James Bell

The aim of this study was to compare retention and re‐entry to treatment between adolescent subjects treated with methadone, those treated with buprenorphine, and those treated with symptomatic (non‐opioid) medication only. We used a retrospective file review of all patients aged less than 18 at first presentation for treatment for opioid dependence. The study was conducted at the Langton Centre, Sydney, Australia, an agency specialising in the treatment of alcohol and other drug dependency. Sixty‐one adolescents (age range 14–17 years at the time of commencing treatment); mean reported age of initiation of heroin use was 14 ± 1.3 years (range 11–16). Sixty‐one per cent were female. The first episode of treatment was methadone maintenance in 20 subjects, buprenorphine in 25, symptomatic medication in 15; one patient underwent assessment only. These 61 subjects had a total of 112 episodes of treatment. Subjects treated with methadone had significantly longer retention in first treatment episode than subjects treated with buprenorphine (mean days 354 vs. 58, p, p<0.05 by t‐test). Subsequent re‐entry for further treatment occurred in 25% of subjects treated with methadone, 60% buprenorphine and 60% symptomatic medications. Time to reentry after first episode of buprenorphine treatment was significantly shorter than after methadone treatment (p < 0.05 by Kaplan‐Meier test). Methadone maintenance appears to have been more effective than buprenorphine at preventing premature drop‐out from treatment of adolescent heroin users.

Since 2001, the Langton Centre has used supervised administration of buprenorphine in treating heroin dependence, without distinguishing between detoxification and maintenance; most people commencing treatment may remain on buprenorphine indefinitely. The aim of this study was to describe retention in treatment, reasons for leaving, re‐entry and pattern of attendance, and compare retention in practice with results from research trials, using a file review of sequential presentations for buprenorphine treatment. Retention in treatment was 37% at 6 months, the same as in Australian research trials of buprenorphine maintenance (37%); most people dropped‐out without consultation or dose tapering. Repeated episodes of treatment constituted 45% of all episodes; missed scheduled doses were common. Participation in buprenorphine treatment often involves repeated, short episodes and erratic attendance. Measures to improve retention in treatment could improve treatment efficacy.