Ana Navarro
Ana Navarro has a total of 9 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Concepción Pérez
Pain Clinic, University Hospital La Princesa, Madrid, Spain
2 shared publicationsJavier Rejas
Health Outcomes Research Department, Pfizer S.L.U., Alcobendas, Madrid, Spain
2 shared publicationsMaría T. Saldaña
Primary Care Health Centre Raíces, Castrillón, Asturias, Spain
2 shared publications- Concepción Pérez
Pain Clinic, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, C/Diego de León 62, 28002, Madrid, Spain
1 shared publication - Javier Rejas
Master in Health Assessment and Market Access, Universidad Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
1 shared publication - María Teresa Saldaña
Primary Care Health Centre Raíces, Castrillón, Asturias, Spain
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 18 October 2011
- Published by Wiley in Pain Practice
- Vol. 12 (5) , 382-393
Costs and Health Resources Utilization Following Switching to Pregabalin in Individuals with Gabapentin‐Refractory Neuropathic Pain: A post hoc Analysis
Purpose: To analyze the changes in pain severity and associated costs resulting from resource utilization and reduced productivity in patients with gabapentin‐refractory peripheral neuropathic pain who switched to pregabalin therapy in primary care settings in Spain. Patients and Methods: This is a post hoc analysis of a 12‐week, multicentre, noninterventional cost‐of‐illness study. Patients were included in the study if they were over 18 years of age and had a diagnosis of chronic, treatment‐refractory peripheral neuropathic pain. The analysis included all pregabalin‐naïve patients who had previously shown an inadequate response to gabapentin and switched to pregabalin. Severity of pain before and after treatment with pregabalin, alone or as an add‐on therapy, was assessed using the Short‐Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF‐MPQ) and its related visual analogue scale (VA). Healthcare resource utilization, productivity (including lost‐workday equivalents [LWDE]), and related costs were assessed at baseline and after pregabalin treatment. Results: A total of 174 patients switched to pregabalin had significant and clinically relevant reductions in pain severity (mean [SD] change on SF‐MPQ VA scale, −31.9 [22.1]; P < 0.05 vs. baseline; effect size, 1.87). Reduction in pain was similar with both pregabalin monotherapy and add‐on therapy. Significant reductions in healthcare resource utilization (concomitant drug use [in pregabalin add‐on group], ancillary tests, and unscheduled medical visits) were observed at the end of trial. Additionally, there were substantial improvements in productivity, including a reduction in the number of LWDE following pregabalin treatment (−18.9 [26.0]; P < 0.0001). These changes correlated with substantial reductions in both direct (−652.9 ± 1622.4 €; P < 0.0001) and indirect healthcare costs (−851.6 [1259.6] €; P < 0.0001). Conclusions: The cost of care in patients with gabapentin‐refractory peripheral neuropathic pain appeared to be significantly reduced after switching to pregabalin treatment, alone or in combination with other analgesic drugs, in a real‐life setting.
- 18 October 2011
- Published by Wiley in Pain Practice
- Vol. 12 (5) , 382-393
Costs and Health Resources Utilization Following Switching to Pregabalin in Individuals with Gabapentin‐Refractory Neuropathic Pain: A post hoc Analysis
Purpose: To analyze the changes in pain severity and associated costs resulting from resource utilization and reduced productivity in patients with gabapentin‐refractory peripheral neuropathic pain who switched to pregabalin therapy in primary care settings in Spain. Patients and Methods: This is a post hoc analysis of a 12‐week, multicentre, noninterventional cost‐of‐illness study. Patients were included in the study if they were over 18 years of age and had a diagnosis of chronic, treatment‐refractory peripheral neuropathic pain. The analysis included all pregabalin‐naïve patients who had previously shown an inadequate response to gabapentin and switched to pregabalin. Severity of pain before and after treatment with pregabalin, alone or as an add‐on therapy, was assessed using the Short‐Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF‐MPQ) and its related visual analogue scale (VA). Healthcare resource utilization, productivity (including lost‐workday equivalents [LWDE]), and related costs were assessed at baseline and after pregabalin treatment. Results: A total of 174 patients switched to pregabalin had significant and clinically relevant reductions in pain severity (mean [SD] change on SF‐MPQ VA scale, −31.9 [22.1]; P < 0.05 vs. baseline; effect size, 1.87). Reduction in pain was similar with both pregabalin monotherapy and add‐on therapy. Significant reductions in healthcare resource utilization (concomitant drug use [in pregabalin add‐on group], ancillary tests, and unscheduled medical visits) were observed at the end of trial. Additionally, there were substantial improvements in productivity, including a reduction in the number of LWDE following pregabalin treatment (−18.9 [26.0]; P < 0.0001). These changes correlated with substantial reductions in both direct (−652.9 ± 1622.4 €; P < 0.0001) and indirect healthcare costs (−851.6 [1259.6] €; P < 0.0001). Conclusions: The cost of care in patients with gabapentin‐refractory peripheral neuropathic pain appeared to be significantly reduced after switching to pregabalin treatment, alone or in combination with other analgesic drugs, in a real‐life setting.
- Open Access
- 20 January 2011
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Neurology
- Vol. 11 (1) , 7
A Cost-Consequences analysis of the effect of Pregabalin in the treatment of peripheral Neuropathic Pain in routine medical practice in Primary Care settings
Neuropathic pain (NeP) is a common symptom of a group of a variety of conditions, including diabetic neuropathy, trigeminal neuralgia, or postherpetic neuralgia. Prevalence of NeP has been estimated to range between 5-7.5%, and produces up to 25% of pain clinics consultations. Due to its severity, chronic evolution, and associated co-morbidities, NeP has an important individual and social impact. The objective was to analyze the effect of pregabalin (PGB) on pain alleviation and longitudinal health and non-health resources utilization and derived costs in peripheral refractory NeP in routine medical practice in primary care settings (PCS) in Spain.
- 20 January 2011
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Neurology
- Vol. 11 (1) , 7
Open AccessA Cost-Consequences analysis of the effect of Pregabalin in the treatment of peripheral Neuropathic Pain in routine medical practice in Primary Care settings
Neuropathic pain (NeP) is a common symptom of a group of a variety of conditions, including diabetic neuropathy, trigeminal neuralgia, or postherpetic neuralgia. Prevalence of NeP has been estimated to range between 5-7.5%, and produces up to 25% of pain clinics consultations. Due to its severity, chronic evolution, and associated co-morbidities, NeP has an important individual and social impact. The objective was to analyze the effect of pregabalin (PGB) on pain alleviation and longitudinal health and non-health resources utilization and derived costs in peripheral refractory NeP in routine medical practice in primary care settings (PCS) in Spain.
- Open Access
- 30 April 2010
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Pain Medicine
- Vol. 11 (5) , 719-731
Patient-reported Outcomes in Subjects with Neuropathic Pain Receiving Pregabalin: Evidence from Medical Practice in Primary Care Settings
Objective. To evaluate the effect of pregabalin on different patient-reported outcomes in subjects with neuropathic pain treated under usual medical p
- 30 April 2010
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Pain Medicine
- Vol. 11 (5) , 719-731
Open AccessPatient-reported Outcomes in Subjects with Neuropathic Pain Receiving Pregabalin: Evidence from Medical Practice in Primary Care Settings
Objective. To evaluate the effect of pregabalin on different patient-reported outcomes in subjects with neuropathic pain treated under usual medical p