Terry Fulmer
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Terry Fulmer has a total of 116 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Stefanie L. Russell
Rutgers School of Dental Medicine, New York, NY, USA
2 shared publications - Abanish Singh
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, USA
1 shared publication Adriana Dias Barbosa Vizzotto
1 shared publication- Akihisa Mitani
Department of Respiratory Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine The University of Tokyo Tokyo Japan
1 shared publication Alex Zautra
1 shared publication- Alexandra Martini de Oliveira
Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 20 October 2020
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 10-11
Abuse, Elder
- 9 June 2014
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect
- Vol. 26 (4) , 351-364
Verbal Mistreatment of the Elderly
Elder mistreatment is expected to rise with the aging of the American population. To date, the association between specific forms of mistreatment and decreased quality of life is poorly understood. The aim of the present study was to explore the association between verbal mistreatment among elderly individuals and depression and quality of life. A sample of 142 older adults (40% male) aged 65 or over was enrolled from a large medical practice and academic dental practice, mean (SD) age = 74.88 (6.98) years. Thirty-eight percent of the sample reported verbal mistreatment. Controlling for sociodemographic characteristics and depression, verbal mistreatment was a significant predictor of social functioning (r = –.28, p < .001), mental health (r = –.25, p < .001), and role limitations OR = 3.02, 95% CI [1.34–6.77]. The present findings highlight the prevalence of verbal mistreatment of elderly individuals.
- 9 June 2014
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect
- Vol. 26 (4) , 351-364
Verbal Mistreatment of the Elderly
Elder mistreatment is expected to rise with the aging of the American population. To date, the association between specific forms of mistreatment and decreased quality of life is poorly understood. The aim of the present study was to explore the association between verbal mistreatment among elderly individuals and depression and quality of life. A sample of 142 older adults (40% male) aged 65 or over was enrolled from a large medical practice and academic dental practice, mean (SD) age = 74.88 (6.98) years. Thirty-eight percent of the sample reported verbal mistreatment. Controlling for sociodemographic characteristics and depression, verbal mistreatment was a significant predictor of social functioning (r = –.28, p < .001), mental health (r = –.25, p < .001), and role limitations OR = 3.02, 95% CI [1.34–6.77]. The present findings highlight the prevalence of verbal mistreatment of elderly individuals.
- Open Access
- 10 October 2013
- Published by Association for Health Sciences and Education in Journal of Nursing Education and Practice
- Vol. 4 (3) , p94
A narrative of the attending nurse model implementation
A narrative of the attending nurse model implementation
- 10 October 2013
- Published by Association for Health Sciences and Education in Journal of Nursing Education and Practice
- Vol. 4 (3) , p94
Open AccessA narrative of the attending nurse model implementation
A narrative of the attending nurse model implementation
- 1 January 2013
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 10-11
Abuse, Elder
- Open Access
- 5 July 2012
- Published by Wiley in Nursing Research and Practice
- Vol. 2012, 1-2
Oral Health
- 5 July 2012
- Published by Wiley in Nursing Research and Practice
- Vol. 2012, 1-2
Open AccessOral Health
- Open Access
- 10 June 2012
- Published by Wiley in Nursing Research and Practice
- Vol. 2012, 1-4
The Primary Care Visit: What Else Could Be Happening?
The Institute of Medicine Report called for a greater role for nurses within the context of oral health in two recent publications,Advancing Oral Health in America(2011) andImproving Access to Oral Health Care for Vulnerable and Underserved Populations(2011). Nurses provide care for many vulnerable persons, including frail and functionally dependent older adults, persons with disabilities, and persons with intellectual and developmental disabilities. These persons are the least likely to receive necessary, health-sustaining dental care (which is distinct from mouth care). The mouth, or more accurately, plaque, serves as a reservoir for bacteria and pathogens. The link between mouth care, oral health, and systemic health is well-documented; infections such as pneumonia have been linked to poor oral health. Nurses, therefore, need to reframe mouth care as oral infection control and infection control more broadly. The can provide the preventive measure that are crucial to minimizing systemic infections. Nurses in all settings can potentially provide mouth care, conduct oral health assessments, educate patients about best mouth care practices, and make dental referrals. Yet, nurses are often hesitant to do anything beyond basic oral hygiene—and even in this area, often fail to provide mouth care based on best practices.
- 10 June 2012
- Published by Wiley in Nursing Research and Practice
- Vol. 2012, 1-4
Open AccessThe Primary Care Visit: What Else Could Be Happening?
The Institute of Medicine Report called for a greater role for nurses within the context of oral health in two recent publications,Advancing Oral Health in America(2011) andImproving Access to Oral Health Care for Vulnerable and Underserved Populations(2011). Nurses provide care for many vulnerable persons, including frail and functionally dependent older adults, persons with disabilities, and persons with intellectual and developmental disabilities. These persons are the least likely to receive necessary, health-sustaining dental care (which is distinct from mouth care). The mouth, or more accurately, plaque, serves as a reservoir for bacteria and pathogens. The link between mouth care, oral health, and systemic health is well-documented; infections such as pneumonia have been linked to poor oral health. Nurses, therefore, need to reframe mouth care as oral infection control and infection control more broadly. The can provide the preventive measure that are crucial to minimizing systemic infections. Nurses in all settings can potentially provide mouth care, conduct oral health assessments, educate patients about best mouth care practices, and make dental referrals. Yet, nurses are often hesitant to do anything beyond basic oral hygiene—and even in this area, often fail to provide mouth care based on best practices.
- Open Access
- 9 January 2012
- Published by Wiley in Gerodontology
- Vol. 29 (2) , 96-105
Screening for elder mistreatment in dental and medical clinics
doi: 10.1111/j.1741‐2358.2010.00405.x Screening for elder mistreatment in dental and medical clinicsObjective: Elder mistreatment (EM) is a potentially fatal and largely unrecognised problem in the United States. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of EM in busy clinics and specifically, we report on the feasibility of screening for EM as well as the appropriate instrumentation for screening.Background: Prevalence estimates for elder mistreatment vary, but recent data from a national sample of community‐residing adults over 60 years of age indicate that 11.4% of older adults report some form of elder mistreatment. There is a paucity of research related to screening in dental and medical clinics to understand the prevalence in such practice settings.Methods: A cross‐sectional study was conducted from January 2008 to March 2009. We enrolled 241 patients at two clinics: a medical clinic (n = 102) and dental clinics (n = 139). A mini‐mental status exam was conducted with a minimum of 18 or better for inclusion. An elder mistreatment screen was next used [elder assessment instrument (EAI‐R) for medical and Hwalek–Sengstock elder abuse screening test (HS‐EAST) for dental].Results: For the 241 patients, we were able to compare data from the EAI‐R with the HS‐EAST. This pilot work demonstrates the feasibility of screening for EM in busy clinics since we documented patient enrolment of 20% in the medical clinics and 66% in dental clinics. Patients are willing to answer extremely‐sensitive questions related to elder mistreatment and are also willing to use computer technology for interviewing.Conclusion: Dental and medical clinics are important practice venues to screen for elder mistreatment.
- 9 January 2012
- Published by Wiley in Gerodontology
- Vol. 29 (2) , 96-105
Open AccessScreening for elder mistreatment in dental and medical clinics
doi: 10.1111/j.1741‐2358.2010.00405.x Screening for elder mistreatment in dental and medical clinicsObjective: Elder mistreatment (EM) is a potentially fatal and largely unrecognised problem in the United States. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of EM in busy clinics and specifically, we report on the feasibility of screening for EM as well as the appropriate instrumentation for screening.Background: Prevalence estimates for elder mistreatment vary, but recent data from a national sample of community‐residing adults over 60 years of age indicate that 11.4% of older adults report some form of elder mistreatment. There is a paucity of research related to screening in dental and medical clinics to understand the prevalence in such practice settings.Methods: A cross‐sectional study was conducted from January 2008 to March 2009. We enrolled 241 patients at two clinics: a medical clinic (n = 102) and dental clinics (n = 139). A mini‐mental status exam was conducted with a minimum of 18 or better for inclusion. An elder mistreatment screen was next used [elder assessment instrument (EAI‐R) for medical and Hwalek–Sengstock elder abuse screening test (HS‐EAST) for dental].Results: For the 241 patients, we were able to compare data from the EAI‐R with the HS‐EAST. This pilot work demonstrates the feasibility of screening for EM in busy clinics since we documented patient enrolment of 20% in the medical clinics and 66% in dental clinics. Patients are willing to answer extremely‐sensitive questions related to elder mistreatment and are also willing to use computer technology for interviewing.Conclusion: Dental and medical clinics are important practice venues to screen for elder mistreatment.