Huib A. Cense

Currently, accurate biomarkers differentiating simple (phlegmonous) from complex (gangrenous and/or perforated) appendicitis in children are lacking. However, both types may potentially require different treatment strategies, and the search for diagnostic modalities remains warranted. Previously, we demonstrated a distinct microbiota (both an increased bacterial diversity and abundance) in the appendix of children with complex compared to simple appendicitis. From the same cohort of patients we have collected 35 rectal swabs under general anesthesia prior to appendectomy and microbiota analysis was performed by IS-pro, a 16S-23S rDNA–based clinical microbiota profiling technique. Using the obtained IS-profiles, we performed cluster analyses (UPGMA), comparison of diversity (Shannon Diversity Index) and intensity (abundance in relative fluorescence units) on phylum level, and comparison on species level of bacteria between simple and complex appendicitis. Regarding these analyses, we observed no clear differences between simple and complex appendicitis. However, increased similarity of the microbial composition of the appendix and rectal swab was found within children with complex compared to simple appendicitis. Furthermore, PLS-DA regression analysis provided clear visual differentiation between simple and complex appendicitis, but the diagnostic power was low (highest AUC 0.65). Conclusion: Microbiota analysis of rectal swabs may be viable to differentiate between simple and complex appendicitis prior to surgery as a supervised classification model allowed for discrimination of both types. However, the current diagnostic power was low and further validation studies are needed to assess the value of this method. What is Known:• Simple and complex appendicitis in children may require different treatment strategies, but accurate preoperative biomarkers are lacking.• Clear differentiation can be made between both types in children based upon the microbial composition in the appendix. What is New:• Increased similarity was found between the microbial composition of the appendix and rectal swab within children with complex compared to simple appendicitis.• Using a supervised classification model rectal swabs may be viable to discriminate between simple and complex appendicitis, but the diagnostic power was low.

Background: Necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTI) affect long‐term quality of life in survivors. Different approaches to debridement may influence quality of life. The aim of this study was to assess the current practice of the debridement of NSTI in the Netherlands.Methods: An animated, interactive online survey was distributed among general surgeons and plastic surgeons in the Netherlands. Two NSTI‐cases were presented, followed by questions regarding the preferred surgical approach. Case one described a woman with a swollen, red leg, with signs of sepsis and without visible necrosis. Case two described an immunocompromised man with septic shock syndrome and extensive necrosis.Results: In total 232 responses were included (143 general surgeons, 89 plastic surgeons). In case one, 32% chose to preserve all skin, while 17% chose to resect all skin above the affected fascia, including normal‐looking skin. In case two, all participants resected necrotic skin, and most (88%) also blue discolored skin. While 32% did not resect more than blue discolored and necrotic skin, 35% also resected red‐colored skin, and 21% all skin overlying the affected fascia, including normal colored skin. Respondents working in a hospital with a burn center tended to preserve more skin, whereas plastic surgeons chose more often for skin resection compared to general surgeons.Conclusions: By using a novel approach to a survey, the authors demonstrate the existence of extensive practice variety regarding the approach to debridement of NSTI among Dutch general and plastic surgeons. Consensus is needed, followed by targeted education of surgeons.

Introduction Strict follow-up after bariatric surgery is an important factor in achieving and maintaining weight loss, whereas regaining weight is the most important threat in long-term follow-up. Stagnation in weight loss or weight regain can be signals of early treatment failure. The aim of this study is to assess the possibility of obtaining frequent objective weight measurements using an Internet-connected home weighing scale. Methods Internet-connected home weighing scales were used to perform weekly follow-up in bariatric surgery patients during the first postoperative year. For each patient, weight measurements were registered and excess body weight loss was calculated. This follow-up method was deemed successful if weight measurements were available for 80 % of all weeks in the first year. Results A total of 14 patients started the protocol. Seven patients (50 %) performed weekly weight measurements for at least 80 % of all weeks in the first year. One-year follow-up was available for 11 patients. Excess weight loss was >50 % in nine (82 %) of these patients and >40 % in the remaining two. Conclusions Using an Internet-connected weighing scale at home is feasible in postsurgery bariatric patients. It can provide the treating physicians with valuable information about weight loss over time. This could possibly offer opportunities for timely interventions during follow-up in case of insufficient weight loss or weight regain.

After major abdominal surgery (MAS), 20 % of patients endure major complications, which require invasive treatment and are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. A quality control algorithm after major abdominal surgery aimed at early identification of patients at risk of developing major complications can decrease associated morbidity and mortality. Literature studies show promising results for C-reactive protein (CRP) as an early marker for postoperative complications, however clinical significance has yet to be determined. A multicenter, stepped wedge, prospective clinical trial including all adult patients planned to undergo elective MAS. The first period consists of standard postoperative monitoring, which entails on demand additional examinations. This is followed by a period with implementation of postoperative control according to the PRECious protocol, which implicates standardized measurement of CRP levels. If CRP levels exceed 140 mg/L on postoperative day 3,4 or 5, an enhanced CT-scan is performed. Primary outcome in this study is a combined primary outcome, entailing all morbidity and mortality due to postoperative complications. Complications are graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Secondary outcomes are hospital length of stay, patients reported outcome measures (PROMs) and cost-effectiveness. Data will be collected during admission, three months and one year postoperatively. Approval by the medical ethics committee of the VU University Medical Center was obtained (ID 2015.114). the PRECious trial is a stepped-wedge, multicenter, open label, prospective clinical trial to determine the effect of a standardized postoperative quality control algorithm on postoperative morbidity and mortality, and cost-effectiveness. www.ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02102217 . Registered 5 February 2015.

Annually approximately 100.000 patients undergo a laparotomy in the Netherlands. About 15,000 of these patients will develop an incisional hernia. Both open and laparoscopic surgical repair have been proven to be safe. However, the most effective treatment of incisional hernias remains unclear. This study, the ‘INCH-trial’, comparing cost-effectiveness of open and laparoscopic incisional hernia repair, is therefore needed. A randomized multi-center clinical trial comparing cost-effectiveness of open and laparoscopic repair of incisional hernias. Patients with a symptomatic incisional hernia, eligible for laparoscopic and open incisional hernia repair. Only surgeons, experienced in both open and laparoscopic incisional hernia repair, will participate in the INCH trial. During incisional hernia repair, a mesh is placed under or on top of the fascia, with a minimal overlap of 5 cm. Primary endpoint is length of hospital stay after an incisional hernia repair. Secondary endpoints are time to full recovery within three months after index surgery, post-operative complications, recurrences, mortality and quality of life. Our hypothesis is that laparoscopic incisional hernia repair comes with a significant shorter hospital stay compared to open incisional hernia repair. A difference of two days is considered significant. One-hunderd-and-thirty-five patients are enrolled in each treatment arm. The economic evaluation will be performed from a societal perspective. Primary outcomes are costs per patient related to time-to-recovery and quality of life. The main goal of the trial is to establish whether laparoscopic incisional hernia repair is superior to conventional open incisional hernia repair in terms of cost-effectiveness. This is measured through length of hospital stay and quality of life. Secondary endpoints are re-operation rate due to post-operative complications or recurrences, mortality and quality of life. The difference in time to full recovery between the two treatment strategies is thought to be in favor of laparoscopic incisional hernia repair. Laparoscopic incisional hernia repair is therefore expected to be a more cost-effective approach. Netherlands Trial register: NTR2808

Evaluation of the long-term results of bariatric surgery with an adjustable gastric band for the treatment of morbid obesity. Retrospective, descriptive. From September 1991-September 1993, 30 patients (6 males, 24 females) received an adjustable gastric band because of morbid obesity, being the first group in the Netherlands. The long-term data on these patients: weight loss, band adjustments, complications, reoperations and patient satisfaction, were collected using a medical record survey and a questionnaire and then analysed. Before the operation, the mean BMI was 42.5 kg/m2 (SD: 5.7) and the mean excess body weight was 50.8 kg (SD: 16.7). The mean follow-up time for all patients was 15.3 years (SD: 5.4) and for the responders to the questionnaire, 17.7 years (SD: 0.7); three patients died during follow-up. After surgery, the mean BMI was reduced to 34.7 kg/m2 (SD: 6.4). The mean excess body weight loss of the entire group was 38.1% (SD: 67.8) and of the patients who still had a gastric band in situ, 27.9% (SD: 67.4). In 15 patients, the gastric band reservoir was replaced at least once. The gastric band was replaced in 18 patients due to complications and eventually permanently removed in 6 patients. Of the respondents, 62% were satisfied with the weight loss and 52% were satisfied with regard to possible side effects and complications. The treatment of morbid obesity with an adjustable gastric band in this very first group of patients has resulted in substantial weight loss, but also a high rate of complications and reoperations. Treatment of these kinds of complications is an important aspect of bariatric surgery today. The efficacy of gastric banding is therefore currently under debate.

The median laparotomy is frequently used by abdominal surgeons to gain rapid and wide access to the abdominal cavity with minimal damage to nerves, vascular structures and muscles of the abdominal wall. However, incisional hernia remains the most common complication after median laparotomy, with reported incidences varying between 2-20%. Recent clinical and experimental data showed a continuous suture technique with many small tissue bites in the aponeurosis only, is possibly more effective in the prevention of incisional hernia when compared to the common used large bite technique or mass closure. The STITCH trial is a double-blinded multicenter randomized controlled trial designed to compare a standardized large bite technique with a standardized small bites technique. The main objective is to compare both suture techniques for incidence of incisional hernia after one year. Secondary outcomes will include postoperative complications, direct costs, indirect costs and quality of life. A total of 576 patients will be randomized between a standardized small bites or large bites technique. At least 10 departments of general surgery and two departments of oncological gynaecology will participate in this trial. Both techniques have a standardized amount of stitches per cm wound length and suture length wound length ratio's are calculated in each patient. Follow up will be at 1 month for wound infection and 1 year for incisional hernia. Ultrasound examinations will be performed at both time points to measure the distance between the rectus muscles (at 3 points) and to objectify presence or absence of incisional hernia. Patients, investigators and radiologists will be blinded during follow up, although the surgeon can not be blinded during the surgical procedure. The STITCH trial will provide level 1b evidence to support the preference for either a continuous suture technique with many small tissue bites in the aponeurosis only or for the commonly used large bites technique. Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01132209

Background: Recently, excellent results are reported on laparoscopic lavage in patients with purulent perforated diverticulitis as an alternative for sigmoidectomy and ostomy.The objective of this study is to determine whether LaparOscopic LAvage and drainage is a safe and effective treatment for patients with purulent peritonitis (LOLA-arm) and to determine the optimal resectional strategy in patients with a purulent or faecal peritonitis (DIVA-arm: perforated DIVerticulitis: sigmoidresection with or without Anastomosis).Methods/Design: In this multicentre randomised trial all patients with perforated diverticulitis are included. Upon laparoscopy, patients with purulent peritonitis are treated with laparoscopic lavage and drainage, Hartmann's procedure or sigmoidectomy with primary anastomosis in a ratio of 2:1:1 (LOLA-arm). Patients with faecal peritonitis will be randomised 1:1 between Hartmann's procedure and resection with primary anastomosis (DIVA-arm). The primary combined endpoint of the LOLA-arm is major morbidity and mortality. A sample size of 132:66:66 patients will be able to detect a difference in the primary endpoint from 25% in resectional groups compared to 10% in the laparoscopic lavage group (two sided alpha = 5%, power = 90%). Endpoint of the DIVA-arm is stoma free survival one year after initial surgery. In this arm 212 patients are needed to significantly demonstrate a difference of 30% (log rank test two sided alpha = 5% and power = 90%) in favour of the patients with resection with primary anastomosis. Secondary endpoints for both arms are the number of days alive and outside the hospital, health related quality of life, health care utilisation and associated costs.Discussion: The Ladies trial is a nationwide multicentre randomised trial on perforated diverticulitis that will provide evidence on the merits of laparoscopic lavage and drainage for purulent generalised peritonitis and on the optimal resectional strategy for both purulent and faecal generalised peritonitis.Trial registration: Nederlands Trial Register NTR2037

Background: Persisting abdominal complaints are common after an episode of diverticulitis treated conservatively. Furthermore, some patients develop frequent recurrences. These two groups of patients suffer greatly from their disease, as shown by impaired health related quality of life and increased costs due to multiple specialist consultations, pain medication and productivity losses. Both conservative and operative management of patients with persisting abdominal complaints after an episode of diverticulitis and/or frequently recurring diverticulitis are applied. However, direct comparison by a randomised controlled trial is necessary to determine which is superior in relieving symptoms, optimising health related quality of life, minimising costs and preventing diverticulitis recurrences against acceptable morbidity and mortality associated with surgery or the occurrence of a complicated recurrence after conservative management. We, therefore, constructed a randomised clinical trial comparing these two treatment strategies. Methods/design: The DIRECT trial is a multicenter randomised clinical trial. Patients (18-75 years) presenting themselves with persisting abdominal complaints after an episode of diverticulitis and/or three or more recurrences within 2 years will be included and randomised. Patients randomised for conservative treatment are treated according to the current daily practice (antibiotics, analgetics and/or expectant management). Patients randomised for elective resection will undergo an elective resection of the affected colon segment. Preferably, a laparoscopic approach is used. The primary outcome is health related quality of life measured by the Gastro-intestinal Quality of Life Index, Short-Form 36, EQ-5D and a visual analogue scale for pain quantification. Secondary endpoints are morbidity, mortality and total costs. The total follow-up will be three years. Discussion: Considering the high incidence and the multicenter design of this study, it may be assumed that the number of patients needed for this study (n = 214), may be gathered within one and a half year. Depending on the expertise and available equipment, we prefer to perform a laparoscopic resection on patients randomised for elective surgery. Should this be impossible, an open technique may be used as this also reflects the current situation. Trial Registration: (Trial register number: NTR1478)