Jukka Lehtonen

Cardiac sarcoidosis is a granulomatous myocarditis, classified by some authorities as an infiltrative cardiomyopathy and by others as an inflammatory cardiomyopathy, that carries an elevated risk of life-threatening arrhythmias, heart failure, and sudden cardiac death. Despite its clinical importance, diagnosis remains challenging. No single modality achieves both high sensitivity and specificity, and the 4 major consensus documents—comprising expert consensus statements, clinical practice guidelines, and a scientific statement—differ in diagnostic thresholds and can yield discordant diagnoses when applied to the same patient. Genetic cardiomyopathies account for a meaningful fraction of patients diagnosed with presumed isolated cardiac sarcoidosis. This primer organizes the diagnostic approach around 2 clinical contexts: de novo cardiac presentation with unexplained atrioventricular block, ventricular arrhythmia, or heart failure without previous sarcoidosis; and cardiac screening in patients with established extracardiac sarcoidosis. In nonurgent presentations, concordant cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and ¹⁸ F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography abnormalities are accepted as sufficient for diagnosis; endomyocardial biopsy is indicated when imaging is inconclusive or giant cell myocarditis must be excluded. Advanced imaging should precede permanent device implantation in all de novo presentations. Isolated cardiac sarcoidosis represents the most diagnostically challenging phenotype. A 5-step pathway is presented that integrates advanced imaging, tissue acquisition when it would change management, and genetic evaluation. Expert opinion on histologic confirmation in nonurgent presentations is divided, and no diagnostic approach has been prospectively validated.

Background and Aims: Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) carries a poorer prognosis than other sarcoidosis subtypes, but its impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) remains insufficiently characterized. To assess HRQoL in CS compared with pulmonary sarcoidosis (PS) and Finnish population norms, and to examine the prognostic value of patient-reported outcomes. Methods and Results: In this multicentre cohort, 240 CS patients from the MIDFIN registry and 65 PS patients completed the RAND-36 and fatigue severity scale (FSS). CS patients (median age 56 years; 75% women) had significantly lower physical functioning (PF) and role-physical (RP) scores than PS patients and age- and sex-standardized Finnish population norms (P < .001). Mental health domains did not differ significantly between CS and PS. Fatigue was comparable (FSS 4.2 vs 3.8; P = .149). Impairment was most pronounced in CS patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction and prior ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation or heart failure; those with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction and no adverse events had scores similar to PS. Over 36 months, 38 CS patients experienced composite adverse events (27 ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation, 7 deaths, 2 heart transplants, 1 left ventricular assist device, 1 pericardiocentesis for sarcoid pericarditis). In multivariable Cox regression, each 10-point decrement in PF (HR 1.16, 95% CI 1.02–1.32, P = .028) and RP (HR 1.14, 95% CI 1.04–1.25, P = .006) independently predicted adverse events, outperforming NYHA class, which lost independent prognostic significance when PF or RP was included in the model. Conclusions: CS substantially impairs physical HRQoL, and lower PF and RP scores predict adverse outcomes beyond conventional risk markers, supporting integration of HRQoL assessment into routine CS risk stratification.

Background: There is no universal agreement on the diagnostic criteria for cardiac sarcoidosis (CS). In 2024, the American Heart Association (AHA) introduced a new diagnostic scheme featuring a quaternary likelihood stratification for CS instead of dichotomy. Its clinical implications are unknown. Methods: We analyzed 252 patients with CS and proven histology (mean age, 49 years; 61% women). Following the AHA diagnostic stratification, CS was retrospectively considered definite given sarcoid granulomas on myocardial biopsy (n=109), highly probable with both clinical and cardiac imaging findings being CS consistent (n=93), and probable with either clinical or imaging findings alone being CS consistent (n=50). The groups were compared for clinical characteristics and the composite incidence of death, transplantation, implantation of a left ventricular assist device, and ventricular tachyarrhythmia on follow‐up (median, 5.0 years). Results: In AHA definite, highly probable, and probable CS: 94%, 99%, and 22% of patients ( P P P P P P P =0.201). Conclusions: The 2024 AHA stratification of CS likelihood distinguishes groups with differences in clinical characteristics but did not have independent prognostic value in our statistical analysis.

BACKGROUND: No large registries of patients with acute eosinophilic myocarditis (EM) are available. However, EM is perceived as a cardiac disease with high mortality, affecting mainly young and middle-aged adults according to small series and case reports. Awareness of the clinical presentation, associated systemic conditions, treatments, and outcomes of this uncommon condition is an unmet need. METHODS: In this international, multicenter, retrospective cohort study, 53 centers screened 193 patients with histologically proven acute EM between 1992 and 2023. After the exclusion of patients with insufficient data (n=10), symptoms lasting >30 days (n=19), or histological diagnosis not confirmed after review (n=8), 156 patients were included. RESULTS: Median age at presentation was 48 years (first to third quartile, 34–59 years) with male predominance (67.3%), and only 2 were pediatric cases (≤16 years of age; 1.3%). The main signs and symptoms at presentation were dyspnea (75.6%), fever (61.3%), and chest pain (53.2%). Unexpectedly, peripheral eosinophilia was reported in only 57.4% of cases, with a median cell count of 630 eosinophils/μL. The median left ventricular ejection fraction at presentation was 32% (first to third quartile, 25%–48%). The disorders most frequently associated with EM were eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (22.4% of cases) and hypersensitivity forms (14.1%). Idiopathic/undefined forms accounted for 44.9% of cases, and miscellaneous causes accounted for 18.6%. In-hospital death or need for heart transplantation (HTx) occurred in 23 patients (14.7%; 22 deaths and 1 HTx), despite 43.6% being treated with temporary mechanical circulatory support and 92.9% being treated with immunosuppressive agents. Estimated rates of death or HTx at 1 and 3 years were 19.0% and 23.8%. Increased age, decreased left ventricular ejection fraction on admission, and no immunosuppressive therapy during hospitalization were independent predictors of death or HTx. A nonsignificant higher occurrence of deaths or HTx was observed in the hypersensitivity form (46.1%) compared with the eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis–associated form (13.1%) at 3 years ( P =0.15). CONCLUSIONS: Acute EM can often present without peripheral eosinophilia, and rates of in-hospital and midterm mortality or HTx are high. Endomyocardial biopsy is required to reach the final diagnosis of EM because relying on peripheral eosinophilia can lead to missing diagnosis. In-hospital immunosuppression is associated with HTx-free survival, although tailored immunosuppressive therapies are needed to improve outcomes. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT06447935.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac sarcoidosis involves a significant but difficult-to-define risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD). Current guidelines recommend consideration of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator for patients with extensive or significant myocardial late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. However, extensive/significant LGE is not defined. METHODS: A nationwide cardiac sarcoidosis registry was screened for patients entered before 2020 with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging done before or P <0.001), with receiver operating characteristic analyses identifying LGE mass ≥9.9% and ≥6 LGE segments as discriminative thresholds. At presentation, 70 patients were free of class I and class IIa implantable cardioverter defibrillator indications unrelated to LGE. Their 5-year rate of SCD/VT was 6.3% (0.0–14.8%) with LGE mass <9.9% versus 21.5% (6.5–36.6%) with higher LGE mass, and 6.9% (0.0–16.3%) with <6 LGE segments versus 20.5% (5.9–35.2%) with ≥6 segments. CONCLUSIONS: In cardiac sarcoidosis, myocardial LGE making up ≥9.9% of LV mass or affecting ≥6 LV segments may suggest prognostically significant LV involvement and a high risk of SCD. However, prospective validation of the thresholds is needed.

Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) results from epithelioid cell granulomas infiltrating the myocardium and predisposing to conduction disturbances, ventricular tachyarrhythmias, and heart failure. Manifest CS, however, constitutes only the top of an iceberg as advanced imaging uncovers cardiac involvement 4 to 5 times more commonly than what is clinically detectable. Definite diagnosis of CS requires myocardial biopsy and histopathology, but a sufficient diagnostic likelihood can be achieved by combining extracardiac histology of sarcoidosis with clinical manifestations and findings on cardiac imaging. CS can appear as the first or only organ manifestation of sarcoidosis or on top of pre-existing extracardiac disease. Due to the lack of controlled trials, the care of CS is based on observational evidence of low quality. Currently, the treatment involves corticosteroid-based, tiered immunosuppression to control myocardial inflammation with medical and device-based therapy for symptomatic atrioventricular block, ventricular tachyarrhythmias, and heart failure. Recent outcome data indicate 90% to 96% 5-year survival in manifest CS with the 10-year figures ranging from 80% to 90%. Major progress in the care of CS awaits the key to its molecular–genetic pathogenesis and large-scale controlled clinical trials.

Aims: Giant cell myocarditis (GCM) is an inflammatory cardiomyopathy akin to cardiac sarcoidosis (CS). We decided to study the findings of GCM on cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging and to compare GCM with CS.Methods and results: CMR studies of 18 GCM patients were analyzed and compared with 18 CS controls matched for age, sex, left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction and presenting cardiac manifestations. The analysts were blinded to clinical data. On admission, the duration of symptoms (median) was 0.2 months in GCM vs. 2.4 months in CS (P = 0.002), cardiac troponin T was elevated (>50 ng/L) in 16/17 patients with GCM and in 2/16 with CS (P < 0.001), their respective median plasma B-type natriuretic propeptides measuring 4488 ng/L and 1223 ng/L (P = 0.011). On CMR imaging, LV diastolic volume was smaller in GCM (177 ± 32 mL vs. 211 ± 58 mL, P = 0.014) without other volumetric or wall thickness measurements differing between the groups. Every GCM patient had multifocal late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) in a distribution indistinguishable from CS both longitudinally, circumferentially, and radially across the LV segments. LGE mass averaged 17.4 ± 6.3% of LV mass in GCM vs 25.0 ± 13.4% in CS (P = 0.037). Involvement of insertion points extending across the septum into the right ventricular wall, the “hook sign” of CS, was present in 53% of GCM and 50% of CS.Conclusion: In GCM, CMR findings are qualitatively indistinguishable from CS despite myocardial inflammation being clinically more acute and injurious. When matched for LV dysfunction and presenting features, LV size and LGE mass are smaller in GCM.

Background: Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) predisposes to sudden cardiac death (SCD). Guidelines for implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) in CS have been issued by the Heart Rhythm Society in 2014 and the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association/Heart Rhythm Society consortium in 2017. How well they discriminate high from low risk remains unknown. Methods: We analyzed the data of 398 patients with CS detected in Finland from 1988 through 2017. All had clinical cardiac manifestations. Histological diagnosis was myocardial in 193 patients (definite CS) and extracardiac in 205 (probable CS). Patients with and without Class I or IIa ICD indications at presentation were identified, and subsequent occurrences of SCD (fatal or aborted) and sustained ventricular tachycardia were recorded, as were ICD indications emerging first on follow-up. Results: Over a median of 4.8 years, 41 patients (10.3%) had fatal (n=8) or aborted (n=33) SCD, and 98 (24.6%) experienced SCD or sustained ventricular tachycardia as the first event. By the Heart Rhythm Society guideline, Class I or IIa ICD indications were present in 339 patients (85%) and absent in 59 (15%), of whom 264 (78%) and 30 (51%), respectively, received an ICD. Cumulative 5-year incidence of SCD was 10.7% (95% CI, 7.4%–15.4%) in patients with ICD indications versus 4.8% (95% CI, 1.2%–19.1%) in those without (χ ² =1.834, P =0.176). The corresponding rates of SCD were 13.8% (95% CI, 9.1%–21.0%) versus 6.3% (95% CI, 0.7%–54.0%; χ ² =0.814, P =0.367) in definite CS and 7.6% (95% CI, 3.8%–15.1%) versus 3.3% (95% CI, 0.5%–22.9%; χ ² =0.680, P =0.410) in probable CS. In multivariable regression analysis, SCD was predicted by definite histological diagnosis ( P =0.033) but not by Class I or IIa ICD indications ( P =0.210). In patients without ICD indications at presentation, 5-year incidence of SCD, sustained ventricular tachycardia, and emerging Class I or IIa indications was 53% (95% CI, 40%–71%). By the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association/Heart Rhythm Society guideline, all patients with complete data (n=245) had Class I or IIa indications for ICD implantation. Conclusions: Current ICD guidelines fail to distinguish a truly low-risk group of patients with clinically manifest CS, the 5-year risk of SCD approaching 5% despite absent ICD indications. Further research is needed on prognostic factors, including the role of diagnostic histology. Meanwhile, all patients with CS presenting with clinical cardiac manifestations should be considered for an ICD implantation.

Background: Acute myocarditis (AM) is thought to be a rare cardiovascular complication of COVID-19, although minimal data are available beyond case reports. We aim to report the prevalence, baseline characteristics, in-hospital management, and outcomes for patients with COVID-19–associated AM on the basis of a retrospective cohort from 23 hospitals in the United States and Europe. Methods: A total of 112 patients with suspected AM from 56 963 hospitalized patients with COVID-19 were evaluated between February 1, 2020, and April 30, 2021. Inclusion criteria were hospitalization for COVID-19 and a diagnosis of AM on the basis of endomyocardial biopsy or increased troponin level plus typical signs of AM on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. We identified 97 patients with possible AM, and among them, 54 patients with definite/probable AM supported by endomyocardial biopsy in 17 (31.5%) patients or magnetic resonance imaging in 50 (92.6%). We analyzed patient characteristics, treatments, and outcomes among all COVID-19–associated AM. Results: AM prevalence among hospitalized patients with COVID-19 was 2.4 per 1000 hospitalizations considering definite/probable and 4.1 per 1000 considering also possible AM. The median age of definite/probable cases was 38 years, and 38.9% were female. On admission, chest pain and dyspnea were the most frequent symptoms (55.5% and 53.7%, respectively). Thirty-one cases (57.4%) occurred in the absence of COVID-19–associated pneumonia. Twenty-one (38.9%) had a fulminant presentation requiring inotropic support or temporary mechanical circulatory support. The composite of in-hospital mortality or temporary mechanical circulatory support occurred in 20.4%. At 120 days, estimated mortality was 6.6%, 15.1% in patients with associated pneumonia versus 0% in patients without pneumonia ( P =0.044). During hospitalization, left ventricular ejection fraction, assessed by echocardiography, improved from a median of 40% on admission to 55% at discharge (n=47; P <0.0001) similarly in patients with or without pneumonia. Corticosteroids were frequently administered (55.5%). Conclusions: AM occurrence is estimated between 2.4 and 4.1 out of 1000 patients hospitalized for COVID-19. The majority of AM occurs in the absence of pneumonia and is often complicated by hemodynamic instability. AM is a rare complication in patients hospitalized for COVID-19, with an outcome that differs on the basis of the presence of concomitant pneumonia.