Yaghoub Assadi
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Yaghoub Assadi has a total of 13 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Mohammad Reza Milani Hosseini
Research Laboratory of Real Samples Analysis
5 shared publications Araz Bidari
Center of Excellence in Electrochemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Tehran, P.O. Box 14155-6455, Tehran, Iran
4 shared publicationsPayam Hemmatkhah
Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry , Iran University of Science and Technology , Tehran, Iran ; Electroanalytical Chemistry Research Center , Iran University of Science and Technology , Tehran, Iran
3 shared publicationsSanaz Jafarvand
Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry , Iran University of Science and Technology , Tehran, Iran ; Electroanalytical Chemistry Research Center , Iran University of Science and Technology , Tehran, Iran
3 shared publications- Mohammad Reza Ganjali
Center of Excellence in Electrochemistry, School of Chemistry, College of Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
2 shared publications - Araz Bidari
Center of Excellence in Electrochemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 10 February 2011
- Published by Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC) in Analytical Methods
- Vol. 3 (3) , 724-730
A novel methodology based on solvents less dense than water through dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction: application in quantitation of l-ascorbate in fruit juices and soft drinks by fiber optic-linear array detection spectrophotometry
In this study a novel methodology is proposed for utilizing solvents less dense than water by using a dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME) technique. Conventional microextraction vessels and facile strategy have been used. We have avoided using routine microextraction solvents in the DLLME procedure that are mostly chlorinated, dense, environmentally hazardous and expensive which limits the application of this method to some extent. The aforesaid process has been combined with fiber optic-linear array detection spectrophotometry (FO-LADS) with charge-coupled device (CCD) detector benefiting of a micro-cell. L-Ascorbate was selected as a model compound and the proposed method was carried out for preconcentration and assay of iodine produced by reduction of potassium iodate in fruit juices, soft drinks and pharmaceutical preparations. The influences of the various analytical parameters on the microextraction procedure and oxidation reaction have been evaluated and optimized. The accuracy of the method was confirmed by parallel analyses as the reference method (ISO 6557/2). The calibration curve was linear in the range of 1.76–26.40 μg mL−1 of L-ascorbate with a correlation coefficient (r) of 0.9912. The LOD obtained from the calibration curve was 0.40 μg mL−1.
- 10 February 2011
- Published by Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC) in Analytical Methods
- Vol. 3 (3) , 724-730
A novel methodology based on solvents less dense than water through dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction: application in quantitation of l-ascorbate in fruit juices and soft drinks by fiber optic-linear array detection spectrophotometry
In this study a novel methodology is proposed for utilizing solvents less dense than water by using a dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME) technique. Conventional microextraction vessels and facile strategy have been used. We have avoided using routine microextraction solvents in the DLLME procedure that are mostly chlorinated, dense, environmentally hazardous and expensive which limits the application of this method to some extent. The aforesaid process has been combined with fiber optic-linear array detection spectrophotometry (FO-LADS) with charge-coupled device (CCD) detector benefiting of a micro-cell. L-Ascorbate was selected as a model compound and the proposed method was carried out for preconcentration and assay of iodine produced by reduction of potassium iodate in fruit juices, soft drinks and pharmaceutical preparations. The influences of the various analytical parameters on the microextraction procedure and oxidation reaction have been evaluated and optimized. The accuracy of the method was confirmed by parallel analyses as the reference method (ISO 6557/2). The calibration curve was linear in the range of 1.76–26.40 μg mL−1 of L-ascorbate with a correlation coefficient (r) of 0.9912. The LOD obtained from the calibration curve was 0.40 μg mL−1.
- 22 September 2009
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Analytical Letters
- Vol. 42 (14) , 2214-2231
Dispersive Liquid–Liquid Microextraction of Silver Prior to Determination by Microsample Introduction-Flame Atomic Absorption Spectrometry
A new simple and sensitive method has been proposed for rapid determination of trace levels of silver in environmental water samples, using dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME) prior to its microsample introduction-flame atomic absorption spectrometry. Under the optimum conditions, the linear range was 0.1–7 µg L−1 and limit of detection was 0.018 µg L−1. The relative standard deviation for 0.50 and 5.00 µg L−1 of silver in water sample was 4.0 and 1.7%, respectively. The relative recoveries of silver from tap, well, river, and seawater samples at spiking levels of 1.00 and 5.00 µg L−1 were in the range of 86.4–98.6%.
- 22 September 2009
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Analytical Letters
- Vol. 42 (14) , 2214-2231
Dispersive Liquid–Liquid Microextraction of Silver Prior to Determination by Microsample Introduction-Flame Atomic Absorption Spectrometry
A new simple and sensitive method has been proposed for rapid determination of trace levels of silver in environmental water samples, using dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME) prior to its microsample introduction-flame atomic absorption spectrometry. Under the optimum conditions, the linear range was 0.1–7 µg L−1 and limit of detection was 0.018 µg L−1. The relative standard deviation for 0.50 and 5.00 µg L−1 of silver in water sample was 4.0 and 1.7%, respectively. The relative recoveries of silver from tap, well, river, and seawater samples at spiking levels of 1.00 and 5.00 µg L−1 were in the range of 86.4–98.6%.
- 12 May 2009
- Published by Springer Nature in Microchimica Acta
- Vol. 166 (1-2) , 69-75
Speciation of chromium in water samples using dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction and flame atomic absorption spectrometry
- 12 May 2009
- Published by Springer Nature in Microchimica Acta
- Vol. 166 (1-2) , 69-75
Speciation of chromium in water samples using dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction and flame atomic absorption spectrometry
- 4 March 2008
- Published by Springer Nature in Microchimica Acta
- Vol. 163 (3-4) , 243-249
Selenium analysis in water samples by dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction based on piazselenol formation and GC–ECD
- 4 March 2008
- Published by Springer Nature in Microchimica Acta
- Vol. 163 (3-4) , 243-249
Selenium analysis in water samples by dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction based on piazselenol formation and GC–ECD
- 16 November 2007
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Separation Science and Technology
- Vol. 42 (15) , 3503-3515
Homogeneous Liquid–Liquid Extraction and Determination of Cobalt, Copper, and Nickel in Water Samples by Flame Atomic Absorption Spectrometry
A simple and effective homogeneous liquid–liquid extraction method has been used for the simultaneous extraction and preconcentration of cobalt, copper, and nickel after the formation of complex with 4‐benzylpiperidinedithiocarbamate potassium salt (K‐4‐BPDC), and later they were determined by flame atomic absorption spectrometry (FAAS) using (water/tetrabutylammonium ion (TBA+)/chloroform) as a ternary component system. The phase separation phenomenon occurred by an ion‐pair formation of TBA+ and perchlorate ion. After the optimization of complexation and extraction conditions ([K‐4‐BPDC]=2.0×10−4 mol l−1, [TBA+]=2.0×10−2 mol l−1, [CHCl3]=60.0 µl, [ClO4 −]=2.0 ×10−2 mol l −1 and pH=6.0), a preconcentration factor of 200 was obtained for only 10 ml of the sample. The analytical curves were linear in the range of 20–1500, 15–2000, 35–1600 µg l−1 and the limits of detection were 10, 5, and 15 µg l−1 for Co2+, Cu2+, and Ni2+, respectively. The proposed method was applied for the extraction and determination of Co2+, Cu2+, and Ni2+ in natural water samples with satisfactory results.
- 16 November 2007
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Separation Science and Technology
- Vol. 42 (15) , 3503-3515
Homogeneous Liquid–Liquid Extraction and Determination of Cobalt, Copper, and Nickel in Water Samples by Flame Atomic Absorption Spectrometry
A simple and effective homogeneous liquid–liquid extraction method has been used for the simultaneous extraction and preconcentration of cobalt, copper, and nickel after the formation of complex with 4‐benzylpiperidinedithiocarbamate potassium salt (K‐4‐BPDC), and later they were determined by flame atomic absorption spectrometry (FAAS) using (water/tetrabutylammonium ion (TBA+)/chloroform) as a ternary component system. The phase separation phenomenon occurred by an ion‐pair formation of TBA+ and perchlorate ion. After the optimization of complexation and extraction conditions ([K‐4‐BPDC]=2.0×10−4 mol l−1, [TBA+]=2.0×10−2 mol l−1, [CHCl3]=60.0 µl, [ClO4 −]=2.0 ×10−2 mol l −1 and pH=6.0), a preconcentration factor of 200 was obtained for only 10 ml of the sample. The analytical curves were linear in the range of 20–1500, 15–2000, 35–1600 µg l−1 and the limits of detection were 10, 5, and 15 µg l−1 for Co2+, Cu2+, and Ni2+, respectively. The proposed method was applied for the extraction and determination of Co2+, Cu2+, and Ni2+ in natural water samples with satisfactory results.
- 24 May 2007
- Published by Springer Nature in Chromatographia
- Vol. 66 (1-2) , 81-86
Determination of Trihalomethanes in Drinking Water by Dispersive Liquid–Liquid Microextraction then Gas Chromatography with Electron-Capture Detection
- 24 May 2007
- Published by Springer Nature in Chromatographia
- Vol. 66 (1-2) , 81-86
Determination of Trihalomethanes in Drinking Water by Dispersive Liquid–Liquid Microextraction then Gas Chromatography with Electron-Capture Detection