AAAntonio Abramo

Antonio Abramo

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Antonio Abramo has a total of 6 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Osteotomy of distal radius fracture malunion using a fast remodeling bone substitute consisting of calcium sulphate and calcium phosphate

    by Antonio Abramo, Mats Geijer, Philippe Kopylov, Magnus Tägil

    Malunion after a distal radius fracture can be treated with an osteotomy of the distal radius. Autologous iliac crest bone graft is often used to fill the gap, but the procedure is associated with donor site morbidity. In this study a novel fast resorbing biphasic bone substitute consisting of a mixture of calcium sulphate and calcium phosphate is used (Cerament™ BoneSupport AB, Sweden). Fifteen consecutive patients, with a mean age of 52 (27–71) years were included. All had a malunion after a distal radius fracture and underwent an osteotomy. A fragment specific fixation system, TriMed® (TriMed, Valencia, CA), consisting of a Buttress Pin® and a Radial Pin Plate® were used for fixation and a calcium sulphate and calcium phosphate mixture as bone substitute. The patients were followed for 1 year. Grip strength increased from 61 (28–93)% of the contralateral hand to 85 (58–109)%, p < 0.001. DASH scores decreased from 37 (22–61) to 24 (2–49) p = 0.003. Radiographically all osteotomies healed. An increase of ulnar variance was noted during healing from 1.8 mm immediately postoperatively to 2.6 mm at final follow up. Osteotomy can increase grip strength and decease disability after a malunited fracture. In the present series the bone substitute was replaced by bone, but a minor loss of the achieved radiographic correction was noted in some patients during osteotomy healing. A more rigid fixation may improve the radiographic outcome with this kind of bone substitute. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 2010


  • Open Access

    Open reduction and internal fixation compared to closed reduction and external fixation in distal radial fractures

    by Antonio Abramo, Philippe Kopylov, Mats Geijer, Magnus Tägil

    In unstable distal radial fractures that are impossible to reduce or to maintain in reduced position, the treatment of choice is operation. The type of operation and the choice of implant, however, is a matter of discussion. Our aim was to investigate whether open reduction and internal fixation would produce a better result than traditional external fixation. 50 patients with an unstable or comminute distal radius fracture were randomized to either closed reduction and bridging external fixation, or open reduction and internal fixation using the TriMed system. The primary outcome parameter was grip strength, but the patients were followed for 1 year with objective clinical assessment, subjective outcome using DASH, and radiographic examination. At 1 year postoperatively, grip strength was 90% (SD 16) of the uninjured side in the internal fixation group and 78% (17) in the external fixation group. Pronation/supination was 150 degrees (15) in the internal fixation group and 136 degrees (20) in the external fixation group at 1 year. There were no differences in DASH scores or in radiographic parameters. 5 patients in the external fixation group were reoperated due to malunion, as compared to 1 in the internal fixation group. 7 other cases were classified as radiographic malunion: 5 in the external fixation group and 2 in the internal fixation group. Internal fixation gave better grip strength and a better range of motion at 1 year, and tended to have less malunions than external fixation. No difference could be found regarding subjective outcome.


  • Open Access

    Osteotomy of dorsally displaced malunited fractures of the distal radius: No loss of radiographic correction during healing with a minimally invasive fixation technique and an injectable bone substitute

    by Antonio Abramo, Magnus Tägil, Mats Geijer, Philippe Kopylov

    Background and purpose Malunion after a distal radius fracture can be treated with an osteotomy of the distal radius. Often autologous iliac crest bone graft is used to fill the gap, but this is associated with donor site morbidity. Instead of bone graft, we have used a slow-resorbing bone substitute in combination with a minimally invasive fixation technique. Patients and methods 25 consecutive patients with a dorsal malunion after a distal radius fracture underwent an osteotomy. A TriMed buttress pin and a radial pin plate were used for fixation, and Norian SRS as bone substitute. The patients were followed for a minimum of 1 year and range of motion, grip strength, DASH scores, and the radiographic correction were measured. Results Forearm rotation improved from 137° to 155°, flexion/extension from 102° to 120°, and radioul-nar deviation from 32° to 43°. Grip strength increased from 62% of the contralateral hand to 82%. DASH scores decreased from 36 to 23. Radiographically, all osteotomies but 1 healed and the radiographic correction achieved was consistent over the first year. Interpretation Osteotomy of the distal radius is effective in increasing motion and grip strength after a malunited distal radial fracture. Patient satisfaction is high and subjective results measured with DASH are good. Using a bone substitute, the operation can be performed as an outpatient procedure and donor-site pain avoided. No loss of the radiographic correction achieved was noted during osteotomy healing.


  • Open Access

    Evaluation of a treatment protocol in distal radius fractures

    by Antonio Abramo, Philippe Kopylov, Magnus Tägil

    Background and purpose Distal radius fractures are most often treated nonoperatively, but sometimes they are treated surgically when deemed unstable. Based on the literature, a consensus protocol for treatment has been developed in southern Sweden to aid clinicians in their decision making. We evaluated the results of this protocol prospectively using a validated outcome instrument (DASH) in a large consecutive and population based series of unselected patients. Methods 581 patients were treated according the protocol. Age, sex, fracture side, and type of treatment were registered. The subjective outcome was measured by DASH. 133 patients were operated. Results 75% of the patients returned the questionnaire. The median DASH score at 3 months was 18.3 and at 12 months it was 7.5. All treatment groups had low DASH scores at the final follow‐up. Reduced, nonoper ated fractures had a worse score (11.6) than undisplaced (4.2) or operated fractures (6.0). Age was the only other predictor, with older patients having a worse score. A correlation was found between the short‐version 11-item QuickDASH questionnaire and the full 30-item DASH, both at 3 months (r = 0.98) and at 1 year (r = 0.97) (p< 0.001 for both). Interpretation Most patients have residual symptoms at 3 months after the fracture but are normalized at 1 year. Good final subjective result was achieved with the proposed protocol regardless of initial severity and treatment of the fracture, as indicated by a low median DASH score in all groups. There was correlation between QuickDASH and the full DASH, and the former could be used in future studies.