Valentina Pagliai
Latest Publications
- 1 December 2012
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Linguistic Anthropology
- Vol. 22 (3) , 245-247
A New Language, A New World: Italian Immigrants in the United States, 1890‐1945 by Nancy C.Carnevale, Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 2009. ix + 243 pp.
- 1 December 2012
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Linguistic Anthropology
- Vol. 22 (3) , 245-247
A New Language, A New World: Italian Immigrants in the United States, 1890‐1945 by Nancy C.Carnevale, Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 2009. ix + 243 pp.
- 26 August 2011
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Linguistic Anthropology
- Vol. 21 (s1) , E94-E112
Unmarked Racializing Discourse, Facework, and Identity in Talk about Immigrants in Italy
Drawing from research on racial formation processes in discourse concerning immigrants to Italy, this article argues that when racializing discourses are introduced as unmarked in a conversation, the coparticipant is put in a position of having to readily agree or openly disagree—with the second option endangering face. Racializing discourses introduced as unmarked thus tend to obtain acquiescence from the coparticipant. At the same time, they work at constructing shared identities around racist and racializing stances, where the unmarking becomes indexical of such shared identities. Instead of seeing racism as a stable belief in the mind of the individual, my analysis suggests that we should consider it as something the person does in interaction. The requirements of conversational rules of engagement, the needs of face, the relationship among the interactants, as well as their moral view, influence the participants' response to racializing discourses in interaction, and whether they might coconstruct or oppose them. [racialization, markedness theory, facework, racism, immigration, Italy]
- 26 August 2011
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Linguistic Anthropology
- Vol. 21 (s1) , E94-E112
Unmarked Racializing Discourse, Facework, and Identity in Talk about Immigrants in Italy
Drawing from research on racial formation processes in discourse concerning immigrants to Italy, this article argues that when racializing discourses are introduced as unmarked in a conversation, the coparticipant is put in a position of having to readily agree or openly disagree—with the second option endangering face. Racializing discourses introduced as unmarked thus tend to obtain acquiescence from the coparticipant. At the same time, they work at constructing shared identities around racist and racializing stances, where the unmarking becomes indexical of such shared identities. Instead of seeing racism as a stable belief in the mind of the individual, my analysis suggests that we should consider it as something the person does in interaction. The requirements of conversational rules of engagement, the needs of face, the relationship among the interactants, as well as their moral view, influence the participants' response to racializing discourses in interaction, and whether they might coconstruct or oppose them. [racialization, markedness theory, facework, racism, immigration, Italy]
- 24 May 2010
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Linguistic Anthropology
- Vol. 20 (1) , 63-71
Introduction: Performing Disputes
- 24 May 2010
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Linguistic Anthropology
- Vol. 20 (1) , 63-71
Introduction: Performing Disputes
- 24 May 2010
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Linguistic Anthropology
- Vol. 20 (1) , 87-100
Conflict, Cooperation, and Facework in Contrasto Verbal Duels
- 24 May 2010
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Linguistic Anthropology
- Vol. 20 (1) , 87-100
Conflict, Cooperation, and Facework in Contrasto Verbal Duels
- 1 September 2009
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Language in Society
- Vol. 38 (5) , 549-579
Conversational agreement and racial formation processes
Recent scholarship on the working of racial formation processes underscores the intersection between discursive and structural components in the emergence of “race,” and the agency of individuals at the local and global level in articulating its meaning. This article offers a link toward understanding how racial formation processes operate in face-to-face interaction, by highlighting how people do racialization. Based on fieldwork in Italy, it explores how conversationalists deploy agreement to co-construct a racialized image of immigrants to Italy. It is argued that this deployment leads to reinforcement of the racist stances expressed in the conversation itself, and possibly beyond it. In addition, the repeated occurrence of agreement during the co-construction of utterances produces a spiral effect around racializing discourse, a progressive deepening of the racialization itself. At the same time, agreement leads to a decrease of personal responsibility for the statements made, which come to be co-constructed among conversationalists. (Agreement, racialization, immigration, Italy)
- 1 September 2009
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Language in Society
- Vol. 38 (5) , 549-579
Conversational agreement and racial formation processes
Recent scholarship on the working of racial formation processes underscores the intersection between discursive and structural components in the emergence of “race,” and the agency of individuals at the local and global level in articulating its meaning. This article offers a link toward understanding how racial formation processes operate in face-to-face interaction, by highlighting how people do racialization. Based on fieldwork in Italy, it explores how conversationalists deploy agreement to co-construct a racialized image of immigrants to Italy. It is argued that this deployment leads to reinforcement of the racist stances expressed in the conversation itself, and possibly beyond it. In addition, the repeated occurrence of agreement during the co-construction of utterances produces a spiral effect around racializing discourse, a progressive deepening of the racialization itself. At the same time, agreement leads to a decrease of personal responsibility for the statements made, which come to be co-constructed among conversationalists. (Agreement, racialization, immigration, Italy)