Kirsty Lee Buising

Background/Objectives: Antimicrobials are regularly prescribed in general practice, yet the infrastructure to support routine review of prescribing in this setting remains limited. Integrated antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) interventions combining automated auditing of routine prescribing data with an educational component are a promising approach to addressing this gap. This qualitative study aimed to explore general practitioner (GP) and practice manager (PM) perspectives on the acceptability, feasibility, and perceived effectiveness of such an intervention implemented across 31 general practices and 97 GPs in Victoria, Australia. It also explored implementation considerations relevant to future scaling of the intervention. This is one of the first studies of GP and PM perspectives on this type of integrated program. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 17 GPs and 5 PMs and analyzed using both inductive and deductive thematic analysis. The Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) informed interview guide development and deductive coding; themes were generated inductively and final themes mapped to the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation–Behavior (COM-B) model for presentation. Results: Four themes were identified: (1) trust, validity, and value of audit and feedback; (2) clinical judgement and patient factors in prescribing complexity; (3) social, organizational, and professional contexts of learning and behavior change; and (4) effort, usability, and workflow in engagement with the intervention. Conclusions: Participants valued AMS activities that supported reflective practice without undermining professional autonomy. Trust in the systems managing prescribing data was a precondition for engagement with the data itself. Engagement also depended on fit with existing workflows, individualized reporting, and contextualized feedback. The social conditions under which learning occurred, such as peer interaction, moderated discussion, and collaborative reflection, mattered as much as the technical components of a program.

Background/Objectives: Inappropriate use of antibiotics contributes to the rise in antibiotic-resistant bacteria and can result in adverse drug effects for individuals. Informed discussions between patients and general practitioners (GPs) can help ensure that treatment decisions about antibiotic use align with the best health outcomes for individuals. Methods: We implemented a set of information resources designed to support clinical discussions and decision-making for patients with common infections in primary care. A suite of patient information sheets, which had been co-designed with primary care providers and consumers, were implemented in eight general practices in metropolitan Melbourne and regional Victoria, from August to November 2020. Results: Post-implementation evaluation, conducted through interviews with 15 primary care providers and 13 patients, revealed that the information sheets were simple, easy to use and generated discussion within consultations. GPs reported using the sheets to reinforce their decision-making during consultations with patients, reduce potential conflict, provide alternatives to antibiotic prescriptions, and offer patients a written summary of management recommendations. Patients found the sheets informative and that they made it easier to understand their diagnosis and to manage their conditions. Both GPs and patients agreed that the content was relevant and effectively enhanced patients’ knowledge of disease conditions, treatment options, and when to seek medical advice and were facilitators of meaningful conversations during consultations. Conclusion: These resources are acceptable in Australian primary care and publicly available for use by GPs, pharmacists and patients in Australia.

Antibiotic resistance is a threat to global health, and inappropriate antibiotic use can be associated with adverse effects. Developing tools to encourage better communication between patients and general practitioners may reduce inappropriate use of antibiotics. The aim of the study was to develop shared decision support tools on common infections using a co-design methodology to address antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) in primary care. Three co-design/interview sessions were conducted with primary care providers and consumers between October 2019–April 2020 in Melbourne, Australia. Participants critiqued existing AMS tools, identified key elements required and optimised resulting prototypes. Primary care providers and consumers prioritised information to include in the AMS tools, such as when to see a doctor, management options, disease symptoms and cause of infection differently. However, both agreed content should be communicated in a plain, concise and logical manner, using inclusive and simple language accompanied by illustrations. Information sheets should be single-sided and A4-sized, appropriate for use before, during or after consultations. Co-design provided a collaborative forum to systematically design and develop products that meet the needs of both primary care providers and consumers. This resulted in the development of seven patient information sheets on common infections that encourage discussion of these infections, conservative management options and appropriate antibiotic use in primary care.

Objective: This study evaluated whether a consumer codesigned leaflet about the common skin infection cellulitis would improve patient satisfaction. Methods: A patient information leaflet was codesigned with consumers incorporating health literacy principles and attached to a new adult lower limb cellulitis management plan launched in three regional Victorian health services. Health service staff were educated to provide the leaflet during hospital care. Patients discharged with a diagnosis of cellulitis in an 8-month period were followed-up via telephone between 31 and 60 days after their discharge. Each patient was asked to provide feedback on the utility of the leaflet (if received) and their overall satisfaction with the information provided to them using a five-point scale (with scores of 4 or 5 considered to indicate satisfaction). Results: In all, 81 of 127 (64%) patients (or carers) were contactable, consented to the study and answered the questions. Of these, 27% (n = 22) reported receiving, accepting and reading the leaflet. The proportion of patients who were satisfied with the information provided to them about cellulitis was 100% for those who received the leaflet, compared with 78% for those who did not receive the leaflet (95% confidence interval 4.8–34%; P = 0.02). Conclusion: The provision of a consumer codesigned leaflet increased patient satisfaction with the information received about cellulitis. Real-world strategies to embed the delivery of such resources are required to ensure that more patients receive the benefit. What is known about the topic?: There are known deficiencies in the information provided to patients about the common skin condition cellulitis. There is little published evaluation of strategies to address these knowledge deficiencies. What does this paper add?: This study evaluated a simple strategy to address patient knowledge deficiencies on cellulitis. It highlights that pertinent information delivered in an accessible way can significantly increase patient satisfaction with the information provided to them. What are the implications for practitioners?: These findings are a timely reminder for practitioners that even a simple intervention, such a providing a hard copy information leaflet, can improve patient satisfaction. A national repository of similar consumer codesigned materials would be valuable and could minimise existing duplication of effort in resource development across health sectors. Real-world strategies to embed the delivery of such resources is required to ensure that more patients receive the benefit.

Despite the availability of evidence-based guidelines, antibiotics for cellulitis remain inappropriately prescribed. This evidence–practice gap is more evident in low-resource settings, such as rural hospitals. This implementation study developed and introduced a cellulitis management plan to improve antibiotic prescribing for cellulitis in three health services in regional Australia. Appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing for cellulitis at Day 1 was the primary outcome measure. Adults with ICD-10-AM codes for lower-limb cellulitis admitted as inpatients of the three health services between May and November 2019 (baseline, n = 165) and March and October 2020 (post-implementation, n = 127) were included in the assessment. The uptake of the cellulitis management plan was 29.1% (37/127). The appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing for cellulitis at Day 1 was similar at baseline (78.7%, 144/183) and in the intention-to-treat post-implementation group (81.8%, 126/154) [95% CI −5.6% to 11.3%, p = 0.50]. Commencement of the cellulitis management plan resulted in a non-statistically significant increase in antibiotic appropriateness at Day 1 compared to when a cellulitis management plan was not commenced (88.1% vs. 79.5%; 95% CI −5.6% to 19.8%; p = 0.20) Evaluation of more real-world strategies to address evidence–practice gaps, such as the appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing for cellulitis, is required.

Inappropriate antimicrobial prescribing contributes to increasing antimicrobial resistance. An antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) program in the form of quality improvement activities that included audit and feedback, clinical decision support and education was developed to help optimise prescribing in general practice. The aim of this study was to evaluate the implementation of this program (Guidance GP) in three general practices in Melbourne, Australia, between November 2019 and August 2020. Thirty-one general practitioners (GPs) participated in the program, with 11 GPs and three practice managers participating in follow-up focus groups and interviews to explore the acceptability and feasibility of the program. Our findings showed that the quality improvement activities were acceptable to GPs, if they accurately fit GPs’ decision-making process and workflow. It was also important that they provided clinically meaningful information in the form of audit and feedback to GPs. The time needed to coordinate the program, and costs to implement the program were some of the potential barriers identified. Facilitators of success were a “whole of practice” approach with enthusiastic GPs and practice staff, and an identified practice champion. The findings of this research will inform implementation strategies for both the Guidance GP program and AMS programs more broadly in Australian general practice, which will be critical for general practice participation and engagement.

Objective: To study the airflow, transmission, and clearance of aerosols in the clinical spaces of a hospital ward that had been used to care for patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and to examine the impact of portable air cleaners on aerosol clearance.Design: Observational study.Setting: A single ward of a tertiary-care public hospital in Melbourne, Australia.Intervention: Glycerin-based aerosol was used as a surrogate for respiratory aerosols. The transmission of aerosols from a single patient room into corridors and a nurses’ station in the ward was measured. The rate of clearance of aerosols was measured over time from the patient room, nurses’ station and ward corridors with and without air cleaners [ie, portable high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filters].Results: Aerosols rapidly travelled from the patient room into other parts of the ward. Air cleaners were effective in increasing the clearance of aerosols from the air in clinical spaces and reducing their spread to other areas. With 2 small domestic air cleaners in a single patient room of a hospital ward, 99% of aerosols could be cleared within 5.5 minutes.Conclusions: Air cleaners may be useful in clinical spaces to help reduce the risk of acquisition of respiratory viruses that are transmitted via aerosols. They are easy to deploy and are likely to be cost-effective in a variety of healthcare settings.