Nuria Ribelles

Advanced breast cancer represents a challenge for patients and physicians due to its dynamic genomic changes, which are associated with resistance to treatments. The main goals of treatment in advanced breast cancer are to improve patient quality of life and to increase patient survival. This is achieved using the most appropriate sequence of treatments based on knowledge of the natural history of the disease. In these guidelines (updated in 2025), we summarize current evidence and available therapies for the medical management of advanced breast cancer.

Breast cancer survivors (BCS) may face functional alterations after surgical intervention. Upper Limb Disorders (ULDs) are highly prevalent even years after a diagnosis. Clinicians may assess the upper limbs after breast cancer. The Upper Limb Functional Index (ULFI) has been validated across different populations and languages. This study aimed to assess the psychometric properties of the Upper Limb Functional Index Spanish version (ULFI-Sp) in the BCS. Methods: A psychometric validation study of the ULFI-Sp was conducted on 216 voluntary breast cancer survivors. The psychometric properties were as follows: analysis of the factor structure by maximum likelihood extraction (MLE), internal consistency, and construct validity by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Results: The factor structure was one-dimensional. ULFI-Sp showed a high internal consistency for the total score (α = 0.916) and the regression score obtained from MLE (α = 0.996). CFA revealed a poor fit, and a new 14-item model (short version) was further tested. The developed short version of the ULFI-SP is preferable to assess upper limb function in Spanish BCS. Conclusions: Given the high prevalence of ULD in this population and the broader versions of ULFI across different languages, this study’s results may be transferred to clinical practice and integrated as part of upper limb assessment after breast cancer.

Background: Breast cancer survivors (BCS) face several symptoms and are at higher risk of weight gain following diagnosis. Current literature shows that both exercise and diet play a key role in recovery of BCS. However, there is a gap between current guidelines and the real-world context. The aim of this article is to describe the process behind a free, not-for-profit community-based therapeutic exercise and education programme (TEEP) for BCS in the clinical setting. Methods: The “Onco-Health Club” (OHC) consists of therapeutic exercise (TE) intervention aimed at ameliorating cancer-related fatigue (CRF) and improving QoL and physical function. TE is supplemented with nutritional education, providing information about the Mediterranean diet. To this end, patients are recruited from an oncologist and are referred to a physiotherapist and a nutritionist for baseline assessment. TEEP consists of a 3-month intervention, delivered twice a week in a group format with 1 h of TE and 30 min of nutritional education. BCS then have a final assessment and are advised to continue with a healthy lifestyle. Data about referral, compliance and assessment were collected. Results: From May 2017 to February of 2020, a total of 158 patients were recruited from 8 cohorts and 142 initially started the OHC. From 119 that joined the program, 96 patients were considered to have finished it with good adherence (assistance > 80%). BCS significantly improved their QoL, as well as upper and lower limb’s function, and increased their level of physical activity. CRF tended to decrease (p = 0.005). Conclusions: This study obtained data on recruitment, compliance, and possible limitations of these kinds of programmes in a real-world context. Further research is needed in order to optimize patient engagement and compliance, as well as to determine the transferability of these programmes in the clinical setting. Trial registration: NCT03879096, Registered 18th March 2019. Retrospectively registered.

Adjuvant endocrine therapy is the most important systemic treatment for postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive early breast cancer following surgery. Most trials have shown that the third-generation aromatase inhibitors, anastrozole, letrozole (LET), and exemestane, significantly prolong disease-free survival compared with tamoxifen. However, an overall survival benefit with aromatase inhibitors was observed in only three trials to date, in retrospective analyses from selected groups of patients: sequential analysis in the Austrian Breast & Colorectal Study Group 8, switch analysis in the Intergroup Exemestane Study, and analysis of initial letrozole in Breast International Group 1–98 study. Although the priming effect observed in preclinical models and breast cancer patients provides a rationale for sequencing adjuvant endocrine treatment with tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors, the optimal strategy for adjuvant endocrine treatment has yet to be determined. This review discusses aromatase inhibitor monotherapy, sequential adjuvant treatment with tamoxifen followed by an aromatase inhibitor, and sequential adjuvant treatment with an aromatase inhibitor followed by tamoxifen. Available data in support of and against each strategy is evaluated. The safety profiles of tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors is also examined.