Vincent W. S. Chan

(Abstracted from Anesthesiology, 123:1256–1266, 2015) The current standard practice for complex arthroscopic elbow surgery is inpatient admission for 72 hours with intensive physiotherapy via continuous passive motion, 24 hours a day for 3 days, and continuous brachial plexus analgesia for pain. The authors of the current study tested an expedited care pathway, with only 24 hours of hospital admission and ambulatory brachial plexus analgesia and continuous passive motion performed at home.

Objective. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of sonography in identifying the anatomic structures of the upper airway and to describe their appearance on sonography. Methods. ...

The presence of neurovascular abnormalities may increase the risk of complications following regional anesthesia techniques. Use of conventional nerve localization methods may fail to detect such abnormalities and potentially result in block failure and/or unintentional neurovascular injury. We use 2 examples to illustrate this, and the concept that systematic use of a preprocedure ultrasound (US) scan may serve as an aid both for diagnosis of abnormal anatomy, and in planning the appropriate anesthetic technique. Use of a preprocedure US scan helped to diagnose abnormal anatomy and assisted in planning a more appropriate anesthetic technique. We believe that a systematic sonographic survey prior to regional anesthesia can be a valuable bedside screening tool to assess the suitability and challenges involved in performing US-guided peripheral nerve block.

In this study we evaluated the minimum stimulating current associated with intraneural needle placement and sonographic appearance of intraneural injection. We inserted a needle 2 cm inside 28 pig nerves (brachial plexus in vivo), recorded the minimum current to elicit a motor response, and injected dye (5 mL) under ultrasound (US) imaging. The minimum current to elicit a motor response was 0.43 mA (range: 0.12-1.8 mA). Nerve expansion was visualized by US in 24 of 28 nerves. Histology revealed penetration of the epineurium in these same 24 nerves. There was no evidence of dysplasia within the fascicle of any nerve. US may prove useful to detect intraneural injection, whereas a motor response above 0.5 mA may not exclude intraneural needle placement. The correlation between intraneural injection and neurological dysfunction remains unclear.

The purpose of this study is to determine if real time ultrasound guidance improves the success rate of axillary brachial plexus blockade. Patients undergoing elective hand surgery were randomly assigned to one of three groups. Axillary blocks were performed using three motor response endpoints in the nerve stimulator (NS) Group, real-time ultrasound guidance in the ultrasound (US) Group and combined ultrasound and nerve stimulation in the USNS Group. Following administration of a standardized solution containing 2% lidocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine and 0.5% bupivacaine (total 42 mL), sensory and motor functions were assessed by a blinded observer every five minutes for 30 min. A successful block was defined as complete sensory loss in the median, radial and ulnar nerve distribution by 30 min. The need for local and general anesthesia supplementation and post-block adverse events were documented. One hundred and eighty-eight patients completed the study. Block success rate was higher in Groups US and USNS (82.8% and 80.7%) than Group NS (62.9%) (P = 0.01 and 0.03 respectively). Fewer patients in Groups US and USNS required supplemental nerve blocks and/or general anesthesia. Postoperatively, axillary bruising and pain were reported more frequently in Group NS. This study demonstrates that ultrasound guidance, with or without concomitant nerve stimulation, significantly improves the success rate of axillary brachial plexus block. Le but de cette étude est de déterminer si l’échoguidage en temps réel améliore le taux de succès du bloc du plexus brachial par approche axillaire. Des patients devant subir une chirurgie élective de la main ont été randomisés en trois groupes. Des blocs axillaires ont été effectués en utilisant: trois points de réponses motrices dans le groupe neurostimulateur (NS), l’échoguidage en temps réel dans le groupe échographie (EG), et l’échographie combinée à la stimulation nerveuse dans le troisième groupe (EGNS). Suite à l’administration d’une solution standardisée contenant de la lidocaïne 2 % avec épinéphrine (1:200 000) et de la bupivacaïne 0,5 % (total 42 mL), les fonctions sensitives et motrices ont été évaluées par un observateur neutre toutes les cinq minutes pendant 30 min. Un bloc réussi a été défini comme la perte complète de sensation dans la distribution des nerfs médian, radial et cubital après 30 min. La nécessité d’une anesthésie locale et générale supplémentaire ainsi que les effets négatifs post-bloc ont été documentés. Chez les 188 patients qui ont terminé l’étude, le taux de succès du bloc a été plus élevé dans les groupes EG et EGNS (82,8 % et 80,7 %) que dans le groupe NS (62,9 %) (P) =0,01 et 0,03 respectivement). Un nombre moins élevé de patients des groupes EG et EGNS a nécessité des blocs nerveux supplémentaires et/ou une anesthésie générale. Après l’opération, les hématomes et douleurs axillaires ont été plus fréquemment observés dans le groupe NS. Cette étude démontre que l’échoguidage, avec ou sans neurostimulation concomitante, améliore de façon significative le taux de succès du bloc du plexus brachial par approche axillaire.

Background: Few studies have examined the use of ultrasound for sciatic nerve localization. The authors evaluated the usefulness of low-frequency ultrasound in identifying the sciatic nerve at three locations in the lower extremity and in guiding needle advancement to target before nerve stimulation. Methods: In this prospective observational study, 15 volunteers underwent sciatic nerve examination using a curved ultrasound probe in the range of 2-5 MHz and a Philips-ATL 5000 unit (ATL Ultrasound, Bothell, WA) in the gluteal, infragluteal, and proximal thigh regions. Thereafter, an insulated block needle was advanced inline with the ultrasound beam to reach the nerve target, which was further confirmed by electrical stimulation. The quality of sciatic nerve images, ease of needle to nerve contact, threshold stimulating current, and resultant motor response were recorded. Results: The sciatic nerve was successfully identified in the transverse view as a solitary predominantly hyperechoic structure on ultrasound in all of the three regions examined. The target nerve was visualized easily in 87% and localized within two needle attempts in all patients. Nerve stimulation was successful in 100% after two attempts with a threshold current of 0.42 +/- 0.12 (mean +/- SD) eliciting foot plantarflexion or dorsiflexion. Conclusions: These preliminary data show that a curved 2- to 5-MHz ultrasound probe provides good quality sciatic nerve imaging in the gluteal, infragluteal, and proximal thigh locations. Ultrasound-assisted sciatic nerve localization is potentially valuable for clinical sciatic nerve blocks.