Thomas A Barnes

As background for the American Association for Respiratory Care (AARC) third 2015 and Beyond conference, we sought information and opinions on the ability of the current respiratory therapy education infrastructure to make changes that would assure competent respiratory therapists in the envisioned healthcare future. After pilot testing and refining the questions, we invited the directors of 435 respiratory therapy programs (based in 411 colleges) that were fully accredited or in the process of being accredited by the Commission on Accreditation for Respiratory Care as of May, 2010, to participate in the survey. Three-hundred forty-eight program directors (80%) provided valid survey responses. Three of the 5 competencies related to evidence-based medicine and respiratory care protocols were taught less often in the associate-degree programs than in the baccalaureate-degree programs. Eighty percent of the baccalaureate-degree programs, compared to 42% of the associate-degree programs, instruct students how to critique published research (P < .001). Only 34% of the associate-degree programs teach students the general meaning of statistical tests, compared to 78% of the baccalaureate-degree programs (P < .001). Ninety-four percent of the baccalaureate-degree programs, versus 81% of the associate-degree programs, teach the students to apply evidence-based medicine to clinical practice (P = .01). Teaching students how to describe healthcare and financial reimbursement systems and the need to reduce the cost of delivering respiratory care (a leadership competency identified by the second 2015 and Beyond conference) was significantly more common in the baccalaureate-degree programs (72%) than in the associate-degree programs (56%) (P = .03). Other competencies showed trends toward differences, and the baccalaureate-degree programs reported higher percentages of success than the associate-degree programs. There are important differences between the baccalaureate-degree and associate-degree programs.

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of obstructive lung disease (OLD) based on clinical grounds is challenging. There have been no population-based COPD studies that collected pulmonary function data in Portugal, a country in transition between phases 2 and 3 of the smoking epidemic. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of obstructive pattern on spirometry in a representative sample of adults from Porto, Portugal. METHODS: We conducted a health survey between 2001 and 2003, and 758 participants ≥ 40 years old had reliable spirometry. We used a structured questionnaire to collect demographic, clinical, social, and behavioral data. Obstructive pattern was defined as FEV₁/FVC < 70%. Logistic regression was performed to quantify the association between socio-demographic and clinical factors and outcome. RESULTS: The participants' mean ± SD age was 58.5 ± 11.5 years, and 62% were women. The prevalence of spirometric obstructive pattern was 10.7%, 95% CI 8.6–13.1%; 13.4% in men, and 9.1% in women (P = .08). The age-adjusted odds ratios for cumulative smoking exposure of less than and more than 20 pack years, in comparison with never smokers, were 3.49 (95% CI 1.02–11.92) and 3.91 (95% CI 1.29–11.89) among men, and 1.47 (95% CI 0.53–4.08) and 2.68 (95% CI 1.07–6.68) among women, respectively. Previously diagnosed OLD was reported by 30.9% (95% CI 21.1–42.1%) of the participants with spirometric obstructive pattern. Spirometry confirmed the OLD diagnosis in 20.5% (95% CI 13.7–28.7%) of subjects who self-reported OLD (kappa = 0.14, 95% CI 0.07–0.20). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of spirometric obstructive pattern was high. Considering Portugal's position in the smoking epidemic, together with the aging of the population, we can expect an increase in the prevalence of OLD in older people and in women. Our results confirm the limited validity of self-reported OLD in epidemiological studies.

The American Association for Respiratory Care has established a task force to identify potential new roles and responsibilities of respiratory therapists (RTs) in 2015 and beyond. The first task fo...

Positive-pressure ventilation of patients with unprotected airways during cardiopulmonary resuscitation can cause gastric dilation. Determine if there is a significant difference in volume delivered to lungs and stomach while using an adult 1,000-mL disposable bag-valve-mask (BVM) device and the oxygen-powered, flow-limited Oxylator EMX resuscitator. We used a bench model to simulate a patient with an unprotected airway, consisting of an intubation manikin, lung analog, and simulated lower esophageal sphincter set at an opening pressure of 20 cm H2O. The BVM and the Oxylator were used to provide mask ventilation at a verbally prompted rate of 12 breaths/min. The volumes delivered with the BVM and the Oxylator to the lungs and stomach were not significantly different: 262 + 112 mL versus 297 + 99 mL and 227 + 199 mL versus 159 + 73 mL, respectively. Our study found no significant difference between the Oxylator and BVM when comparing tidal volume delivered to lungs and stomach during ventilation of a simulated unconscious nonintubated patient. More research on BVM use and the Oxylator should be done to validate the American Heart Association's guideline recommendations for ventilating unconscious patients with unprotected airways. Research on gastric dilation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation needs to be done with bench models using manikins that simulate chest excursion, bidirectional airway flow, lung impedance, and gastric compliance.