Hans Ekkehard Plesser

A striking feature of the organization of the early visual pathway is the significant feedback from primary visual cortex to cells in the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN). Despite numerous experimental and modeling studies, the functional role for this feedback remains elusive. We present a new firing-rate-based model for LGN relay cells in cat, explicitly accounting for thalamocortical loop effects. The established DOG model, here assumed to account for the spatial aspects of the feedforward processing of visual stimuli, is extended to incorporate the influence of thalamocortical loops including a full set of orientation-selective cortical cell populations. Assuming a phase-reversed push-pull arrangement of ON and OFF cortical feedback as seen experimentally, this extended DOG (eDOG) model exhibits linear firing properties despite non-linear firing characteristics of the corticothalamic cells. The spatiotemporal receptive field of the eDOG model has a simple algebraic structure in Fourier space, while the real-space receptive field, as well as responses to visual stimuli, are found by evaluation of an integral. As an example application we use the eDOG model to study effects of cortical feedback on responses to flashing circular spots and patch-grating stimuli and find that the eDOG model can qualitatively account for experimental findings.

Progress in science depends on the effective exchange of ideas among scientists. New ideas can be assessed and criticized in a meaningful manner only if they are formulated precisely. This applies to simulation studies as well as to experiments and theories. But after more than 50 years of neuronal network simulations, we still lack a clear and common understanding of the role of computational models in neuroscience as well as established practices for describing network models in publications. This hinders the critical evaluation of network models as well as their re-use. We analyze here 14 research papers proposing neuronal network models of different complexity and find widely varying approaches to model descriptions, with regard to both the means of description and the ordering and placement of material. We further observe great variation in the graphical representation of networks and the notation used in equations. Based on our observations, we propose a good model description practice, composed of guidelines for the organization of publications, a checklist for model descriptions, templates for tables presenting model structure, and guidelines for diagrams of networks. The main purpose of this good practice is to trigger a debate about the communication of neuronal network models in a manner comprehensible to humans, as opposed to machine-readable model description languages. We believe that the good model description practice proposed here, together with a number of other recent initiatives on data-, model-, and software-sharing, may lead to a deeper and more fruitful exchange of ideas among computational neuroscientists in years to come. We further hope that work on standardized ways of describing—and thinking about—complex neuronal networks will lead the scientific community to a clearer understanding of high-level concepts in network dynamics, and will thus lead to deeper insights into the function of the brain. Scientists make precise, testable statements about their observations and models of nature. Other scientists can then evaluate these statements and attempt to reproduce or extend them. Results that cannot be reproduced will be duly criticized to arrive at better interpretations of experimental results or better models. Over time, this discourse develops our joint scientific knowledge. A crucial condition for this process is that scientists can describe their own models in a manner that is precise and comprehensible to others. We analyze in this paper how well models of neuronal networks are described in the scientific literature and conclude that the wide variety of manners in which network models are described makes it difficult to communicate models successfully. We propose a good model description practice to improve the communication of neuronal network models.

Lovelace and Cios ( 2008 ) recently proposed a very simple spiking neuron (VSSN) model for simulations of large neuronal networks as an efficient replacement for the integrate-and-fire neuron model. We argue that the VSSN model falls behind key advances in neuronal network modeling over the past 20 years, in particular, techniques that permit simulators to compute the state of the neuron without repeated summation over the history of input spikes and to integrate the subthreshold dynamics exactly. State-of-the-art solvers for networks of integrate-and-fire model neurons are substantially more efficient than the VSSN simulator and allow routine simulations of networks of some 10⁵ neurons and 10⁹ connections on moderate computer clusters.

Very large networks of spiking neurons can be simulated efficiently in parallel under the constraint that spike times are bound to an equidistant time grid. Within this scheme, the subthreshold dynamics of a wide class of integrate-and-fire-type neuron models can be integrated exactly from one grid point to the next. However, the loss in accuracy caused by restricting spike times to the grid can have undesirable consequences, which has led to interest in interpolating spike times between the grid points to retrieve an adequate representation of network dynamics. We demonstrate that the exact integration scheme can be combined naturally with off-grid spike events found by interpolation. We show that by exploiting the existence of a minimal synaptic propagation delay, the need for a central event queue is removed, so that the precision of event-driven simulation on the level of single neurons is combined with the efficiency of time-driven global scheduling. Further, for neuron models with linear subthreshold dynamics, even local event queuing can be avoided, resulting in much greater efficiency on the single-neuron level. These ideas are exemplified by two implementations of a widely used neuron model. We present a measure for the efficiency of network simulations in terms of their integration error and show that for a wide range of input spike rates, the novel techniques we present are both more accurate and faster than standard techniques.