Olivier Fedrigo
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Olivier Fedrigo has a total of 32 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Adam D. Pfefferle
Biology Department, Duke University, Durham, N.C., USA
2 shared publicationsCourtney C. Babbitt
Biology Department, Duke University, Durham, N.C., USA
2 shared publicationsGregory A. Wray
Biology Department, Duke University, Durham, N.C., USA
2 shared publications- Adam M. Phillippy
Genome Informatics Section, Center for Genomics and Data Science Research, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health
1 shared publication - Bo Li
BGI-shenzhen, Shenzhen, China
1 shared publication Christine E. Wall
Department of Evolutionary Anthropology, Duke University, Durham, N.C., USA
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 8 July 2014
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in GigaScience
- Vol. 3 (1) , 11
High-coverage sequencing and annotated assemblies of the budgerigar genome
Background. Parrots belong to a group of behaviorally advanced vertebrates and have an advanced ability of vocal learning relative to other vocal-learni
- 8 July 2014
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in GigaScience
- Vol. 3 (1) , 11
Open AccessHigh-coverage sequencing and annotated assemblies of the budgerigar genome
Background. Parrots belong to a group of behaviorally advanced vertebrates and have an advanced ability of vocal learning relative to other vocal-learni
- Open Access
- 7 October 2011
- Published by S. Karger AG in Brain, Behavior and Evolution
- Vol. 78 (4) , 315-326
A Potential Role for Glucose Transporters in the Evolution of Human Brain Size
Differences in cognitive abilities and the relatively large brain are among the most striking differences between humans and their closest primate relatives. The energy trade-off hypothesis predicts that a major shift in energy allocation among tissues occurred during human origins in order to support the remarkable expansion of a metabolically expensive brain. However, the molecular basis of this adaptive scenario is unknown. Two glucose transporters (SLC2A1 and SLC2A4) are promising candidates and present intriguing mutations in humans, resulting, respectively, in microcephaly and disruptions in whole-body glucose homeostasis. We compared SLC2A1 and SLC2A4 expression between humans, chimpanzees and macaques, and found compensatory and biologically significant expression changes on the human lineage within cerebral cortex and skeletal muscle, consistent with mediating an energy trade-off. We also show that these two genes are likely to have undergone adaptation and participated in the development and maintenance of a larger brain in the human lineage by modulating brain and skeletal muscle energy allocation. We found that these two genes show human-specific signatures of positive selection on known regulatory elements within their 5′-untranslated region, suggesting an adaptation of their regulation during human origins. This study represents the first case where adaptive, functional and genetic lines of evidence implicate specific genes in the evolution of human brain size.
- 7 October 2011
- Published by S. Karger AG in Brain, Behavior and Evolution
- Vol. 78 (4) , 315-326
Open AccessA Potential Role for Glucose Transporters in the Evolution of Human Brain Size
Differences in cognitive abilities and the relatively large brain are among the most striking differences between humans and their closest primate relatives. The energy trade-off hypothesis predicts that a major shift in energy allocation among tissues occurred during human origins in order to support the remarkable expansion of a metabolically expensive brain. However, the molecular basis of this adaptive scenario is unknown. Two glucose transporters (SLC2A1 and SLC2A4) are promising candidates and present intriguing mutations in humans, resulting, respectively, in microcephaly and disruptions in whole-body glucose homeostasis. We compared SLC2A1 and SLC2A4 expression between humans, chimpanzees and macaques, and found compensatory and biologically significant expression changes on the human lineage within cerebral cortex and skeletal muscle, consistent with mediating an energy trade-off. We also show that these two genes are likely to have undergone adaptation and participated in the development and maintenance of a larger brain in the human lineage by modulating brain and skeletal muscle energy allocation. We found that these two genes show human-specific signatures of positive selection on known regulatory elements within their 5′-untranslated region, suggesting an adaptation of their regulation during human origins. This study represents the first case where adaptive, functional and genetic lines of evidence implicate specific genes in the evolution of human brain size.
- Open Access
- 2 September 2010
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 5 (9) , e12545
A Pipeline to Determine RT-QPCR Control Genes for Evolutionary Studies: Application to Primate Gene Expression across Multiple Tissues
Because many species-specific phenotypic differences are assumed to be caused by differential regulation of gene expression, many recent investigations have focused on measuring transcript abundance. Despite the availability of high-throughput platforms, quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-QPCR) is often the method of choice because of its low cost and wider dynamic range. However, the accuracy of this technique heavily relies on the use of multiple valid control genes for normalization. We created a pipeline for choosing genes potentially useful as RT-QPCR control genes for measuring expression between human and chimpanzee samples across multiple tissues, using published microarrays and a measure of tissue-specificity. We identified 13 genes from the pipeline and from commonly used control genes: ACTB, USP49, ARGHGEF2, GSK3A, TBP, SDHA, EIF2B2, GPDH, YWHAZ, HPTR1, RPL13A, HMBS, and EEF2. We then tested these candidate genes and validated their expression stability across species. We established the rank order of the most preferable set of genes for single and combined tissues. Our results suggest that for at least three tissues (cerebral cortex, liver, and skeletal muscle), EIF2B2, EEF2, HMBS, and SDHA are useful genes for normalizing human and chimpanzee expression using RT-QPCR. Interestingly, other commonly used control genes, including TBP, GAPDH, and, especially ACTB do not perform as well. This pipeline could be easily adapted to other species for which expression data exist, providing taxonomically appropriate control genes for comparisons of gene expression among species.
- 2 September 2010
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 5 (9) , e12545
Open AccessA Pipeline to Determine RT-QPCR Control Genes for Evolutionary Studies: Application to Primate Gene Expression across Multiple Tissues
Because many species-specific phenotypic differences are assumed to be caused by differential regulation of gene expression, many recent investigations have focused on measuring transcript abundance. Despite the availability of high-throughput platforms, quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-QPCR) is often the method of choice because of its low cost and wider dynamic range. However, the accuracy of this technique heavily relies on the use of multiple valid control genes for normalization. We created a pipeline for choosing genes potentially useful as RT-QPCR control genes for measuring expression between human and chimpanzee samples across multiple tissues, using published microarrays and a measure of tissue-specificity. We identified 13 genes from the pipeline and from commonly used control genes: ACTB, USP49, ARGHGEF2, GSK3A, TBP, SDHA, EIF2B2, GPDH, YWHAZ, HPTR1, RPL13A, HMBS, and EEF2. We then tested these candidate genes and validated their expression stability across species. We established the rank order of the most preferable set of genes for single and combined tissues. Our results suggest that for at least three tissues (cerebral cortex, liver, and skeletal muscle), EIF2B2, EEF2, HMBS, and SDHA are useful genes for normalizing human and chimpanzee expression using RT-QPCR. Interestingly, other commonly used control genes, including TBP, GAPDH, and, especially ACTB do not perform as well. This pipeline could be easily adapted to other species for which expression data exist, providing taxonomically appropriate control genes for comparisons of gene expression among species.
- 15 March 2005
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution
- Vol. 304B (2) , 119-128
DRUIDS?Detection of regions with unexpected internal deviation from stationarity
Most methods for inferring phylogenies from sequence data assume that patterns of substitution have been stationary over time. Changes in evolutionary constraint can result in nonstationary substitution patterns that are phylogenetically misleading unless modeled appropriately. Here we present a multiple‐alignment‐based method to identify regions that are likely to contain misleading phylogenetic signals due to changes in evolutionary constraints. The method uses a moving window approach to identify regions with a statistically significant deviation from stationarity in the physicochemical properties of amino acids among taxa. The protocol has been implemented in the software package DRUIDS (Detecting Regions of Unexpected Internal Deviation from Stationarity), available from the first author upon request. J. Exp. Zool. 304:119–128, 2005.
- 15 March 2005
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution
- Vol. 304B (2) , 119-128
DRUIDS?Detection of regions with unexpected internal deviation from stationarity
Most methods for inferring phylogenies from sequence data assume that patterns of substitution have been stationary over time. Changes in evolutionary constraint can result in nonstationary substitution patterns that are phylogenetically misleading unless modeled appropriately. Here we present a multiple‐alignment‐based method to identify regions that are likely to contain misleading phylogenetic signals due to changes in evolutionary constraints. The method uses a moving window approach to identify regions with a statistically significant deviation from stationarity in the physicochemical properties of amino acids among taxa. The protocol has been implemented in the software package DRUIDS (Detecting Regions of Unexpected Internal Deviation from Stationarity), available from the first author upon request. J. Exp. Zool. 304:119–128, 2005.