Andrea Martel
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Andrea Martel has a total of 5 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- David Paul Eisenman
Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Community Health Sciences, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA
1 shared publication - Deborah Glik
UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Department of Community Health Sciences, Los Angeles, CA, USA
1 shared publication - Jitka Sammartinova
Department of Community Health Sciences, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Suite 26-081, Box 951772, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
1 shared publication - Michael Prelip
Department of Community Health Sciences, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Box 951772, Suite 16-035 CHS, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
1 shared publication - Michael Stajura
Department of Community Health Sciences, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Suite 26-081, Box 951772, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 28 June 2012
- Published by MDPI AG in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
- Vol. 9 (7) , 2293-2311
Perspectives of Community- and Faith-Based Organizations about Partnering with Local Health Departments for Disasters
Public health emergency planners can better perform their mission if they develop and maintain effective relationships with community- and faith-based organizations in their jurisdictions. This qualitative study presents six themes that emerged from 20 key informant interviews representing a wide range of American community- and faith-based organizations across different types of jurisdictions, organizational types, and missions. This research seeks to provide local health department public health emergency planners with tools to assess and improve their inter-organizational community relationships. The themes identified address the importance of community engagement, leadership, intergroup dynamics and communication, and resources. Community- and faith-based organizations perceive that they are underutilized or untapped resources with respect to public health emergencies and disasters. One key reason for this is that many public health departments limit their engagement with community- and faith-based organizations to a one-way “push” model for information dissemination, rather than engaging them in other ways or improving their capacity. Beyond a reprioritization of staff time, few other resources would be required. From the perspective of community- and faith-based organizations, the quality of relationships seems to matter more than discrete resources provided by such ties.
- 28 June 2012
- Published by MDPI AG in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
- Vol. 9 (7) , 2293-2311
Open AccessPerspectives of Community- and Faith-Based Organizations about Partnering with Local Health Departments for Disasters
Public health emergency planners can better perform their mission if they develop and maintain effective relationships with community- and faith-based organizations in their jurisdictions. This qualitative study presents six themes that emerged from 20 key informant interviews representing a wide range of American community- and faith-based organizations across different types of jurisdictions, organizational types, and missions. This research seeks to provide local health department public health emergency planners with tools to assess and improve their inter-organizational community relationships. The themes identified address the importance of community engagement, leadership, intergroup dynamics and communication, and resources. Community- and faith-based organizations perceive that they are underutilized or untapped resources with respect to public health emergencies and disasters. One key reason for this is that many public health departments limit their engagement with community- and faith-based organizations to a one-way “push” model for information dissemination, rather than engaging them in other ways or improving their capacity. Beyond a reprioritization of staff time, few other resources would be required. From the perspective of community- and faith-based organizations, the quality of relationships seems to matter more than discrete resources provided by such ties.