Siqiong June Liu
Research Subjects
Siqiong June Liu has a total of 31 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Christophe Dubois
Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy, LSU Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA, 70112, USA
5 shared publications - Iaroslav Savtchouk
Département de Neurosciences Fondamentales, Université de Lausanne, 1005 Lausanne, Switzerland
5 shared publications Christophe J. Dubois
4 shared publicationsLu Sun
Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy, LSU Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA; Department of Biology, Penn State University, State College, PA 16802, USA
4 shared publicationsJessica Fawcett-Patel
Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA; Southeast Louisiana VA Healthcare System, New Orleans, LA 70119, USA
3 shared publications- Qian Yang
Key laboratory of molecular pathology in Tumors of Guangxi Higher Education Institutions, Department of Pathology, the Affiliated Hospital of Youjiang Medical University for Nationalities, Baise City, China
3 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 8 January 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Cell Reports
- Vol. 44 (1) , 115180
Emotional stress increases GluA2 expression and potentiates fear memory via adenylyl cyclase 5
- 8 January 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Cell Reports
- Vol. 44 (1) , 115180
Open AccessEmotional stress increases GluA2 expression and potentiates fear memory via adenylyl cyclase 5
- Open Access
- 31 August 2023
- Published by Elsevier in Cell Reports
- Vol. 42 (9) , 113057
Cerebellar interneurons control fear memory consolidation via learning-induced HCN plasticity
- 31 August 2023
- Published by Elsevier in Cell Reports
- Vol. 42 (9) , 113057
Open AccessCerebellar interneurons control fear memory consolidation via learning-induced HCN plasticity
- 21 March 2023
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 163-168
Stellate Cells
- 5 December 2021
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 881-902
Stellate Cells: Synaptic Processing and Plasticity
- 5 December 2021
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 881-902
Stellate Cells: Synaptic Processing and Plasticity
- Open Access
- 24 May 2021
- Published by Frontiers Media SA in Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience
- Vol. 13
GluN2D NMDA Receptors Gate Fear Extinction Learning and Interneuron Plasticity
The cerebellum is critically involved in the formation of associative fear memory and in subsequent extinction learning. Fear conditioning is associated with a long-term potentiation at both excitatory and inhibitory synapses onto Purkinje cells. We therefore tested whether fear conditioning unmasks novel forms of synaptic plasticity, which enable subsequent extinction learning to reset cerebellar circuitry. We found that fear learning enhanced GABA release from molecular layer interneurons and this was reversed after fear extinction learning. Importantly an extinction-like stimulation of parallel fibers after fear learning is sufficient to induce a lasting decrease in inhibitory transmission (I-LTDstim) in the cerebellar cortex, a form of plasticity that is absent in naïve animals. While NMDA (N-methyl-D-aspartate) receptors are required for the formation and extinction of associative memory, the role of GluN2D, one of the four major NMDA receptor subunits, in learning and memory has not been determined. We found that fear conditioning elevates spontaneous GABA release in GluN2D KO as shown in WT mice. Deletion of GluN2D, however, abolished the I-LTDstim induced by parallel fiber stimulation after learning. At the behavioral level, genetic deletion of GluN2D subunits did not affect associative learning and memory retention, but impaired subsequent fear extinction learning. D-cycloserine, a partial NMDA receptor (NMDAR) agonist, failed to rescue extinction learning in mutant mice. Our results identify GluN2D as a critical NMDAR subunit for extinction learning and reveal a form of GluN2D-dependent metaplasticity that is associated with extinction in the cerebellum.
- 24 May 2021
- Published by Frontiers Media SA in Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience
- Vol. 13
Open AccessGluN2D NMDA Receptors Gate Fear Extinction Learning and Interneuron Plasticity
The cerebellum is critically involved in the formation of associative fear memory and in subsequent extinction learning. Fear conditioning is associated with a long-term potentiation at both excitatory and inhibitory synapses onto Purkinje cells. We therefore tested whether fear conditioning unmasks novel forms of synaptic plasticity, which enable subsequent extinction learning to reset cerebellar circuitry. We found that fear learning enhanced GABA release from molecular layer interneurons and this was reversed after fear extinction learning. Importantly an extinction-like stimulation of parallel fibers after fear learning is sufficient to induce a lasting decrease in inhibitory transmission (I-LTDstim) in the cerebellar cortex, a form of plasticity that is absent in naïve animals. While NMDA (N-methyl-D-aspartate) receptors are required for the formation and extinction of associative memory, the role of GluN2D, one of the four major NMDA receptor subunits, in learning and memory has not been determined. We found that fear conditioning elevates spontaneous GABA release in GluN2D KO as shown in WT mice. Deletion of GluN2D, however, abolished the I-LTDstim induced by parallel fiber stimulation after learning. At the behavioral level, genetic deletion of GluN2D subunits did not affect associative learning and memory retention, but impaired subsequent fear extinction learning. D-cycloserine, a partial NMDA receptor (NMDAR) agonist, failed to rescue extinction learning in mutant mice. Our results identify GluN2D as a critical NMDAR subunit for extinction learning and reveal a form of GluN2D-dependent metaplasticity that is associated with extinction in the cerebellum.
- Open Access
- 8 February 2021
- Published by Springer Nature in Nature Communications
- Vol. 12 (1) , 1
Author Correction: Inhibitory neurotransmission drives endocannabinoid degradation to promote memory consolidation
A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-21329-7.
- 8 February 2021
- Published by Springer Nature in Nature Communications
- Vol. 12 (1) , 1
Open AccessAuthor Correction: Inhibitory neurotransmission drives endocannabinoid degradation to promote memory consolidation
A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-21329-7.
- Open Access
- 17 December 2020
- Published by Springer Nature in Nature Communications
- Vol. 11 (1) , 1-16
Inhibitory neurotransmission drives endocannabinoid degradation to promote memory consolidation
Endocannabinoids retrogradely regulate synaptic transmission and their abundance is controlled by the fine balance between endocannabinoid synthesis and degradation. While the common assumption is that “on-demand” release determines endocannabinoid signaling, their rapid degradation is expected to control the temporal profile of endocannabinoid action and may impact neuronal signaling. Here we show that memory formation through fear conditioning selectively accelerates the degradation of endocannabinoids in the cerebellum. Learning induced a lasting increase in GABA release and this was responsible for driving the change in endocannabinoid degradation. Conversely, Gq-DREADD activation of cerebellar Purkinje cells enhanced endocannabinoid signaling and impaired memory consolidation. Our findings identify a previously unappreciated reciprocal interaction between GABA and the endocannabinoid system in which GABA signaling accelerates endocannabinoid degradation, and triggers a form of learning-induced metaplasticity.
- 17 December 2020
- Published by Springer Nature in Nature Communications
- Vol. 11 (1) , 1-16
Open AccessInhibitory neurotransmission drives endocannabinoid degradation to promote memory consolidation
Endocannabinoids retrogradely regulate synaptic transmission and their abundance is controlled by the fine balance between endocannabinoid synthesis and degradation. While the common assumption is that “on-demand” release determines endocannabinoid signaling, their rapid degradation is expected to control the temporal profile of endocannabinoid action and may impact neuronal signaling. Here we show that memory formation through fear conditioning selectively accelerates the degradation of endocannabinoids in the cerebellum. Learning induced a lasting increase in GABA release and this was responsible for driving the change in endocannabinoid degradation. Conversely, Gq-DREADD activation of cerebellar Purkinje cells enhanced endocannabinoid signaling and impaired memory consolidation. Our findings identify a previously unappreciated reciprocal interaction between GABA and the endocannabinoid system in which GABA signaling accelerates endocannabinoid degradation, and triggers a form of learning-induced metaplasticity.
- Open Access
- 30 March 2020
- Published by Society for Neuroscience in Journal of Neuroscience
- Vol. 40 (17) , 3374-3384
Emotional Stress Induces Structural Plasticity in Bergmann Glial Cells via an AC5–CPEB3–GluA1 Pathway
Stress alters brain function by modifying the structure and function of neurons and astrocytes. The fine processes of astrocytes are critical for the clearance of neurotransmitters during synaptic transmission. Thus, experience-dependent remodeling of glial processes is anticipated to alter the output of neural circuits. However, the molecular mechanisms that underlie glial structural plasticity are not known. Here we show that a single exposure of male and female mice to an acute stress produced a long-lasting retraction of the lateral processes of cerebellar Bergmann glial cells. These cells express the GluA1 subunit of AMPA-type glutamate receptors, and GluA1 knockdown is known to shorten the length of glial processes. We found that stress reduced the level of GluA1 protein and AMPA receptor-mediated currents in Bergmann glial cells, and these effects were absent in mice devoid of CPEB3, a protein that binds to GluA1 mRNA and regulates GluA1 protein synthesis. Administration of a β-adrenergic receptor blocker attenuated the reduction in GluA1, and deletion of adenylate cyclase 5 prevented GluA1 suppression. Therefore, stress suppresses GluA1 protein synthesis via an adrenergic/adenylyl cyclase/CPEB3 pathway, and reduces the length of astrocyte lateral processes. Our results identify a novel mechanism for GluA1 subunit plasticity in non-neuronal cells and suggest a previously unappreciated role for AMPA receptors in stress-induced astrocytic remodeling.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENTAstrocytes play important roles in synaptic transmission by extending fine processes around synapses. In this study, we showed that a single exposure to an acute stress triggered a retraction of lateral/fine processes in mouse cerebellar astrocytes. These astrocytes express GluA1, a glutamate receptor subunit known to lengthen astrocyte processes. We showed that astrocytic structural changes are associated with a reduction of GluA1 protein levels. This requires activation of β-adrenergic receptors and is triggered by noradrenaline released during stress. We identified adenylyl cyclase 5, an enzyme that elevates cAMP levels, as a downstream effector and found that lowering GluA1 levels depends on CPEB3 proteins that bind to GluA1 mRNA. Therefore, stress regulates GluA1 protein synthesis via an adrenergic/adenylyl cyclase/CPEB3 pathway in astrocytes and remodels their fine processes.
- 30 March 2020
- Published by Society for Neuroscience in Journal of Neuroscience
- Vol. 40 (17) , 3374-3384
Open AccessEmotional Stress Induces Structural Plasticity in Bergmann Glial Cells via an AC5–CPEB3–GluA1 Pathway
Stress alters brain function by modifying the structure and function of neurons and astrocytes. The fine processes of astrocytes are critical for the clearance of neurotransmitters during synaptic transmission. Thus, experience-dependent remodeling of glial processes is anticipated to alter the output of neural circuits. However, the molecular mechanisms that underlie glial structural plasticity are not known. Here we show that a single exposure of male and female mice to an acute stress produced a long-lasting retraction of the lateral processes of cerebellar Bergmann glial cells. These cells express the GluA1 subunit of AMPA-type glutamate receptors, and GluA1 knockdown is known to shorten the length of glial processes. We found that stress reduced the level of GluA1 protein and AMPA receptor-mediated currents in Bergmann glial cells, and these effects were absent in mice devoid of CPEB3, a protein that binds to GluA1 mRNA and regulates GluA1 protein synthesis. Administration of a β-adrenergic receptor blocker attenuated the reduction in GluA1, and deletion of adenylate cyclase 5 prevented GluA1 suppression. Therefore, stress suppresses GluA1 protein synthesis via an adrenergic/adenylyl cyclase/CPEB3 pathway, and reduces the length of astrocyte lateral processes. Our results identify a novel mechanism for GluA1 subunit plasticity in non-neuronal cells and suggest a previously unappreciated role for AMPA receptors in stress-induced astrocytic remodeling.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENTAstrocytes play important roles in synaptic transmission by extending fine processes around synapses. In this study, we showed that a single exposure to an acute stress triggered a retraction of lateral/fine processes in mouse cerebellar astrocytes. These astrocytes express GluA1, a glutamate receptor subunit known to lengthen astrocyte processes. We showed that astrocytic structural changes are associated with a reduction of GluA1 protein levels. This requires activation of β-adrenergic receptors and is triggered by noradrenaline released during stress. We identified adenylyl cyclase 5, an enzyme that elevates cAMP levels, as a downstream effector and found that lowering GluA1 levels depends on CPEB3 proteins that bind to GluA1 mRNA. Therefore, stress regulates GluA1 protein synthesis via an adrenergic/adenylyl cyclase/CPEB3 pathway in astrocytes and remodels their fine processes.
- 21 February 2019
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 1-22
Stellate Cells: Synaptic Processing and Plasticity
- 21 February 2019
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 1-22
Stellate Cells: Synaptic Processing and Plasticity
- 25 November 2016
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 189-193
Stellate Cells