Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article

Previous Organizations / Institutes

The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years


Amanda Seidl has a total of 46 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Equivalent Behavioral Facilitation to Tactile Cues in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder

    by Girija Kadlaskar, Sophia Bergmann, Rebecca McNally Keehn, Amanda Seidl, Brandon Keehn

    The alerting network, a subcomponent of attention, enables humans to respond to novel information. Children with ASD have shown equivalent alerting in response to visual and/or auditory stimuli compared to typically developing (TD) children. However, it is unclear whether children with ASD and TD show equivalent alerting to tactile stimuli. We examined (1) whether tactile cues affect accuracy and reaction times in children with ASD and TD, (2) whether the duration between touch-cues and auditory targets impacts performance, and (3) whether behavioral responses in the tactile cueing task are associated with ASD symptomatology. Six- to 12-year-olds with ASD and TD participated in a tactile-cueing task and were instructed to respond with a button press to a target sound /a/. Tactile cues were presented at 200, 400, and 800 ms (25% each) prior to the auditory target. The remaining trials (25%) were presented without tactile cues. Findings suggested that both groups showed equivalent alerting responses to tactile cues. Additionally, all children were faster to respond to auditory targets at longer cue–target intervals. Finally, there was an association between rate of facilitation and RRB scores in all children, suggesting that patterns of responding to transient phasic cues may be related to ASD symptomatology.


  • Vocal development in a large‐scale crosslinguistic corpus

    by Margaret Cychosz, Alejandrina Cristia, Elika Bergelson, Marisa Casillas, Gladys Baudet, Anne S. Warlaumont, Camila Scaff, Lisa Yankowitz, Amanda Seidl

    This study evaluates whether early vocalizations develop in similar ways in children across diverse cultural contexts. We analyze data from daylong audio recordings of 49 children (1–36 months) from five different language/cultural backgrounds. Citizen scientists annotated these recordings to determine if child vocalizations contained canonical transitions or not (e.g., “ba” vs. “ee”). Results revealed that the proportion of clips reported to contain canonical transitions increased with age. Furthermore, this proportion exceeded 0.15 by around 7 months, replicating and extending previous findings on canonical vocalization development but using data from the natural environments of a culturally and linguistically diverse sample. This work explores how crowdsourcing can be used to annotate corpora, helping establish developmental milestones relevant to multiple languages and cultures. Lower inter‐annotator reliability on the crowdsourcing platform, relative to more traditional in‐lab expert annotators, means that a larger number of unique annotators and/or annotations are required, and that crowdsourcing may not be a suitable method for more fine‐grained annotation decisions. Audio clips used for this project are compiled into a large‐scale infant vocalization corpus that is available for other researchers to use in future work.


  • Open Access

    Does Human Touch Facilitate Object Categorization in 6-to-9-Month-Old Infants?

    by Girija Kadlaskar, Sandra Waxman, Amanda Seidl

    Infants form object categories in the first months of life. By 3 months and throughout the first year, successful categorization varies as a function of the acoustic information presented in conjunction with category members. Here we ask whether tactile information, delivered in conjunction with category members, also promotes categorization. Six- to 9-month-olds participated in an object categorization task in either a touch-cue or no-cue condition. For infants in the touch-cue condition, familiarization images were accompanied by precisely-timed light touches from their caregivers; infants in the no-cue condition saw the same images but received no touches. Only infants in the touch-cue condition formed categories. This provides the first evidence that touch may play a role in supporting infants’ object categorization.


  • Open Access

    Social touch interacts with infants’ learning of auditory patterns

    by Casey Lew-Williams, Brock Ferguson, Rana Abu-Zhaya, Amanda Seidl


  • Infant–Mother Acoustic–Prosodic Alignment and Developmental Risk

    by Amanda Seidl, Alejandrina Cristia, Melanie Soderstrom, Eon-Suk Ko, Emily A. Abel, Ashleigh Kellerman, A. J. Schwichtenberg

    Purpose: One promising early marker for autism and other communicative and language disorders is early infant speech production. Here we used daylong recordings of high- and low-risk infant–mother dyads to examine whether acoustic–prosodic alignment as well as two automated measures of infant vocalization are related to developmental risk status indexed via familial risk and developmental progress at 36 months of age.Method: Automated analyses of the acoustics of daylong real-world interactions were used to examine whether pitch characteristics of one vocalization by the mother or the child predicted those of the vocalization response by the other speaker and whether other features of infants' speech in daylong recordings were associated with developmental risk status or outcomes.Results: Low-risk and high-risk dyads did not differ in the level of acoustic–prosodic alignment, which was overall not significant. Further analyses revealed that acoustic–prosodic alignment did not predict infants' later developmental progress, which was, however, associated with two automated measures of infant vocalizations (daily vocalizations and conversational turns).Conclusions: Although further research is needed, these findings suggest that automated measures of vocalizations drawn from daylong recordings are a possible early identification tool for later developmental progress/concerns.Supplemental Material: https://osf.io/cdn3v/


  • The impact of brief restriction to articulation on children's subsequent speech production

    by Amanda Seidl, Françoise Brosseau-Lapré, Lisa Goffman

    This project explored whether disruption of articulation during listening impacts subsequent speech production in 4-yr-olds with and without speech sound disorder (SSD). During novel word learning, typically-developing children showed effects of articulatory disruption as revealed by larger differences between two acoustic cues to a sound contrast, but children with SSD were unaffected by articulatory disruption. Findings suggest that, when typically developing 4-yr-olds experience an articulatory disruption during a listening task, the children's subsequent production is affected. Children with SSD show less influence of articulatory experience during perception, which could be the result of impaired or attenuated ties between perception and articulation.


  • Acoustic-phonetic differences between infant- and adult-directed speech: the role of stress and utterance position

    by Yuanyuan Wang, Amanda Seidl, Alejandrina Cristia

    Previous studies have shown that infant-directed speech (IDS) differs from adult-directed speech (ADS) on a variety of dimensions. The aim of the current study was to investigate whether acoustic differences between IDS and ADS in English are modulated by prosodic structure. We compared vowels across the two registers (IDS, ADS) in both stressed and unstressed syllables, and in both utterance-medial and -final positions. Vowels in target bisyllabic trochees in the speech of twenty mothers of 4- and 11-month-olds were analyzed. While stressed and unstressed vowels differed between IDS and ADS for a measure of F0, and trended in similar directions for vowel peripherality, neither set differed in duration. These profiles held for both utterance-medial and -final words.


  • Toward Establishing Continuity in Linguistic Skills Within Early Infancy

    by Amanda Seidl, Brian French, Yuanyuan Wang, Alejandrina Cristia


  • Why the body comes first: effects of experimenter touch on infants' word finding

    by Amanda Seidl, Ruth Tincoff, Christopher Baker, Alejandrina Cristia

    The lexicon of 6‐month‐olds is comprised of names and body part words. Unlike names, body part words do not often occur in isolation in the input. This presents a puzzle: How have infants been able to pull out these words from the continuous stream of speech at such a young age? We hypothesize that caregivers' interactions directed at and on the infant's body may be at the root of their early acquisition of body part words. An artificial language segmentation study shows that experimenter‐provided synchronous tactile cues help 4‐month‐olds to find words in continuous speech. A follow‐up study suggests that this facilitation cannot be reduced to the highly social situation in which the directed interaction occurs. Taken together, these studies suggest that direct caregiver–infant interaction, exemplified in this study by touch cues, may play a key role in infants' ability to find word boundaries, and suggests that early vocabulary items may consist of words often linked with caregiver touches.A video abstract of this article can be viewed athttp://youtu.be/NfCj5ipatyE


  • The Learnability of Phonotactic Patterns in Onset and Coda Positions

    by Yuanyuan Wang, Amanda Seidl

    Cross-linguistically, languages allow a wider variety of phonotactic patterns in onsets than in codas. However, the variability of phonotactic patterns in coda position in different languages suggests these patterns must, at least in part, be learned. Two experiments were conducted to explore whether there is an asymmetry in English-learning infants’ ability to learn novel phonotactic patterns in word-medial onset and coda positions. In Experiment 1, English-learning 8- and 12-month-olds were familiarized with bisyllabic nonsense words with voiced fricatives restricted to either word-medial onset (Onset condition) or word-medial coda positions (Coda condition). At test, infants heard novel words that either followed or violated the familiarized patterns. Twelve-month-olds in the Onset condition showed a preference for the familiarized pattern; however, 12-month-olds in Coda condition as well as 8-month-olds in both conditions displayed no such preference. To explore whether there is a developmental pattern in these positional effects, in Experiment 2, 15-month-olds were tested in only the Coda condition. These toddlers showed a preference for the familiarized phonotactic pattern. These findings support the hypothesis that infants’ learning of positional phonotactics is asymmetrical.