribute to the increased risk; in these cases, identification of the genes involved will be very difficult. Despite these potential problems, the effectiveness of preventive measures for CRC, especially in high-risk individuals, means that the search for new predisposition genes is justified.


  • Analysis of chromosomal instability in human colorectal adenomas with two mutational hits at APC

    by O. M. Sieber, K. Heinimann, P. Gorman, H. Lamlum, M. Crabtree, C. A. Simpson, D. Davies, K. Neale, S. V. Hodgson, R. R. Roylance, et al.

    In vitro data show that the adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) protein associates with the mitotic spindle and that mouse embryonic stem cells with biallelic Apc mutations are karyotypically unstable. These findings led to suggestions that APC acts in chromosomal segregation and that APC inactivation leads to chromosomal instability (CIN). An alternative hypothesis based on allelic loss studies in colorectal adenomas proposes that CIN precedes and contributes to genetic changes at APC . We determined whether colorectal adenomas with two mutations at APC show features consistent with these models by studying 55 lesions (average size 5 mm; range 1–13 mm) from patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. A variety of methods was used depending on available material, including flow cytometry, comparative genomic hybridization, and loss of heterozygosity (LOH) analysis. Selected adenomas were assessed for proliferative activity by Ki-67 immunocytochemistry. Seventeen of 20 (85%) tumors were diploid, two were near-diploid, and one was hypotetraploid. Just one (near-diploid) tumor showed increased proliferative activity. LOH was found occasionally on chromosome 15q (2 of 49 tumors), but not on chromosome 18q (0 of 48). In 20 adenomas, LOH at APC was associated with loss at 5q but not 5p markers, with the former encompassing a minimum of 20 Mb. However, three of these lesions analyzed by comparative genomic hybridization displayed normal profiles, suggesting, together with other data, that the mechanism of LOH at APC is probably somatic recombination. Our results therefore do not support the hypothesis that CIN precedes APC mutations in tumorigenesis. Regarding the model in which APC mutations lead directly to CIN, if APC mutations do have this effect in vivo , it must be subtle. Alternatively, CIN associated with APC mutations might be essentially an in vitro phenomenon.