Paul Meakin
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Paul Meakin has a total of 7 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Alexandre M. Tartakovsky
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
2 shared publications Alexandre M. Tartakovsky
Computational Mathematics Technical Group, Computational and Information Sciences Directorate Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Richland Washington USA
1 shared publication- Andy L. Ward
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Southern university and A&M College, Baton Rouge, LA, 70809
1 shared publication - Daniel M. Tartakovsky
University of California, San Diego
1 shared publication Glenn E. McCreery
Idaho National Laboratory Life and Earth Sciences Idaho Falls Idaho USA
1 shared publicationHai Huang
Idaho National Laboratory Life and Earth Sciences Idaho Falls Idaho USA
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Top Cited Papers
- 14 July 2009
- Published by American Geophysical Union (AGU) in Reviews of Geophysics
- Vol. 47 (3)
Modeling and simulation of pore‐scale multiphase fluid flow and reactive transport in fractured and porous media
In the subsurface, fluids play a critical role by transporting dissolved minerals, colloids, and contaminants (sometimes over long distances); by mediating dissolution and precipitation processes; and by enabling chemical transformations in solution and at mineral surfaces. Although the complex geometries of fracture apertures, fracture networks, and pore spaces may make it difficult to accurately predict fluid flow in saturated (single‐phase) subsurface systems, well‐developed methods are available. The simulation of multiphase fluid flow in the subsurface is much more challenging because of the large density and/or viscosity ratios found in important applications (water/air in the vadose zone; water/oil, water/gas, gas/oil, and water/oil/gas in hydrocarbon reservoirs; water/air/nonaqueous phase liquids (nonaqueous phase liquids/dense nonaqueous phase liquids) in contaminated vadose zone systems; and gas/molten rock in volcanic systems, for example). In addition, the complex behavior of fluid‐fluid‐solid contact lines and their impact on dynamic contact angles must also be taken into account and coupled with the fluid flow. Here we review the methods that are currently being used to simulate pore‐scale multiphase fluid flow and reactive transport in fractured and porous media. After the introduction, the review begins with an overview of the fundamental physics of multiphase fluids flow followed by a more detailed discussion of the complex dynamic behavior of contact lines and contact angles, an important barrier to accurate pore‐scale modeling and simulation. The main part of the review focuses on five different approaches: pore network models, lattice gas and lattice Boltzmann methods, Monte Carlo methods, particle methods (molecular dynamics, dissipative particle dynamics, and smoothed particle hydrodynamics), and traditional grid‐based computational fluid dynamics coupled with interface tracking and a contact angle model. Finally, the review closes with a discussion of future trends and challenges.
- 14 July 2009
- Published by American Geophysical Union (AGU) in Reviews of Geophysics
- Vol. 47 (3)
Top Cited PapersModeling and simulation of pore‐scale multiphase fluid flow and reactive transport in fractured and porous media
In the subsurface, fluids play a critical role by transporting dissolved minerals, colloids, and contaminants (sometimes over long distances); by mediating dissolution and precipitation processes; and by enabling chemical transformations in solution and at mineral surfaces. Although the complex geometries of fracture apertures, fracture networks, and pore spaces may make it difficult to accurately predict fluid flow in saturated (single‐phase) subsurface systems, well‐developed methods are available. The simulation of multiphase fluid flow in the subsurface is much more challenging because of the large density and/or viscosity ratios found in important applications (water/air in the vadose zone; water/oil, water/gas, gas/oil, and water/oil/gas in hydrocarbon reservoirs; water/air/nonaqueous phase liquids (nonaqueous phase liquids/dense nonaqueous phase liquids) in contaminated vadose zone systems; and gas/molten rock in volcanic systems, for example). In addition, the complex behavior of fluid‐fluid‐solid contact lines and their impact on dynamic contact angles must also be taken into account and coupled with the fluid flow. Here we review the methods that are currently being used to simulate pore‐scale multiphase fluid flow and reactive transport in fractured and porous media. After the introduction, the review begins with an overview of the fundamental physics of multiphase fluids flow followed by a more detailed discussion of the complex dynamic behavior of contact lines and contact angles, an important barrier to accurate pore‐scale modeling and simulation. The main part of the review focuses on five different approaches: pore network models, lattice gas and lattice Boltzmann methods, Monte Carlo methods, particle methods (molecular dynamics, dissipative particle dynamics, and smoothed particle hydrodynamics), and traditional grid‐based computational fluid dynamics coupled with interface tracking and a contact angle model. Finally, the review closes with a discussion of future trends and challenges.
- 22 July 2008
- Published by American Physical Society (APS) in Physical Review Letters
- Vol. 101 (4) , 044502
Stochastic Langevin Model for Flow and Transport in Porous Media
We present a new model for fluid flow and solute transport in porous media, which employs smoothed particle hydrodynamics to solve a Langevin equation for flow and dispersion in porous media. This allows for effective separation of the advective and diffusive mixing mechanisms, which is absent in the classical dispersion theory that lumps both types of mixing into dispersion coefficient. The classical dispersion theory overestimates both mixing-induced effective reaction rates and the effective fractal dimension of the mixing fronts associated with miscible fluid Rayleigh-Taylor instabilities. We demonstrate that the stochastic (Langevin equation) model overcomes these deficiencies.
- 22 July 2008
- Published by American Physical Society (APS) in Physical Review Letters
- Vol. 101 (4) , 044502
Stochastic Langevin Model for Flow and Transport in Porous Media
We present a new model for fluid flow and solute transport in porous media, which employs smoothed particle hydrodynamics to solve a Langevin equation for flow and dispersion in porous media. This allows for effective separation of the advective and diffusive mixing mechanisms, which is absent in the classical dispersion theory that lumps both types of mixing into dispersion coefficient. The classical dispersion theory overestimates both mixing-induced effective reaction rates and the effective fractal dimension of the mixing fronts associated with miscible fluid Rayleigh-Taylor instabilities. We demonstrate that the stochastic (Langevin equation) model overcomes these deficiencies.
- 20 May 2008
- Published by Springer Nature in Transport in Porous Media
- Vol. 76 (1) , 11-34
Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics Model of Non-Aqueous Phase Liquid Flow and Dissolution
- 20 May 2008
- Published by Springer Nature in Transport in Porous Media
- Vol. 76 (1) , 11-34
Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics Model of Non-Aqueous Phase Liquid Flow and Dissolution
- 6 October 2005
- Published by American Geophysical Union (AGU) in Geophysical Research Letters
- Vol. 32 (19)
Modeling of multiphase fluid motion in fracture intersections and fracture networks
A two‐dimensional volume of fluid (VOF) method was used to simulate liquid movement within unsaturated fracture intersections and fracture networks. Fragmentation and merging of liquid interfaces are automatically handled, without resorting to adaptive mesh refinement or interface repairing algorithms. Wetting effects are modeled by imposing different contact angles depending on whether the liquid interface is advancing, receding, or essentially stationary. The numerical examples and experimental validation presented in this study clearly demonstrate the potential value of the VOF method for the modeling of liquid motion in unsaturated fractures, fracture junctions and fracture networks.
- 6 October 2005
- Published by American Geophysical Union (AGU) in Geophysical Research Letters
- Vol. 32 (19)
Modeling of multiphase fluid motion in fracture intersections and fracture networks
A two‐dimensional volume of fluid (VOF) method was used to simulate liquid movement within unsaturated fracture intersections and fracture networks. Fragmentation and merging of liquid interfaces are automatically handled, without resorting to adaptive mesh refinement or interface repairing algorithms. Wetting effects are modeled by imposing different contact angles depending on whether the liquid interface is advancing, receding, or essentially stationary. The numerical examples and experimental validation presented in this study clearly demonstrate the potential value of the VOF method for the modeling of liquid motion in unsaturated fractures, fracture junctions and fracture networks.