Susan Gottesman

A monthly journal publishing high-quality, peer-reviewed research on all topics related to RNA and its metabolism in all organisms

RpoS, the master sigma factor during stationary phase and under a variety of stress conditions, is regulated at multiple levels, including regulated degradation. Degradation is dependent upon ClpXP and the RssB adaptor protein. H-NS, a nucleoid-associated protein, affects the regulated degradation of RpoS; in the absence of H-NS, RpoS is stable. The mechanisms involved in this regulation were not known. We have found that H-NS inhibits the expression of iraD and iraM, the genes coding for two anti-adaptor proteins that stabilize RpoS when overexpressed. The regulation by H-NS of iraM is independent from the previously demonstrated regulation by the PhoP/PhoQ two-component system. Moreover, differences in the behavior of several hats alleles are explained by a role for StpA, an H-NS-like protein, in the regulation of RpoS stability. This finding parallels recent observations for a role of StpA in regulation of RpoS stability in Salmonella.

Summary: A major class of small bacterial RNAs (sRNAs) regulate translation and mRNA stability by pairing with target mRNAs, dependent upon the RNA chaperone Hfq. Hfq, related to the Lsm/Sm families of splicing proteins, binds the sRNAs and stabilizes them in vivo and stimulates pairing with mRNAs in vitro. Although Hfq is abundant, the sRNAs, when induced, are similarly abundant. Therefore, Hfq may be limiting for sRNA function. We find that, when overexpressed, a number of sRNAs competed with endogenous sRNAs for binding to Hfq. This correlated with lower accumulation of the sRNAs (presumably a reflection of the loss of Hfq binding), and lower activity of the sRNAs in regulating gene expression. Hfq was limiting for both positive and negative regulation by the sRNAs. In addition, deletion of the gene for an expressed and particularly effective competitor sRNA improved the regulation of genes by other sRNAs, suggesting that Hfq is limiting during normal growth conditions. These results support the existence of a hierarchy of sRNA competition for Hfq, modulating the function of some sRNAs.

In Escherichia coli, many small noncoding regulatory RNAs (sRNAs) post-transcriptionally regulate gene expression by base-pairing to mRNAs in a process that is mediated by the RNA chaperone Hfq. Binding of the sRNA to the mRNA can lead to increased or decreased mRNA stability and/or translation. It is not known if proteins other than Hfq are necessary for this process. In order to identify additional genes required for the post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression by Hfq-dependent sRNAs, we developed a novel combined genetic selection and screen for mutants defective in sRNA regulation. In our combined genetic selection and screen, we isolated hfq mutants and mutants in pnp, encoding polynucleotide phosphorylase (PNPase). We show that loss-of-function mutations in pnp result in a decreased stability of several sRNAs including RyhB, SgrS, and CyaR and also decrease both the negative and positive regulation by sRNAs. The defect in stability of CyaR and in negative and positive regulation are suppressed by deletion mutations in RNase E. Altogether, our results suggest that the lack of sRNA-mediated regulation in the absence of an active form of PNPase is due to the rapid turnover of sRNA resulting from an increase in RNase E activity and/or an increase in access of other ribonucleases to sRNAs.

Small noncoding RNAs (sRNAs) regulate gene expression inEscherichia coliby base pairing with mRNAs and modulating translation and mRNA stability. The sRNAs DsrA and RprA stimulate the translation of the stress response transcription factor RpoS by base pairing with the 5′ untranslated region of therpoSmRNA. In the present study, we found that therpoSmRNA was unstable in the absence of DsrA and RprA and that expression of these sRNAs increased both the accumulation and the half-life of therpoSmRNA. Mutations indsrA,rprA, orrpoSthat disrupt the predicted pairing sequences and reduce translation of RpoS also destabilize therpoSmRNA. We found that therpoSmRNA accumulates in an RNase E mutant strain in the absence of sRNA expression and, therefore, is degraded by an RNase E-mediated mechanism. DsrA expression is required, however, for maximal translation even whenrpoSmRNA is abundant. This suggests that DsrA protectsrpoSmRNA from degradation by RNase E and that DsrA has a further activity in stimulating RpoS protein synthesis.rpoSmRNA is subject to degradation by an additional pathway, mediated by RNase III, which, in contrast to the RNase E-mediated pathway, occurs in the presence and absence of DsrA or RprA.rpoSmRNA and RpoS protein levels are increased in an RNase III mutant strain with or without the sRNAs, suggesting that the role of RNase III in this context is to reduce the translation of RpoS even when the sRNAs are acting to stimulate translation.

Small RNA regulators (sRNAs) have been identified in a wide range of bacteria and found to play critical regulatory roles in many processes. The major families of sRNAs include true antisense RNAs, synthesized from the strand complementary to the mRNA they regulate, sRNAs that also act by pairing but have limited complementarity with their targets, and sRNAs that regulate proteins by binding to and affecting protein activity. The sRNAs with limited complementarity are akin to eukaryotic microRNAs in their ability to modulate the activity and stability of multiple mRNAs. In many bacterial species, the RNA chaperone Hfq is required to promote pairing between these sRNAs and their target mRNAs. Understanding the evolution of regulatory sRNAs remains a challenge; sRNA genes show evidence of duplication and horizontal transfer but also could be evolved from tRNAs, mRNAs or random transcription.

EMBO Press is an editorially independent publishing platform for the development of EMBO scientific publications.

Bacterial small noncoding RNAs carry out both positive and negative regulation of gene expression by pairing with mRNAs; in Escherichia coli , this regulation often requires the RNA chaperone Hfq. Three small regulatory RNAs (sRNAs), DsrA, RprA, and ArcZ, positively regulate translation of the sigma factor RpoS, each pairing with the 5′ leader to open up an inhibitory hairpin. In vitro, rpoS interaction with sRNAs depends upon an (AAN) ₄ Hfq-binding site upstream of the pairing region. Here we show that both Hfq and this Hfq binding site are required for RprA or ArcZ to act in vivo and to form a stable complex with rpoS mRNA in vitro; both were partially dispensable for DsrA at 37 °C. ArcZ sRNA is processed from 121 nt to a stable 56 nt species that contains the pairing region; only the 56 nt ArcZ makes a strong Hfq-dependent complex with rpoS . For each of these sRNAs, the stability of the sRNA•mRNA complexes, rather than their rate of formation, best predicted in vivo activity. These studies demonstrate that binding of Hfq to the rpoS mRNA is critical for sRNA regulation under normal conditions, but if the stability of the sRNA•mRNA complex is sufficiently high, the requirement for Hfq can be bypassed.

Summary: Non‐coding small RNAs (sRNAs) play a major role in post‐transcriptional regulation of gene expression. Of the 80 sRNAs that have been identified in E. coli, one‐third bind to the RNA chaperone Hfq. Hfq both stabilizes these sRNAs in vivo and stimulates pairing to targets in vitro. A novel Hfq‐dependent RNA, called here MgrR, was identified by its ability to bind Hfq. Expression of MgrR requires the PhoQ/PhoP two‐component system; the PhoP response regulator is active under low Mg²⁺ concentrations and is an important virulence regulator in Salmonella; mgrR is also found in Salmonella species. Negatively regulated targets of MgrR identified using microarrays include eptB, involved in lipopolysaccharide (LPS) modification, and ygdQ, encoding a hypothetical protein. Cell sensitivity to the antimicrobial polymyxin B is affected by LPS modifications, and cells carrying an mgrR deletion were approximately 10 times more resistant than wild‐type cells to polymyxin B. Thus, lower Mg²⁺ concentrations, sensed by PhoQ/PhoP, lead to expression of MgrR, changing LPS. sRNAs have previously been shown to regulate many outer membrane proteins. This work demonstrates that LPS, a major contributor of bacterial interactions with mammalian cells, is also subject to regulation by sRNAs.

Many bacterial small regulatory RNAs (sRNAs) pair with mRNA targets, stimulating or inhibiting mRNA stability and/or translation. Regulation of these sRNAs is usually due to tight transcriptional regulation of synthesis.In this issue of Genes & Development and a related paper in Molecular Microbiology, Figueroa-Bossi and colleagues (pp. 2004–2015) and Overgaard and colleagues report a novel regulatory mechanism in which induction of a competing mRNA acts to titrate away the sRNA, allowing expression of an otherwise strongly inhibited target gene.