Andrea Ferrante
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Andrea Ferrante has a total of 4 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Jack Gorski
Blood Research Institute, BloodCenter of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53201
1 shared publicationMargaret J. Castellini
Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK 99775
1 shared publicationMegan Hoffman
Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK 99775
1 shared publicationMegan Templeton
Institute of Arctic Biology, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK 99775; Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK 99775; and
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 1 August 2015
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The Journal of Immunology
- Vol. 195 (3) , 1251-1261
The Thermodynamic Mechanism of Peptide–MHC Class II Complex Formation Is a Determinant of Susceptibility to HLA-DM
Peptides bind MHC class II molecules through a thermodynamically nonadditive process consequent to the flexibility of the reactants. Currently, how the specific outcome of this binding process affects the ensuing epitope selection needs resolution. Calorimetric assessment of binding thermodynamics for hemagglutinin 306–319 peptide variants to the human MHC class II HLA-DR1 (DR1) and a mutant DR1 reveals that peptide/DR1 complexes can be formed with different enthalpic and entropic contributions. Complexes formed with a smaller entropic penalty feature circular dichroism spectra consistent with a non–compact form, and molecular dynamics simulation shows a more flexible structure. The opposite binding mode, compact and less flexible, is associated with greater entropic penalty. These structural variations are associated with rearrangements of residues known to be involved in HLA-DR (DM) binding, affinity of DM for the complex, and complex susceptibility to DM-mediated peptide exchange. Thus, the thermodynamic mechanism of peptide binding to DR1 correlates with the structural rigidity of the complex, and DM mediates peptide exchange by “sensing” flexible complexes in which the aforementioned residues are rearranged at a higher frequency than in more rigid ones.
- 1 August 2015
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The Journal of Immunology
- Vol. 195 (3) , 1251-1261
The Thermodynamic Mechanism of Peptide–MHC Class II Complex Formation Is a Determinant of Susceptibility to HLA-DM
Peptides bind MHC class II molecules through a thermodynamically nonadditive process consequent to the flexibility of the reactants. Currently, how the specific outcome of this binding process affects the ensuing epitope selection needs resolution. Calorimetric assessment of binding thermodynamics for hemagglutinin 306–319 peptide variants to the human MHC class II HLA-DR1 (DR1) and a mutant DR1 reveals that peptide/DR1 complexes can be formed with different enthalpic and entropic contributions. Complexes formed with a smaller entropic penalty feature circular dichroism spectra consistent with a non–compact form, and molecular dynamics simulation shows a more flexible structure. The opposite binding mode, compact and less flexible, is associated with greater entropic penalty. These structural variations are associated with rearrangements of residues known to be involved in HLA-DR (DM) binding, affinity of DM for the complex, and complex susceptibility to DM-mediated peptide exchange. Thus, the thermodynamic mechanism of peptide binding to DR1 correlates with the structural rigidity of the complex, and DM mediates peptide exchange by “sensing” flexible complexes in which the aforementioned residues are rearranged at a higher frequency than in more rigid ones.
- 16 January 2013
- Published by Wiley in Immunology
- Vol. 138 (2) , 85-92
HLA‐DM: arbiter conformationis
The recognition by CD4(+) T cells of peptides bound to class II MHC (MHCII) molecules expressed on the surface of antigen-presenting cells is a key step in the initiation of an adaptive immune response. Presentation of peptides is the outcome of an intracellular selection process occurring in dedicated endosomal compartments involving, among others, an MHCII-like molecule named HLA-DM (DM). The impact of DM on the epitope selection machinery has been known for more than 15 years. However, the mechanism by which DM skews the presented repertoire in favour of kinetically stable complexes has remained elusive. Here, a review of the most recent observations in the field is presented, pointing to the possibility that DM decides the survival of a peptide-MHCII complex (pMHCII) on the basis of its conformational flexibility, which is a function of the 'tightness' of interaction between the peptide and the MHCII at a specific region of the binding site.
- 16 January 2013
- Published by Wiley in Immunology
- Vol. 138 (2) , 85-92
HLA‐DM: arbiter conformationis
The recognition by CD4(+) T cells of peptides bound to class II MHC (MHCII) molecules expressed on the surface of antigen-presenting cells is a key step in the initiation of an adaptive immune response. Presentation of peptides is the outcome of an intracellular selection process occurring in dedicated endosomal compartments involving, among others, an MHCII-like molecule named HLA-DM (DM). The impact of DM on the epitope selection machinery has been known for more than 15 years. However, the mechanism by which DM skews the presented repertoire in favour of kinetically stable complexes has remained elusive. Here, a review of the most recent observations in the field is presented, pointing to the possibility that DM decides the survival of a peptide-MHCII complex (pMHCII) on the basis of its conformational flexibility, which is a function of the 'tightness' of interaction between the peptide and the MHCII at a specific region of the binding site.
- Open Access
- 1 January 2013
- Published by Frontiers Media SA in Frontiers in Immunology
- Vol. 4, 308
Thermodynamics of Peptide-MHC Class II Interactions: Not all Complexes are Created Equal
The adaptive immune response begins when CD4+ T cells recognize antigenic peptides bound to class II molecules of the Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHCII). The interaction between peptides and MHCII has been historically interpreted as a rigid docking event. However, this model has been challenged by the evidence that conformational flexibility plays an important role in peptide-MHCII complex formation. Thermodynamic analysis of the binding reaction suggests a model of complexation in which the physical-chemical nature of the peptide determines the variability in flexibility of the substates in the peptide-MHC conformational ensemble. This review discusses our understanding of the correlation between thermodynamics of peptide binding and structural features of the resulting complex as well as their impact on HLA-DM activity and on our ability to predict MHCII-restricted epitopes.
- 1 January 2013
- Published by Frontiers Media SA in Frontiers in Immunology
- Vol. 4, 308
Open AccessThermodynamics of Peptide-MHC Class II Interactions: Not all Complexes are Created Equal
The adaptive immune response begins when CD4+ T cells recognize antigenic peptides bound to class II molecules of the Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHCII). The interaction between peptides and MHCII has been historically interpreted as a rigid docking event. However, this model has been challenged by the evidence that conformational flexibility plays an important role in peptide-MHCII complex formation. Thermodynamic analysis of the binding reaction suggests a model of complexation in which the physical-chemical nature of the peptide determines the variability in flexibility of the substates in the peptide-MHC conformational ensemble. This review discusses our understanding of the correlation between thermodynamics of peptide binding and structural features of the resulting complex as well as their impact on HLA-DM activity and on our ability to predict MHCII-restricted epitopes.
- 30 June 2012
- Published by Springer Nature in Immunologic Research
- Vol. 56 (1) , 85-95
For many but not for all: how the conformational flexibility of the peptide/MHCII complex shapes epitope selection
The adaptive immune response starts when CD4+ T cells recognize peptide antigens presented by class II molecules of the Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHCII). Two outstanding features of MHCII molecules are their polymorphism and the ability of each allele to bind a large panoply of peptides. The ability of each MHCII molecule to interact with a limited, though broad, range of amino acid sequences, or “permissive specificity” of binding, is the result of structural flexibility. This flexibility has been identified through biochemical and biophysical studies, and molecular dynamic simulations have modeled the conformational rearrangements that the peptide and the MHCII undergo during interaction. Moreover, there is evidence that the structural flexibility of the peptide/MHCII complex correlates with the activity of the “peptide-editing” molecule DM. In light of the impact that these recent findings have on our ability to predict MHCII epitopes, a review of the structural and thermodynamic determinants of peptide binding to MHCII is proposed.
- 30 June 2012
- Published by Springer Nature in Immunologic Research
- Vol. 56 (1) , 85-95
For many but not for all: how the conformational flexibility of the peptide/MHCII complex shapes epitope selection
The adaptive immune response starts when CD4+ T cells recognize peptide antigens presented by class II molecules of the Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHCII). Two outstanding features of MHCII molecules are their polymorphism and the ability of each allele to bind a large panoply of peptides. The ability of each MHCII molecule to interact with a limited, though broad, range of amino acid sequences, or “permissive specificity” of binding, is the result of structural flexibility. This flexibility has been identified through biochemical and biophysical studies, and molecular dynamic simulations have modeled the conformational rearrangements that the peptide and the MHCII undergo during interaction. Moreover, there is evidence that the structural flexibility of the peptide/MHCII complex correlates with the activity of the “peptide-editing” molecule DM. In light of the impact that these recent findings have on our ability to predict MHCII epitopes, a review of the structural and thermodynamic determinants of peptide binding to MHCII is proposed.
- Open Access
- 27 April 2012
- Published by Springer Nature in Scientific Reports
- Vol. 2 (1) , 386
A Peptide/MHCII conformer generated in the presence of exchange peptide is substrate for HLA-DM editing
The mechanism of HLA-DM (DM) activity is still unclear. We have shown that DM-mediated peptide release from HLA-DR (DR) is dependent on the presence of exchange peptide. However, DM also promotes a small amount of peptide release in the absence of exchange peptide. Here we show that SDS-PAGE separates purified peptide/DR1 complexes (pDR1) into two conformers whose ratio is peptide Kd-dependent. In the absence of exchange peptide, DM only releases peptide from the slower migrating conformer. Addition of exchange peptide converts the DM-resistant conformer to the slower migrating conformer, which is DM labile. Thus, exchange peptide generates a conformer of pDR1 which constitutes the intermediate for peptide exchange and the substrate for DM activity. The resolution of the intermediate favors the highest affinity peptide. However, once folded into the DM-resistant conformer, even low affinity peptides can be presented in the absence of free peptide, broadening the repertoire available for presentation.
- 27 April 2012
- Published by Springer Nature in Scientific Reports
- Vol. 2 (1) , 386
Open AccessA Peptide/MHCII conformer generated in the presence of exchange peptide is substrate for HLA-DM editing
The mechanism of HLA-DM (DM) activity is still unclear. We have shown that DM-mediated peptide release from HLA-DR (DR) is dependent on the presence of exchange peptide. However, DM also promotes a small amount of peptide release in the absence of exchange peptide. Here we show that SDS-PAGE separates purified peptide/DR1 complexes (pDR1) into two conformers whose ratio is peptide Kd-dependent. In the absence of exchange peptide, DM only releases peptide from the slower migrating conformer. Addition of exchange peptide converts the DM-resistant conformer to the slower migrating conformer, which is DM labile. Thus, exchange peptide generates a conformer of pDR1 which constitutes the intermediate for peptide exchange and the substrate for DM activity. The resolution of the intermediate favors the highest affinity peptide. However, once folded into the DM-resistant conformer, even low affinity peptides can be presented in the absence of free peptide, broadening the repertoire available for presentation.