Marja Kolström
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Marja Kolström has a total of 10 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Ari Isokangas
Univ Oulu, Control Engn, POB 8000, FI-90014 Oulu, Finland
1 shared publication - Diana Tuomasjukka
European Forest Institute, Yliopistokatu 6 B, 80100 Joensuu, Finland
1 shared publication - Jari Lindblad
Nat Resources Inst Finland Luke, Prod Syst, Yliopistokatu 6, FI-80100 Joensuu, Finland
1 shared publication - Johanna Routa
Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke) Latokartanonkaari 9 FI-00790 Helsinki Finland
1 shared publication - Johanna Ruotsalainen
Finnish Meteorol Inst, Aviat & Mil Weather Serv, POB 1627, FI-70211 Kuopio, Finland
1 shared publication - Lauri Sikanen
Nat Resources Inst Finland Luke, Yliopistokatu 6B, FI-80100 Joensuu, Finland
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 1 January 2018
- Published by Finnish Society of Forest Science in Silva Fennica
- Vol. 52 (2)
Weather based moisture content modelling of harvesting residues in the stand
- 1 January 2018
- Published by Finnish Society of Forest Science in Silva Fennica
- Vol. 52 (2)
Open AccessWeather based moisture content modelling of harvesting residues in the stand
- Open Access
Sustainability Impact Assessment on the Production and Use of Different Wood and Fossil Fuels Employed for Energy Production in North Karelia, Finland
The utilization rate of woody biomass in eastern Finland is high and expected to increase further in the near future as set out in several regional, national and European policies and strategies. The aim of this study was to assess the sustainability impacts of changes in fuel consumption patterns. We investigated fossil and woody biomass-based energy production chains in the region of North Karelia, focusing on some economic, environmental and social indicators. Indicators were selected based on stakeholder preferences and evaluated using the Tool for Sustainability Impact Assessment (ToSIA). The analysis was based on representative values from National Forest Inventory data, scientific publications, national and regional statistics, databases, published policy targets and expert opinion. From the results it became evident that shifting from fossil to wood-based energy production implies some trade-offs. Replacing oil with woody biomass in energy production would increase the local value added remaining in the region, create employment opportunities and would reduce total GHG emissions. However, firewood, wood chips from small-diameter trees from early thinning and wood pellets have high production costs. Moreover, large greenhouse gas emission resulted from wood pellet production. The case study generated valuable reference data for future sustainability assessments and demonstrated the usefulness of ToSIA as a tool presenting existing knowledge on sustainability impacts of alternative energy supply chains to inform decision making.
Open AccessSustainability Impact Assessment on the Production and Use of Different Wood and Fossil Fuels Employed for Energy Production in North Karelia, Finland
The utilization rate of woody biomass in eastern Finland is high and expected to increase further in the near future as set out in several regional, national and European policies and strategies. The aim of this study was to assess the sustainability impacts of changes in fuel consumption patterns. We investigated fossil and woody biomass-based energy production chains in the region of North Karelia, focusing on some economic, environmental and social indicators. Indicators were selected based on stakeholder preferences and evaluated using the Tool for Sustainability Impact Assessment (ToSIA). The analysis was based on representative values from National Forest Inventory data, scientific publications, national and regional statistics, databases, published policy targets and expert opinion. From the results it became evident that shifting from fossil to wood-based energy production implies some trade-offs. Replacing oil with woody biomass in energy production would increase the local value added remaining in the region, create employment opportunities and would reduce total GHG emissions. However, firewood, wood chips from small-diameter trees from early thinning and wood pellets have high production costs. Moreover, large greenhouse gas emission resulted from wood pellet production. The case study generated valuable reference data for future sustainability assessments and demonstrated the usefulness of ToSIA as a tool presenting existing knowledge on sustainability impacts of alternative energy supply chains to inform decision making.