Goerg H. Michler
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Goerg H. Michler has a total of 27 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
K. Knoll
BASF Aktiengesellschaft, Polymers Laboratory, ZKT/I–B 1, D-67056 Ludwigshafen, Germany
2 shared publicationsKonrad Knoll
2 shared publicationsR. Adhikari
Department of Engineering, Institute of Materials Science, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, D-06099 Halle/Saale, Germany
2 shared publicationsRameshwar Adhikari
Department of Engineering, Institute of Materials Science, Martin Luther University Halle‐Wittenberg, D‐06099 Halle/Saale, Germany
2 shared publications- Rameshwar Adhikari
Institute of Materials Science, Department of Engineering, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, D - 06099 Halle/Saale, Germany
2 shared publications Sven Henning
Department of Engineering, Institute of Materials Science, Martin Luther University Halle‐Wittenberg, D‐06099 Halle/Saale, Germany
2 shared publications
Latest Publications
- 1 June 2013
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Materials Research Innovations
- Vol. 17 (4) , 250-256
Functionalisation of bamboo and sisal fibres cellulose in ionic liquids
- 1 June 2013
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Materials Research Innovations
- Vol. 17 (4) , 250-256
Functionalisation of bamboo and sisal fibres cellulose in ionic liquids
- 26 August 2010
- Published by Wiley in Macromolecular Symposia
- Vol. 294 (1)
Preface
- 3 November 2004
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Polymer Science Part B: Polymer Physics
- Vol. 42 (24) , 4478-4488
Molecular deformation mechanisms of isotactic polypropylene in α‐ and β‐crystal forms by FTIR spectroscopy
The orientation behavior of isotactic polypropylene (iPP) in α‐ and β‐crystal form was investigated by rheo‐optical Fourier transformed infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. This method enabled quantification of the degree of orientation as a feature of structural changes during uniaxial elongation in not only the crystalline phase but also the amorphous one. Molecular orientation mechanisms can be successfully derived from experimental results. Generally, three mechanisms were detected for iPP: (1) interlamellar separation in the amorphous phase, (2) interlamellar slip and lamellar twisting at small elongations, and (3) intralamellar slip at high elongations. The third mechanism was favored by α‐PP, whereas β‐PP favored the second mechanism, which, in fact, was responsible for the different mechanical properties of both materials at the macroscopic level. On the other hand, crystallization conditions may have significantly affected the amorphous orientation. Nevertheless, for both iPP types the chains in the amorphous phase always oriented less than did those in the crystalline phase. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 42: 4478–4488, 2004
- 3 November 2004
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Polymer Science Part B: Polymer Physics
- Vol. 42 (24) , 4478-4488
Molecular deformation mechanisms of isotactic polypropylene in α‐ and β‐crystal forms by FTIR spectroscopy
The orientation behavior of isotactic polypropylene (iPP) in α‐ and β‐crystal form was investigated by rheo‐optical Fourier transformed infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. This method enabled quantification of the degree of orientation as a feature of structural changes during uniaxial elongation in not only the crystalline phase but also the amorphous one. Molecular orientation mechanisms can be successfully derived from experimental results. Generally, three mechanisms were detected for iPP: (1) interlamellar separation in the amorphous phase, (2) interlamellar slip and lamellar twisting at small elongations, and (3) intralamellar slip at high elongations. The third mechanism was favored by α‐PP, whereas β‐PP favored the second mechanism, which, in fact, was responsible for the different mechanical properties of both materials at the macroscopic level. On the other hand, crystallization conditions may have significantly affected the amorphous orientation. Nevertheless, for both iPP types the chains in the amorphous phase always oriented less than did those in the crystalline phase. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 42: 4478–4488, 2004
- 1 August 2004
- Published by Wiley in Macromolecular Symposia
- Vol. 214 (1) , 47-72
Toughness Enhancement of Nanostructured Amorphous and Semicrystalline Polymers
- 1 August 2004
- Published by Wiley in Macromolecular Symposia
- Vol. 214 (1) , 47-72
Toughness Enhancement of Nanostructured Amorphous and Semicrystalline Polymers
- Open Access
- 2 March 2004
- Published by IOP Publishing in New Journal of Physics
- Vol. 6, 28
Asymmetric PS-block-(PS-co-PB)-block-PS block copolymers: morphology formation and deformation behaviour
- 2 March 2004
- Published by IOP Publishing in New Journal of Physics
- Vol. 6, 28
Open AccessAsymmetric PS-block-(PS-co-PB)-block-PS block copolymers: morphology formation and deformation behaviour
- 14 October 2003
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Applied Polymer Science
- Vol. 90 (12) , 3424-3429
Morphology and stress relaxation in oriented polyolefin shrink films
- 14 October 2003
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Applied Polymer Science
- Vol. 90 (12) , 3424-3429
Morphology and stress relaxation in oriented polyolefin shrink films
- 9 September 2003
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Applied Polymer Science
- Vol. 90 (6) , 1670-1677
Microhardness of styrene/butadiene block copolymer systems: Influence of molecular architecture
The influence of molecular architecture on the mechanical properties of styrene/butadiene block copolymers was investigated by means of the microhardness technique. It was found that the microhardness of the styrene/butadiene block copolymers is dictated by the nature of microphase separated morphology. In contrast to polymer blends and random copolymers, in which the microhardness generally follows the additivity rule, the behavior of the investigated block copolymers was found to significantly deviate depending on their molecular architecture. The glass‐transition temperature of the polystyrene phase (Tg‐PS), which practically remained constant and that of the polybutadiene phase (Tg‐PB), which varied with the change in the block copolymer architecture, apparently do not influence the microhardness values of the block copolymers. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 90: 1670–1677, 2003
- 9 September 2003
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Applied Polymer Science
- Vol. 90 (6) , 1670-1677
Microhardness of styrene/butadiene block copolymer systems: Influence of molecular architecture
The influence of molecular architecture on the mechanical properties of styrene/butadiene block copolymers was investigated by means of the microhardness technique. It was found that the microhardness of the styrene/butadiene block copolymers is dictated by the nature of microphase separated morphology. In contrast to polymer blends and random copolymers, in which the microhardness generally follows the additivity rule, the behavior of the investigated block copolymers was found to significantly deviate depending on their molecular architecture. The glass‐transition temperature of the polystyrene phase (Tg‐PS), which practically remained constant and that of the polybutadiene phase (Tg‐PB), which varied with the change in the block copolymer architecture, apparently do not influence the microhardness values of the block copolymers. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 90: 1670–1677, 2003
- 27 August 2003
- Published by Wiley in Macromolecular Symposia
- Vol. 198 (1) , 117-134
Morphology and micromechanical behaviour of styrene/butadiene block copolymers and their blends with polystyrene
- 27 August 2003
- Published by Wiley in Macromolecular Symposia
- Vol. 198 (1) , 117-134
Morphology and micromechanical behaviour of styrene/butadiene block copolymers and their blends with polystyrene
- 16 April 2003
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Polymer Science Part B: Polymer Physics
- Vol. 41 (11) , 1157-1167
Investigation of the micromechanical deformation behavior of styrene–butadiene star block copolymer/polystyrene blends with high‐voltage electron microscopy
- 16 April 2003
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Polymer Science Part B: Polymer Physics
- Vol. 41 (11) , 1157-1167
Investigation of the micromechanical deformation behavior of styrene–butadiene star block copolymer/polystyrene blends with high‐voltage electron microscopy
- 1 January 1999
- Published by EDP Sciences in Europhysics News
- Vol. 30 (3) , 69
Morphology and Micromechanics of Polymers
- 1 January 1999
- Published by EDP Sciences in Europhysics News
- Vol. 30 (3) , 69
Morphology and Micromechanics of Polymers