Christine E. Canman

Defects in genes crucial for the process of DNA repair by homology-directed DNA repair (HDR), such as BRCA1 and BRCA2, are well-known contributors to cancer pathogenesis as well as an Achilles' heel that can be exploited therapeutically. BRCA1/2-deficient cells are exquisitely sensitive to agents that stall replication forks, such as PARP inhibitors and platinating drugs, presumably due to the inability to repair double-stranded breaks that form as a consequence of replication fork collapse. BRCA1/2 also promote tolerance to DNA replication stress by protecting replication forks from nucleolytic degradation. Both biological endpoints involve the deposition of RAD51 onto single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) for homology searching and strand exchange during HDR repair, as well as protection of newly synthesized DNA from nucleolytic degradation (i.e., replication fork protection). In this issue of Cancer Research, Panzarino and colleagues performed multiple separation-of-function studies and identify the lesion most associated with intolerance to replication stress in BRCA1/2-deficient cells is persistent ssDNA gaps in newly synthesized DNA, resulting from a failure to restrain DNA replication. Mechanisms that suppress gap formation are closely associated with chemoresistance, and the authors’ findings challenge the paradigm that lack of HR repair or fork protection underlie the phenotype known as BRCAness. See related article by Panzarino et al., p. 1388

Glioblastoma (GBM) is a highly aggressive form of cancer that is resistant to standard therapy with concurrent radiation and temozolomide, two agents that work by inducing DNA damage. An underlying cause of this resistance may be a subpopulation of cancer stem–like cells that display a heightened DNA damage response (DDR). Although this DDR represents an attractive therapeutic target for overcoming the resistance of GBMs to radiotherapy, until now, the cause of this DDR upregulation has not been understood. In a previous issue of Cancer Research, Carruthers and colleagues investigated DNA replication stress as an underlying mechanism responsible for upregulation of the DDR and hence the radiation resistance of glioma stem–like cells. Furthermore, the authors explore the efficacy of combined ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related kinase and PARP inhibitors as a strategy to leverage these mechanisms and overcome radiation resistance. Cancer Res; 78(24); 1–4. ©2018 AACR. See related article by Carruthers and colleagues, Cancer Res; 78(17); 5060–71.

The rapid ubiquitination of chromatin surrounding DNA double-stranded breaks (DSB) drives the formation of large structures called ionizing radiation-induced foci (IRIF), comprising many DNA damage response (DDR) proteins. This process is regulated by RNF8 and RNF168 ubiquitin ligases and is thought to be necessary for DNA repair and activation of signaling pathways involved in regulating cell cycle checkpoints. Here we demonstrate that it is possible to interfere with ubiquitin-dependent recruitment of DDR factors by expressing proteins containing ubiquitin binding domains (UBDs) that bind to lysine 63-linked polyubiquitin chains. Expression of the E3 ubiquitin ligase RAD18 prevented chromatin spreading of 53BP1 at DSBs, and this phenomenon was dependent upon the integrity of the RAD18 UBD. An isolated RAD18 UBD interfered with 53BP1 chromatin spreading, as well as other important DDR mediators, including RAP80 and the BRCA1 tumor suppressor protein, consistent with the model that the RAD18 UBD is blocking access of proteins to ubiquitinated chromatin. Using the RAD18 UBD as a tool to impede localization of 53BP1 and BRCA1 to repair foci, we found that DDR signaling, DNA DSB repair, and radiosensitivity were unaffected. We did find that activated ATM (S1981P) and phosphorylated SMC1 (a specific target of ATM) were not detectable in DNA repair foci, in addition to upregulated homologous recombination repair, revealing 2 DDR responses that are dependent upon chromatin spreading of certain DDR factors at DSBs. These data demonstrate that select UBDs containing targeting motifs may be useful probes in determining the biological significance of protein-ubiquitin interactions.

DNA interstrand crosslinks (ICLs) are covalent linkages between two strands of DNA, and their presence interferes with essential metabolic processes such as transcription and replication. These lesions are extremely toxic, and their repair is essential for genome stability and cell survival. In this review, we will discuss how the removal of ICLs requires interplay between multiple genome maintenance pathways and can occur in the absence of replication (replication‐independent ICL repair) or during S phase (replication‐coupled ICL repair), the latter being the predominant pathway used in mammalian cells. It is now well recognized that translesion DNA synthesis (TLS), especially through the activities of REV1 and DNA polymerase zeta (Polζ), is necessary for both ICL repair pathways operating throughout the cell cycle. Recent studies suggest that the convergence of two replication forks upon an ICL initiates a cascade of events including unhooking of the lesion through the actions of structure‐specific endonucleases, thereby creating a DNA double‐stranded break (DSB). TLS across the unhooked lesion is necessary for restoring the sister chromatid before homologous recombination repair. Biochemical and genetic studies implicate REV1 and Polζ as being essential for performing lesion bypass across the unhooked crosslink, and this step appears to be important for subsequent events to repair the intermediate DSB. The potential role of Fanconi anemia pathway in the regulation of REV1 and Polζ‐dependent TLS and the involvement of additional polymerases, including DNA polymerases kappa, nu, and theta, in the repair of ICLs is also discussed in this review. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 2012.

Oxaliplatin, satraplatin, and picoplatin are cisplatin analogs that interact with DNA forming intrastrand and interstrand DNA cross-links (ICLs). Replicative bypass of cisplatin DNA adducts requires the cooperative actions of at least three translesion DNA synthesis (TLS) polymerases: Polη, REV1, and Polζ. Because oxaliplatin, satraplatin, and picoplatin contain bulkier chemical groups attached to the platinum core compared with cisplatin, we hypothesized that these chemical additions may impede replicative bypass by TLS polymerases and reduce tolerance to platinum-containing adducts. We examined multiple responses of cancer cells to oxaliplatin, satraplatin, or picoplatin treatment under conditions where expression of a TLS polymerase was limited. Our studies revealed that, although Polη contributes to the tolerance of cisplatin adducts, it plays a lesser role in promoting replication through oxaliplatin, satraplatin, and picoplatin adducts. REV1 and Polζ were necessary for tolerance to all four platinum analogs and prevention of hyperactivation of the DNA damage response after treatment. In addition, REV1 and Polζ were important for the resolution of DNA double-stranded breaks created during replication-associated repair of platinum-containing ICLs. Consistent with ICLs being the predominant cytotoxic lesion, depletion of REV1 or Polζ rendered two different model cell systems extremely sensitive to all four drugs, whereas Polη depletion had little effect. Together, our data suggest that REV1 and Polζ are critical for promoting resistance to all four clinically relevant platinum-based drugs by promoting both translesion DNA synthesis and DNA repair.

REV1 and DNA Polymerase ζ (REV3 and REV7) play important roles in translesion DNA synthesis (TLS) in which DNA replication bypasses blocking lesions. REV1 and Polζ have also been implicated in promoting repair of DNA double-stranded breaks (DSBs). However, the mechanism by which these two TLS polymerases increase tolerance to DSBs is poorly understood. Here we demonstrate that full-length human REV1, REV3 and REV7 interact in vivo (as determined by co-immunoprecipitation studies) and together, promote homologous recombination repair. Cells lacking REV3 were hypersensitive to agents that cause DSBs including the PARP inhibitor, olaparib. REV1, REV3 or REV7-depleted cells displayed increased chromosomal aberrations, residual DSBs and sites of HR repair following exposure to ionizing radiation. Notably, cells depleted of DNA polymerase η (Polη) or the E3 ubiquitin ligase RAD18 were proficient in DSB repair following exposure to IR indicating that Polη-dependent lesion bypass or RAD18-dependent monoubiquitination of PCNA are not necessary to promote REV1 and Polζ-dependent DNA repair. Thus, the REV1/Polζ complex maintains genomic stability by directly participating in DSB repair in addition to the canonical TLS pathway.

Translesion DNA synthesis (TLS) is a process whereby specialized DNA polymerases are recruited to bypass DNA lesions that would otherwise stall high-fidelity polymerases. We provide evidence that TLS across cisplatin intrastrand cross-links is performed by multiple translesion DNA polymerases. First, we determined that PCNA monoubiquitination by RAD18 is necessary for efficient bypass of cisplatin adducts by the TLS polymerases eta (Poleta), REV1, and zeta (Polzeta) based on the observations that depletion of these proteins individually leads to decreased cell survival, cell cycle arrest in S phase, and activation of the DNA damage response. Second, we showed that in addition to PCNA monoubiquitination by RAD18, the Fanconi anemia core complex is also important for recruitment of REV1 to stalled replication forks in cisplatin treated cells. Third, we present evidence that REV1 and Polzeta are uniquely associated with protection against cisplatin and mitomycin C-induced chromosomal aberrations, and both are necessary for the timely resolution of DNA double-strand breaks associated with repair of DNA interstrand cross-links. Together, our findings indicate that REV1 and Polzeta facilitate repair of interstrand cross-links independently of PCNA monoubiquitination and Poleta, whereas RAD18 plus Poleta, REV1, and Polzeta are all necessary for replicative bypass of cisplatin intrastrand DNA cross-links.