Giovanna Zanoni

Celiac disease (CD) is an autoimmune disorder caused by gluten intake in genetically predisposed individuals. This article provides an overview of the available data on the risks of infectious diseases and the mechanisms involved in CD, including a detailed analysis of vaccine efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety. The published articles were retrieved from the PubMed database using the terms “celiac disease”, “efficacy”, “hyposplenism”, “immune response”, “infections”, “immunization”, “immunogenicity”, “safety”, “vaccination”, and “vaccine”. CD can be associated with several autoimmune diseases, including selective immunoglobulin A deficiency (SIgAD), altered mucosal permeability, and hyposplenism. These conditions entail an increased risk of infections, which can be prevented by targeted vaccinations, although specific recommendations on immunization practices for subjects with CD have not been released. Regarding vaccinations, the immune response to the Hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccine can be impaired in patients with CD; therefore, proposed strategies to elicit and maintain protective specific antibody titers are summarized. For patients with conditions that put them at risk of infections, vaccinations against Pneumococcus and other encapsulated bacteria should be recommended. Based on the available evidence, the Rotavirus vaccine offered to children could be useful in preventing CD in at-risk subjects. Overall, except for the HBV vaccine, vaccine efficacy in patients with CD is comparable to that in the general population, and no safety concerns have arisen.

Dear Editor,We thank and appreciate the in-depth questions evoked regarding our article. We take this opportunity to delvedeeper into some aspects of our clinical case, which, for reasons of brevity, we were unable to include in the text. Unfortunately, for ethical reasons and because tests for naproxen are not available, we were unable to ascertain its role. Owing to the severity of the reaction (anaphylaxis) and according to the guidelines on drug allergy, we chose to perform an oral challenge to test tolerance to an alternative nonsteroidal, anti-inflammatory drug, nimesulide, and, although our patient tolerated the same, a drug allergy to naproxen is not ruled out. The character of naproxen is not related to alpha-gal sensitization, because the excipient magnesium stearate present in the naproxen tablet is of plant origin. Another hypothesis is that naproxen acts as a cofactor of the reaction manifested after eating a sandwich containing ham. Regarding the “anaphylaxis with hypovolemic shock” mentioned in the abstract, we confirm that the patient experienced anaphylactic shock immediately after an emergency surgical procedure when a gelatin-containing drug was injected to treat the onset of hypovolemia. In fact, a key issue in our case report was to alert clinicians that a routine product, such as colloids, used in the operating room could cause anaphylactic shock in an already critical patient. About the third point, our patient was sensitized to the following airborne allergens: IgE to Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus = 0.41 KU/L; IgE to cat epithelium = 0.92 KU/L; IgE to dog epithelium = 0.92 KU/L; and IgE to cow’s epithelium = 2.07 KU/L. Atopy and sensitization to cat and dog epithelia are reported in literature in association with alpha-gal syndrome (AGS). In particular, sensitization to cat and dog epithelia is because these are the two sources of allergens containing alpha-gal. In our case, given the appearance of symptoms of allergic rhinitis following exposure to dogs and cats, we hypothesized that our patient had a fairlyextensive sensitization to furry animals, probably because of his work-related exposure. However, owing to the lack of data, we could not find any relationship to explain the potential association between cow’s epithelium/dander sensitization and alpha-gal; it can’t be denied that cow’s dander is an alpha-gal-containing allergen source. Moreover, our patient was also sensitized to cow’s milk. For brevity, we did not report all the results of sensitizationto milk and its proteins, which are as follows: IgE to cow’s milk was assessed over time and ranged from 6.32 kUA/l to

Underreporting is the main limitation of spontaneous reporting systems. This cohort-event monitoring study aims to examine the potential of short message service (SMS)-based surveillance compared to traditional surveillance systems. Using VigiVax software, parents of vaccinated children aged two years or younger, in the period March 2021–May 2022, received a single SMS inquiry about adverse events following immunization (AEFI). Responses were collected, validated by health operators and integrated with the information on electronic immunization registries. AEFI reports were automatically submitted to the Italian Pharmacovigilance system. Among 254,160 SMS messages sent, corresponding to 451,656 administered doses (AD), 71,643 responses were collected (28.2% response rate), and 21,231 of them (8.3%) reported AEFI. After a seriousness assessment based on clinical criteria, 50 reports (0.24%) were classified as serious. Among these, a causality assessment identified 31 reports at least potentially related to the vaccination (RR: 6.86/100,000 AD). Febrile seizures following MMRV (measles, mumps, rubella, varicella) vaccination accounted for 11 of these 31 cases, with an incidence of 32 per 100,000 AD. No fatal outcomes were reported. Our findings support the highly favorable risk profile of pediatric vaccinations and the possibility to improve spontaneous reporting through the integration of digital technologies.

Underreporting is the main limitation of the spontaneous reporting systems. This study aims to reduce underreporting enhancing public participation in vaccinovigilance through an SMS-based reporting system integrated with electronic immunization registries (IRs). Using the VigiVax software, parents of vaccinated children aged 2 years or younger received a single SMS inquiry about adverse events following immunization (AEFI). Responses were collected, validated by health operators and integrated with the information on IRs. AEFI reports were automatically submitted to the Italian Pharmacovigilance system. Among 254,160 SMS messages sent, corre-sponding to 451,656 administered doses (AD), 71,643 responses were collected (28.2% response rate), 21,231of them (8.3%) reporting an AEFI. After seriousness assessment based on clinical criteria, 50 reports (0,24%) were classified as serious. Among these, causality assessment identi-fied 31 reports at least potentially related to the vaccination (RR: 6.86/100,000 AD). Febrile seizures following MMRV vaccination accounted for 11 of these 31 cases, with an incidence of 32 per 100,000 AD. No fatal outcomes were reported. Our findings support the highly favorable risk profile of pediatric vaccinations and the possibility to improve spontaneous reporting through the integration of digital technologies.

Delayed anaphylaxis after ingestion of red meat because of galactose-alpha-1,3-galactose (alpha-gal) syndrome has increased in recent years. The mechanism involves an immunoglobulin E reaction to alpha-gal, a molecule found in mammalian meat, dairy products, medications and excipients containing mammalian-derived components, and tick salivary glycans. Sensitization occurs due to the bite of a lone star tick and the transmission of alpha-gal molecules into person's bloodstream. We describe a case of alpha-gal syndrome with severe food, drug, and perioperative allergy in which anaphylaxis with hypovolemic shock occurred immediately after an emergency surgical procedure, when a gelatin-containing drug was injected. This case study confirms that the clinical manifestations of alpha-gal syndrome could be different depending on the route of administration, with immediate reactions if an alpha-gal-containing drug is injected and delayed type allergic manifestations occurring several hours after oral intake. The purpose of this report is to highlight the importance of risk communication in case of exposure to medical products and surgical procedures of patients with alpha-gal syndrome and to encourage drug manufacturers to indicate clearly the origin of excipients in product literature.

Currently available vaccines are safe, but, potentially, any vaccine can cause an allergic reaction and, albeit very rare, anaphylaxis can occur. Although its rarity, the precise diagnostic management of a suspected anaphylaxis postvaccination is of paramount importance due to the risk of a potentially serious reaction after re‐exposure, while a misdiagnosis might lead to an increase in the number of children that interrupt vaccinations resulting in an unjustifiably individual and collective risk of loss of protection against immune preventable diseases. In the light that most cases of suspected allergy to a vaccine are not effectively confirmed in up to 85% of the cases referred for an allergy evaluation, patients can continue the vaccination schedule with the same formulation and tolerance of the booster doses. The patient assessment has to be done by an expert in the vaccine field, usually an allergist or an immunologist depending on the country, to select subjects at risk of allergic reactions and to perform the correct procedures for vaccine hypersensitivity diagnosis and management, in order to guarantee safe immunization practices. The aim of this review is to provide a practical guidance for the safe management of allergic children undergoing immunization procedures. The guide is referred both to the evaluation of children who have previously experienced a suspected allergic reaction to a specific vaccine and their management in case of further booster doses, and to children allergic to a component of the vaccine to be administered.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the major cause of liver-related death worldwide. Interleukin 6 (IL-6) promotes the growth of the HCC microenvironment. The correlation between Child–Pugh (CP) and HCC stage and between HCC stage and sarcopenia is still not clear. Our aim was to investigate whether IL-6 is correlated with HCC stage and could represent a diagnostic marker for sarcopenia. Ninety-three HCC cirrhotic patients in different stages, according to BCLC-2022 (stages A, B, and C), were enrolled. Anthropometric and biochemical parameters, comprehensive of IL-6, were collected. The skeletal muscle index (SMI) was measured using dedicated software on computer tomography (CT) images. IL-6 level was higher in advanced (BCLC C) compared to the early-intermediate (BCLC A-B) stages (21.4 vs. 7.7 pg/mL, p < 0.005). On multivariate analysis, IL-6 levels were statistically dependent on the degree of liver disease severity (CP score) and HCC stages (p = 0.001 and p = 0.044, respectively). Sarcopenic patients presented lower BMI (24.7 ± 5.3 vs. 28.5 ± 7.0), higher PMN/lymphocyte ratio (2.9 ± 2.4 vs. 2.3 ± 1.2) and increased values of log (IL-6) (1.3 ± 0.6 vs. 1.1 ± 0.3). Univariate logistic regression between sarcopenia and log (IL-6) showed a significant odds ratio (OR 14.88, p = 0.044) with an AUC of 0.72. IL-6 appears to be an effective biomarker for the diagnosis of advanced cirrhotic HCC. In addition, IL-6 could be considered a marker of cirrhotic HCC-related sarcopenia, suggesting further investigation with BIA- or CT-dedicated software.