Eric J. Heyer
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Eric J. Heyer has a total of 96 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
E. Sander Connolly
Department of Neurological Surgery, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA; Department of Neurology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
10 shared publicationsDonald O. Quest
Neurological Surgery, Columbia University, New York, NY
7 shared publicationsJoanna L. Mergeche
Department of Anesthesiology, Columbia University, 630 West 168th Street, P&S Box 46, New York, NY 10032, USA
7 shared publicationsSamuel S. Bruce
Department of Neurological Surgery, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
6 shared publicationsRobert A. Solomon
Neurological Surgery, Columbia University, New York, NY
5 shared publicationsZirka H. Anastasian
Columbia University
5 shared publications
Latest Publications
- 13 June 2017
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 459-472
Carotid Surgery
- 31 March 2014
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Clinical Neuroscience
- Vol. 21 (3) , 406-411
Reduced middle cerebral artery velocity during cross-clamp predicts cognitive dysfunction after carotid endarterectomy
- 31 March 2014
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Clinical Neuroscience
- Vol. 21 (3) , 406-411
Reduced middle cerebral artery velocity during cross-clamp predicts cognitive dysfunction after carotid endarterectomy
- 1 February 2014
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Clinical Neuroscience
- Vol. 21 (2) , 236-240
Apolipoprotein E-ε4 polymorphism and cognitive dysfunction after carotid endarterectomy
- 1 February 2014
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Clinical Neuroscience
- Vol. 21 (2) , 236-240
Apolipoprotein E-ε4 polymorphism and cognitive dysfunction after carotid endarterectomy
- 1 November 2013
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Neurosurgery
- Vol. 73 (5) , 791-796
Phosphodiesterase 4D Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism 83 and Cognitive Dysfunction in Carotid Endarterectomy Patients
BACKGROUND:. Phosphodiesterase 4D (PDE4D), through the regulation of cyclic AMP, modulates inflammation and other processes that affect atherosclerosis
- 1 November 2013
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Neurosurgery
- Vol. 73 (5) , 791-796
Phosphodiesterase 4D Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism 83 and Cognitive Dysfunction in Carotid Endarterectomy Patients
BACKGROUND:. Phosphodiesterase 4D (PDE4D), through the regulation of cyclic AMP, modulates inflammation and other processes that affect atherosclerosis
- Open Access
- 14 September 2013
- Published by American Diabetes Association in Diabetes Care
- Vol. 36 (10) , 3283-3286
Inflammation and Cognitive Dysfunction in Type 2 Diabetic Carotid Endarterectomy Patients
OBJECTIVE: Type 2 diabetic patients have a high incidence of cerebrovascular disease, elevated inflammation, and high risk of developing cognitive dysfunction following carotid endarterectomy (CEA). To elucidate the relationship between inflammation and the risk of cognitive dysfunction in type 2 diabetic patients, we aim to determine whether elevated levels of systemic inflammatory markers are associated with cognitive dysfunction 1 day after CEA. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: One hundred fifteen type 2 diabetic CEA patients and 156 reference surgical patients were recruited with written informed consent in this single-center cohort study. All patients were evaluated with an extensive battery of neuropsychometric tests. Preoperative monocyte counts, HbA1c, C-reactive protein (CRP), intercellular adhesion molecule 1, and matrix metalloproteinase 9 activity levels were obtained. RESULTS: In a multivariate logistic regression model constructed to identify predictors of cognitive dysfunction in type 2 diabetic CEA patients, each unit of monocyte counts (odds ratio [OR] 1.76 [95% CI 1.17–2.93]; P = 0.005) and CRP (OR 1.17 [1.10–1.29]; P < 0.001) was significantly associated with higher odds of developing cognitive dysfunction 1 day after CEA in type 2 diabetic patients. CONCLUSIONS: Type 2 diabetic patients with elevated levels of preoperative systemic inflammatory markers exhibit more cognitive dysfunction 1 day after CEA. These observations have implications for the preoperative medical management of this high-risk group of surgical patients undergoing carotid revascularization with CEA.
- 14 September 2013
- Published by American Diabetes Association in Diabetes Care
- Vol. 36 (10) , 3283-3286
Open AccessInflammation and Cognitive Dysfunction in Type 2 Diabetic Carotid Endarterectomy Patients
OBJECTIVE: Type 2 diabetic patients have a high incidence of cerebrovascular disease, elevated inflammation, and high risk of developing cognitive dysfunction following carotid endarterectomy (CEA). To elucidate the relationship between inflammation and the risk of cognitive dysfunction in type 2 diabetic patients, we aim to determine whether elevated levels of systemic inflammatory markers are associated with cognitive dysfunction 1 day after CEA. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: One hundred fifteen type 2 diabetic CEA patients and 156 reference surgical patients were recruited with written informed consent in this single-center cohort study. All patients were evaluated with an extensive battery of neuropsychometric tests. Preoperative monocyte counts, HbA1c, C-reactive protein (CRP), intercellular adhesion molecule 1, and matrix metalloproteinase 9 activity levels were obtained. RESULTS: In a multivariate logistic regression model constructed to identify predictors of cognitive dysfunction in type 2 diabetic CEA patients, each unit of monocyte counts (odds ratio [OR] 1.76 [95% CI 1.17–2.93]; P = 0.005) and CRP (OR 1.17 [1.10–1.29]; P < 0.001) was significantly associated with higher odds of developing cognitive dysfunction 1 day after CEA in type 2 diabetic patients. CONCLUSIONS: Type 2 diabetic patients with elevated levels of preoperative systemic inflammatory markers exhibit more cognitive dysfunction 1 day after CEA. These observations have implications for the preoperative medical management of this high-risk group of surgical patients undergoing carotid revascularization with CEA.
- 1 September 2013
- Published by Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG) in Journal of Neurosurgery
- Vol. 119 (3) , 648-654
Complement polymorphisms and cognitive dysfunction after carotid endarterectomy
Object: The role of genetic polymorphisms in the neurological outcome of patients after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) remains unclear. There are single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that predispose patients to postoperative cognitive dysfunction (CD). We aim to assess the predictability of three complement cascade-related SNPs for CD in patients having CEAs. Methods: In 252 patients undergoing CEA, genotyping was performed for the following polymorphisms: complement component 5 (C5) rs17611, mannose-binding lectin 2 (MBL2) rs7096206, and complement factor H (CFH) rs1061170. Differences among genotypes were analyzed via the chi-square test. Patients were evaluated with a neuropsychometric battery for CD 1 day and 1 month after CEA. A multiple logistic regression model was created. All variables with univariate p < 0.20 were included in the final model. Results: The C5 genotypes A/G (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.11–0.60, p = 0.002) and G/G (OR 0.22, 95% CI 0.09–0.52, p < 0.001) were significantly associated with lower odds of exhibiting CD at 1 day after CEA compared with A/A. The CFH genotypes C/T (OR 3.37, 95% CI 1.69–6.92, p < 0.001) and C/C (OR 3.67, 95% CI 1.30–10.06, p = 0.012) were significantly associated with higher odds of exhibiting CD at 1 day after CEA compared with T/T. Statin use was also significantly associated with lower odds of exhibiting CD at 1 day after CEA (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.22–0.84, p = 0.01). No SNPs were significantly associated with CD at 1 month after CEA. Conclusions: The presence of a deleterious allele in the C5 and CFH SNPs may predispose patients to exhibit CD after CEA. This finding supports previous data demonstrating that the complement cascade system may play an important role in the development of CD. These findings warrant further investigation.
- 1 September 2013
- Published by Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG) in Journal of Neurosurgery
- Vol. 119 (3) , 648-654
Complement polymorphisms and cognitive dysfunction after carotid endarterectomy
Object: The role of genetic polymorphisms in the neurological outcome of patients after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) remains unclear. There are single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that predispose patients to postoperative cognitive dysfunction (CD). We aim to assess the predictability of three complement cascade-related SNPs for CD in patients having CEAs. Methods: In 252 patients undergoing CEA, genotyping was performed for the following polymorphisms: complement component 5 (C5) rs17611, mannose-binding lectin 2 (MBL2) rs7096206, and complement factor H (CFH) rs1061170. Differences among genotypes were analyzed via the chi-square test. Patients were evaluated with a neuropsychometric battery for CD 1 day and 1 month after CEA. A multiple logistic regression model was created. All variables with univariate p < 0.20 were included in the final model. Results: The C5 genotypes A/G (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.11–0.60, p = 0.002) and G/G (OR 0.22, 95% CI 0.09–0.52, p < 0.001) were significantly associated with lower odds of exhibiting CD at 1 day after CEA compared with A/A. The CFH genotypes C/T (OR 3.37, 95% CI 1.69–6.92, p < 0.001) and C/C (OR 3.67, 95% CI 1.30–10.06, p = 0.012) were significantly associated with higher odds of exhibiting CD at 1 day after CEA compared with T/T. Statin use was also significantly associated with lower odds of exhibiting CD at 1 day after CEA (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.22–0.84, p = 0.01). No SNPs were significantly associated with CD at 1 month after CEA. Conclusions: The presence of a deleterious allele in the C5 and CFH SNPs may predispose patients to exhibit CD after CEA. This finding supports previous data demonstrating that the complement cascade system may play an important role in the development of CD. These findings warrant further investigation.
- 1 July 2013
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Vascular Surgery
- Vol. 58 (1) , 277
Statins Reduce Neurologic Injury in Asymptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Patients
- 1 July 2013
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Vascular Surgery
- Vol. 58 (1) , 277
Statins Reduce Neurologic Injury in Asymptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Patients
- 1 April 2013
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Stroke
- Vol. 44 (4) , 1150-1152
Statins Reduce Neurologic Injury in Asymptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Patients
Background and Purpose—: Statins are neuroprotective in a variety of experimental models of cerebral injury. We sought to determine whether patients taking statins before asymptomatic carotid endarterectomy exhibit a lower incidence of neurological injury (clinical stroke and cognitive dysfunction). Methods—: A total of 328 patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis scheduled for elective carotid endarterectomy consented to participate in this observational study of perioperative neurological injury. Results—: Patients taking statins had a lower incidence of clinical stroke (0.0% vs 3.1%; P =0.02) and cognitive dysfunction (11.0% vs 20.2%; P =0.03). In a multivariate regression model, statin use was significantly associated with decreased odds of cognitive dysfunction (odds ratio, 0.51 [95% CI, 0.27–0.96]; P =0.04). Conclusions—: Preoperative statin use was associated with less neurological injury after asymptomatic carotid endarterectomy. These observations suggest that it may be possible to further reduce the perioperative morbidity of carotid endarterectomy. Clinical Trial Registration—: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00597883
- 1 April 2013
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Stroke
- Vol. 44 (4) , 1150-1152
Statins Reduce Neurologic Injury in Asymptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Patients
Background and Purpose—: Statins are neuroprotective in a variety of experimental models of cerebral injury. We sought to determine whether patients taking statins before asymptomatic carotid endarterectomy exhibit a lower incidence of neurological injury (clinical stroke and cognitive dysfunction). Methods—: A total of 328 patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis scheduled for elective carotid endarterectomy consented to participate in this observational study of perioperative neurological injury. Results—: Patients taking statins had a lower incidence of clinical stroke (0.0% vs 3.1%; P =0.02) and cognitive dysfunction (11.0% vs 20.2%; P =0.03). In a multivariate regression model, statin use was significantly associated with decreased odds of cognitive dysfunction (odds ratio, 0.51 [95% CI, 0.27–0.96]; P =0.04). Conclusions—: Preoperative statin use was associated with less neurological injury after asymptomatic carotid endarterectomy. These observations suggest that it may be possible to further reduce the perioperative morbidity of carotid endarterectomy. Clinical Trial Registration—: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00597883
- 1 September 2012
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Anesthesiology
- Vol. 117 (3) , 684-685
In Reply
We would like to thank Dr. Williams for responding to our editorial,1 which appeared in the February 2012 issue of ANESTHESIOLOGY.
- 1 September 2012
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Anesthesiology
- Vol. 117 (3) , 684-685
In Reply
We would like to thank Dr. Williams for responding to our editorial,1 which appeared in the February 2012 issue of ANESTHESIOLOGY.
- 1 February 2012
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Anesthesiology
- Vol. 116 (2) , 244-245
What Matters during Endovascular Therapy for Acute Stroke
PATIENTS who experience acute ischemic stroke increasingly are undergoing treatment with endovascular revascularization procedures. Davis et al. present a retrospective review encompassing their 6 yr experience treating 96 stroke patients with endovascular arterial revascularization, half receiving local anesthesia or sedation, and the remainder receiving general anesthesia.1 A number of recently published studies have implicated general anesthesia as a factor in poor outcome.2 – 5
- 1 February 2012
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Anesthesiology
- Vol. 116 (2) , 244-245
What Matters during Endovascular Therapy for Acute Stroke
PATIENTS who experience acute ischemic stroke increasingly are undergoing treatment with endovascular revascularization procedures. Davis et al. present a retrospective review encompassing their 6 yr experience treating 96 stroke patients with endovascular arterial revascularization, half receiving local anesthesia or sedation, and the remainder receiving general anesthesia.1 A number of recently published studies have implicated general anesthesia as a factor in poor outcome.2 – 5