James K. Malone

Background: Cardiovascular effects of glucose-lowering agents are of increasing interest. Our aim was to assess the effects of the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist exenatide on heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP) in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Methods: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, subjects with T2DM on metformin and/or a thiazolidinedione were randomized to receive exenatide (5 μg for 4 weeks followed by 10 μg) or placebo BID for 12 weeks. Heart rate and BP were assessed with 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring. The primary measure was change from baseline in mean 24-hour HR. Results: Fifty-four subjects (28 exenatide, 26 placebo) were randomized and comprised the intent-to-treat population. Baseline values (exenatide and placebo) were (mean ± SE) 74.4 ± 2.1 and 74.5 ± 1.9 beats/minute for HR, 126.4 ± 3.2 and 119.9 ± 2.8 mm Hg for systolic BP (SBP), and 75.2 ± 2.1 and 70.5 ± 2.0 mm Hg for diastolic BP (DBP). At 12 weeks, no significant change from baseline in 24-hour HR was observed with exenatide or placebo (LS mean ± SE, 2.1 ± 1.4 versus -0.7 ± 1.4 beats/minute, respectively; between treatments, p = 0.16). Exenatide therapy was associated with trends toward lower 24-hour, daytime, and nighttime SBP; changes in DBP were similar between groups. No changes in daytime or nighttime rate pressure product were observed. With exenatide, body weight decreased from baseline by -1.8 ± 0.4 kg (p < 0.0001; treatment difference -1.5 ± 0.6 kg, p < 0.05). The most frequently reported adverse event with exenatide was mild to moderate nausea. Conclusions: Exenatide demonstrated no clinically meaningful effects on HR over 12 weeks of treatment in subjects with T2DM. The observed trends toward lower SBP with exenatide warrant future investigation. Trial registration: NCT00516074

Exenatide is the first glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist approved for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Exenatide lowers blood glucose through multiple mechanisms, including enhancement of glucose-dependent insulin secretion, suppression of excess glucagon secretion, reduction of food intake and slowing of gastric emptying. The current formulation of exenatide requires twice-daily dosing (exenatide BID), and an extended-release formulation of exenatide is now in development for use as a once-weekly injection (exenatide QW). The purpose of this report is to review the most current clinical data on the development of exenatide QW for the treatment of T2DM. In clinical trials, exenatide QW significantly improved glycemic control, resulted in patient weight loss, and was well tolerated in patients with T2DM. In a head-to-head clinical trial, exenatide QW caused greater improvements in glycemic control and was better tolerated than exenatide BID. Given the rapidly increasing prev...

Insulin is an effective treatment for type 2 diabetes (T2D), a progressive condition in which insulin deficiency is one of the core defects. When patients with T2D are unable to achieve glycemic goals with diet and oral antihyperglycemic medications, a common starting insulin regimen consists of basal or premixed insulin added to oral antihyperglycemic medications. When glycemic goals are not achieved with the initial insulin regimen, a basal-bolus regimen is necessary. This article reviews clinical-trial data on the efficacy and safety profile of prandial premixed insulin analogues (insulin aspart and insulin lispro) compared with basal insulin analogues (insulin glargine, insulin detemir, and insulin lispro protamine suspension), with or without a prandial insulin analogue, in the management of T2D. A systematic search of Ovid, MEDLINE, and EMBASE (1995-2007) was performed to identify published randomized controlled trials comparing prandial premixed insulin analogues with basal insulin analogues, with or without prandial insulin, in patients with T2D. The search terms were premixed insulin analogues, premixed insulin, biphasic insulin aspart, insulin aspart 70/30, insulin aspart 50/50, premixed insulin lispro, insulin lispro 75/25, insulin lispro 50/50, glargine, and detemir. Abstracts presented at the 2005 and 2006 meetings of the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes and bibliographies of the identified studies were also reviewed. Predetermined criteria for study inclusion were treatment duration of at least 12 weeks, T2D diagnosed using valid criteria, use of a basal insulin analogue (with or without rapid-acting insulin) as a study comparator, and use of well-accepted end points (eg, glycosylated hemoglobin [HbA1c], hypoglycemia, preprandial and postprandial blood glucose). Of the identified randomized controlled trials, 3 studies compared premixed insulin analogues containing 70% or 75% basal and 30% or 25% rapid-acting insulin analogue with basal insulin analogues only, and 3 studies evaluated premixed insulin analogues containing 50% basal and 50% rapid-acting insulin analogue with basal insulin analogues only. Use of prandial premixed insulin analogues was associated with better overall and postprandial glycemic control. In the studies that compared twice-daily premixed insulin analogues with a basal insulin analogue, changes in HbA1c ranged from -1.00% to -2.79% and from -0.42% to -2.36%, respectively (P < 0.01). In the studies that compared thrice-daily premixed insulin analogues with a basal insulin analogue, changes in HbA1c ranged from -0.72% to -1.2% and from -0.3% to -0.75%, respectively (P < 0.01). These results were achieved with some increase in overall hypoglycemia, but not in nocturnal or severe hypoglycemia. Doses of the premixed insulin analogues were adjusted during the titration period to achieve glycemic goals. The results of this systematic review suggest that regimens consisting of prandial premixed insulin analogues, which provide both basal and prandial insulin coverage, may be used as an initial insulin regimen in patients with T2D to enable better overall, preprandial, and postprandial glycemic control compared with a basal insulin analogue regimen alone. Premixed insulin analogues are an effective option for initiating and intensifying insulin therapy in patients with T2D.

The risks of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and type 2 diabetes increase as body mass index increases in overweight (25–30 kg/m²) and obese (>30 kg/m²) individuals. However, these risks can be reduced with even modest weight loss. In patients with established type 2 diabetes, control of both glycemia and body weight are important to minimize the risk of future diabetic complications. Exenatide is a 39‐amino‐acid peptide incretin mimetic currently approved in the United States for the treatment of type 2 diabetes as an adjunct to sulfonylurea and/or metformin. Phase‐3 clinical studies showed exenatide therapy for 30 weeks significantly reduced glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), and fasting and postprandial plasma glucose, while significantly reducing body weight. Open‐label extensions from these pivotal trials demonstrated patients treated with exenatide for 2 years had sustained reductions in glycemic control at 30 weeks and a progressive reduction in body weight. Patients treated with exenatide also had improvement in blood pressure, inflammatory markers, and lipid profiles. The glucoregulatory and weight‐reducing effects of exenatide are the result of multiple modes of action that mimic several of the glucoregulatory actions of the naturally occurring peptide, glucagon‐like peptide‐1 (GLP‐1). These include restoration of first phase insulin response, enhancement of glucose‐dependent insulin secretion, suppression of inappropriate glucagon secretion, slowing of gastric emptying, and affects on satiety leading to reduced food intake. Further research is required to fully understand the role for exenatide to potentially alleviate metabolic disorders associated with type 2 diabetes, including CVD and obesity. Drug Dev. Res. 67:666–676, 2006.

Aims  To compare the glycaemic control of an insulin lispro mixture (25% insulin lispro and 75% NPL) twice daily in combination with metformin to that of once‐daily insulin glargine plus metformin in patients with Type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with intermediate insulin, or insulin plus oral agent(s) combination therapy.Research design and methods  Ninety‐seven patients were randomized in a multicentre, open‐label, 32‐week crossover study. Primary variables evaluated: haemoglobin A_1c (A_1c), 2‐h post‐prandial blood glucose (BG), hypoglycaemia rate (episodes/patient/30 days), incidence (% patients experiencing ≥ 1 episode) of overall and nocturnal hypoglycaemia.Results  At endpoint, A_1c was lower with the insulin lispro mixture plus metformin compared with glargine plus metformin (7.54% ± 0.87% vs. 8.14% ± 1.03%, P < 0.001). Change in A_1c from baseline to endpoint was greater with the insulin lispro mixture plus metformin (−1.00% vs. −0.42%; P < 0.001). Two‐hour post‐prandial BG was lower after morning, midday, and evening meals (P < 0.001) during treatment with the insulin lispro mixture plus metformin. The fasting BG values were lower with glargine plus metformin (P = 0.007). Despite lower BG at 03.00 hours (P < 0.01), patients treated with the insulin lispro mixture plus metformin had a lower rate of nocturnal hypoglycaemia (0.14 ± 0.49 vs. 0.34 ± 0.85 episodes/patient/30 days; P = 0.002), although the overall hypoglycaemia rate was not different between treatments (0.61 ± 1.41 vs. 0.44 ± 1.07 episodes/patient/30 days; P = 0.477).Conclusion  In patients with Type 2 diabetes and inadequate glucose control while on insulin or insulin and oral agent(s) combination therapy, treatment with a twice‐daily insulin lispro mixture plus metformin, which targets both post‐prandial and pre‐meal BG, provided clinically significant improvements in A_1c, significantly reduced post‐prandial BG after each meal, and reduced nocturnal hypoglycaemia as compared with once‐daily glargine plus metformin, a treatment that targets fasting BG.