PFPeter W Fowlie

Peter W Fowlie

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article

Previous Organizations / Institutes

The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years


Peter W Fowlie has a total of 12 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Growing skull fracture at birth: a rare presentation of Menkes disease

    by Helen McPherson, Katie Prentice, Peter W Fowlie, Pasquale Gallo, Philippus Brink, Gavin Main, David Goudie, Alison Cozens, Shetty Bhushan

    A boy was born after spontaneous labour at 35 weeks’ gestation weighing 2.3 kg (25th centile). Pregnancy had been unremarkable. Labour was not augmented, and spontaneous vaginal (vertex) delivery followed with no instrumentation and no trauma. Apgar scores were 61 and 95, and no significant resuscitation was needed. Progressive occipital swelling was immediately noted. CT head demonstrated extensive comminuted and displaced skull fractures with a large subgaleal bleed (figures 1 and 2). The baby was stabilised with volume …


  • Prophylactic intravenous indomethacin for preventing mortality and morbidity in preterm infants

    by Peter W Fowlie, Peter G Davis, William McGuire

    Background Persistent patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) is associated with mortality and morbidity in preterm infants. Prostaglandin synthetase inhibitors such as indomethacin promote PDA closure but also have potential side effects. The effect of the prophylactic use of indomethacin, where infants who may not have gone on to develop a symptomatic PDA would be exposed to indomethacin, warrants particular scrutiny. Objectives To determine the effect of prophylactic indomethacin on mortality and morbidity in preterm infants. Search methods The standard search strategy of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group was used. This included searches of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library, Issue 5, 2010), MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL (until April 2010), conference proceedings, and previous reviews. Selection criteria Randomised or quasi‐randomised controlled trials that compared prophylactic indomethacin versus placebo or no drug in preterm infants. Data collection and analysis The standard methods of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group were used, with separate evaluation of trial quality and data extraction by two review authors. Main results Nineteen eligible trials in which 2872 infants participated were identified. Most participants were very low birth weight, but the largest single trial restricted participation to extremely low birth weight infants (N = 1202). The trials were generally of good quality. The incidence of symptomatic PDA [typical relative risk (RR) 0.44, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.38 to 0.50] and PDA surgical ligation (typical RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.37,0.71) was significantly lower in treated infants. Prophylactic indomethacin also significantly reduced the incidence of severe intraventricular haemorrhage (typical RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.82). Meta‐analyses found no evidence of an effect on mortality (typical RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.12) or on a composite of death or severe neurodevelopmental disability assessed at 18 to 36 months old (typical RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.90, 1.15). Authors' conclusions Prophylactic indomethacin has short‐term benefits for preterm infants including a reduction in the incidence of symptomatic PDA, PDA surgical ligation, and severe intraventricular haemorrhage. However, there is no evidence of effect on mortality or neurodevelopment.


  • Communicating with parents on the neonatal unit

    by Peter W Fowlie, Allan Jackson

    Footnotes ARTICLE Competing interests: None declared.


  • Prophylactic intravenous indomethacin for preventing mortality and morbidity in preterm infants

    by Peter W Fowlie, Peter G Davis

    Patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) and intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH) are both associated with increased mortality and morbidity in preterm infants. Indomethacin has been used successfully to treat symptomatic PDA and may also prevent or limit IVH in the neonatal period. There are however potential unwanted side effects of indomethacin, in particular a potential for reduced organ perfusion that might outweigh any clinical benefits. The prophylactic use of indomethacin, where infants who may not have gone on to develop a symptomatic PDA or IVH would be exposed to indomethacin, warrants particular scrutiny. This review examines the effectiveness of prophylactic intravenous indomethacin in reducing the mortality and morbidity associated with PDA and IVH in preterm infants. An initial literature search was conducted in three computerised databases: MEDLINE; EMBASE; and the Oxford Database of Perinatal Trials in October 1994. The search was updated in February 1997 and October 2001. Strict selection criteria were applied to clinical trials: the population had to be newborn preterm infants (less than 37 completed weeks gestation); the intervention had to be prophylactic intravenous indomethacin; the trial had to be randomised and controlled; and at least one of several prespecified outcomes had to be reported in the results. The methodological quality of each study was assessed using explicit criteria. Data on relevant outcome measures were extracted and, where appropriate, the results of individual trials were combined using meta‐analysis techniques to provide a pooled estimate of effect. Nineteen eligible trials randomising 2872 infants were identified. There is no evidence of difference in mortality at latest follow‐up between infants receiving prophylactic indomethacin and controls, pooled relative risk (RR) = 0.96 [95% CI 0.81 to 1.12]. There is no evidence to suggest prophylactic indomethacin is associated with any reduction in long‐term neurosensory impairment, ie no significant difference in rates of cognitive delay, cerebral palsy, blindness or deafness. The incidence of symptomatic patent ductus arteriosus is significantly reduced in treated infants, pooled RR = 0.44 [0.38 to 0.50] but there is no evidence that treatment affects respiratory outcomes. Prophylactic indomethacin reduces the need for surgical PDA ligation [RR = 0.51 (0.37,0.71)]. Prophylactic indomethacin significantly reduces the incidence of Grade 3 and 4 intraventricular haemorrhage, pooled RR = 0.66 [0.53 to 0.82]. There is no evidence of difference in rates of necrotising enterocolitis, excessive clinical bleeding or sepsis. Increased incidence of oliguria is seen with prophylactic indomethacin [RR = 1.90 (1.45,2.47] but this is not associated with major renal impairment. Prophylactic treatment with indomethacin has a number of immediate benefits, in particular a reduction in symptomatic patent ductus arteriosus, the need for duct ligation and severe intraventricular haemorrhage. There is no evidence to suggest either benefit or harm in longer term outcomes including neurodevelopment. Depending on clinical circumstances and personal preferences, there may be a role for prophylactic indomethacin in some infants on some neonatal units.