Ari Robicsek
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Ari Robicsek has a total of 8 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Jennifer L. Beaumont
Clinical Outcomes Solutions, Tucson, USA
2 shared publications Lance R. Peterson
Departments of Pathology, Northwestern University's Feinberg School of Medicine, Evanston, Illinois
2 shared publicationsRichard B. Thomson
2 shared publicationsEugene F. Yen
1 shared publicationKaren M. Ilag
1 shared publicationKatherine Appert
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 30 April 2009
- Published by Elsevier in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
- Vol. 69 (5) , AB207-AB208
False-Positive Findings of a Clostridium Difficile Enzyme Immunoassay On Aspirates Obtained During Colonoscopy
- 30 April 2009
- Published by Elsevier in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
- Vol. 69 (5) , AB207-AB208
False-Positive Findings of a Clostridium Difficile Enzyme Immunoassay On Aspirates Obtained During Colonoscopy
- Open Access
- 1 April 2009
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Clinical Infectious Diseases
- Vol. 48 (7) , 910-913
Duration of Colonization with Methicillin‐ResistantStaphylococcus aureus
The duration of colonization with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus is not well defined. During 1564 admissions after a clinical culture or
- 1 April 2009
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Clinical Infectious Diseases
- Vol. 48 (7) , 910-913
Open AccessDuration of Colonization with Methicillin‐ResistantStaphylococcus aureus
The duration of colonization with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus is not well defined. During 1564 admissions after a clinical culture or
- 1 February 2008
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Vol. 46 (2) , 588-592
Prediction of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Involvement in Disease Sites by Concomitant Nasal Sampling
Nasal colonization with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is believed to precede disease. It is therefore reasonable to expect that testing for nasal MRSA colonization could provide guidance in the choice of empirical therapy for infections. We conducted a retrospective review of 5,779 nasal MRSA tests performed within a 24-h period before or after a clinical culture showed the growth of any organism. A positive nasal MRSA test strongly predicted MRSA involvement at a clinical site (relative risk, 12.9 times higher than in the remainder of the population; 95% confidence intervals [CI], 10.4, 16.1). Nasal MRSA colonization also strongly predicted antimicrobial resistance in other organisms. A negative nasal test was less useful; only 217 of 323 patients (67.2%; 95% CI, 61.8, 72.3) with clinical cultures involving MRSA had detectable, concomitant nasal MRSA colonization. Patients with clindamycin-susceptible MRSA infections were less likely (59%) to have nasal colonization than those with clindamycin-resistant MRSA infections (71%; P = 0.042). Patients nasally colonized with MRSA were substantially more likely to have antibiotic-resistant floras in clinical specimens, and this should be considered when initiating therapy. However, nearly a third of MRSA-infected patients were not nasally colonized, suggesting that nasal colonization need not precede disease and that a negative test for nasal colonization would not rule out MRSA disease in settings of moderate or high prevalence.
- 1 February 2008
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Vol. 46 (2) , 588-592
Prediction of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Involvement in Disease Sites by Concomitant Nasal Sampling
Nasal colonization with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is believed to precede disease. It is therefore reasonable to expect that testing for nasal MRSA colonization could provide guidance in the choice of empirical therapy for infections. We conducted a retrospective review of 5,779 nasal MRSA tests performed within a 24-h period before or after a clinical culture showed the growth of any organism. A positive nasal MRSA test strongly predicted MRSA involvement at a clinical site (relative risk, 12.9 times higher than in the remainder of the population; 95% confidence intervals [CI], 10.4, 16.1). Nasal MRSA colonization also strongly predicted antimicrobial resistance in other organisms. A negative nasal test was less useful; only 217 of 323 patients (67.2%; 95% CI, 61.8, 72.3) with clinical cultures involving MRSA had detectable, concomitant nasal MRSA colonization. Patients with clindamycin-susceptible MRSA infections were less likely (59%) to have nasal colonization than those with clindamycin-resistant MRSA infections (71%; P = 0.042). Patients nasally colonized with MRSA were substantially more likely to have antibiotic-resistant floras in clinical specimens, and this should be considered when initiating therapy. However, nearly a third of MRSA-infected patients were not nasally colonized, suggesting that nasal colonization need not precede disease and that a negative test for nasal colonization would not rule out MRSA disease in settings of moderate or high prevalence.